1.Predictive factors of surgical complications after pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies: a large single-institution experience
Lucia TORTORELLA ; Cintoni MARCO ; Matteo LOVERRO ; Conte CARMINE ; Eleonora PERSICHETTI ; Nicolò BIZZARRI ; Costantini BARBARA ; Santullo FRANCESCO ; Nazario FOSCHI ; Valerio GALLOTTA ; Giacomo AVESANI ; Vito CHIANTERA ; Alfredo ERCOLI ; Francesco FANFANI ; Anna FAGOTTI ; Maria Cristina MELE ; Stefano RESTAINO ; Salvatore Gueli ALLETTI ; Giovanni SCAMBIA ; Giuseppe VIZZIELLI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(1):e4-
Objective:
To evaluate pre-operative predictors of early (<30 days) severe complications (grade Dindo 3+) in patients with gynecological malignancy submitted to pelvic exenteration (PE).
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 129 patients submitted to surgery at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli between 2010 and 2019. We included patients affected by primary or recurrent/persistent cervical, endometrial, or vulvar/vaginal cancers. Post-operative complications were graded according to the Dindo classification. Logistic regression was used to analyze potential predictors of complications.
Results:
We performed 63 anterior PE, 10 posterior PE, and 56 total PE. The incidence of early severe post-operative complications was 27.9% (n=36), and the early mortality rate was 2.3% (n=3). More frequent complications were related to the urinary diversion and intestinal surgery. In univariable analysis, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL (odds ratio [OR]=4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.65–10.7; p=0.003), low albumin levels (OR=3.9; 95% CI=1.27–12.11; p=0.025), diabetes (OR=4.15; 95% CI=1.22–14.1; p=0.022), 2+ comorbidities at presentation (OR=5.18;95% CI=1.49–17.93; p=0.012) were predictors of early severe complications. In multivariable analysis, only low hemoglobin and comorbidities at presentation were independent predictors of complications.
Conclusion
Pelvic exenteration is an aggressive surgery characterized by a high rate of postoperative complications. Pre-operative assessment of comorbidities and patient health status are crucial to better select the right candidate for this type of surgery.
2.Predictive factors of surgical complications after pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies: a large single-institution experience
Lucia TORTORELLA ; Cintoni MARCO ; Matteo LOVERRO ; Conte CARMINE ; Eleonora PERSICHETTI ; Nicolò BIZZARRI ; Costantini BARBARA ; Santullo FRANCESCO ; Nazario FOSCHI ; Valerio GALLOTTA ; Giacomo AVESANI ; Vito CHIANTERA ; Alfredo ERCOLI ; Francesco FANFANI ; Anna FAGOTTI ; Maria Cristina MELE ; Stefano RESTAINO ; Salvatore Gueli ALLETTI ; Giovanni SCAMBIA ; Giuseppe VIZZIELLI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(1):e4-
Objective:
To evaluate pre-operative predictors of early (<30 days) severe complications (grade Dindo 3+) in patients with gynecological malignancy submitted to pelvic exenteration (PE).
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 129 patients submitted to surgery at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli between 2010 and 2019. We included patients affected by primary or recurrent/persistent cervical, endometrial, or vulvar/vaginal cancers. Post-operative complications were graded according to the Dindo classification. Logistic regression was used to analyze potential predictors of complications.
Results:
We performed 63 anterior PE, 10 posterior PE, and 56 total PE. The incidence of early severe post-operative complications was 27.9% (n=36), and the early mortality rate was 2.3% (n=3). More frequent complications were related to the urinary diversion and intestinal surgery. In univariable analysis, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL (odds ratio [OR]=4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.65–10.7; p=0.003), low albumin levels (OR=3.9; 95% CI=1.27–12.11; p=0.025), diabetes (OR=4.15; 95% CI=1.22–14.1; p=0.022), 2+ comorbidities at presentation (OR=5.18;95% CI=1.49–17.93; p=0.012) were predictors of early severe complications. In multivariable analysis, only low hemoglobin and comorbidities at presentation were independent predictors of complications.
Conclusion
Pelvic exenteration is an aggressive surgery characterized by a high rate of postoperative complications. Pre-operative assessment of comorbidities and patient health status are crucial to better select the right candidate for this type of surgery.
3.Predictive factors of surgical complications after pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies: a large single-institution experience
Lucia TORTORELLA ; Cintoni MARCO ; Matteo LOVERRO ; Conte CARMINE ; Eleonora PERSICHETTI ; Nicolò BIZZARRI ; Costantini BARBARA ; Santullo FRANCESCO ; Nazario FOSCHI ; Valerio GALLOTTA ; Giacomo AVESANI ; Vito CHIANTERA ; Alfredo ERCOLI ; Francesco FANFANI ; Anna FAGOTTI ; Maria Cristina MELE ; Stefano RESTAINO ; Salvatore Gueli ALLETTI ; Giovanni SCAMBIA ; Giuseppe VIZZIELLI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(1):e4-
Objective:
To evaluate pre-operative predictors of early (<30 days) severe complications (grade Dindo 3+) in patients with gynecological malignancy submitted to pelvic exenteration (PE).
