1.The Effect of Low-Dose Nitroglycerin Ointment on Skin Flap Necrosis in Breast Reconstruction after Skin-Sparing or Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Min Ho YUN ; Eul Sik YOON ; Byung Il LEE ; Seung Ha PARK
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2017;44(6):509-515
BACKGROUND: Skin flap necrosis is a common complication after mastectomy and breast reconstruction. It has been proven that nitroglycerin ointment, as a topical vasodilator, can decrease the rate of skin flap necrosis after mastectomy and breast reconstruction. However, nitroglycerin can cause several side effects, including headache, dizziness, and hypotension. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the application of a low dose of nitroglycerin ointment reduced the rate of skin flap necrosis in breast reconstruction after skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy. METHODS: A total of 73 cases of breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy at our institution from March 2012 to January 2017 were retrospectively studied. Of these patients, 52 received nitroglycerin ointment (4.5 mg) application to the skin around the nipple-areolar complex from August 2015 to January 2017, while 21 received fusidic acid ointment from March 2012 to August 2015. The number of patients who experienced necrosis of the breast skin flap was counted in both groups. RESULTS: Skin flap necrosis developed in 2 (3.8%) patients who were treated with nitroglycerin ointment and 5 (23.8%) patients who did not receive nitroglycerin ointment treatment. Patients who did not receive nitroglycerin ointment treatment had a significantly higher risk of mastectomy skin flap necrosis than patients who did (odds ratio=7.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 44.23; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose nitroglycerin ointment administration significantly decreased the rate of skin flap necrosis in patients who underwent breast reconstruction after skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy, without increasing the incidence of the side effects of nitroglycerin.
Breast*
;
Dizziness
;
Female
;
Fusidic Acid
;
Headache
;
Humans
;
Hypotension
;
Incidence
;
Mammaplasty*
;
Mastectomy*
;
Necrosis*
;
Nitroglycerin*
;
Ointments
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Skin*
2.Emergence of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Positive ST80 Clone of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Busan, Korea.
Journal of Bacteriology and Virology 2016;46(4):269-274
Community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has become widespread in the community and healthcare settings, and a number of clonal lineages emerged on every country. Sequence type (ST) 80 clone of CA-MRSA was dominant in Europe and has increasingly been isolated from the Middle East but so far never found in Korea. In this study, 48 MRSA isolates recovered from ear infections were characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, staphylocoagulase (SC) genotyping, staphylococcal protein A gene (spa) typing, accessory gene regulator (agr) typing, and virulence gene profiling. Most MRSA strains belonged to three major clones: ST5-SCCmec II-SC type II (n=19, 39.6%), ST239-SCCmec III-SC type IV (n=15, 31.2%), and ST72-SCCmec IV-SC type Vb (n=11, 22.9%). Among the isolates, one strain was Panton- Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-positive ST80-SCCmec IV-SC type XIa - spa type t044-agr group III, and exfoliative toxin D-positive. This strain was susceptible to most antibiotics, but resistant to tetracycline and fusidic acid. This is the first report on the emergence of European ST80 CA-MRSA clone in Korea.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
Busan*
;
Clone Cells*
;
Coagulase
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Ear
;
Europe
;
Fusidic Acid
;
Korea*
;
Leukocidins
;
Methicillin Resistance*
;
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus*
;
Middle East
;
Multilocus Sequence Typing
;
Staphylococcal Protein A
;
Staphylococcus aureus
;
Tetracycline
;
Virulence
3.Change in Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Skin-Colonizing Staphylococcus aureus in Korean Patients with Atopic Dermatitis during Ten-Year Period.
Jung Min PARK ; Ju Hyun JO ; Hyunju JIN ; Hyun Chang KO ; Moon Bum KIM ; Jung Min KIM ; Do Won KIM ; Ho Sun JANG ; Byung Soo KIM
Annals of Dermatology 2016;28(4):470-478
BACKGROUND: A small subset of adolescents atopic dermatitis (AD) tends to persist. This also leads to get more antibiotics exposure with advancing years. Antibiotic resistance has been regarded as a serious problem during Staphylococcus aureus treatment, especially methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). OBJECTIVE: It was investigated the S. aureus colonization frequency in the skin lesions and anterior nares of adolescent AD patients and evaluated the changes in S. aureus antimicrobial susceptibility for years. METHODS: Patients who visited our clinic from September 2003 to August 2005 were classified into group A, and patients who visited from August 2010 to March 2012 were classified into group B. To investigate the differences with regard to patients' age and disease duration, the patients were subdivided into groups according to age. Lesional and nasal specimens were examined. RESULTS: Among the 295 AD patients, the total S. aureus colonization rate in skin lesions was 66.9% (95/142) for group A and 78.4% (120/153) for group B. No significant changes in the systemic antimicrobial susceptibilities of S. aureus strains isolated from adolescent AD patients were observed during about 10-year period. The increased trend of MRSA isolation in recent adolescent AD outpatients suggest that the community including school could be the source of S. aureus antibiotic resistance and higher fusidic acid resistance rates provides evidence of imprudent topical use. CONCLUSION: Relatively high MRSA isolation and fusidic acid resistance rates in recent AD patients suggest that the community harbors antibiotic-resistant S. aureus.
