Since its first description in 2013, robust evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has been on the rise. A large case series and meta-analysis report supported results up to 24 months, while some other studies already described 5-year data. If associated with pharmacotherapy, the ESG may help one to achieve weight loss similar to that of surgical sleeve gastrectomy. Though the results of the ongoing randomized trials on ESG are awaited, currently available data support the clinical use of the ESG, especially for patients who are refusing or unfit for bariatric surgery.
Gastrectomy ; Gastroplasty/methods* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Obesity, Morbid ; Treatment Outcome

Obesity is a complex metabolic disease. Currently, obesity treatment includes lifestyle modification, obesity drug treatment, and bariatric surgery. Lifestyle modification is an essential part of obesity treatment, but it is limited by itself. And anti-obesity treatment drugs also showed limited weight loss effect, about 3-9% per year, and can cause serious side effects such as cardiovascular side events. Surgical treatment requires high cost, permanent resection of the gastrointestinal tract and can cause complication related to surgery. Recently, several promising endoscopic bariatric therapies are emerging. Endoluminal bariatric treatment using flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy could offer a minimally invasive treatment aimed at achieving an effect comparable to obesity surgery, while offering advantages of low cost and safety. In this paper, we described a new technological method, recent clinical data, and the latest findings on obstacles to be overcome for endoscopic gastroplasty using endoscopic suture instruments. Endoscopic gastroplasty presented reduced gastric volume, effective weight loss and maintenance effect without severe adverse events. It could suggest an attractive treatment option for obesity.
Bariatric Surgery ; Bariatrics ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; Gastroplasty* ; Life Style ; Metabolic Diseases ; Methods ; Obesity* ; Sutures ; Weight Loss

Along with the soaring prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) globally, metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has been rapidly developing into a major surgical subspecialty. However, the indications, benefits and potential risks of MBS are still controversial so far. In September 2015, the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit (DSS-II() was successfully convened, and later on an international joint statement on metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for T2DM was released based upon the consensus reached in DSS-II(, aiming to serve as a new global clinical guideline. The DSS-II( joint statement was initiated and endorsed by 5 leading international diabetes organizations, including American Diabetes Association (ADA), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS), Diabetes India, as well as Diabetes UK, and was developed by an expert committee comprised of 48 international authorities as voting delegates. Up to the date of publication, the DSS-II( statement has been officially endorsed by 45 international professional associations/societies, including 30 non-surgical and 15 surgical organizations. In this statement, the following six aspects were recommended to differentiate MBS from traditional bariatric surgery: 1)The primary goal of MBS is to treat T2DM and to reduce the risk of T2DM complications; 2) In addition to a 50% or more of excess weight loss and normalization of glycemia, outcomes of diabetes complications should also be considered as clinical endpoints of MBS; 3) For patient selection, body mass index (BMI), T2DM treatment, as well as long-term risks versus benefits, including its effects on cardiovascular events (CVD), should all be considered; 4) T2DM and its complications, as well as pancreatic function reserve should be assessed pre-operatively; 5) Major surgical options include laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), and bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch(BPD-DS). BPD-DS has the best outcome in T2DM remission followed by LRYGB, LSG and LAGB; 6) Glycemic variation should be intensively monitored, and if needed, managed following surgery. Clinical follow-up should be conducted at least once every six months within two years after surgery. For patients achieving complete remission from T2DM, diabetes complications should still be monitored within five years after surgery with the same frequency and protocols as pre-operatively.
Aftercare ; standards ; Bariatric Surgery ; methods ; standards ; Biliopancreatic Diversion ; Blood Glucose ; physiology ; Body Mass Index ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; surgery ; Disease Management ; Gastrectomy ; Gastric Bypass ; Gastroplasty ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia ; surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Obesity ; surgery ; Patient Care Planning ; standards ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; standards ; Remission Induction ; methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss

Bariatric and metabolic surgery has become the clinical hot topic of the treatment of metabolic syndromes including obesity and diabetes mellitus, but how to choose the appropriate surgical procedure remains the difficult problem in clinical practice. Clinical guidelines of American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery(ASMBS)(version 2013) introduced the procedures of bariatric and metabolic surgery mainly including biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch(BPD-DS), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG). To choose the appropriate bariatric and metabolic procedure, the surgeons should firstly understand the indications and the contraindications of each procedure. Procedure choice should also consider personal condition (body mass index, comorbidities and severity of diabetes), family and socioeconomic status (postoperative follow-up attendance, understanding of potential surgical risk of gastrectomy and patient's will), family and disease history (patients with high risk of gastric cancer should avoid LRYGB; patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease should avoid LSG) and associated personal factors of surgeons. With the practice of bariatric and metabolic surgery, the defects, especially long-term complications, of different procedures were found. For example, LRYGB resulted in higher incidence of postoperative anemia and marginal ulcer, high risk of gastric cancer as well as the requirement of vitamin supplementation and regular follow-up. Though LSG has lower surgical risk, its efficacy of diabetes mellitus remission and long-term weight loss are inferior to the LRYGB. These results pose challenges to the surgeons to balance the benefits and risks of the bariatric procedures. A lot of factors can affect the choice of bariatric and metabolic procedure. Surgeons should choose the procedure according to patient's condition with the consideration of the choice of patients. The bariatric and metabolic surgery not only manages the diabetes mellitus and weight loss, but also results in the reconstruction of gastrointestinal tract and side effect. Postoperative surgical complications and nutritional deficiency should also be considered. Thereby, individualized bariatric procedure with the full consideration of each related factors is the ultimate objective of bariatric and metabolic surgery.
Anemia ; epidemiology ; Bariatric Surgery ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Biliopancreatic Diversion ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Body Mass Index ; Comorbidity ; Contraindications ; Diabetes Mellitus ; surgery ; Disease Management ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastric Bypass ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Gastroplasty ; methods ; mortality ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Long Term Adverse Effects ; epidemiology ; Malnutrition ; epidemiology ; Obesity ; surgery ; Patient Acuity ; Patient Care Planning ; Patient Compliance ; Postgastrectomy Syndromes ; epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Risk Assessment ; methods ; Risk Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss

The emerging endoscopic technologies are proved to be effective treatments for obesity in selected patients and to offer the potential advantages of reduced invasiveness, reversibility and repeatability. From the view of operation principle, endoscopic technologies can be classified as restrictive procedure, malabsorption procedure and endoscopic revision of gastric bypass. Restrictive procedures include intragastric balloon, aspiration therapy, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) and transoral gastroplasty. Intragastric balloon employs space occupying, volume restriction and satiety mechanisms, which is superior to drugs and lifestyle change, but shorter than sleeve and bypass surgery. Aspiration therapy is similar to standard percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, while there are no available data regarding the obesity and metabolic improvement. Compared with traditional bariatric surgery, ESG does not excise gastric tissue with less complications and without weight regain, but it can not be used as an independent operation still now. Transoral gastroplasty is rarely applied clinically whose efficacy and long-term complications need further studies. Malabsorption surgery includes endoscopic duodenojejunal bypass sleeve (EDJBS) and endoscopic gastroduodenojejunal bypass sleeve(EGDJBS). EDJBS may have the similar mechanism like bypass reducing the blood glucose. Even with obvious effect of weight loss, EDJBS has high morbidity of complications and requirements of the skilled operators. EGDJBS, which imitates bypass anatomy changes and belongs to the mixed operation, should be superior to the above procedures in reducing weight theoretically, but due to the lack of clinical data, its short-term and long-term efficacy still need further clinical observation. As compared to the complexity and risks associated with telescopic surgical revision, endoscopic suturing has been confirmed as less invasive and safer for stomal revisions, while its long-term efficacy of reducing weight and improvement of diabetes are not yet clear. Even if long-term efficacy of reducing weight and morbidity of complication in endoscopic bariatric surgery are still indefinite, and clinical trial researches of large sample and long-term follow-up are absent, with the development of endoscopic skill and the gradual clinical application, endoscopic bariatric surgery will provide a new option for the patients of obesity and metabolic diseases.
Bariatric Surgery ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Disease Management ; Endoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastric Balloon ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastric Bypass ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastroplasty ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Metabolic Diseases ; surgery ; Obesity ; surgery ; Reoperation ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Surgical Stomas ; pathology ; statistics & numerical data ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes [food tolerance scores (FTS) and quality of life] after three types of restrictive bariatric surgery: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP), and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2013, all patients that underwent primary surgery were included in one of the LAGB, LGCP, or LSG groups. These three groups were then compared with respect to FTS, gastrointestinal quality of life indices (GIQLI), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Questionnaires were sent to all patients both pre- and post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients (LAGB=45, LGCP=22, and LSG=18) returned the questionnaires in full, and these patients constituted the study cohort. The cohort was predominately female (n=73, 85.9%). Mean percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) values after LAGB, LGCP, and LSG were 65.4+/-27.0%, 65.6+/-25.2%, and 82.7+/-21.7%, respectively (p=0.044). Mean postoperative FTSs and improvements in total GIQLIs after LAGB, LGCP, and LSG were 15.96, 20.95, and 21.33 and -3.40, 6.68, and 18.78, respectively (p<0.05). All procedures produced improvements in the three SF-36 domain scores. Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences between the three procedures in terms of improvements in general health and emotional well-being. CONCLUSION: LGCP is safe and effective at achieving significant weight loss. In terms of food tolerance and GI quality of life, LGCP was found to be comparable to gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy.
Adult ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Gastrectomy/*methods ; Gastroplasty/adverse effects/*methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/*methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity, Morbid/psychology/*surgery ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Period ; *Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss ; Young Adult

Esophageal perforation after endoscopic forceful pneumatic dilatation for achalasia is a devastating complication and surgical treatment is necessary. A 65-yr-old man and a 54-yr-old woman referred for esophageal perforation two hours after pneumatic dilatation and during the procedure, respectively. Gastroplasties through thoracotomy were performed in both cases and their recoveries were uneventful. The esophagogram with gastrografin on the post-operative 8th day did not show any passage disturbance or leakage at the anastomosis site. On the follow-up endoscopy 4 to 6 months after operation revealed that reflux esophagitis of LA classification A were noted in the both patients. They did not complain any reflux symptom or dysphagia for 9 to 13 months after operation. Instead of the most widely used procedure; primary repair of perforation site, wrapping with intercostal muscle flap and esophagomyotomy, gastroplasty was performed in two cases of iatrogenic esophageal perforation in achalasia and experienced good results.
Aged ; Deglutition Disorders/complications ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/*adverse effects ; Esophageal Achalasia/*surgery ; Esophageal Perforation/*surgery ; Esophagus/*surgery ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications ; Gastroplasty/*methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Thoracotomy

PURPOSE: Pouch dilatation and band slippage are the most common long-term complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The aim of the study is to present our experience of diagnosis and management of these complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pars flaccida technique with anterior fixation of the fundus was routinely used. All band adjustments were performed under fluoroscopy. We analyzed the incidence, clinico-radiologic features, management, and revisional surgeries for treatment of these complications. We further presented the outcome of gastric plication techniques as a measure for prevention of these complications. RESULTS: From March 2009 to March 2012, we performed LAGB on 126 morbidly obese patients. Among them, 14 patients (11.1%) were diagnosed as having these complications. Four patients (3.2%) had concentric pouch dilatations, which were corrected by band adjustment. Ten (7.9%) had eccentric pouch with band slippage. Among the ten patients, there were three cases of posterior slippage, which were corrected by reoperation, and seven cases of eccentric pouch dilatation with anterior slippage. Three were early anterior slippage, which was managed conservatively. Two were acute anterior slippage, one of whom underwent a revision. There were two cases of chronic anterior slippage, one of whom underwent a revision. The 27 patients who underwent gastric plication did not present with eccentric pouch with band slippage during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The incidence of pouch dilatation with/without band slippage was 11.1%. Management should be individualized according to clinico-radiologic patterns. Gastric plication below the band might prevent these complications.
Adult ; Female ; Gastroplasty/adverse effects/*methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity, Morbid/*surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo assess the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) approach in the treatment of morbid obesity and its complications.

METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 16 patients who underwent LAGB and MDT approach in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 2009 to February 2011.

RESULTSOf these 16 patients, 15 patients completed the 3 month follow up; their body weight and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly after treatment (both P=0.000), with an percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) of (25.7±7.4)%. Thirteen patients completed 6 month follow up; their body weight and BMI were significantly lower than the preoperative levels (both P=0.001), while there were no significant difference between the third and sixth month measurements (P=0.103 and P=0.053, respectively); %EWL of 6 months after operation was significantly higher than that of 3 months after operation [(37.0±14.7)% vs. (29.1±6.8)%,P=0.042]. Six patients completed 12 month follow up; their body weight and BMI decreased significantly at the first 3 months after operation (P=0.007 and P=0.005,respectively) and at the second 6 postoperative months (P=0.007 and P=0.013,respectively); the BMI of 6 months after operation was significantly lower than that of 3 months after operation (P=0.045), but there was no significant difference of body weight between the third and sixth month after operation (P=0.065); meanwhile, the %EWL increased significantly within the second 3 postoperative months from (29.6±6.8é% to(42.4±14.0é%(P=0.028), and also within the second 6 postoperative months (60.4±12.6é%(P=0.001). In 9 patients with pre-operative obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome, the symptom was remarkably resolved in all these 9 patients 3 months after the treatment. Of 16 patients with preoperative metabolic syndrome, the condition was obviously improved after treatment in 10 patients. Of 9 patients with hypertension preoperatively, the blood pressure returned to normal level after the withdrawal of antihypertensive agents in 7 patients; in addition, one patient had his dose decreased and one patient switched to a milder antihypertensive agent. Of 8 patients accompanied with type 2 diabetes, 7 had their antidiabetic drugs withdrawn after the blood sugar returned normal and one patient had his dose decreased.

CONCLUSIONLAGB combined with MDT approach is effective, safe, and feasible for treating morbid obesity and its complications.

Adult ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroplasty ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity, Morbid ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

Bariatric surgery is an effective way to achieve long-term weight reduction in severely obese patients. This article illuminates the indications, procedures, complications, and results of bariatric surgery for severe obesity.
Bariatric Surgery ; methods ; Gastric Bypass ; methods ; Gastroplasty ; methods ; Humans ; Obesity, Morbid ; surgery