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 129 patients submitted to surgery at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli between 2010 and 2019. We included patients affected by primary or recurrent/persistent cervical, endometrial, or vulvar/vaginal cancers. Post-operative complications were graded according to the Dindo classification. Logistic regression was used to analyze potential predictors of complications.
Results:
We performed 63 anterior PE, 10 posterior PE, and 56 total PE. The incidence of early severe post-operative complications was 27.9% (n=36), and the early mortality rate was 2.3% (n=3). More frequent complications were related to the urinary diversion and intestinal surgery. In univariable analysis, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL (odds ratio [OR]=4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.65–10.7; p=0.003), low albumin levels (OR=3.9; 95% CI=1.27–12.11; p=0.025), diabetes (OR=4.15; 95% CI=1.22–14.1; p=0.022), 2+ comorbidities at presentation (OR=5.18;95% CI=1.49–17.93; p=0.012) were predictors of early severe complications. In multivariable analysis, only low hemoglobin and comorbidities at presentation were independent predictors of complications.
Conclusion
Pelvic exenteration is an aggressive surgery characterized by a high rate of postoperative complications. Pre-operative assessment of comorbidities and patient health status are crucial to better select the right candidate for this type of surgery.
4.Monitoring Cognitive Functions During Deep Brain Stimulation Interventions by Real Time Neuropsychological Testing
Ilaria GUARRACINO ; Christian LETTIERI ; Massimo MONDANI ; Stanislao D’AURIA ; Giovanni SCIACCA ; Flavia LAVEZZI ; Miran SKRAP ; Serena D’AGOSTINI ; Gian Luigi GIGLI ; Mariarosaria VALENTE ; Barbara TOMASINO
Journal of Movement Disorders 2024;17(4):442-446
Objective:
We monitored cognition in 14 Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients during deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery when the electrode was positioned at the target subthalamic nucleus (STN) (i.e., the STN motor area).
Methods:
We present the DBS-real-time neuropsychological testing (DBS-RTNT) protocol and our preliminary experience with it; we also compared the intraoperative patient performance with the baseline data.
Results:
Compared with the baseline data, patients undergoing DBS-RTNT in the target area demonstrated a significantly decreased performance on some tasks belonging to the memory and executive function domains. Patients undergoing right hemisphere DBS-RTNT had significantly lower short-term memory and sequencing scores than did patients undergoing left hemisphere DBS-RTNT.
Conclusion
PD patient cognitive performance should be monitored during DBS surgery, as STN-DBS may induce changes. These preliminary data contribute to improving our understanding of the anatomo-functional topography of the STN during DBS surgery, which will enable the identification of the best site for producing positive motor effects without causing negative cognitive and/or emotional changes in individual patients in the future. In principle, medications (i.e., patients who underwent surgery in a levodopa-off state) could have influenced our results; therefore, future studies are needed to address the possible confounding effects of levodopa use.
5.Monitoring the activities of Italian colposcopy clinics before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Giovanni Delli CARPINI ; Paolo Giorgi ROSSI ; Luca GIANNELLA ; Jacopo Di GIUSEPPE ; Nicolò CLEMENTE ; Francesco SOPRACORDEVOLE ; Maggiorino BARBERO ; Giorgio BOGANI ; Rosa De VINCENZO ; Massimo ORIGONI ; Francesco CANTATORE ; Barbara GARDELLA ; Mattia DOMINONI ; Ermelinda MONTI ; Carlo Antonio LIVERANI ; Anna VISCARDI ; Alessio PAGAN ; Andrea AMADORI ; Chiara ALESSI ; Matteo ANDOLFATTO ; Paolo CATTANI ; Annalisa PIERALLI ; Guido STEVENAZZI ; Andrea CIAVATTINI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2023;34(1):e7-
Objective:
To evaluate the impact of healthcare reorganization during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic on Italian colposcopy clinic activities, focusing on cervical excision procedures, follow-ups for conservative management of low-grade lesions, and follow-ups post cervical excision.
Methods:
Retrospective study conducted in 14 Italian colposcopy clinics. The number and clinical characteristics of cervical excisions, follow-ups for conservative management of low-grade lesions, and follow-ups after cervical excision were compared between the period March 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020 (pre-pandemic) and March 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021 (pandemic) with a Poisson regression analysis.
Results:
In the pandemic period, the number of cervical excisions was reduced by 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]=−15.6% to −2%; p=0.011). Excisions were less frequently performed in the operating room (−35.1%; 95% CI=−47.6% to −22.6%; p<0.001), the number of patients from spontaneous screening was reduced by −14.0% (95% CI=−23.4% to −4.6%; p=0.003), and the CO2-laser technique was used less frequently (−30%; 95% CI=−45.1% to −15.0%; p<0.001). As compared to the pre-pandemic period, the number of follow-ups for conservative management of low-grade lesions was reduced by −26.7% (95% CI=−39.0% to −14.4%; p<0.001), and the follow-up appointments after cervical excision were reduced by −51.0% (95% CI=−58.1% to −43.9%; p<0.001).
Conclusion
The most significant impact of the healthcare reorganization during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was on follow-ups after cervical excision. The resumption of disrupted activities should follow a risk-based prioritization, starting from women in follow-up after cervical excision. It is advisable that the trend of performing cervical excision as an outpatient procedure is maintained in the post-pandemic period.
6.Characteristics and patterns of care of endometrial cancer before and during COVID-19 pandemic
Giorgio BOGANI ; Giovanni SCAMBIA ; Chiara CIMMINO ; Francesco FANFANI ; Barbara COSTANTINI ; Matteo LOVERRO ; Gabriella FERRANDINA ; Fabio LANDONI ; Luca BAZZURINI ; Tommaso GRASSI ; Domenico VITOBELLO ; Gabriele SIESTO ; Anna Myriam PERRONE ; Vanna ZANAGNOLO ; Pierandrea DE IACO ; Francesco MULTINU ; Fabio GHEZZI ; Jvan CASARIN ; Roberto BERRETTA ; Vito A CAPOZZI ; Errico ZUPI ; Gabriele CENTINI ; Antonio PELLEGRINO ; Silvia CORSO ; Guido STEVENAZZI ; Serena MONTOLI ; Anna Chiara BOSCHI ; Giuseppe COMERCI ; Pantaleo GRECO ; Ruby MARTINELLO ; Francesco SOPRACORDEVOLE ; Giorgio GIORDA ; Tommaso SIMONCINI ; Marta CARETTO ; Enrico SARTORI ; Federico FERRARI ; Antonio CIANCI ; Giuseppe SARPIETRO ; Maria Grazia MATARAZZO ; Fulvio ZULLO ; Giuseppe BIFULCO ; Michele MORELLI ; Annamaria FERRERO ; Nicoletta BIGLIA ; Fabio BARRA ; Simone FERRERO ; Umberto Leone Roberti MAGGIORE ; Stefano CIANCI ; Vito CHIANTERA ; Alfredo ERCOLI ; Giulio SOZZI ; Angela MARTOCCIA ; Sergio SCHETTINI ; Teresa ORLANDO ; Francesco G CANNONE ; Giuseppe ETTORE ; Andrea PUPPO ; Martina BORGHESE ; Canio MARTINELLI ; Ludovico MUZII ; Violante Di DONATO ; Lorenza DRIUL ; Stefano RESTAINO ; Alice BERGAMINI ; Giorgio CANDOTTI ; Luca BOCCIOLONE ; Francesco PLOTTI ; Roberto ANGIOLI ; Giulia MANTOVANI ; Marcello CECCARONI ; Chiara CASSANI ; Mattia DOMINONI ; Laura GIAMBANCO ; Silvia AMODEO ; Livio LEO ; Raphael THOMASSET ; Diego RAIMONDO ; Renato SERACCHIOLI ; Mario MALZONI ; Franco GORLERO ; Martina Di LUCA ; Enrico BUSATO ; Sami KILZIE ; Andrea DELL'ACQUA ; Giovanna SCARFONE ; Paolo VERCELLINI ; Marco PETRILLO ; Salvatore DESSOLE ; Giampiero CAPOBIANCO ; Andrea CIAVATTINI ; Giovanni Delli CARPINI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2022;33(1):e10-
Objective:
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has correlated with the disruption of screening activities and diagnostic assessments. Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies and it is often detected at an early stage, because it frequently produces symptoms. Here, we aim to investigate the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on patterns of presentation and treatment of EC patients.
Methods:
This is a retrospective study involving 54 centers in Italy. We evaluated patterns of presentation and treatment of EC patients before (period 1: March 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020) and during (period 2: April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021) the COVID-19 outbreak.
Results:
Medical records of 5,164 EC patients have been retrieved: 2,718 and 2,446 women treated in period 1 and period 2, respectively. Surgery was the mainstay of treatment in both periods (p=0.356). Nodal assessment was omitted in 689 (27.3%) and 484 (21.2%) patients treated in period 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). While, the prevalence of patients undergoing sentinel node mapping (with or without backup lymphadenectomy) has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (46.7% in period 1 vs. 52.8% in period 2; p<0.001). Overall, 1,280 (50.4%) and 1,021 (44.7%) patients had no adjuvant therapy in period 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). Adjuvant therapy use has increased during COVID-19 pandemic (p<0.001).