Adolescent
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
Colon
;
Dermatitis, Atopic*
;
Drug Resistance, Microbial
;
Fusidic Acid
;
Humans
;
Methicillin Resistance
;
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
;
Outpatients
;
Skin
;
Staphylococcus aureus*
;
Staphylococcus*
4.Antibiotic Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus in Atopic Dermatitis: Current Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Korea and Treatment Strategies.
Mi Young JUNG ; Jong Youn CHUNG ; Hae Young LEE ; Jiho PARK ; Dong Youn LEE ; Jun Mo YANG
Annals of Dermatology 2015;27(4):398-403
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is a well-known microbe that colonizes or infects the skin in atopic dermatitis (AD). The prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in AD has recently been increasing. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in AD skin lesions and evaluate the prevalence of MRSA in Korea. We also recommend proper first-line topical antibiotics for Korean patients with AD. METHODS: We studied S. aureus-positive skin swabs (n=583) from the lesional skin of infants, children, and adults who presented to our outpatient clinic with AD from July 2009 to April 2012. RESULTS: S. aureus exhibited high susceptibility against most antimicrobial agents. However, it exhibited less susceptibility to benzylpenicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and fusidic acid. The prevalence of MRSA was 12.9% among 583 S. aureus isolates, and the susceptibility to oxacillin was significantly lower in infants in both acute and chronic AD lesions. CONCLUSION: S. aureus from AD has a high prevalence of MRSA and multidrug resistance, especially in infants. In addition, the rate of fusidic acid resistance is high among all age groups, and mupirocin resistance increases with age group regardless of lesional status. This is the first study comparing the antimicrobial susceptibility rates of S. aureus isolates from AD cases with respect to age and lesion status in Korea.
Adult
;
Ambulatory Care Facilities
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
Anti-Infective Agents
;
Child
;
Clindamycin
;
Colon
;
Dermatitis, Atopic*
;
Drug Resistance, Multiple
;
Erythromycin
;
Fusidic Acid
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Korea*
;
Methicillin Resistance*
;
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus*
;
Mupirocin
;
Oxacillin
;
Penicillin G
;
Prevalence*
;
Skin
;
Staphylococcus aureus*
;
Staphylococcus*
5.In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of Fusidic Acid and Retapamulin against Mupirocin- and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Sang Hyun PARK ; Jin Kyung KIM ; Kun PARK
Annals of Dermatology 2015;27(5):551-556
BACKGROUND: The in vitro activities of retapamulin and fusidic acid against clinical isolates of mupirocin-resistant and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Korea are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the activities of retapamulin and fusidic acid against clinical isolates of mupirocin-resistant MRSA. METHODS: Clinical isolates of mupirocin-resistant MRSA were collected from two tertiary hospitals. The minimal inhibitory concentrations of mupirocin, fusidic acid, and retapamulin were determined using agar dilution method. Polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm the identity of the species and the presence of resistance genes. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of chromosomal DNA were used to determine the genetic similarity of high-level mupirocin-resistant isolates. RESULTS: Of the 497 MRSA isolates tested, 22 (4.4%) were mupirocin-resistant. Of these, 9 (1.8%) and 13 (2.6%) had high-level and low-level mupirocin resistance, respectively. Analysis of the PFGE patterns of the high-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA isolates identified five clusters. All 13 of the low-level mupirocin-resistant isolates were resistant to fusidic acid but susceptible to retapamulin. However, among the 9 high-level mupirocin-resistant isolates, 56% were resistant to fusidic acid, and all were susceptible to retapamulin. CONCLUSION: Retapamulin is highly active in vitro against Korean clinical isolates of high-level mupirocinand methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with different genetic backgrounds. Fusidic acid is more active against high-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA than low-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA.
Agar
;
DNA
;
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field
;
Furosemide*
;
Fusidic Acid*
;
Korea
;
Methicillin Resistance*
;
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus*
;
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
;
Mupirocin
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Tertiary Care Centers
6.In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of Fusidic Acid and Retapamulin against Mupirocin- and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Sang Hyun PARK ; Jin Kyung KIM ; Kun PARK
Annals of Dermatology 2015;27(5):551-556
BACKGROUND: The in vitro activities of retapamulin and fusidic acid against clinical isolates of mupirocin-resistant and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Korea are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the activities of retapamulin and fusidic acid against clinical isolates of mupirocin-resistant MRSA. METHODS: Clinical isolates of mupirocin-resistant MRSA were collected from two tertiary hospitals. The minimal inhibitory concentrations of mupirocin, fusidic acid, and retapamulin were determined using agar dilution method. Polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm the identity of the species and the presence of resistance genes. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of chromosomal DNA were used to determine the genetic similarity of high-level mupirocin-resistant isolates. RESULTS: Of the 497 MRSA isolates tested, 22 (4.4%) were mupirocin-resistant. Of these, 9 (1.8%) and 13 (2.6%) had high-level and low-level mupirocin resistance, respectively. Analysis of the PFGE patterns of the high-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA isolates identified five clusters. All 13 of the low-level mupirocin-resistant isolates were resistant to fusidic acid but susceptible to retapamulin. However, among the 9 high-level mupirocin-resistant isolates, 56% were resistant to fusidic acid, and all were susceptible to retapamulin. CONCLUSION: Retapamulin is highly active in vitro against Korean clinical isolates of high-level mupirocinand methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with different genetic backgrounds. Fusidic acid is more active against high-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA than low-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA.
Agar
;
DNA
;
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field
;
Furosemide*
;
Fusidic Acid*
;
Korea
;
Methicillin Resistance*
;
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus*
;
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
;
Mupirocin
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Tertiary Care Centers
7.Retrospective Clinical Trial of Fusidic Acid versus Petrolatum in the Postprocedure Care of Clean Dermatologic Procedures.
Dong Hun LEE ; Dong Young KIM ; So Young YOON ; Hyun Sun PARK ; Hyun Sun YOON ; Soyun CHO
Annals of Dermatology 2015;27(1):15-20
BACKGROUND: Clean dermatologic procedures create wounds with a low risk of infection (usually up to 5%). Whether the use of topical antibiotics is advocated, with regard to its efficacy and safety issues such as antibiotic resistance and sensitizing potential, is controversial. Fusidic acid, a topical antibiotic against gram-positive bacteria, is a rare sensitizer and commonly used in postprocedure care in Korea. OBJECTIVE: This is a retrospective study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety between fusidic acid and petrolatum for the postprocedure care of clean dermatologic procedures. METHODS: Patients were treated with either fusidic acid or petrolatum ointment, applied on the wound created during clean dermatologic procedures such as biopsy of the punch, incisional, excisional, and shave types. The efficacy, adverse events, and subjective level of satisfaction were retrieved from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 414 patients with a total of 429 wounds were enrolled. The overall rate of adverse events was 0.9%, and the rates of adverse events in the fusidic acid group and the petrolatum group were 1.4% and 0.5%, respectively (p=0.370). There was no wound discharge, pain, tenderness, swelling, induration, or dehiscence in both groups. The patients' self-assessment of the wound was not significantly different between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the hypothesis that the routine prophylactic use of topical antibiotics is not indicated for clean dermatologic procedures. We recommend the use of petrolatum in the postoperative care of clean dermatologic procedures because of its equivalent efficacy and superior safety profiles.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
Biopsy
;
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures
;
Drug Resistance, Microbial
;
Fusidic Acid*
;
Gram-Positive Bacteria
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Medical Records
;
Petrolatum*
;
Postoperative Care
;
Retrospective Studies*
;
Self-Assessment
;
Wound Healing
;
Wounds and Injuries
8.Anaphylaxis to Topically Applied Sodium Fusidate.
Mi Ran PARK ; Do Soo KIM ; Jihyun KIM ; Kangmo AHN
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research 2013;5(2):110-112
Fusidic acid is a bacteriostatic antibiotic that is effective primarily on gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium species. It is often topically applied to the skin, but is also given systemically as a tablet or injection. Allergic contact dermatitis, or urticaria, has been reported as a side effect of fusidic acid treatment, whereas anaphylaxis to topically administered fusidic acid has not been reported previously. A 16-year-old boy visited an outpatient clinic for further evaluation of anaphylaxis. He suffered abrasions on his arms during exercise, which were treated with a topical ointment containing sodium fusidate. Within 30 minutes, he developed urticaria and eyelid swelling, followed by a cough and respiratory difficulty. His symptoms were relieved by emergency treatment in a nearby hospital. To investigate the etiology, oral provocation with fusidate was performed. After 125 mg (1/2 tablet) of sodium fusidate was administered, he developed a cough and itching of the throat within 30 minutes, which was followed by chest discomfort and urticaria. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) dropped from 4.09 L at baseline to 3.50 L after challenge, although wheezing was not heard in his chest. After management with an inhaled bronchodilator using a nebulizer, chest discomfort was relieved and FEV1 rose to 3.86 L. The patient was directed not to use fusidate, especially on abrasions. Here we report the first case of anaphylaxis resulting from topical fusidic acid application to abrasions.
Ambulatory Care Facilities
;
Anaphylaxis
;
Arm
;
Corynebacterium
;
Cough
;
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
;
Emergency Treatment
;
Eyelids
;
Forced Expiratory Volume
;
Furosemide
;
Fusidic Acid
;
Gram-Positive Bacteria
;
Humans
;
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
;
Pharynx
;
Pruritus
;
Respiratory Sounds
;
Skin
;
Sodium
;
Staphylococcus
;
Thiram
;
Thorax
;
Urticaria
9.The Prevalence, Genotype and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of High- and Low-Level Mupirocin Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Se Young PARK ; Shin Moo KIM ; Seok Don PARK
Annals of Dermatology 2012;24(1):32-38
BACKGROUND: Mupirocin has been used for the treatment of skin infections and eradication of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The increased use of this antibiotic has been accompanied by outbreaks of MRSA that are resistant to mupirocin. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the prevalence, genotype and antimicrobial susceptibility of mupirocin-resistant MRSA from 4 Korean hospitals. METHODS: A total 193 MRSA clinical isolates were collected from four university hospitals. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests, including mupirocin, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern analysis were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 27 of the 193 (14.1%) MRSA isolates were resistant to mupirocin. All of the (A) hospital isolates showed high-level (HL) mupirocin resistance and the low-level (LL) mupirocin resistant strains were from three other hospitals. The PFGE patterns of 16 mupirocin-resistant isolates were divided into 5 clusters (1-5), and the nine HL mupirocin-resistant isolates belonged to cluster 1. Both the HL and LL mupirocin-resistant MRSA isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and rifampin, but they were resistant to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin and tetracycline. The erythromycin and fusidic acid resistance rates were different between the HL and LL resistant isolates. CONCLUSION: HL mupirocin-resistant isolates that could transfer this resistance to other bacteria were detected and these isolates were clonally related. The emergence of mupirocin resistant isolates emphasizes the importance of using antibiotics judiciously and carefully monitoring the prevalence of mupirocin resistance.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
Bacteria
;
Ciprofloxacin
;
Clindamycin
;
Disease Outbreaks
;
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field
;
Erythromycin
;
Fusidic Acid
;
Genotype
;
Hospitals, University
;
Methicillin Resistance
;
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
;
Mupirocin
;
Prevalence
;
Rifampin
;
Skin
;
Tetracycline
;
Vancomycin
10.Isolation and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Mupirocin-Resistant and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Clinical Samples.
Shin Moo KIM ; Se Young PARK ; Seok Don PARK
Journal of Bacteriology and Virology 2011;41(4):279-286
Resistance to mupirocin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have increased with wide use of mupirocin in many countries, but the prevalence in Korea is not well-known. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and clonality of mupirocin-resistant (MUP-R) isolates from three Korean hospitals. A total of 175 MRSA isolates were collected from three university hospitals in 2009-2010. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by the disk diffusion and the agar dilution methods. femA, mecA and mupA genes were detected by polymerase chain reactions. Pulsed-filed gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern of genomic DNA was determined after digestion with SmaI. Overall, 12 among the 175 MRSA isolates were resistant to mupirocin, with prevalence ranging from 0 to 10% depending on hospitals. Three high-level (HL) and nine low-level (LL) MUR-R isolates were obtained from two hospitals. All MUP-R isolates were susceptible to rifampin and vancomycin, but were resistant to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, and erythromycin. Eight LL and one HL MUP-R isolates were also resistant to fusidic acid. PFGE analysis showed three HL MUP-R isolates belonged to arbitrary cluster 3, 5 and 6 with 60~90% similarity compared to LL MUP-R isolates. In conclusion, the HL resistance to mupirocin was detected in two hospitals, but HL MUP-R isolates were clonally not related.
Adenosine
;
Agar
;
Ciprofloxacin
;
Clindamycin
;
Diffusion
;
Digestion
;
DNA
;
Electrophoresis
;
Erythromycin
;
Fusidic Acid
;
Hospitals, University
;
Korea
;
Methicillin Resistance
;
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
;
Mupirocin
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Prevalence
;
Rifampin
;
Vancomycin

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail