1.A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Tae Gyu KIM ; Chul Seung LEE ; Dong Geun LEE ; Choon Sik CHUNG ; Seung Han KIM ; Sang Hwa YU ; Jeong Eun LEE ; Gwan Cheol LEE ; Dong Woo KANG ; Jeong Sub KIM ; Gyu Young JEONG
Annals of Coloproctology 2025;41(2):145-153
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			The long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH) compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) are not fully understood. This study aimed to introduce a modified PSH (mPSH) and compare its clinical efficacy and safety with those of CH. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. This study was performed at a single hospital and involved 6 colorectal surgeons. In total, 110 patients were enrolled between July 2019 and September 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either mPSH group (n=55) or CH group (n=55). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative average pain and postoperative peak pain using visual analog scale score between the 2 groups. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The required duration of analgesia was shorter in the mPSH group than in the CH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). However, the laxative requirement duration (P<0.010), return to work (P<0.010), satisfaction score (P<0.010), and Vaizey score (P=0.014) were significantly better in the mPSH group. The average and peak postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the mPSH group during the 15 days after surgery (P<0.001). The overall complication rate in both groups was 9.1%, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.867). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The mPSH group demonstrated better improvement in symptoms, lower pain scores, and greater patient early satisfaction after surgery than the CH group. Therefore, this surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective alternative for CH. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Tae Gyu KIM ; Chul Seung LEE ; Dong Geun LEE ; Choon Sik CHUNG ; Seung Han KIM ; Sang Hwa YU ; Jeong Eun LEE ; Gwan Cheol LEE ; Dong Woo KANG ; Jeong Sub KIM ; Gyu Young JEONG
Annals of Coloproctology 2025;41(2):145-153
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			The long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH) compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) are not fully understood. This study aimed to introduce a modified PSH (mPSH) and compare its clinical efficacy and safety with those of CH. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. This study was performed at a single hospital and involved 6 colorectal surgeons. In total, 110 patients were enrolled between July 2019 and September 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either mPSH group (n=55) or CH group (n=55). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative average pain and postoperative peak pain using visual analog scale score between the 2 groups. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The required duration of analgesia was shorter in the mPSH group than in the CH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). However, the laxative requirement duration (P<0.010), return to work (P<0.010), satisfaction score (P<0.010), and Vaizey score (P=0.014) were significantly better in the mPSH group. The average and peak postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the mPSH group during the 15 days after surgery (P<0.001). The overall complication rate in both groups was 9.1%, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.867). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The mPSH group demonstrated better improvement in symptoms, lower pain scores, and greater patient early satisfaction after surgery than the CH group. Therefore, this surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective alternative for CH. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Tae Gyu KIM ; Chul Seung LEE ; Dong Geun LEE ; Choon Sik CHUNG ; Seung Han KIM ; Sang Hwa YU ; Jeong Eun LEE ; Gwan Cheol LEE ; Dong Woo KANG ; Jeong Sub KIM ; Gyu Young JEONG
Annals of Coloproctology 2025;41(2):145-153
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			The long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH) compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) are not fully understood. This study aimed to introduce a modified PSH (mPSH) and compare its clinical efficacy and safety with those of CH. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. This study was performed at a single hospital and involved 6 colorectal surgeons. In total, 110 patients were enrolled between July 2019 and September 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either mPSH group (n=55) or CH group (n=55). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative average pain and postoperative peak pain using visual analog scale score between the 2 groups. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The required duration of analgesia was shorter in the mPSH group than in the CH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). However, the laxative requirement duration (P<0.010), return to work (P<0.010), satisfaction score (P<0.010), and Vaizey score (P=0.014) were significantly better in the mPSH group. The average and peak postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the mPSH group during the 15 days after surgery (P<0.001). The overall complication rate in both groups was 9.1%, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.867). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The mPSH group demonstrated better improvement in symptoms, lower pain scores, and greater patient early satisfaction after surgery than the CH group. Therefore, this surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective alternative for CH. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Tae Gyu KIM ; Chul Seung LEE ; Dong Geun LEE ; Choon Sik CHUNG ; Seung Han KIM ; Sang Hwa YU ; Jeong Eun LEE ; Gwan Cheol LEE ; Dong Woo KANG ; Jeong Sub KIM ; Gyu Young JEONG
Annals of Coloproctology 2025;41(2):145-153
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			The long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH) compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) are not fully understood. This study aimed to introduce a modified PSH (mPSH) and compare its clinical efficacy and safety with those of CH. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. This study was performed at a single hospital and involved 6 colorectal surgeons. In total, 110 patients were enrolled between July 2019 and September 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either mPSH group (n=55) or CH group (n=55). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative average pain and postoperative peak pain using visual analog scale score between the 2 groups. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The required duration of analgesia was shorter in the mPSH group than in the CH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). However, the laxative requirement duration (P<0.010), return to work (P<0.010), satisfaction score (P<0.010), and Vaizey score (P=0.014) were significantly better in the mPSH group. The average and peak postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the mPSH group during the 15 days after surgery (P<0.001). The overall complication rate in both groups was 9.1%, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.867). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The mPSH group demonstrated better improvement in symptoms, lower pain scores, and greater patient early satisfaction after surgery than the CH group. Therefore, this surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective alternative for CH. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Tae Gyu KIM ; Chul Seung LEE ; Dong Geun LEE ; Choon Sik CHUNG ; Seung Han KIM ; Sang Hwa YU ; Jeong Eun LEE ; Gwan Cheol LEE ; Dong Woo KANG ; Jeong Sub KIM ; Gyu Young JEONG
Annals of Coloproctology 2025;41(2):145-153
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			The long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH) compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) are not fully understood. This study aimed to introduce a modified PSH (mPSH) and compare its clinical efficacy and safety with those of CH. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. This study was performed at a single hospital and involved 6 colorectal surgeons. In total, 110 patients were enrolled between July 2019 and September 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either mPSH group (n=55) or CH group (n=55). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative average pain and postoperative peak pain using visual analog scale score between the 2 groups. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The required duration of analgesia was shorter in the mPSH group than in the CH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). However, the laxative requirement duration (P<0.010), return to work (P<0.010), satisfaction score (P<0.010), and Vaizey score (P=0.014) were significantly better in the mPSH group. The average and peak postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the mPSH group during the 15 days after surgery (P<0.001). The overall complication rate in both groups was 9.1%, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.867). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The mPSH group demonstrated better improvement in symptoms, lower pain scores, and greater patient early satisfaction after surgery than the CH group. Therefore, this surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective alternative for CH. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Recurrent Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Gyu Chul CHUNG ; Soo Jung LEE ; Kang Yeun PAK
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2024;38(6):489-495
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			To analyze changes in choroidal thickness in patients with recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) before and after surgical intervention and to identify factors that influence changes in choroidal thickness. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for recurrent RRD from November 2019 to March 2023. Choroidal thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography at baseline and at 2 and 6 months postoperatively. The study analyzed the impact of various factors on choroidal thickness changes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The study included 33 patients, demonstrating a significant decrease in choroidal thickness in the surgical eye compared to the fellow eye over a 6-month period. In the univariate analysis, changes in choroidal thickness were significantly correlated with changes in central retinal thickness (p = 0.048) from baseline to 2 months and with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade from 2 to 6 months (p = 0.009) and from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.020). In the multivariate analysis, an association was found between changes in choroidal thickness from 2 to 6 months and PVR grade (p = 0.030) 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			The findings indicate that surgical reattachment in eyes with recurrent RRD leads to a significant reduction in choroidal thickness. The extent of this reduction is influenced by the severity of PVR, highlighting the importance of considering PVR severity when evaluating surgical outcomes in patients with recurrent RRD. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Recurrent Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Gyu Chul CHUNG ; Soo Jung LEE ; Kang Yeun PAK
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2024;38(6):489-495
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			To analyze changes in choroidal thickness in patients with recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) before and after surgical intervention and to identify factors that influence changes in choroidal thickness. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for recurrent RRD from November 2019 to March 2023. Choroidal thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography at baseline and at 2 and 6 months postoperatively. The study analyzed the impact of various factors on choroidal thickness changes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The study included 33 patients, demonstrating a significant decrease in choroidal thickness in the surgical eye compared to the fellow eye over a 6-month period. In the univariate analysis, changes in choroidal thickness were significantly correlated with changes in central retinal thickness (p = 0.048) from baseline to 2 months and with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade from 2 to 6 months (p = 0.009) and from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.020). In the multivariate analysis, an association was found between changes in choroidal thickness from 2 to 6 months and PVR grade (p = 0.030) 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			The findings indicate that surgical reattachment in eyes with recurrent RRD leads to a significant reduction in choroidal thickness. The extent of this reduction is influenced by the severity of PVR, highlighting the importance of considering PVR severity when evaluating surgical outcomes in patients with recurrent RRD. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Recurrent Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Gyu Chul CHUNG ; Soo Jung LEE ; Kang Yeun PAK
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2024;38(6):489-495
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			To analyze changes in choroidal thickness in patients with recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) before and after surgical intervention and to identify factors that influence changes in choroidal thickness. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for recurrent RRD from November 2019 to March 2023. Choroidal thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography at baseline and at 2 and 6 months postoperatively. The study analyzed the impact of various factors on choroidal thickness changes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The study included 33 patients, demonstrating a significant decrease in choroidal thickness in the surgical eye compared to the fellow eye over a 6-month period. In the univariate analysis, changes in choroidal thickness were significantly correlated with changes in central retinal thickness (p = 0.048) from baseline to 2 months and with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade from 2 to 6 months (p = 0.009) and from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.020). In the multivariate analysis, an association was found between changes in choroidal thickness from 2 to 6 months and PVR grade (p = 0.030) 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			The findings indicate that surgical reattachment in eyes with recurrent RRD leads to a significant reduction in choroidal thickness. The extent of this reduction is influenced by the severity of PVR, highlighting the importance of considering PVR severity when evaluating surgical outcomes in patients with recurrent RRD. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Recurrent Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Gyu Chul CHUNG ; Soo Jung LEE ; Kang Yeun PAK
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2024;38(6):489-495
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			To analyze changes in choroidal thickness in patients with recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) before and after surgical intervention and to identify factors that influence changes in choroidal thickness. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for recurrent RRD from November 2019 to March 2023. Choroidal thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography at baseline and at 2 and 6 months postoperatively. The study analyzed the impact of various factors on choroidal thickness changes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The study included 33 patients, demonstrating a significant decrease in choroidal thickness in the surgical eye compared to the fellow eye over a 6-month period. In the univariate analysis, changes in choroidal thickness were significantly correlated with changes in central retinal thickness (p = 0.048) from baseline to 2 months and with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade from 2 to 6 months (p = 0.009) and from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.020). In the multivariate analysis, an association was found between changes in choroidal thickness from 2 to 6 months and PVR grade (p = 0.030) 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			The findings indicate that surgical reattachment in eyes with recurrent RRD leads to a significant reduction in choroidal thickness. The extent of this reduction is influenced by the severity of PVR, highlighting the importance of considering PVR severity when evaluating surgical outcomes in patients with recurrent RRD. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Recurrent Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Gyu Chul CHUNG ; Soo Jung LEE ; Kang Yeun PAK
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2024;38(6):489-495
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			To analyze changes in choroidal thickness in patients with recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) before and after surgical intervention and to identify factors that influence changes in choroidal thickness. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for recurrent RRD from November 2019 to March 2023. Choroidal thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography at baseline and at 2 and 6 months postoperatively. The study analyzed the impact of various factors on choroidal thickness changes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The study included 33 patients, demonstrating a significant decrease in choroidal thickness in the surgical eye compared to the fellow eye over a 6-month period. In the univariate analysis, changes in choroidal thickness were significantly correlated with changes in central retinal thickness (p = 0.048) from baseline to 2 months and with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade from 2 to 6 months (p = 0.009) and from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.020). In the multivariate analysis, an association was found between changes in choroidal thickness from 2 to 6 months and PVR grade (p = 0.030) 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			The findings indicate that surgical reattachment in eyes with recurrent RRD leads to a significant reduction in choroidal thickness. The extent of this reduction is influenced by the severity of PVR, highlighting the importance of considering PVR severity when evaluating surgical outcomes in patients with recurrent RRD. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail