BACKGROUND/AIMS: The relationship between patient survival and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C remains unclear. The aims of this study were to compare the characteristics of patients with and without BPAR and to identify risk factors for BPAR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 169 HCV-RNA-positive patients who underwent LT at three centers. RESULTS: BPAR occurred in 39 (23.1%) of the HCV-RNA-positive recipients after LT. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 92.1%, 90.3%, and 88.5%, respectively, in patients without BPAR, and 75.7%, 63.4%, and 58.9% in patients with BPAR (P<0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that BPAR was associated with the non-use of basiliximab and tacrolimus and the use of cyclosporin in LT recipients with HCV RNA-positive. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that the immunosuppression status of HCV-RNA-positive LT recipients should be carefully determined in order to prevent BPAR and to improve patient survival.
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use ; Biopsy ; Cyclosporine/therapeutic use ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Genotype ; Graft Rejection/mortality/*prevention & control ; Hepacivirus/genetics/isolation & purification ; Hepatitis C/drug therapy/*virology ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/*therapeutic use ; *Liver Transplantation/adverse effects ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; RNA, Viral/blood ; Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Tacrolimus/therapeutic use

PURPOSE: Recently, bortezomib has been used to treat antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) refractory to conventional treatment such as plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab. The authors aimed to describe their experiences when bortezomib was used to treat refractory AMR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven refractory AMR episodes treated with bortezomib were included in this study. The patients received one or two cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. RESULTS: Bortezomib effectively reduced antibodies against various targets, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II, ABO blood group antigen, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor. Antibodies were depleted or reduced significantly in eight AMR episodes. Overall, there was a significant improvement in the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3 months after therapy (36.91+/-22.15 mL/min/1.73 m2) versus eGFR at time of AMR diagnosis (17.00+/-9.25 mL/min/1.73 m2; p=0.007). All six early-onset AMR episodes (within 6 months post-transplantation) showed full recovery of allograft function. Additionally, three of the five late-onset AMR episodes (>6 months post-transplantation) showed improved allograft function. CONCLUSION: Anti-humoral treatment based on bortezomib might be an effective strategy against refractory AMR caused by various types of antibodies. Notably, this treatment could be more effective in early-onset AMR than in late-onset AMR.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents/*therapeutic use ; Boronic Acids/therapeutic use ; Bortezomib/*therapeutic use ; Female ; Graft Rejection/*drug therapy/*prevention & control ; Humans ; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use ; Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use ; Isoantibodies ; Kidney Failure, Chronic/*surgery ; *Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Plasmapheresis ; Pyrazines/administration & dosage ; Transplantation, Homologous

The optimal immunosuppressive strategy for renal transplant recipients at high immunologic risk remains a topic of investigation. This prospective single arm pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combined tacrolimus and sirolimus regimen in recipients at immunological high risk and to compare outcomes with a contemporaneous control group received tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients that received a renal allograft between 2010 and 2011 at high risk (defined as panel reactive antibodies > 50%, 4 or more human leukocyte antigen mismatches, or retransplantation) were enrolled. All patients received basiliximab induction and corticosteroids. A total of 28 recipients treated with tacrolimus and sirolimus were enrolled in this study and 69 recipients were retrospectively reviewed as a control group. The sirolimus group showed a higher, but not statistically significant, incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection and a lower glomerular filtration rate than the control group. Furthermore, sirolimus group was associated with significant increases in BKV infection (P = 0.031), dyslipidemia (P = 0.004), and lymphocele (P = 0.020). The study was terminated prematurely due to a high incidence of adverse events. A de novo tacrolimus/sirolimus combination regimen may not be an ideal choice for recipients at high immunological risk.
Adult ; Drug Therapy, Combination/methods ; Female ; Graft Rejection/diagnosis/*etiology/*prevention & control ; Humans ; Immunocompromised Host ; Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Kidney Transplantation/*adverse effects ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sirolimus/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Survival Rate ; Tacrolimus/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is an important cause of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. It has an unfavorable clinical course, and no definite treatment guidelines have yet been established. Here, we report our center's experience with biopsy-proven BKVAN and investigate factors associated with its progression. METHODS: From January 2004 to April 2013, 25 patients with BKVAN were diagnosed by biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Of the 25 patients, 10 were deceaseddonor transplant recipients and 15 were living-donor transplant recipients. Three of the patients underwent retransplantation. The primary immunosuppressant used was tacrolimus in 17 patients and cyclosporine in eight patients. RESULTS: BKVAN was observed at a mean duration of 22.8 ± 29.1 months after transplantation. The mean serum creatinine level at biopsy was 2.2 ± 0.7 mg/dL. BKVAN occurred with acute rejection in eight patients (28%). Immunosuppression modification was performed in 21 patients (84%). Additionally, leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin were administered to 13 patients (52%) and two (8%), respectively. Allograft loss occurred in five patients (27.8%) during the follow- up period at 0.7, 17.1, 21.8, 39.8, and 41.5 months after the BKVAN diagnosis. Advanced stages of BKVAN, increased creatinine levels, and accompanying acute rejection at the time of BKVAN diagnosis increased the risk of allograft failure. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven BKVAN were unfavorable in the present study, especially in patients with advanced-stage BKVAN, poor renal function, and acute allograft rejection.
Adult ; Allografts ; Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use ; BK Virus/*pathogenicity ; Biomarkers/blood ; Biopsy ; Creatinine/blood ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Graft Rejection/diagnosis/drug therapy/immunology/*virology ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Immunocompromised Host ; Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Kidney Transplantation/*adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Opportunistic Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy/immunology/*virology ; Polyomavirus Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy/immunology/*virology ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Virus Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy/immunology/*virology

This study aimed to investigate the effect of bortezomib in the desensitization and treatment of acute antibody mediated rejection (AAMR) in kidney transplantation. Nine patients who received bortezomib therapy for desensitization (DSZ group, n = 3) or treatment of AAMR (AAMR group, n = 6) were included in this study. In the DSZ group, 2 patients required DSZ owing to positive cross match and 1 owing to ABO mismatch with high baseline anti-ABO antibody titer (1:1,024). Bortezomib was used at 1, 3, 8, and 11 days from the start of the treatment. In the AAMR group, 3 patients showed full recovery of allograft function after bortezomib use and decrease in donor specific anti-HLA antibody (HLA-DSA). However, 3 patients did not respond to bortezomib and experienced allograft failure. In the DSZ group, negative conversion of T-CDC (complement-dependent cytotoxicity) was achieved, and HLA-DSA was decreased to lower than a weak level (median fluorescence intensity [MFI] < 5,000) in 2 patients. In the case of ABO mismatch kidney transplantation, the anti-A/B antibody titer decreased to below the target (< or = 1:16) after bortezomib therapy. Therefore, bortezomib could be an alternative therapeutic option for desensitization and treatment of AAMR that is unresponsive to conventional therapies.
Adult ; Boronic Acids/*therapeutic use ; Desensitization, Immunologic/*methods ; Female ; Graft Rejection/*drug therapy/*prevention & control ; HLA Antigens/immunology ; Humans ; Kidney/surgery ; Kidney Transplantation/*methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pyrazines/*therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo determine the optimal dose range (therapeutic window) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for preventing acute graft rejection following renal transplantation.

METHODSThe trough concentration of MMF (MPA-C0) at 12 h after oral administration of the drug (two doses daily given at an interval of 12 h) was monitored in 110 renal transplant recipients within a month, in 2-3 months, and over 4 months after the transplantation using EMIT method. The occurrence of acute graft rejection and drug toxicity were observed in all the patients during the one-year follow-up.

RESULTSs The incidence of acute graft rejection after transplantation was 13.64% (15/110) in these patients. Drug toxicity and complications occurred in 32.73% (36/110) of the patients, including 12 cases with reduced white blood cell counts, 10 with MMF cid-associated diarrhea, 10 with infection, 4 with liver function damage. Acute rejection was successfully reversed after methylprednisolone treatment and drug toxicity was managed by corresponding treatment and adjustment of MMF dose. No deaths or graft removal occurred in these patients. The ROC curve showed that a MPA-C0 of 1.40-2.80 mg/L was optimal in preventing acute rejection after the transplantation and reducing adverse drug effects.

CONCLUSIONMonitoring MPA-C0 and individualized MMF dosing help to prevent acute graft rejection, reducing drug toxicity and complications, and improving graft survival rate after renal transplantation.

Graft Rejection ; drug therapy ; prevention & control ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Kidney Transplantation ; Methylprednisolone ; Mycophenolic Acid ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors

OBJECTIVETo study the suppressive effect of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase on transplantation rejection in mice heterotopic cardiac transplantation.

METHODSAdenovirus vector containing IDO gene was used to infect donor (C57BL/6) DC to obtain IDO(+)DC. Mouse heterotopic cardiac transplantation models were established (C57BL/6-BALB/c) and the following groups were set up, including the control group, DC injection group, TC injection group, IDO(+)DC injection group and co-injection group of IDO(+)DC and TC, 12 donors and 12 recipients in each group.Survival time of the donor heart in every group was observed. Meanwhile, donor hearts were harvested 7 days post transplantation for different examinations, including pathological examination, mRNA expression of IDO through real-time PCR, IDO protein expression through Western blot. Peripheral blood of recipients was also harvested for CD3(+)T lymphocyte apoptosis rate examination through fluorescence-activated cell sorting.One-way ANOVA and Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis were used for statistic analysis of IDO expression, CD3(+)T lymphocyte apoptosis rate and survival time of the donor heart respectively.

RESULTSCadiac allograft median survival time of each group were 7.0, 7.5, 11.0, 17.5, 24.0 days respectively. Compared with control and DC injection group, IDO(+)DC, TC and co-injection group significantly prolonged the survival time of donor hearts (t = 3.523-8.449, P < 0.01). Both IDO mRNA and protein expression showed significant increase(t = 5.974-16.176, P < 0.01). The CD3(+)T lymphocyte apoptosis rate was also significantly increased (t = 6.324-38.120, P < 0.01). Compared with IDO(+)DC or TC group alone, co-injection group significantly prolonged the survival time of the donor heart (t = 5.971 and 2.831, P < 0.05). Both IDO mRNA and protein expression showed significant increase (t = 2.853-15.194, P < 0.01).Furthermore, the CD3(+)T lymphocyte apoptosis rate was significantly increased as well (t = 26.069 and 7.643, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSSuppressive effect of co-injection of IDO(+)DC and TC is much more effective than administration of IDO(+)DC or TC alone, which suggests that IDO achieved immune suppressive effect through the pathway of tryptophan depletion and accumulation of TC.

Animals ; Gene Transfer Techniques ; Graft Rejection ; drug therapy ; Heart Transplantation ; Indoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-Dioxygenase ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mice, Inbred C57BL

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare once-daily tacrolimus with twice-daily tacrolimus in terms of safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study was conducted at three institutes. Patients in the investigational group were converted from tacrolimus twice daily to the same dose of extended-release tacrolimus once daily at 1 month post-transplantation, while patients in the control group were maintained on tacrolimus twice daily. The efficacies, safeties, and patient satisfaction for the two drugs at 6 months post-transplantation were compared. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled and randomized to the investigational group (28 of 29 patients completed the study) or the control group (26 of 31 patients completed the study). At 6 months post-transplantation, composite efficacy failure rates including the incidences of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in the investigational and control groups were 0% and 10.7%, respectively; patient survival was 100% in each group. No difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate values were observed at 6 months post-transplantation (p=0.97). The safety and satisfaction profile (immunosuppressant therapy barrier scale) of once-daily tacrolimus was comparable with that of twice-daily tacrolimus (p=0.35). CONCLUSION: Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus one month after transplantation is safe and effective.
Adult ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Graft Rejection/drug therapy/prevention & control ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/*administration & dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; *Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Safety ; Tacrolimus/*administration & dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The dose of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been reduced in Asia due to side effects associated with the conventional fixed dose of 2-3 g/day. We aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics of a reduced dose of MMF and to validate its feasibility in combination with tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: Two sequential studies were performed in adult LDLT between October 2009 and 2011. First, we performed a prospective pharmacokinetic study in 15 recipients. We measured the area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12) for mycophenolic acid at postoperative days 7 and 14, and we performed a protocol biopsy before discharge. Second, among 215 recipients, we reviewed 74 patients who were initially administered a reduced dose of MMF (1.0 g/day) with tacrolimus (trough, 8-12 ng/mL during the first month, and 5-8 ng/mL thereafter), with a 1-year follow-up. We performed protocol biopsies at 2 weeks and 1 year post-LDLT. RESULTS: In the first part of study, AUC0-12 was less than 30 mgh/L in 93.3% of cases. In the second, validating study, 41.9% of the recipients needed dose reduction or cessation due to side effects within the first year after LDLT. At 12 months post-LDLT, 17.6% of the recipients were administered a lower dose of MMF (0.5 g/day), and 16.2% needed permanent cessation due to side effects. The 1- and 12-month rejection-free survival rates were 98.6% and 97.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A reduced dose of MMF was associated with low blood levels compared to the existing recommended therapeutic range. However, reducing the dose of MMF combined with a low level of tacrolimus was feasible clinically, with an excellent short-term outcome in LDLT.
Adult ; Aged ; Area Under Curve ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology ; Graft Rejection/prevention & control ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/blood/*pharmacokinetics ; Leukopenia/etiology ; Liver/pathology ; Liver Failure/*therapy ; *Liver Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mycophenolic Acid/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives/blood/pharmacokinetics ; ROC Curve ; Retrospective Studies ; Tacrolimus/therapeutic use ; Tissue Donors

This study was designed to evaluate whether sirolimus (SRL) conversion effectively improves renal function and histopathology in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-treated renal recipients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. SRL conversion from CNI was performed in patients who underwent kidney transplantation from 6 months to 5 yr prior to screening. Forty-five patients were enrolled. The effect of SRL conversion on graft function was evaluated, and protocol biopsies were performed preconversion and 1 yr after conversion. Overall graft function after SRL conversion gradually improved, and the improvement in renal function was closely associated with the shorter duration of CNI exposure. When we divided the patients by the duration of CNI exposure, the patients with less than 1 yr of CNI exposure demonstrated significant improvement, but patients with a greater than 1 yr CNI exposure did not exhibit significant improvement. In contrast, protocol biopsies demonstrated no significant improvements in the modified "ah" score or other Banff scores after SRL conversion. Furthermore, the duration of CNI treatment prior to SRL conversion was not associated with histological findings 1 yr after SRL conversion. SRL conversion improved graft function in renal recipients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency, but this effect is not accompanied by histological improvement.
Adult ; Calcineurin Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Drug Synergism ; Female ; Graft Rejection/*etiology/*prevention & control ; Graft Survival/drug effects ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects/*methods ; Male ; Renal Insufficiency/diagnosis/*therapy ; Republic of Korea ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sirolimus/*administration & dosage ; Transplantation Tolerance/drug effects ; Treatment Outcome