Conclusion
Our data suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the characteristics and patterns of care of EC patients. These findings highlight the need to implement healthcare services during the pandemic.
7.The Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology Recommendation for Breast Tumor Recurrence: Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Criteria
Marta BOTTERO ; Valentina BORZILLO ; Stefano PERGOLIZZI ; Barbara Alicja JERECZEK-FOSSA ; Edy IPPOLITO ; Giovanni Piero FREZZA ; Lucio FORTUNATO ; Renzo CORVÒ ; Giovanni Luigi PAPPAGALLO ; Stefano ARCANGELI ; Stefano M. MAGRINI ; Rolando M. D'ANGELILLO
Journal of Breast Cancer 2021;24(3):241-252
Salvage mastectomy is currently considered the standard of care for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and postoperative radiotherapy (RT). Alternative treatment options for these patients, such as a second BCS followed by repeated RT, have been suggested. The panel of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology developed clinical recommendations for second BCS followed by re-irradiation over mastectomy alone for women with IBTR using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology and the evidence to decision framework. The following outcomes were identified by the panel: locoregional control, metastasis-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival; acute and late toxicity, specific late toxicity, second locoregional tumor, and death related to treatment.An Embase and PubMed literature search was performed by two independent authors. Five retrospective observational studies were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis.According to the reports in the literature and our analysis, the advantages of second quadrantectomy and re-irradiation (re-QUART) outweigh its side effects, with overall good rates of survival and adequate toxicity without increasing costs. Given the very low level of evidence, the panel stated that a second BCS plus re-irradiation can be considered as an alternative to salvage mastectomy for selected patients with IBTR.
8.The Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology Recommendation for Breast Tumor Recurrence: Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Criteria
Marta BOTTERO ; Valentina BORZILLO ; Stefano PERGOLIZZI ; Barbara Alicja JERECZEK-FOSSA ; Edy IPPOLITO ; Giovanni Piero FREZZA ; Lucio FORTUNATO ; Renzo CORVÒ ; Giovanni Luigi PAPPAGALLO ; Stefano ARCANGELI ; Stefano M. MAGRINI ; Rolando M. D'ANGELILLO
Journal of Breast Cancer 2021;24(3):241-252
Salvage mastectomy is currently considered the standard of care for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and postoperative radiotherapy (RT). Alternative treatment options for these patients, such as a second BCS followed by repeated RT, have been suggested. The panel of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology developed clinical recommendations for second BCS followed by re-irradiation over mastectomy alone for women with IBTR using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology and the evidence to decision framework. The following outcomes were identified by the panel: locoregional control, metastasis-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival; acute and late toxicity, specific late toxicity, second locoregional tumor, and death related to treatment.An Embase and PubMed literature search was performed by two independent authors. Five retrospective observational studies were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis.According to the reports in the literature and our analysis, the advantages of second quadrantectomy and re-irradiation (re-QUART) outweigh its side effects, with overall good rates of survival and adequate toxicity without increasing costs. Given the very low level of evidence, the panel stated that a second BCS plus re-irradiation can be considered as an alternative to salvage mastectomy for selected patients with IBTR.
9.Laboratory Monitoring of Biological Therapies in Rheumatology: The Role of Immunogenicity
Maurizio BENUCCI ; Valentina GROSSI ; Mariangela MANFREDI ; Arianna DAMIANI ; Maria INFANTINO ; Paolo MOSCATO ; Luigi CINQUANTA ; Elisa GREMESE ; Barbara TOLUSSO ; Luca PETRICCA ; Anna Laura FEDELE ; Stefano ALIVERNINI ; Fabiola ATZENI ; Giovanni MINISOLA ; Roberto VERNA
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2020;40(2):101-113
Biological drugs, such as proteins and immunogens, are increasingly used to treat various diseases, including tumors and autoimmune diseases, and biological molecules have almost completely replaced synthetic drugs in rheumatology. Although biological treatments such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs seem to be quite safe, they cause some undesirable effects, such as the onset of infections due to weakening of the immune system. Given the biological nature of these drugs, they might be recognized as extraneous; this would induce an immune reaction that neutralizes their effectiveness or lead to more serious consequences. Laboratories play a pivotal role in appropriate therapeutic management. The aim of this review was to underline the production of anti-drug antibodies during treatment with biological drugs and highlight the role of laboratories in ensuring appropriate use of these drugs.
10.Megakaryoblasts in a newborn with Down syndrome.
Sabrina BUORO ; Michela SEGHEZZI ; Gianmaria BORLERI ; Barbara MANENTI
Blood Research 2018;53(2):102-102
No abstract available.
Down Syndrome*
;
Humans
;
Infant, Newborn*
;
Megakaryocyte Progenitor Cells*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail