1.Characteristics of T cell immune responses in adults inoculated with 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine for 12 months
Jing WANG ; Ya-Qun LI ; Hai-Yan WANG ; Yao-Ru SONG ; Jing LI ; Wen-Xin WANG ; Lin-Yu WAN ; Chun-Bao ZHOU ; Xing FAN ; Fu-Sheng WANG
Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army 2024;49(2):165-170
Objective To evaluate the characteristics of different antigen-specific T cell immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2)after inoculation with 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine for 12 months.Methods Fifteen healthy adults were enrolled in this study and blood samples collected at 12 months after receiving two doses of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine.The level and phenotypic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific T lymphocytes were detected by activation-induced markers(AIM)based on polychromatic flow cytometry.Results After 12 months of inoculation with 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine,more than 90%of adults had detectable Spike and Non-spike antigen-specific CD4+ T cells immune responses(Spike:14/15,P=0.0001;Non-spike:15/15,P<0.0001).80%of adults had detectable Spike and Non-spike antigen-specific CD8+ T cells immune responses(Spike:12/15,P=0.0463;Non-spike:12/15,P=0.0806).Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells induced by SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccination after 12 months were composed of predominantly central memory(CM)and effector memory 1(EM1)cells.On the other hand,in terms of helper subsets,antigen-specific CD4+ T cells mainly showed T helper 1/17(Th1/17)and T helper 2(Th2)phenotypes.Conclusions SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccination generates durable and extensive antigen-specific CD4+ T cell memory responses,which may be the key factor for the low proportion of severe coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)infection in China.
2.Construction and characterization of lpxC deletion strain based on CRISPR/Cas9 in Acinetobacter baumannii
Zong-ti SUN ; You-wen ZHANG ; Hai-bin LI ; Xiu-kun WANG ; Jie YU ; Jin-ru XIE ; Peng-bo PANG ; Xin-xin HU ; Tong-ying NIE ; Xi LU ; Jing PANG ; Lei HOU ; Xin-yi YANG ; Cong-ran LI ; Lang SUN ; Xue-fu YOU
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica 2024;59(5):1286-1294
Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are major outer membrane components of Gram-negative bacteria. Unlike most Gram-negative bacteria,
3.Discussion on Building a Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology Assessment System Suitable for Chinese National Conditions
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(10):38-43
Objective:To explore the construction of a medical Artificial Intelligence(AI)technology assessment system suitable for the national conditions in China.Methods:Summarize the domestic and international traditional health technology assessment system,and analyze the distinctive characteristics and novel risk factors of medical AI technology.Results:The existing evaluation indexes of technical characteristics are most likely to assess AI technology based on the sub-evaluation indexes of reliability,but the evaluation focus of reliability cannot be assessed for algorithms,big data,arithmetic power and the existence of risk factors,and the existing system of health technology assessment needs to be further improved.Conclusion:Traditional health technology assessment system is challenging to apply to the evaluation of medical AI technology.It is recommended to use the traditional health technology assessment framework as a foundational structure,incorporate evaluation indicators related to the characteristics of medical AI technology,and refer to evaluation indicators and methods from relevant fields to adjust and refine the medical AI technology assessment system.
4.Discussion on Building a Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology Assessment System Suitable for Chinese National Conditions
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(10):38-43
Objective:To explore the construction of a medical Artificial Intelligence(AI)technology assessment system suitable for the national conditions in China.Methods:Summarize the domestic and international traditional health technology assessment system,and analyze the distinctive characteristics and novel risk factors of medical AI technology.Results:The existing evaluation indexes of technical characteristics are most likely to assess AI technology based on the sub-evaluation indexes of reliability,but the evaluation focus of reliability cannot be assessed for algorithms,big data,arithmetic power and the existence of risk factors,and the existing system of health technology assessment needs to be further improved.Conclusion:Traditional health technology assessment system is challenging to apply to the evaluation of medical AI technology.It is recommended to use the traditional health technology assessment framework as a foundational structure,incorporate evaluation indicators related to the characteristics of medical AI technology,and refer to evaluation indicators and methods from relevant fields to adjust and refine the medical AI technology assessment system.
5.Discussion on Building a Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology Assessment System Suitable for Chinese National Conditions
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(10):38-43
Objective:To explore the construction of a medical Artificial Intelligence(AI)technology assessment system suitable for the national conditions in China.Methods:Summarize the domestic and international traditional health technology assessment system,and analyze the distinctive characteristics and novel risk factors of medical AI technology.Results:The existing evaluation indexes of technical characteristics are most likely to assess AI technology based on the sub-evaluation indexes of reliability,but the evaluation focus of reliability cannot be assessed for algorithms,big data,arithmetic power and the existence of risk factors,and the existing system of health technology assessment needs to be further improved.Conclusion:Traditional health technology assessment system is challenging to apply to the evaluation of medical AI technology.It is recommended to use the traditional health technology assessment framework as a foundational structure,incorporate evaluation indicators related to the characteristics of medical AI technology,and refer to evaluation indicators and methods from relevant fields to adjust and refine the medical AI technology assessment system.
6.Discussion on Building a Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology Assessment System Suitable for Chinese National Conditions
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(10):38-43
Objective:To explore the construction of a medical Artificial Intelligence(AI)technology assessment system suitable for the national conditions in China.Methods:Summarize the domestic and international traditional health technology assessment system,and analyze the distinctive characteristics and novel risk factors of medical AI technology.Results:The existing evaluation indexes of technical characteristics are most likely to assess AI technology based on the sub-evaluation indexes of reliability,but the evaluation focus of reliability cannot be assessed for algorithms,big data,arithmetic power and the existence of risk factors,and the existing system of health technology assessment needs to be further improved.Conclusion:Traditional health technology assessment system is challenging to apply to the evaluation of medical AI technology.It is recommended to use the traditional health technology assessment framework as a foundational structure,incorporate evaluation indicators related to the characteristics of medical AI technology,and refer to evaluation indicators and methods from relevant fields to adjust and refine the medical AI technology assessment system.
7.Discussion on Building a Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology Assessment System Suitable for Chinese National Conditions
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(10):38-43
Objective:To explore the construction of a medical Artificial Intelligence(AI)technology assessment system suitable for the national conditions in China.Methods:Summarize the domestic and international traditional health technology assessment system,and analyze the distinctive characteristics and novel risk factors of medical AI technology.Results:The existing evaluation indexes of technical characteristics are most likely to assess AI technology based on the sub-evaluation indexes of reliability,but the evaluation focus of reliability cannot be assessed for algorithms,big data,arithmetic power and the existence of risk factors,and the existing system of health technology assessment needs to be further improved.Conclusion:Traditional health technology assessment system is challenging to apply to the evaluation of medical AI technology.It is recommended to use the traditional health technology assessment framework as a foundational structure,incorporate evaluation indicators related to the characteristics of medical AI technology,and refer to evaluation indicators and methods from relevant fields to adjust and refine the medical AI technology assessment system.
8.Discussion on Building a Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology Assessment System Suitable for Chinese National Conditions
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(10):38-43
Objective:To explore the construction of a medical Artificial Intelligence(AI)technology assessment system suitable for the national conditions in China.Methods:Summarize the domestic and international traditional health technology assessment system,and analyze the distinctive characteristics and novel risk factors of medical AI technology.Results:The existing evaluation indexes of technical characteristics are most likely to assess AI technology based on the sub-evaluation indexes of reliability,but the evaluation focus of reliability cannot be assessed for algorithms,big data,arithmetic power and the existence of risk factors,and the existing system of health technology assessment needs to be further improved.Conclusion:Traditional health technology assessment system is challenging to apply to the evaluation of medical AI technology.It is recommended to use the traditional health technology assessment framework as a foundational structure,incorporate evaluation indicators related to the characteristics of medical AI technology,and refer to evaluation indicators and methods from relevant fields to adjust and refine the medical AI technology assessment system.
9.Discussion on Building a Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology Assessment System Suitable for Chinese National Conditions
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(10):38-43
Objective:To explore the construction of a medical Artificial Intelligence(AI)technology assessment system suitable for the national conditions in China.Methods:Summarize the domestic and international traditional health technology assessment system,and analyze the distinctive characteristics and novel risk factors of medical AI technology.Results:The existing evaluation indexes of technical characteristics are most likely to assess AI technology based on the sub-evaluation indexes of reliability,but the evaluation focus of reliability cannot be assessed for algorithms,big data,arithmetic power and the existence of risk factors,and the existing system of health technology assessment needs to be further improved.Conclusion:Traditional health technology assessment system is challenging to apply to the evaluation of medical AI technology.It is recommended to use the traditional health technology assessment framework as a foundational structure,incorporate evaluation indicators related to the characteristics of medical AI technology,and refer to evaluation indicators and methods from relevant fields to adjust and refine the medical AI technology assessment system.
10.Discussion on Building a Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology Assessment System Suitable for Chinese National Conditions
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(10):38-43
Objective:To explore the construction of a medical Artificial Intelligence(AI)technology assessment system suitable for the national conditions in China.Methods:Summarize the domestic and international traditional health technology assessment system,and analyze the distinctive characteristics and novel risk factors of medical AI technology.Results:The existing evaluation indexes of technical characteristics are most likely to assess AI technology based on the sub-evaluation indexes of reliability,but the evaluation focus of reliability cannot be assessed for algorithms,big data,arithmetic power and the existence of risk factors,and the existing system of health technology assessment needs to be further improved.Conclusion:Traditional health technology assessment system is challenging to apply to the evaluation of medical AI technology.It is recommended to use the traditional health technology assessment framework as a foundational structure,incorporate evaluation indicators related to the characteristics of medical AI technology,and refer to evaluation indicators and methods from relevant fields to adjust and refine the medical AI technology assessment system.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail