BackgroundThe diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel diseases is clinically difficult. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic value of double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diseases.

MethodsThe history and outcomes of 2806 patients who underwent double-balloon enteroscopy from July 2004 to April 2017 were reviewed, which included 562 patients with obscure digestive tract bleeding, 457 patients with obscure diarrhea, 930 patients with obscure abdominal pain, 795 patients with obscure weight loss, and 62 patients with obscure intestinal obstruction. Examinations were performed through the mouth and/or anus according to the clinical symptoms and abdominal images. If a lesion was not detected through one direction, examination through the other direction was performed as necessary. Eighty-four patients with small-bowel polyps, 26 with intestinal obstruction caused by enterolith, and 18 with bleeding from Dieulafoy's lesions in the small intestine were treated endoscopically.

ResultsA total of 2806 patients underwent double-balloon enteroscopy, and no serious complications occurred. An endoscopic approach through both the mouth and anus was used in 212 patients. Lesions were detected in 1696 patients, with a detection rate of 60.4%; the rates for obscure digestive tract bleeding, diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss, and intestinal obstruction were 85.9% (483/562), 73.5% (336/457), 48.2% (448/930), 49.1% (390/795), and 62.9% (39/62), respectively. For patients with small-bowel polyps who underwent endoscopic therapy, no complications such as digestive tract bleeding and perforation occurred. Intestinal obstruction with enteroliths was relieved with endoscopic lithotripsy. Among the 18 patients with bleeding from small-bowel Dieulafoy's lesions, 14 patients were controlled with endoscopic hemostasis.

ConclusionDouble-balloon enteroscopy is useful for diagnosing and treating some small-bowel disease.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Double-Balloon Enteroscopy ; methods ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Humans ; Intestinal Diseases ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Intestinal Obstruction ; Intestine, Small ; diagnostic imaging ; Leiomyosarcoma ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Lymphoma ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Polyps ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Young Adult

Intramural esophageal dissection is a rare but clinically important condition in the field of gastroenterology. Classically, intramural esophageal dissection rarely occurs in patients who are anticoagulated or have poor medical condition, and its clinical presentation may include chest pain, dysphagia and hematemesis. Herein, we present a case of intramural esophageal dissection in an alcoholic hepatitis patient that was diagnosed by endoscopy and successfully treated with conservative management.
Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis ; Enteral Nutrition ; Esophageal Diseases/*diagnosis/surgery ; Esophagoscopy ; Hepatitis, Alcoholic/*pathology ; Humans ; Intubation, Gastrointestinal ; Male ; Middle Aged

No abstract available.
Adult ; Antineoplastic Agents/*adverse effects ; Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use ; Biopsy ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/*drug therapy/pathology/surgery ; Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate/*adverse effects ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/*chemically induced/diagnosis ; Mycobacterium tuberculosis/*isolation & purification ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/*adverse effects ; Rectal Neoplasms/*drug therapy/pathology/surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis/drug therapy/*microbiology

Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has evolved tremendously from the early days when candlelight was used to illuminate scopes to the extent that it has now become an integral part of the practice of modern gastroenterology. The first gastroscope was a rigid scope first introduced by Adolf Kussmaul in 1868. However this scope suffered from the 2 drawbacks of poor illumination and high risk of instrumental perforation. Rudolf Schindler improved on this by inventing the semiflexible gastroscope in 1932. But it was Basil Hirschowitz, using the principle of light conduction in fibreoptics, who allowed us to "see well" for the first time when he invented the flexible gastroscopy in 1958. With amazing speed and innovation, instrument companies, chiefly Japanese, had improved on the Hirschowitz gastroscope and invented a flexible colonoscope. Walter McCune introduced the technique of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 1968 which has now evolved into a sophisticated procedure. The advent of the digital age in the 1980s saw the invention of the videoendoscope. Videoendoscopes have allowed us to start seeing the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) "better" with high magnification and resolution and optical/digital enhancements. Fusing confocal and light microscopy with endoscopy has allowed us to perform an "optical biopsy" of the GI mucosa. Development of endoscopic ultrasonography has allowed us to see "beyond" the GIT lumen. Seeing better has allowed us to do better. Endoscopists have ventured into newer procedures such as the resection of mucosal and submucosal tumours and the field of therapeutic GI endoscopy sees no end in sight.
Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Equipment Design ; Gastrointestinal Diseases ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Humans ; Video Recording

BACKGROUND/AIMS: With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities. METHODS: Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases.
Abdominal Pain/etiology ; Aged ; Bezoars/diagnosis/*surgery ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis/*surgery ; Humans ; Lithotripsy/methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

The Dieulafoy lesion is a rare cause of severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Although it may occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract, the lesion is most commonly located in the stomach, and the small bowel is an extremely uncommon site. Since Dieulafoy lesion in the small bowel is difficult to access by endoscopy, it seems impossible to diagnose and treat by initial endoscopy unlike the lesions in stomach. We experienced a case of Dieulafoy lesion of jejunum with massive hemorrhage in 54-year-old male. Active jejunal bleeding was shown by computed tomography scan and mesenteric angiography. Partial resection of the jejunum was performed. Final pathologic finding revealed Dieulafoy lesion of the jejunum.
Angiography ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/complications/*diagnosis ; Humans ; Jejunal Diseases/complications/*diagnosis/surgery ; Male ; Mesenteric Arteries/radiography ; Middle Aged ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopic polypectomy is a valuable procedure for preventing colorectal cancer, but is not without complications. Delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy is a rare, but serious complication. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors of delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in a single university hospital. Forty cases and 120 controls were included. Data collected included comorbidity, use of antiplatelet agents, size and number of resected polyps, histology and gross morphology of resected polyps, endoscopist's experience, resection method, use of sedation, and use of prophylactic hemostasis. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, size, histology and number of resected polyps, endoscopist's experience, resection method and use of prophylactic hemostasis were significant risk factors for delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy. In multivariate analysis, risk of delayed bleeding increased by 11.6% for every 1 mm increase in resected polyp diameter (OR, 1.116; 95% CI 1.041-1.198; p=0.002). Number of resected polyps (OR, 1.364; 95% CI, 1.113-1.671; p=0.003) and endoscopist's experience (OR, 6.301; 95% CI, 2.022-19.637; p=0.002) were significant risk factors for delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Size and numbers of resected polyps, and endoscopist's experience were independent risk factors for delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy. More caution would be necessary when removing polyps with these factors.
Adult ; Aged ; Case-Control Studies ; Colonic Diseases/*diagnosis/pathology ; Colonic Polyps/*surgery ; Colonoscopy/adverse effects ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors

No abstract available.
Colonic Diseases/*diagnosis ; Colonic Polyps/*surgery ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*etiology ; Humans ; Male

OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical features, diagnosis methods, therapeutic principles of intestinal Behcet's disease.

METHODSking Union Medical College Hospital from August 1998 to April 2010 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTSThe clinical courses of patients with intestinal Behcet's disease were from 26 days to 33 years, and the average duration was 6.32 +/- 1.01 years. The appearance of extra-gastrointestinal symptoms was significantly earlier than that of gastrointestinal symptoms (7.35 +/- 1.39 years vs. 3.24 +/- 0.82 years, P<0.05). The predominant gastrointestinal manifestations were right lower quadrant pain (95.56%) and hematochezia or melena (40.00%). Misdiagnosis occurred in 17 cases. In patients without systemic medicine therapy before surgery, the incidence of postoperative infection of incision site and abdominal cavity was significantly higher than that in those undergoing systemic medicine therapy (80.00% vs. 0%, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSBecause of the diversity of gastrointestinal manifestations, intestinal Behcet's disease is easily misdiagnosed. The systemic medical therapy before surgery could decrease the incidence of infection of incision and abdominal cavity.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Behcet Syndrome ; diagnosis ; pathology ; surgery ; Child ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases ; diagnosis ; pathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Intestinal Diseases ; diagnosis ; pathology ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Young Adult

No abstract available.
Acute Disease ; Appendectomy ; *Appendix ; Cecal Diseases/*diagnosis/surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*diagnosis/surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged