2.Surgical treatment of presbyopia II
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2019;62(12):623-628
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			This review gives an overview of the current multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) landscape, in terms of the technology, benefits, and limitations of different premium IOLs, as well as significant clinical outcomes. Cataract is the most common cause of visual impairment in older adults. From 1980, the number of blind and visually impaired people have decreased due to cataract surgery. As the number of surgical procedures increases every year, patient demands have also changed with many patients expecting excellent visual acuity without glasses. Multifocal IOLs can provide spectacle-independence for near, intermediate, and distant vision tasks. Multifocal IOLs can be classified into bifocal, trifocal, and extended depth of focus multifocal IOLs. The ultimate goal of multifocal lenses includes reduced incidence of photic phenomena, and improved uncorrected near, intermediate, and far visual acuities for those working with computers and smartphones, as well as no contrast sensitivity loss. Although some patients have issues with halos and glare, overall patient satisfaction and quality of life are generally high after multifocal IOL implantation. Careful patient selection should be made to satisfy different individual needs.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Adult
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cataract
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Contrast Sensitivity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Eyeglasses
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glare
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glass
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Incidence
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lenses, Intraocular
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Satisfaction
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Selection
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Presbyopia
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Quality of Life
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Smartphone
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Vision Disorders
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Visual Acuity
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
3.Surgical treatment of presbyopia I
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2019;62(12):616-622
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Presbyopia is an age-related condition that progressively decreases the ability to focus on near objects. Minimally invasive surgical techniques have been developed to improve near vision, including laser in situ keratomileuses (LASIK) and corneal inlay. Most have similar approaches using monovision or increasing the depth of focus. Monovision laser refractive surgery is a combination of conventional LASIK, LASIK which creates a multifocal cornea (central near or peripheral near) and aspheric micro-monovision LASIK with a special ablation profile, which develops spherical aberration. Conductive keratoplasty is a method that uses radiofrequency energy to shrink the mid-peripheral corneal stromal tissue. However, it is not used because of regression. A corneal inlay is a small device that is implanted in the corneal flap or pocket made by a femtosecond laser. It is inserted into the non-dominant eye. There are various inlays such as the Flexivue Microlens (refractive), Raindrop (corneal shape-changing), and KAMRA (small-aperture) inlays. However, the safety and effectiveness of these inlays have not been proven over a long follow-up period, so care is required when performing inlay implantation. All presbyopia treatments can improve near vision but also have limitations and side effects such as reduced far vision, contrast sensitivity, or increased glare. Therefore, it is essential to select patients carefully. Mechanisms associated with presbyopia are not fully understood, and presbyopia remains challenging for ophthalmologists.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Contrast Sensitivity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cornea
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Corneal Transplantation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Follow-Up Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glare
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Inlays
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Methods
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Presbyopia
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Refractive Surgical Procedures
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Vision, Monocular
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
4.Current Issues and Future Considerations in Undergraduate Medical Education from the Perspective of the Korean Medical Doctor Development System
Korean Medical Education Review 2018;20(2):72-77
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Observation of the current Korean medical education and training system shows that certain negative traits of unchangeable solidification engraft themselves so deeply into the overarching system that they are now hampering the state of the national health welfare. Focusing only on undergraduate medical education, we can point out some glaring side-effects that should be of concern to any stakeholder. For instance, a graduate can legally begin his career as an independent practitioner immediately after passing the licensing exam and return to the old stuck school-year system of 2-year-premedical and 4-year-medical programs where outcome-based and integrated curricula are incomplete and unsatisfactory. In terms of learning opportunities, the balance between patient care and public health, as well as that between in-hospital highly specialized practice and community-based general practice, has worsened. Every stakeholder should be aware of these considerations in order to obtain the insight to forge a new direction. Moreover, our medical schools must prepare our students to take on the global roles of patient care within the Fourth Industrial Revolution, health advocacy for the imminent super-aged society, and education and research in the bio-health industry, by building and applying the concept of academic medicine. We will need to invest more resources, including educational specialists, into the current undergraduate medical education system in order to produce proper outcomes, smart curriculum, innovative methods of teaching and learning, and valid and reliable monitoring and evaluation. The improved quality of undergraduate medical education is the starting point for the success of the national system for public health and medical care as a whole, and therefore its urgency and significance should be emphasized to the public. The medical society should go beyond fixing what is broken and usher in a new era of cooperation and collaboration that invites other health professionals, governmental partners, law-makers, opinion leaders, and the general public in its steps toward the future.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Cooperative Behavior
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Curriculum
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Education
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Education, Medical
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Education, Medical, Undergraduate
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			General Practice
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glare
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Health Occupations
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Learning
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Licensure
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Care
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Public Health
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Schools, Medical
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Societies, Medical
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Specialization
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
5.Clinical Outcomes of Diffractive Aspheric Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation
Jung Hyun LEE ; Young Joo CHO ; Tae Hyung LIM ; Kee Yong CHOI ; Beom Jin CHO
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2018;59(2):145-152
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with diffractive aspheric trifocal intraocular lens FineVision Pod F IOL (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) implantation. METHODS: Thirty eight eyes received phacoemulsification and implantation of FineVision Pod F IOL. Uncorrected distant visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), refractive values, and defocus curve were evaluated at postoperative 1 month and 3 months. Optical quality was evaluated with the contrast sensitivity test, OQAS® (Optical Quality Analysis System, Visiometrics, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain) and questionnaire. RESULTS: At the 3-month postoperative follow-up, the mean spherical equivalent was 0.01 ± 0.31 D and the mean UDVA, UIVA and UNVA were 0.04 ± 0.07, 0.19 ± 0.12, and 0.04 ± 0.07, respectively. Mean contrast sensitivities at 0.75, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degrees were 2.00 ± 1.54, 2.16 ± 1.60, 2.25 ± 1.76, 2.16 ± 1.83, 1.52 ± 1.47 and 1.03 ± 0.95 respectively and mean objective scatter index by OQAS® (Optical Quality Analysis System, Visiometrics) was 1.54 ± 0.74. In satisfaction analysis, general satisfaction with surgery was 89% and spectacle independence were 89% at far, 78% at intermediate and 83% at near distance. Postoperative dissatisfaction factors were dryness (36%), glare at night (32%), halo (18%). CONCLUSIONS: The FineVision Pod F IOL showed excellent distant and near visual acuities with an effective intermediate visual acuity. The eyes with FineVision Pod F IOL expected to achieve the favorable visual outcome and patient satisfaction.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Cataract
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Contrast Sensitivity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Follow-Up Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glare
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lens Implantation, Intraocular
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lenses, Intraocular
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Satisfaction
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Phacoemulsification
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Visual Acuity
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
6.Trifocal versus Bifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation after Cataract Surgery or Refractive Lens Exchange: a Meta-analysis.
Chang Ho YOON ; In Soo SHIN ; Mee Kum KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2018;33(44):e275-
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy between trifocal and bifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. METHODS: Through PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, we searched potentially relevant articles published from 1990 to 2018. Defocus curves, visual acuities (VAs) were measured as primary outcomes. Spectacle dependence, postoperative refraction, contrast sensitivity (CS), glare, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were measured as secondary outcomes. Effects were pooled using random-effects method. RESULTS: We included 11 clinical trials, with a total of 787 eyes (395 subjects). The trifocal IOL group showed better binocular distance VA corrected with defocus levels of −0.5, −1.0, −1.5, and −2.5 diopter than the bifocal IOL group (All P ≤ 0.004). The trifocal IOL group showed better monocular uncorrected distance and intermediate VAs (mean difference [MD], −0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.07, −0.01; P = 0.006 and MD, −0.07 logMAR; 95% CI, −0.13, −0.01; P = 0.03, respectively). Postoperative refraction, glare, CS, and HOAs were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSION: The overall findings indicate that trifocal diffractive IOL implantation is better than the bifocal diffractive IOL in intermediate VA, and provides similar or better in distance and near VAs without any major deterioration in the visual quality.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Cataract*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Contrast Sensitivity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glare
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lens Implantation, Intraocular*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lenses, Intraocular*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Methods
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Telescopes
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Visual Acuity
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
7.Probiotics as a Potential Immunomodulating Pharmabiotics in Allergic Diseases: Current Status and Future Prospects.
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research 2018;10(6):575-590
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			The prevalence of allergic disorders has dramatically increased over the past decade, particularly in developed countries. Apart from gastrointestinal disorders, neoplasia, genital and dermatological diseases etc., dysregulation of gut microbiota (dysbiosis) has also been found to be associated with increased risk of allergies. Probiotics are increasingly being employed to correct dysbiosis and, in turn, to modulate allergic diseases. However, several factors like strain variations and effector metabolites or component of them in a bacterial species can affect the efficacy of those as probiotics. On the other hand, host variations like geographical locations, food habits etc. could also affect the expected results from probiotic usage. Thus, there is a glaring deficiency in our approach to establish probiotics as an irrefutable treatment avenue for suitable disorders. In this review, we explicate on the reported probiotics and their effects on certain allergic diseases like atopic dermatitis, food allergy and asthma to establish their utility. We propose possible measures like elucidation of effector molecules and functional mechanisms of probiotics towards establishing probiotics for therapeutic use. Certain probiotics studies have led to very alarming outcomes which could have been precluded, had effective guidelines been in place. Thus, we also propose ways to secure the safety of probiotics. Overall, our efforts tend to propose necessary discovery and quality assurance guidelines for developing probiotics as potential immunomodulatory ‘Pharmabiotics.’
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Asthma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dermatitis, Atopic
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Developed Countries
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dysbiosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Food Habits
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Food Hypersensitivity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Gastrointestinal Microbiome
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glare
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hand
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hypersensitivity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Prevalence
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Probiotics*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
8.Efficacy of Anterior Stromal Puncture Using 5% NaCl Eye Drops for Prolonged Time in Recurrent Corneal Erosion Syndrome.
Da Young SHIN ; So Hyang CHUNG
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2017;58(5):503-508
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the combined treatment of anterior stromal puncture with the concurrent use of 5% NaCl eye drops for 6 months for recurrent corneal erosion syndrome. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 21 patients (21 eyes) who underwent the combined treatment of anterior stromal puncture with 5% NaCl eye drops qid for 6 months to treat recurrent corneal erosion syndromes. The patients' age, gender, history of corneal trauma, history of ocular surgery, recurrence rate, need for additional treatments after recurrence and complication were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age was 42.05 ± 13.83 years (19-68 years) with no significant difference in gender, and the mean follow up period was 8.48 ± 2.76 months (6-15 months). Among the 21 eyes 14 eyes (66.7%) had a previous history of corneal trauma, 2 eyes (9.52%) had previous refractive surgery, 1 eye (4.8%) had corneal dystrophy, 2 eyes (9.5%) had diabetic mellitus and 5 eyes (28.81%) had an unknown origin. Furthermore, 3 eyes (14.3%) developed recurrences and 2 eyes were resolved with conservative treatment while 1 eye needed additional anterior stroma puncture. There was no recurrence after retreatment with anterior stroma puncture. No significant complications such as infection or inflammation developed with the exception of corneal opacity in which one patient developed glare due to corneal opacity. CONCLUSIONS: The combined treatment of anterior stromal puncture with 5% NaCl eye drops for a prolonged time might be effective at preventing the recurrence of refractory recurrent corneal erosion syndrome with conservative treatments.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Corneal Injuries
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Corneal Opacity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Follow-Up Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glare
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Inflammation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Ophthalmic Solutions*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Punctures*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Recurrence
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Refractive Surgical Procedures
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Retreatment
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Retrospective Studies
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
9.Intraindividual Comparison of Visual Outcomes between Blue Light-filtering and Ultraviolet Light-filtering Intraocular Lens.
Geun Young LEE ; Im Gyu KIM ; Sung YU ; Gwang Ja LEE ; Kyoo Won LEE ; Young Jeung PARK
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2017;58(1):34-42
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			PURPOSE: To compare the clinical results of short-term visual acuity and quality of vision after implantation of a yellow-tinted blue light-filtering intraocular lens (IOL) (Acrysof IQ® SN60WF) and an clear ultraviolet (UV) light filtering IOL (enVista™ MX60) in the same patient. METHODS: 44 patients with bilateral cataract received an SN60WF in one eye and an MX60 in the other eye. All eyes were evaluated for refraction power and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at preoperative and 1, 3 months postoperatively. At postoperative 3 months, corrected visual acuity, quality of vision (OQAS II®), contrast sensitivity (CGT 2000®) and visual field (Humphrey Field Analyzer®), and subjective patients' response to the degree of brightness were evaluated. Furthermore, glistening degree, intraocular stability, and posterior capsular opacification were examined. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in average refractive power or UCVA at 1 and 3 months (p > 0.05) between the two groups. At 3 months after cataract surgery, the quality of vision according to OQAS II®, the contrast sensitivity according to CGT 2000® with the glare either on or off, and visual field; showed no difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Both IOLs had no glistening and posterior capsular opacity. The patients' response to the degree of brightness shows that MX60 (48.3%) has a higher degree of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Yellow-tinted blue light-filtering IOL and clear UV light-filtering IOL had no difference in short-term visual acuity and quality of vision. Subjective brightness perception, however, was better with clear UV light-filtering IOL.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Cataract
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Contrast Sensitivity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glare
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lenses, Intraocular*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Visual Acuity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Visual Fields
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
10.Comparison of Clinical Long-Term Outcomes with Two Types of One-Piece Aspheric Intraocular Lenses after Cataract Surgery.
Yong Seok PARK ; Yong Sok JI ; Kyung Chul YOON
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2016;57(2):221-227
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of glistening-free intraocular lens (IOL) and conventional 1-piece aspheric IOL in implanted in-the-bag. METHODS: After phacoemulsification performed by a single surgeon, 2 different IOLs were implanted: enVista MX60 (glistening-free 1-piece aspheric IOL) in 38 eyes (group A) and AcrySof IQ (conventional 1-piece aspheric IOL) in 46 eyes (group B). Glare symptom score (0-5) obtained by questionnaires, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Functional Acuity Contrast Test (FACT), posterior capsular opacity (PCO), glistening formation and spherical equivalent error were compared and analyzed preoperatively and 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement of BCVA and contrast sensitivity postoperatively was observed in all groups. There was statistically significant increase of glistening in group B compared with group A. However, there was no significant difference of FACT scores of spatial frequency in A, B, C, D and E columns and glare symptom score (0-10) obtained by questionnaires 12 months after surgery. Spherical equivalent errors were -0.38 +/- 0.27 D and -0.36 +/- 0.28 D for groups A and B, respectively. PCO occurred in 2 eyes in group A and 4 eyes in group B. CONCLUSIONS: EnVista MX60 IOL showed less glistening formation than AcrySof IQ IOL, however, there was no significant difference in terms of vision quality such as BCVA, FACT and glare symptom score at 12 months postoperatively.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Cataract*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Contrast Sensitivity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glare
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lenses, Intraocular*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Phacoemulsification
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Visual Acuity
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail