BACKGROUND/AIMS: The natural history of severe erosive reflux disease in Korea remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate endoscopic follow-up results in subjects with severe reflux esophagitis under routine clinical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total 61,891 subjects underwent an upper endoscopic examination in the health check-up program from January 2007 to December 2013. We reviewed medical charts of patients who had been diagnosed with severe reflux esophagitis. The severity of reflux esophagitis was determined by the Los Angeles (LA) classification system. Patients underwent at least one follow up endoscopy after diagnosis of severe reflux esophagitis. We classified the patients into two groups; regressed in severity and remained unchanged, according to follow up endoscopic status. RESULTS: Based on endoscopic findings, 5,938 subjects (9.6%) were found to have reflux esopohagitis: 121 subjects (0.2%) in LA-C; 39 subjects (0.06%) in LA-D. Among 31 patients who had endoscopic follow-up, 23 patients (74.2%) showed regression from LA C/D to LA A/B or minimal change disease or normal. The mean follow up duration was 42.2 months in regression group and 53.2 months in no change group. All patients had been treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on a regular or on-demand basis. Age, sex, smoking, alcohol, exercise, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, sliding hiatal hernia, body mass index, waist circumference and duration of PPIs therapy did not significantly influence regression of severe reflux esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of severe reflux esophagitis patients under routine clinical care showed improvement on endoscopic follow-up.
Body Mass Index ; Classification ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Diagnosis ; Dyslipidemias ; Endoscopy* ; Esophagitis ; Esophagitis, Peptic* ; Follow-Up Studies* ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Hernia, Hiatal ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Korea* ; Natural History ; Nephrosis, Lipoid ; Proton Pump Inhibitors ; Smoke ; Smoking ; Waist Circumference

PURPOSE: During sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), patients may not be able to perform inspiration, which is necessary to examine the esophagogastric junction. Therefore sedation may affect diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux-related findings. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of sedation on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux-related findings during EGD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 28914 patients older than 20 years who underwent EGD at our institution between January 2011 and December 2011. Ultimately, 1546 patients indicated for EGD for health check-up and symptom evaluation were included. RESULTS: There were 18546 patients who had diagnostic EGD: 10471 patients (56%) by non-sedated EGD and 8075 patients (43%) by sedated EGD. After statistical adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index, minimal change esophagitis, and hiatal hernia were significantly less frequently observed in the sedated EGD group [odds ratio (OR), 0.651; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.586 to 0.722 and OR, 0.699; 95% CI, 0.564 to 0.866]. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in other findings at the gastroesophageal junction, such as reflux esophagitis with Los Angeles classification A, B, C, and D or Barrett's esophagus, between the two groups. Similarly, there were no differences in early gastric cancer, advanced gastric cancer, and gastric ulcer occurrence. CONCLUSION: Sedation can impede the detection of minimal change esophagitis and hiatal hernia, but does not influence detection of reflux esophagitis of definite severity and Barrett's esophagus.
Adult ; Aged ; Barrett Esophagus ; Body Mass Index ; Endoscopy, Digestive System/instrumentation/*methods ; Esophagitis, Peptic/*diagnosis ; Esophagogastric Junction/*pathology ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux/*diagnosis ; Hernia, Hiatal/*diagnosis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies

No abstract available.
Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Esophagitis, Peptic/diagnosis/*drug therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/*therapeutic use ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sucralfate/therapeutic use

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In pediatrics, endoscopic examination has become a common procedure for evaluation of gastrointestinal presentations. However, there are limited data on pediatric endoscopy in Korea. The aim of this study was to analyze the current status and clinical impacts of endoscopic examination in children and adolescents. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of outpatients who visited the tertiary hospital. Patients under 18 years of age who underwent endoscopy were included. Endoscopic findings were classified as specific and normal based on gross findings. Specific endoscopic findings were reflux esophagitis, peptic ulcers, and Mallory-Weiss tear. Other findings included acute gastritis classified according to the updated Sydney system. RESULTS: In 722 of 330,350 patients (0.2%), endoscopic examination (554 esophagogastroduodenoscopies [EGDs], 121 colonoscopies, 47 sigmoidoscopies) was performed between January 2008 and January 2013. In EGD, abdominal pain was the most frequent presentation (64.1%). The most common diagnosis was gastritis (53.2%), followed by reflux esophagitis. The frequency of peptic ulcer disease was 12.8%. Frequent symptoms leading to colonoscopic examination were abdominal pain, diarrhea, and hematochezia. In colonoscopy, a negative result was more likely in children younger than 7 years old. After the procedure, the diagnostic yield of EGD and colonoscopy was 88.1% and 45.8%, respectively, and the rate of change in management was 67.1%. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatrics, endoscopic examination was useful for the choice of therapeutic strategy and it would be a standard method for evaluation of gastrointestinal presentation.
Abdominal Pain ; Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; *Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Esophagitis, Peptic/diagnosis/drug therapy ; Female ; Gastritis/diagnosis/drug therapy ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis ; Histamine H2 Antagonists/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis ; Male ; Peptic Ulcer/diagnosis/drug therapy ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Tertiary Care Centers

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is diagnosed based on symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation but is a heterogeneous condition which can be subclassified according to endoscopy and esophageal reflux monitoring. The aim of this study was to identify differences in demographic characteristics and reflux symptom patterns among patients with various spectrum of GERD. METHODS: Patients having weekly heartburn or acid regurgitation were classified into four pathophysiological subgroups according to endoscopy and pH monitoring: reflux esophagitis (RE), endoscopy-negative reflux disease with pathological reflux (PR+), hypersensitive esophagus (HE), and normal acid exposure with negative symptom association (pH-). RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were enrolled. The numbers of patients in the subgroups were: RE, 39.0%; PR+, 20.0%; HE, 10.3%; and pH-, 30.8%. Grossly, reflux symptom patterns and relieving/exacerbating factors did not differ between subgroups. Prevalence of extraesophageal syndrome was higher in patients with PR+ than in other groups. Overlapping functional dyspepsia was common in all groups. The SCL-90-R depression score was higher in PR+ patients than in RE patients (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Demographic characteristics and reflux symptom patterns cannot differentiate pH- group from GERD subtypes. Esophageal pH monitoring could be considered for the initial evaluation of GERD in the tertiary referral setting.
Adult ; Aged ; Depressive Disorder/etiology ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Esophagitis, Peptic/complications/diagnosis ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications/*diagnosis/psychology ; Humans ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Psychophysiologic Disorders/etiology ; Questionnaires ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is one of the most common causes of chronic cough and is a potential risk factor for the exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for reflux esophagitis (RE) in COPD patients. METHODS: From our hospital database, between September 2006 and April 2010, we searched for subjects who were 40 years old or older and had undergone both postbronchodilator spirometry and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). COPD was defined as having a ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity < 0.7 in postbronchodilator spirometry and no abnormality causing airway obstruction, except emphysematous changes, on a chest X-ray. The diagnosis of RE was based on a mucosal break surrounding the distal esophageal sphincter through EGD. RESULTS: In total, 253 patients with COPD were enrolled. The prevalence of RE in COPD was 30% (76/253). Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that age (odds ratio [OR], 0.950; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.918 to 0.983; p = 0.003), smoking pack-years (OR, 1.015; 95% CI, 1.004 to 1.025; p = 0.006), and inhaled anticholinergics (OR, 0.516; 95% CI, 0.271 to 0.982; p = 0.044) were independently associated with RE in COPD patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of RE in our COPD patients was higher than that reported previously in the Korean general population. In COPD, smoking increased the risk of RE, whereas inhaled anticholinergics may be associated with a reduced risk of RE.
Administration, Inhalation ; Aged ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Cholinergic Antagonists/administration & dosage ; Comorbidity ; Databases, Factual ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Esophagitis, Peptic/diagnosis/*epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Prevalence ; Protective Factors ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis/drug therapy/*epidemiology ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Smoking/adverse effects/epidemiology ; Spirometry

PURPOSE: Esophageal candidiasis (EC) is the most frequent opportunistic fungal infection in immunocompromised host. However, we have found EC in healthy individuals through esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for EC in healthy individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 281 patients who had been incidentally diagnosed with EC. We also conducted age and sex matched case control study to identify the risk factor for EC. RESULTS: The prevalence of EC was 0.32% (281/88125). The most common coexisting EGD finding was reflux esophagitis (49/281, 17.4%). An antifungal agent was prescribed in about half of EC, 139 cases (49.5%). Follow-up EGD was undertaken in 83 cases (29.5%) and 20 cases of candidiasis was persistently found. Case control study revealed EC were more often found in user of antibiotics (p=0.015), corticosteroids (p=0.002) and herb medication (p=0.006) as well as heavy drinking (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of EC was 0.32% (281/88125) in Korea. Use of antibiotics, corticosteroids and herb as well as heavy drinking were significant risk factors for EC in healthy individuals.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Alcohol Drinking ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use ; Antifungal Agents/pharmacology ; Candidiasis/*diagnosis/epidemiology ; Case-Control Studies ; Esophageal Diseases/*diagnosis/epidemiology ; Esophagitis, Peptic/complications/diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Immunocompromised Host ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Plant Preparations/therapeutic use ; Prevalence ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors

Barrett Esophagus ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Biopsy ; Consensus ; Epithelial Cells ; pathology ; Esophagitis ; pathology ; Esophagitis, Peptic ; pathology ; Esophagoscopy ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Humans

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies suggest that the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in Korea. However, studies on risk factors for GERD have yielded inconsistent results. The aims of this study were to compare clinical features between symptomatic syndromes without esophageal injury (=non-erosive disease [NED]) and syndromes with esophageal injury (=erosive disease [ED]), and to determine risk factors associated ED. METHODS: A total of 450 subjects who visited gastroenterology clinics of six training hospitals in Daegu from March 2008 to April 2010 were consecutively enrolled. The subjects were asked to complete a questionnaire which inquired about gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. The questionnaire also included questions about smoking, alcohol drinking, consumption of coffee, use of drugs, exercise, and other medical history. The subjects were subdivided into NED and ED groups. RESULTS: The proportion of subjects in each NED and ED group was 172 (38.2%) and 278 (61.8%). Male gender, smoking, alcohol drinking, consumption of coffee, large waist circumference, infrequent medication of antacids, aspirin and NSAIDs, infrequent and mild GERD symptoms were all significantly associated with ED on univariate analysis. Age, hiatal hernia, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, change in weight during 1 year, and number of typical GERD symptoms were not independent risk factors for ED. However, the association between ED and alcohol drinking, infrequent medication of antacids, mild typical GERD symptoms remained as strong risk factors after adjustments on multivariate logistic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Independent risk factors associated with ED were alcohol drinking, infrequent medication of antacids and mild typical GERD symptoms.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Alcohol Drinking ; Antacids/therapeutic use ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use ; Aspirin/therapeutic use ; Barrett Esophagus/complications/diagnosis ; Body Mass Index ; Coffee ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Esophagitis, Peptic/complications/*diagnosis ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications/*diagnosis ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Questionnaires ; Republic of Korea ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sex Factors ; Waist Circumference

No abstract available.
Alcohol Drinking ; Antacids/therapeutic use ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Esophagitis, Peptic/complications/*diagnosis ; Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications/*diagnosis ; Humans ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors