graft survival following primary penetrating keratoplasty (PK) with imported donor corneas.METHODS: The eyes of patients who underwent primary PK with imported donor corneas were classified retrospectively into two groups according to a donor-age cutoff of 65 years. Primary outcome measures were rejection-free graft survival and graft survival. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess the factors affecting graft survival. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, while differences between groups were examined using a log-rank test. A subgroup analysis of low- and high-risk eyes according to preoperative diagnosis was also performed.RESULTS: A total of 140 eyes from 138 patients (age, 58 ± 18 years) were enrolled. Cox regression analysis revealed that the donor age of 65 years or older group presented an increased risk of both graft rejection and failure. Survival analysis revealed that rejection-free graft survival and graft survival rates were higher in eyes in the donor age of less than 65 years group. Finally, in the subgroup analysis, both rejection-free graft survival and graft survival rates were significantly higher in the donor age of less than 65 years group than in the donor age of 65 years or older group, but only in the low-risk subgroup.CONCLUSIONS: Donor age may correlate with graft survival in primary PK performed with imported donor corneas. Donor age could be a considerable factor in primary PK with imported donor corneas, especially in preoperatively low-risk patients.]]>
Cornea ; Corneal Transplantation ; Diagnosis ; Graft Rejection ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Keratoplasty, Penetrating ; Methods ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants

After the Organ Transplant Act was enforced in 2000, the criteria for the diagnosis of brain death have been legalized, and cardiac transplantation has become a promising treatment choice for patients with chronic heart disease. Even though more than hundreds of cases have been accumulated in the national registry and the survival rates are increasing, the compliance of long-term survivors may decrease paradoxically, which can hinder the efforts to enhance the quality of the registry. The patients who are lost from the doctor's surveillance and die outside hospitals should be appropriately examined to determine the cause of death so that the influence of their medical condition, if any, on their death could be revealed. Here, we report an autopsy case of a patient who died of a complication of chronic rejection after cardiac transplantation.
Allografts ; Autopsy ; Brain Death ; Cause of Death ; Compliance ; Coronary Vessels ; Diagnosis ; Graft Rejection ; Heart Diseases ; Heart Transplantation ; Humans ; Myocardial Infarction ; Survival Rate ; Survivors ; Transplants

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a rare event in liver transplantation compared to other solid organs such as the kidney and heart because of the different immunologic reactions in the liver and it ability to compensate for damage. Although it is not easy to define the histological features that help diagnosis because of its rarity, a few histologic features such as portal eosinophilia with eosinophilic endothelialitis have been reported as useful for diagnosis of acute AMR in presensitized patients. C4d staining is not a good indicator of AMR in liver grafts because of its low sensitivity and specificity. AMR is an emerging cause of chronic graft failure, especially in high risk patients having preformed or de novo donor specific alloantibodies (DSA). Some histologic parameters including interface hepatitis, lobular inflammation, portal collagenation, portal venopathy, and sinusoidal fibrosis, have been suggested as chronic AMR to predict graft fibrosis and survival in DSA positive patients. In conclusion, recent studies have resulted in the histological diagnostic criteria of AMR becoming more specific; however, confirmation of AMR still requires strong clinical evidence for alloantibodies.
Collagen ; Diagnosis* ; Eosinophilia ; Eosinophils ; Fibrosis ; Graft Rejection ; Heart ; Hepatitis ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Isoantibodies ; Kidney ; Liver Transplantation ; Liver* ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants

Solid organ transplantation is a therapeutic option for end-stage organ diseases. However, complications including infection and graft rejection, which are related to immunosuppressive therapy, remain the major causes of morbidity and mortality following solid organ transplantation. The optimal approach to infection in solid organ transplant recipients is prevention; failing this, prompt and aggressive diagnosis and therapy are essential. In addition, the epidemiology of infections after solid organ transplantation has shifted as a result of changes in immunosuppressive strategies and improved survival. Immunosuppression must be linked with appropriate vaccinations, donor and recipient screening, patient education regarding infectious risks and lifestyle, monitoring, and antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Diagnosis ; Epidemiology ; Graft Rejection ; Humans ; Immunosuppression ; Life Style ; Mass Screening ; Mortality ; Opportunistic Infections* ; Organ Transplantation* ; Patient Education as Topic ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants* ; Vaccination

OBJECTIVETo explore the diagnosis, treatment and long-term outcome of late acute rejection (LAR) following adult orthotropic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODSA total of 398 consecutive adult patients who underwent OLT in Organ Transplant Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University between January 2007 and December 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 48 patients (12. 1%) developed to LAR, including 43 male patients and 5 female patients, with an average age of (52 ± 13) years(18 - 70 years). The mean body mass index was (22.1 ± 4. 5) kg/m2 (15. 4 - 30. 4 kg/m2). The indications of the liver transplantation recipients included 16 cases of end-staged liver cirrhosis after hepatitis B or C(33. 3%), 14 cases with severe hepatitis (29. 2%), 9 cases of primary liver cancer(18. 5%), 5 cases of alcoholic liver cirrhosis (10. 4%), 1 case with autoimmune liver disease (2. 1%) , the other 3 cases (6. 3%). They were followed up by outpatient service, telephone and other means. Survival curves were generated with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling was used for predictors of mortality. Statistically significant variables found by single factor regression analysis were put into the Cox proportional hazards regression model of multivariate analysis.

RESULTSThe time-to-event was 23. 6 months after OLT which were more common in the first year to the third year post-transplant (26/48,52. 4%). Thirty-five cases were assessed as mild, 11 cases were assessed as moderate, and 2 cases were assessed as severe ,based on the Banff schema. After adjustment to the immunosuppressive regimen, the overall recovery rate reached to 81. 3%. The rate of steroid-resistant acute rejection was 11. 8% (4/34). Inadequate immunosuppression and steroid pulsation were two independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of LAR (P = 0. 008, P = 0. 003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONSLAR is an uncommon complication after OLT. Inadequate immunosuppression and steroid pulsation are the major risk factors for prognosis of LAR. Improving patient compliance and strengthening blood concentration surveillance can increase the patient survival.

Acute Disease ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Graft Rejection ; diagnosis ; mortality ; therapy ; Hepatitis B ; Humans ; Immunosuppression ; Liver Cirrhosis ; Liver Neoplasms ; Liver Transplantation ; mortality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Steroids ; Young Adult

No abstract available.
Adult ; Female ; Graft Rejection/immunology/*prevention & control ; Graft Survival ; *Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; *Immune Tolerance ; Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use ; Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis/*surgery ; *Kidney Transplantation ; Living Donors ; Siblings ; Time Factors ; *Transplantation Chimera ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients who undergo repeat kidney transplantations (KTs) are considered at high risk for experiencing immunologic and non-immunologic complications. In this study, we investigated the clinical outcomes, including medical and surgical complications, of patients who underwent a third KT at our center. METHODS: Between March 1969 and December 2012, a total of 2,110 KTs were performed at the Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Of them, we examined 11 patients who underwent a third KT, and investigated the allograft outcomes and complication rates. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration after KT was 72.4 ± 78.3 months. The mean age at KT was 38.2 ± 8.0 years, and seven patients (63.6%) were males. Nine patients (81.8%) underwent living-donor KT. A cross-match test yielded positive results in four of the nine patients, and all underwent pretransplant desensitization therapy. After KT, three patients (27.2%) showed delayed graft function. Acute rejection developed in four patients (36.4%), and surgical complications that required surgical correction occurred in three patients. Allograft failure developed due to acute rejection (n = 3) or chronic rejection (n = 1) in four patients. Allograft survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 81.8%, 42.9%, and 42.9%, respectively; however, the allograft survival rate at 5 years was > 80% in patients who underwent KT only after results of the panel reactive antibody test became available. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, a third KT procedure may be acceptable, although aggressive pretransplant immune monitoring and patient selection may be required to reduce the risks of acute rejection and surgical complications.
Acute Disease ; Adult ; Allografts ; Chronic Disease ; Delayed Graft Function/diagnosis/*etiology/therapy ; Female ; Graft Rejection/diagnosis/*immunology/therapy ; Graft Survival ; *Histocompatibility ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use ; Kidney Transplantation/*adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Selection ; Reoperation ; Republic of Korea ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

The optimal immunosuppressive strategy for renal transplant recipients at high immunologic risk remains a topic of investigation. This prospective single arm pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combined tacrolimus and sirolimus regimen in recipients at immunological high risk and to compare outcomes with a contemporaneous control group received tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients that received a renal allograft between 2010 and 2011 at high risk (defined as panel reactive antibodies > 50%, 4 or more human leukocyte antigen mismatches, or retransplantation) were enrolled. All patients received basiliximab induction and corticosteroids. A total of 28 recipients treated with tacrolimus and sirolimus were enrolled in this study and 69 recipients were retrospectively reviewed as a control group. The sirolimus group showed a higher, but not statistically significant, incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection and a lower glomerular filtration rate than the control group. Furthermore, sirolimus group was associated with significant increases in BKV infection (P = 0.031), dyslipidemia (P = 0.004), and lymphocele (P = 0.020). The study was terminated prematurely due to a high incidence of adverse events. A de novo tacrolimus/sirolimus combination regimen may not be an ideal choice for recipients at high immunological risk.
Adult ; Drug Therapy, Combination/methods ; Female ; Graft Rejection/diagnosis/*etiology/*prevention & control ; Humans ; Immunocompromised Host ; Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Kidney Transplantation/*adverse effects ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sirolimus/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Survival Rate ; Tacrolimus/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is an important cause of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. It has an unfavorable clinical course, and no definite treatment guidelines have yet been established. Here, we report our center's experience with biopsy-proven BKVAN and investigate factors associated with its progression. METHODS: From January 2004 to April 2013, 25 patients with BKVAN were diagnosed by biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Of the 25 patients, 10 were deceaseddonor transplant recipients and 15 were living-donor transplant recipients. Three of the patients underwent retransplantation. The primary immunosuppressant used was tacrolimus in 17 patients and cyclosporine in eight patients. RESULTS: BKVAN was observed at a mean duration of 22.8 ± 29.1 months after transplantation. The mean serum creatinine level at biopsy was 2.2 ± 0.7 mg/dL. BKVAN occurred with acute rejection in eight patients (28%). Immunosuppression modification was performed in 21 patients (84%). Additionally, leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin were administered to 13 patients (52%) and two (8%), respectively. Allograft loss occurred in five patients (27.8%) during the follow- up period at 0.7, 17.1, 21.8, 39.8, and 41.5 months after the BKVAN diagnosis. Advanced stages of BKVAN, increased creatinine levels, and accompanying acute rejection at the time of BKVAN diagnosis increased the risk of allograft failure. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven BKVAN were unfavorable in the present study, especially in patients with advanced-stage BKVAN, poor renal function, and acute allograft rejection.
Adult ; Allografts ; Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use ; BK Virus/*pathogenicity ; Biomarkers/blood ; Biopsy ; Creatinine/blood ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Graft Rejection/diagnosis/drug therapy/immunology/*virology ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Immunocompromised Host ; Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Kidney Transplantation/*adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Opportunistic Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy/immunology/*virology ; Polyomavirus Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy/immunology/*virology ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Virus Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy/immunology/*virology

OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical predictors of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after liver transplantation.

METHODSThe clinical data of 182 patients (146 male and 36 female with a mean age of (50 ± 7) years) receiving liver transplantation in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between January 2004 and December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed.All patients were divided into two groups, namely the CMV infection group (n=24) and the control group (n=158). Logistic regression was used to identify the predictive factors of postoperative CMV infection.

RESULTSAccording to univariate analysis results, the factors for CMV infection were acute liver failure (P=0.032), MELD score ≥ 30 (P=0.001), liver retransplantation (P=0.002), acute rejection (P=0.000) and delayed graft function (P=0.022). According to multi-analysis results, MELD score ≥ 30 (P=0.037, 95%CI:1.194-271.461) and acute rejection (P=0.033, 95%CI:1.179-51.863) were proved to be independent predictors by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONThe study indicates that MELD score ≥ 30 and acute rejection are the independent predictors of CMV infection.

Adult ; Beijing ; Cytomegalovirus Infections ; diagnosis ; End Stage Liver Disease ; diagnosis ; Female ; Graft Rejection ; Humans ; Liver Transplantation ; adverse effects ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Postoperative Complications ; virology ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index