Intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with diverse spine diseases, including spinal stenosis, facet arthropathy, and disc herniation, which have socio-economic effects. A normal intervertebral disc has consistency and homeostasis, consisting of annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, notochordal cells, nucleus pulposus cells, and an endplate with an immune privilege. On the other hand, when the degenerative process has pathologic causes, the inflammatory reaction could lead to nerve sprouting and vascularization into the tissue. Histopathologically, the pathologic process involves the degradation of the extracellular matrix, apoptosis and necrosis of nucleus pulposus cells, inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation, disruption of endplate chondrogenic cells, and other processes. Various approaches for managing disc degeneration have been reported. Among them, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been regarded as representative trials. In vitro and animal studies with MSCs have reported some promising outcomes in terms of inflammatory modulation and regeneration, but several limitations have been pointed out, including the issues of graft rejection and survival. Because the paracrine mechanism would be a main therapeutic factor of MSCs, extracellular vesicles (EVs), one of the factors released from MSCs, have been considered a promising source for regenerative medicine. EVs possess nucleic acids, functional proteins, and inflammation-related factors, playing a significant role in the inflammatory reaction and regeneration. The current review article discusses the pathophysiology of disc degeneration, outcomes of conventional MSCs and EVs, and current limitations and future perspectives on EV therapeutics.

Intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with diverse spine diseases, including spinal stenosis, facet arthropathy, and disc herniation, which have socio-economic effects. A normal intervertebral disc has consistency and homeostasis, consisting of annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, notochordal cells, nucleus pulposus cells, and an endplate with an immune privilege. On the other hand, when the degenerative process has pathologic causes, the inflammatory reaction could lead to nerve sprouting and vascularization into the tissue. Histopathologically, the pathologic process involves the degradation of the extracellular matrix, apoptosis and necrosis of nucleus pulposus cells, inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation, disruption of endplate chondrogenic cells, and other processes. Various approaches for managing disc degeneration have been reported. Among them, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been regarded as representative trials. In vitro and animal studies with MSCs have reported some promising outcomes in terms of inflammatory modulation and regeneration, but several limitations have been pointed out, including the issues of graft rejection and survival. Because the paracrine mechanism would be a main therapeutic factor of MSCs, extracellular vesicles (EVs), one of the factors released from MSCs, have been considered a promising source for regenerative medicine. EVs possess nucleic acids, functional proteins, and inflammation-related factors, playing a significant role in the inflammatory reaction and regeneration. The current review article discusses the pathophysiology of disc degeneration, outcomes of conventional MSCs and EVs, and current limitations and future perspectives on EV therapeutics.

Intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with diverse spine diseases, including spinal stenosis, facet arthropathy, and disc herniation, which have socio-economic effects. A normal intervertebral disc has consistency and homeostasis, consisting of annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, notochordal cells, nucleus pulposus cells, and an endplate with an immune privilege. On the other hand, when the degenerative process has pathologic causes, the inflammatory reaction could lead to nerve sprouting and vascularization into the tissue. Histopathologically, the pathologic process involves the degradation of the extracellular matrix, apoptosis and necrosis of nucleus pulposus cells, inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation, disruption of endplate chondrogenic cells, and other processes. Various approaches for managing disc degeneration have been reported. Among them, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been regarded as representative trials. In vitro and animal studies with MSCs have reported some promising outcomes in terms of inflammatory modulation and regeneration, but several limitations have been pointed out, including the issues of graft rejection and survival. Because the paracrine mechanism would be a main therapeutic factor of MSCs, extracellular vesicles (EVs), one of the factors released from MSCs, have been considered a promising source for regenerative medicine. EVs possess nucleic acids, functional proteins, and inflammation-related factors, playing a significant role in the inflammatory reaction and regeneration. The current review article discusses the pathophysiology of disc degeneration, outcomes of conventional MSCs and EVs, and current limitations and future perspectives on EV therapeutics.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: Periprosthetic osteolysis is a prevalent complication following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), implicating various cytokines in osteoclastogenesis as pivotal in this process. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between osteolysis and the concentrations of osteoclastogenesis-related cytokines in synovial fluid and investigate its clinical value following TAA. Methods: Synovial fluid samples from 23 ankles that underwent revision surgery for osteolysis following TAA were analyzed as the osteolysis group. As a control group, we included synovial fluid samples obtained from 23 ankles during primary TAA for osteoarthritis. The receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) ratio in these samples was quantified using sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques, and a bead-based multiplex immunoassay facilitated the detection of specific osteoclastogenesis-related cytokines. Results: RANKL levels averaged 487.9 pg/mL in 14 of 23 patients in the osteolysis group, with no detection in the control group’s synovial fluid. Conversely, a significant reduction in OPG levels was observed in the osteolysis group (p = 0.002), resulting in a markedly higher mean RANKL/OPG ratio (0.23) relative to controls (p = 0.020). Moreover, the osteolysis group had increased concentrations of various osteoclastogenesis-related cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1) in the synovial fluid relative to the control group. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that periprosthetic osteolysis was associated with osteoclastogenesis activation through an elevated RANKL/OPG ratio following TAA. We assume that RANKL and other osteoclastogenesis-related cytokines in the synovial fluid have clinical value as a potential marker for the development and progression of osteolysis following TAA.

Background: Sagittal talar translation is an important factor influencing the sagittal alignment of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Thus, accurate measurement of sagittal talar translation is crucial. This study proposes a simple method (tibiotalar distance [TTD]) that can quantify talar translation without being affected by the ankle and subtalar joint condition or the talar component position in patients with TAA. Methods: We enrolled 280 eligible patients (296 ankles) who underwent primary TAA between 2005 and 2019 and retrospectively reviewed them for sagittal talar translation. The TTD was measured for each patient on weight-bearing lateral ankle radiographs by 3 raters. In addition, we analyzed interrater and intrarater reliability for the TTD method. Results: We found that the TTD method could quantify the talar translation and was not affected by the preoperative condition of the ankle joint surface, subtalar joint pathologies, or the postoperative talar component position. The TTD method showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (> 0.9) in all interrater and intrarater reliability analyses. In the analysis of 157 healthy, unoperated contralateral ankles, we identified that TTD showed a Gaussian distribution (p = 0.284) and a mean of 38.91 mm (normal range, 29.63–48.20 mm). Conclusions The TTD method is a simple and reliable method that could be applied to patients with TAA to assess the sagittal talar translation regardless of the pre-and postoperative joint condition and implantation status.

The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases has been regularly developing guidelines for adult immunization since 2007. In 2023, the guidelines for the following seven vaccines were revised: influenza, herpes zoster, pneumococcal, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (Tdap), human papillomavirus (HPV), meningococcal, and rabies vaccines. For the influenza vaccine, a recommendation for enhanced vaccines for the elderly was added. For the herpes zoster vaccine, a recommendation for the recombinant zoster vaccine was added. For the pneumococcal vaccine, the current status of the 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 20-valent PCV was described. For the Tdap vaccine, the possibility of using Tdap instead of tetanus-diphtheria vaccine was described. For the HPV vaccine, the expansion of the eligible age for vaccination was described. For the meningococcal vaccine, a recommendation for the meningococcal B vaccine was added. For the rabies vaccine, the number of pre-exposure prophylaxis doses was changed. This manuscript documents the summary and rationale of the revisions for the seven vaccines. For the vaccines not mentioned in this manuscript, the recommendations in the 3rd edition of the Vaccinations for Adults textbook shall remain in effect.