Objective:This study aims to analyze the threshold changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions（DPOAE） and auditory brainstem response（ABR） in adult Otof-/- mice before and after gene therapy, evaluating its effectiveness and exploring methods for assessing hearing recovery post-treatment. Methods:At the age of 4 weeks, adult Otof-/- mice received an inner ear injection of a therapeutic agent containing intein-mediated recombination of the OTOF gene, delivered via dual AAV vectors through the round window membrane（RWM）. Immunofluorescence staining assessed the proportion of inner ear hair cells with restored otoferlin expression and the number of synapses.Statistical analysis was performed to compare the DPOAE and ABR thresholds before and after the treatment. Results:AAV-PHP. eB demonstrates high transduction efficiency in inner ear hair cells. The therapeutic regimen corrected hearing loss in adult Otof-/- mice without impacting auditory function in wild-type mice. The changes in DPOAE and ABR thresholds after gene therapy are significantly correlated at 16 kHz. Post-treatment,a slight increase in DPOAE was observeds,followed by a recovery trend at 2 months post-treatment. Conclusion:Gene therapy significantly restored hearing in adult Otof-/- mice, though the surgical delivery may cause transient hearing damage. Precise and gentle surgical techniques are essential to maximize gene therapy's efficacy.
Mice ; Animals ; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology* ; Hearing/physiology* ; Ear, Inner ; Hearing Loss/therapy* ; Genetic Therapy ; Auditory Threshold/physiology* ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Membrane Proteins

Objective: To explore the value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) monitoring combined with brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and compound action potential (CAP) monitoring during vestibular schwannoma resection for the protection of the cochlear nerve. Methods: Clinical data from 12 patients with vestibular schwannomas who had useful hearing prior to surgery were analyzed at the PLA General Hospital from January to December 2021. Among them, there were 7 males and 5 females, ranging in age from 25 to 59 years. Before surgery, patients underwent audiology assessments (including pure tone audiometry, speech recognition rate, etc.), facial nerve function evaluation, and cranial MRI. They then underwent vestibular schwannoma resection via the retrosigmoid approach. EABR, BAEP, and CAP were simultaneously monitored during surgery, and patients' hearing preservation was observed and analyzed after surgery. Results: Prior to surgery, the average PTA threshold of the 12 patients ranged from11 to 49 dBHL, with a SDS of 80% to 100%. Six patients had grade A hearing, and six patients had grade B hearing. All 12 patients had House-Brackman grade I facial nerve function prior to surgery. The MRI indicated tumor diameters between 1.1 and 2.4 cm. Complete removal was achieved in 10/12 patients, while near-total removal was achieved in 2/12 patients. There were no serious complications at the one-month follow-up after surgery. At the three-month follow-up, all 12 patients had House-Brackman grade I or II facial nerve function. Under EABR with CAP and BAEP monitoring, successful preservation of the cochlear nerve was achieved in six of ten patients (2 with grade B hearing, 3 with grade C hearing, and 1 with grade D hearing). Successful preservation of the cochlear nerve was not achieved in another four patients (all with grade D hearing). In two patients, EABR monitoring was unsuccessful due to interference signals; however, Grade C or higher hearing was successfully preserved under BAEP and CAP monitoring. Conclusion: The application of EABR monitoring combined with BAEP and CAP monitoring during vestibular schwannoma resection can help improve postoperative preservation of the cochlear nerve and hearing.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Neuroma, Acoustic/complications* ; Hearing/physiology* ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Cochlear Nerve ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*

The qualitative, quantitative, and localization analysis of hearing loss is one of the important contents of forensic clinical research and identification. Pure-tone audiometry is the "gold standard" for hearing loss assessment, but it is affected by the subjective cooperation of the assessed person. Due to the complexity of the auditory pathway and the diversity of hearing loss, the assessment of hearing loss requires the combination of various subjective and objective audiometric techniques, along with comprehensive evaluation based on the case situation, clinical symptoms, and other examinations to ensure the scientificity, accuracy and reliability of forensic hearing impairment assessment. Objective audiometry includes acoustic impedance, otoacoustic emission, and various auditory evoked potentials. The frequency-specific auditory brainstem response (ABR), 40 Hz auditory event related potential, and auditory steady-state response are commonly used for objective hearing threshold assessment. The combined application of acoustic impedance, otoacoustic emission and ABR can be used to locate hearing loss and determine whether it is located in the middle ear, cochlea, or posterior cochlea. This article reviews the application value of objective audiometry techniques in hearing threshold assessment and hearing loss localization, aiming to provide reference for forensic identification of hearing loss.
Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Auditory Threshold/physiology* ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Hearing Loss/diagnosis* ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods* ; Clinical Medicine

PURPOSE: Auditory nerve injury is one of the most common nerve injury complications of skull base fractures. However, there is currently a lack of auxiliary examination methods for its direct diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to find a more efficient and accurate means of diagnosis for auditory nerve injury. METHODS: Through retrospectively analyzing the results of brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and high-resolution CT (HRCT) in 37 patients with hearing impairment following trauma from January 1, 2018 to July 31, 2020, the role of the two inspection methods in the diagnosis of auditory nerve injury was studied. Inclusion criteria were patient had a clear history of trauma and unilateral hearing impairment after trauma; while exclusion criteria were: (1) severe patient with a Glasgow coma scale score ≤5 because these patients were classified as severe head injury and admitted to the intensive care unit, (2) patient in the subacute stage admitted 72 h after trauma, and (3) patient with prior hearing impairment before trauma. According to Goodman's classification of hearing impairment, the patients were divided into low/medium/severe injury groups. In addition, patients were divided into HRCT-positive and negative groups for further investigation with their BAEP results. The positive rates of BEAP for each group were observed, and the results were analyzed by Chi-square test (p < 0.05, regarded as statistical difference). RESULTS: A total of 37 patients were included, including 21 males and 16 females. All of them were hospitalized patients with GCS score of 6-15 at the time of admission. The BAEP positive rate in the medium and severe injury group was 100%, which was significantly higher than that in the low injury group (27.27%) (p < 0.01). The rate of BEAP positivity was significantly higher in the HRCT-positive group (20/30, 66.7%) than in the HRCT-negative group (1/7, 14.3%) (p < 0.05). Twenty patients (54.05%) were both positive for BEAP and HRCT test, and considered to have auditory nerve damage. Six patients (16.22%) were both negative for BEAP and HRCT test, and 10 patients (27.03%) were BAEP-negative but HRCT-positive: all the 16 patients were considered as non-neurological injury. The rest 1 case (2.70%) was BAEP-positive but HRCT-negative, which we speculate may have auditory nerve concussion. CONCLUSION By way of BAEP combining with skull base HRCT, we may improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of auditory nerve injury. Such a diagnostic strategy may be beneficial to guiding treatment plans and evaluating prognosis.
Cochlear Nerve ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Female ; Hearing Loss ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Skull Base/diagnostic imaging* ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Objective: To study the protective effects of metformin on noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and its differential protein omics expression profile. Methods: In January 2021, 39 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into control group, noise exposure group and metformin+noise exposure group, with 13 rats in each group. Rats in the noise exposure group and metformin+noise exposure group were continuously exposed to octave noise with sound pressure level of 120 dB (A) and center frequency of 8 kHz for 4 h. Rats in the metformin+noise exposure group were treated with 200 mg/kg/d metformin 3 d before noise exposure for a total of 7 d. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) was used to test the changes of hearing thresholds before noise exposure and 1, 4, 7 d after noise exposure in the right ear of rats in each group. Tandem mass tag (TMT) quantitative proteomics was used to identify and analyze the differentially expressed protein in the inner ear of rats in each group, and it was verified by immunofluorescence staining with frozen sections. Results: The click-ABR thresholds of right ear in the noise exposure group and metformin+noise exposure group were significantly higher than those in the control group 1, 4, 7 d after noise exposure (P<0.05) . The click-ABR threshold of right ear in the metformin+noise exposure group were significantly lower than that in the noise exposure group (P<0.05) . Compared with the noise exposure group, 1035 up-regulated proteins and 1145 down-regulated proteins were differentially expressed in the metformin+noise exposure group. GO enrichment analysis showed that the significantly differentially expressed proteins were mainly involved in binding, molecular function regulation, signal transduction, and other functions. Enrichment analysis of KEGG pathway revealed that the pathways for significant enrichment of differentially expressed proteins included phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein kinase B (PI3K-Akt) signaling pathway, focal adhesion, diabetic cardiomyopathy, mitogen, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. Immunofluorescence experiments showed that compared with the noise exposure group, the fluorescence intensity of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) in the metformin+noise exposure group was increased, and the fluorescence intensity of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (eIF4EBP1) was decreased. Conclusion: Noise exposure can lead to an increase in rat hearing threshold, and metformin can improve noise-induced hearing threshold abnormalities through multiple pathways and biological processes.
Animals ; Auditory Threshold/physiology* ; Cochlea ; Ear, Inner ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/prevention & control* ; Male ; Metformin/pharmacology* ; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism* ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar

High level noise can damage cochlear hair cells, auditory nerve and synaptic connections between cochlear hair cells and auditory nerve, resulting in noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Recent studies have shown that animal cochleae have circadian rhythm, which makes them different in sensitivity to noise throughout the day. Cochlear circadian rhythm has a certain relationship with brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glucocorticoids, which affects the degree of hearing loss after exposure to noise. In this review, we summarize the research progress of the regulation of cochlear sensitivity to noise by circadian rhythm and prospect the future research direction.
Animals ; Auditory Threshold ; Circadian Rhythm ; Cochlea ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Hair Cells, Auditory ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced ; Noise/adverse effects*

OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationship between the frequency characteristics and response threshold of auditory steady-state response (ASSR), auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP), and their application values in forensic medicine. METHODS: Thirty volunteers with normal hearing (60 ears) were selected to perform pure tone audiometry (PTA) threshold and ASSR, ABR and 40 Hz AERP response threshold tests in the standard sound insulation shielding room, and the results were statistically analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software. RESULTS: At 0.5 kHz and 1.0 kHz frequencies, the correlation between 40 Hz AERP response threshold and PTA threshold was good, which was better than that of ASSR and ABR response threshold. At 2.0 kHz and 4.0 kHz frequencies, the correlation between ASSR and ABR response thresholds and PTA threshold was good, which was better than that of 40 Hz AERP response threshold. CONCLUSIONS To evaluate the hearing at 0.5 kHz and 1.0 kHz frequencies, it is recommended to use 40 Hz AERP and ASSR to comprehensively assess the PTA threshold of the subjects. To evaluate the hearing at 2.0 kHz and 4.0 kHz frequencies, ABR and ASSR are recommended to assess the PTA threshold of subjects comprehensively. The combination of ASSR, ABR and 40 Hz AERP can improve the accuracy of hearing function evaluation.
Acoustic Stimulation/methods* ; Audiometry, Evoked Response ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Auditory Threshold/physiology* ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Forensic Medicine ; Hearing/physiology* ; Humans

OBJECTIVES: To explore the characters and the relationship among latency response, amplitude and sound stimulus intensity of auditory long latency response（ALR）, and to investigate the significance of ALR applied in auditory threshold prediction. METHODS: Total 46 subjects （92 ears） with normal hearing were tested by ALR. The ALR waves of the subjects were elicited by 5 sound stimulus intensity according to the order of 70, 50, 30, 20 and 10 dB nHL. By making N₁ wave and P₂ wave, the values of 3 observed indexes （the latencies of N₁ wave and P₂ wave and N₁-P₂ amplitude） were obtained, and the variation trend of the observed indexes were statistically analyzed. The differences in the frequency of the indexes were observed. RESULTS: The rate of ALR waves from 46 subjects （92 ears） with normal hearing was 100%. The latencies of N₁ wave and P₂ wave delayed gradually and N₁-P₂ amplitude declined with sound stimulus intensity descending. CONCLUSIONS In suitable conditions, ALR is a stable technology for hearing thresholds prediction. The relation between sound stimulus intensity and latency of N₁ wave, latency of P₂ wave and N₁-P₂ amplitude of ALR plays an important part in auditory thresholds assessment.
Acoustic Stimulation ; Auditory Threshold/physiology* ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology* ; Female ; Hearing ; Humans ; Male ; Noise ; Reaction Time

BACKGROUNDThe auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) have been used to treat deafness for patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2 and nontumor patients. The lack of an appropriate animal model has limited the study of improving hearing rehabilitation by the device. This study aimed to establish an animal model of ABI in adult rhesus macaque monkey (Macaca mulatta).

METHODSSix adult rhesus macaque monkeys (M. mulatta) were included. Under general anesthesia, a multichannel ABI was implanted into the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle through the modified suboccipital-retrosigmoid (RS) approach. The electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR) waves were tested to ensure the optimal implant site. After the operation, the EABR and computed tomography (CT) were used to test and verify the effectiveness via electrophysiology and anatomy, respectively. The subjects underwent behavioral observation for 6 months, and the postoperative EABR was tested every two weeks from the 1 st month after implant surgery.

RESULTThe implant surgery lasted an average of 5.2 h, and no monkey died or sacrificed. The averaged latencies of peaks I, II and IV were 1.27, 2.34 and 3.98 ms, respectively in the ABR. One-peak EABR wave was elicited in the operation, and one- or two-peak waves were elicited during the postoperative period. The EABR wave latencies appeared to be constant under different stimulus intensities; however, the amplitudes increased as the stimulus increased within a certain scope.

CONCLUSIONSIt is feasible and safe to implant ABIs in rhesus macaque monkeys (M. mulatta) through a modified suboccipital RS approach, and EABR and CT are valid tools for animal model establishment. In addition, this model should be an appropriate animal model for the electrophysiological and behavioral study of rhesus macaque monkey with ABI.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of the round window stimulation electrical evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) test, and optimize the parameters of recording and stimulation electrodes positions. METHOD: Ten healthy Hartley guinea pigs (20 ears) were used for the EABR test. The positive stimulation electrodes were placed into the round window niche, the animals were divided into three group according to the negative electrodes position, group A: the electric field was parallel with the projection of cochlear modiolus on the tympanic membrane, group B: the electric field was perpendicular to modiolus projection toward to the mastoid, group C: the electric field was perpendicular to modiolus projection toward to the zygomatic process. A series of optimized recording and stimulation parameters were uesed to reduce the electrical artifact. RESULT: All the 20 ears were normal in the ABR testing, and EABR waves were stable and well-differentiated in the EABR tests out of cochlea. But EABR waves of group A were more stable and differentiated than those of group B and C. In group A, the threshold of EABR was (0.54 ± 0.11) mA, and latency of wave III was (1.71 ± 0.05) ms when the stimulus intensity was 0.8 mA. In group B, the threshold of EABR was (0.62 ± 0.12) mA, and latency of wave III was (1.77 ± 0.03) ms. In group C, the threshold of EABR was (0.70 ± 0.14) mA, and latency of wave III was (1.86 ± 0.04)ms. The threshold of EABR and latency of wave III were significantly different among the three groups by statistic analysis. CONCLUSION EABR waves were stable and well-differentiated in the EABR tests out of cochlea. The EABR waves were recorded more stably and differentiated when the stimulating electrode and recording electrode were paralleled with the projection of modiolus on the tympanic membrane.
Animals ; Cochlea ; physiology ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrodes ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem ; Guinea Pigs ; Round Window, Ear ; Tympanic Membrane