1.Comparison of the long-term outcomes of cast immobilization methods in distal radius fractures:a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Maria Florencia DESLIVIA ; Claudia SANTOSA ; Sherly Desnita SAVIO ; Erica KHOLINNE ; Made Bramantya KARNA ; Anak Agung Gde Yuda ASMARA
The Ewha Medical Journal 2024;47(4):e51-
		                        		
		                        			 Objectives:
		                        			Conservative treatment for distal radius fractures typically involves closed reduction and immobilization with a plaster cast. However, no consensus exists regarding the best method and duration for immobilization. This study investigated the functional outcomes associated with different plaster cast application techniques in the treatment of stable distal radius fractures. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A systematic search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for studies in the last 5 years. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials that investigated non-operative treatments for distal radius fractures. We excluded studies with short-term follow-up (less than 3 months), ongoing trials, those that did not directly address fractures, and studies involving the use of sugar-tong splints or non-circular immobilization. The outcomes evaluated included subjective measures (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score; Mayo Wrist Score; and visual analog scale) and objective outcomes (complication rate and radiological parameters). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			We included seven articles from 2017 to 2022. These studies reported a total of 542 fractures, predominantly in women, with a mean age of over 50 years. Both short and long arm casts demonstrated similar functional and radiological outcomes. A longer immobilization period (>3 weeks) should be considered to prevent re-displacement. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			In stable fractures treated conservatively, the use of both short and long arm casts resulted in comparable functional outcomes in older patients. Immobilization for at least 3 weeks is recommended, as it provided similar clinical and radiological outcomes compared to longer periods of immobilization (level of evidence: 2A). 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Basic to advanced elbow arthroscopy: the history, basic set up, and indications
Erica KHOLINNE ; In-ho JEON ; Jae-Man KWAK
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2024;27(3):386-395
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Elbow arthroscopy presents challenges; however, its indications and advantages over traditional open surgery are swiftly evolving. Despite being less widely performed than on other joints such as the knee, shoulder, ankle, and hip, arthroscopic management of the elbow has potential. The goals of this review are to describe and broaden the current applications of elbow arthroscopy. Additionally, we will provide insights and strategies to enhance the effectiveness of elbow arthroscopy. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Comparison of the long-term outcomes of cast immobilization methods in distal radius fractures:a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Maria Florencia DESLIVIA ; Claudia SANTOSA ; Sherly Desnita SAVIO ; Erica KHOLINNE ; Made Bramantya KARNA ; Anak Agung Gde Yuda ASMARA
The Ewha Medical Journal 2024;47(4):e51-
		                        		
		                        			 Objectives:
		                        			Conservative treatment for distal radius fractures typically involves closed reduction and immobilization with a plaster cast. However, no consensus exists regarding the best method and duration for immobilization. This study investigated the functional outcomes associated with different plaster cast application techniques in the treatment of stable distal radius fractures. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A systematic search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for studies in the last 5 years. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials that investigated non-operative treatments for distal radius fractures. We excluded studies with short-term follow-up (less than 3 months), ongoing trials, those that did not directly address fractures, and studies involving the use of sugar-tong splints or non-circular immobilization. The outcomes evaluated included subjective measures (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score; Mayo Wrist Score; and visual analog scale) and objective outcomes (complication rate and radiological parameters). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			We included seven articles from 2017 to 2022. These studies reported a total of 542 fractures, predominantly in women, with a mean age of over 50 years. Both short and long arm casts demonstrated similar functional and radiological outcomes. A longer immobilization period (>3 weeks) should be considered to prevent re-displacement. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			In stable fractures treated conservatively, the use of both short and long arm casts resulted in comparable functional outcomes in older patients. Immobilization for at least 3 weeks is recommended, as it provided similar clinical and radiological outcomes compared to longer periods of immobilization (level of evidence: 2A). 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Comparison of the long-term outcomes of cast immobilization methods in distal radius fractures:a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Maria Florencia DESLIVIA ; Claudia SANTOSA ; Sherly Desnita SAVIO ; Erica KHOLINNE ; Made Bramantya KARNA ; Anak Agung Gde Yuda ASMARA
The Ewha Medical Journal 2024;47(4):e51-
		                        		
		                        			 Objectives:
		                        			Conservative treatment for distal radius fractures typically involves closed reduction and immobilization with a plaster cast. However, no consensus exists regarding the best method and duration for immobilization. This study investigated the functional outcomes associated with different plaster cast application techniques in the treatment of stable distal radius fractures. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A systematic search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for studies in the last 5 years. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials that investigated non-operative treatments for distal radius fractures. We excluded studies with short-term follow-up (less than 3 months), ongoing trials, those that did not directly address fractures, and studies involving the use of sugar-tong splints or non-circular immobilization. The outcomes evaluated included subjective measures (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score; Mayo Wrist Score; and visual analog scale) and objective outcomes (complication rate and radiological parameters). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			We included seven articles from 2017 to 2022. These studies reported a total of 542 fractures, predominantly in women, with a mean age of over 50 years. Both short and long arm casts demonstrated similar functional and radiological outcomes. A longer immobilization period (>3 weeks) should be considered to prevent re-displacement. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			In stable fractures treated conservatively, the use of both short and long arm casts resulted in comparable functional outcomes in older patients. Immobilization for at least 3 weeks is recommended, as it provided similar clinical and radiological outcomes compared to longer periods of immobilization (level of evidence: 2A). 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Basic to advanced elbow arthroscopy: the history, basic set up, and indications
Erica KHOLINNE ; In-ho JEON ; Jae-Man KWAK
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2024;27(3):386-395
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Elbow arthroscopy presents challenges; however, its indications and advantages over traditional open surgery are swiftly evolving. Despite being less widely performed than on other joints such as the knee, shoulder, ankle, and hip, arthroscopic management of the elbow has potential. The goals of this review are to describe and broaden the current applications of elbow arthroscopy. Additionally, we will provide insights and strategies to enhance the effectiveness of elbow arthroscopy. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Basic to advanced elbow arthroscopy: the history, basic set up, and indications
Erica KHOLINNE ; In-ho JEON ; Jae-Man KWAK
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2024;27(3):386-395
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Elbow arthroscopy presents challenges; however, its indications and advantages over traditional open surgery are swiftly evolving. Despite being less widely performed than on other joints such as the knee, shoulder, ankle, and hip, arthroscopic management of the elbow has potential. The goals of this review are to describe and broaden the current applications of elbow arthroscopy. Additionally, we will provide insights and strategies to enhance the effectiveness of elbow arthroscopy. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Comparison of the long-term outcomes of cast immobilization methods in distal radius fractures:a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Maria Florencia DESLIVIA ; Claudia SANTOSA ; Sherly Desnita SAVIO ; Erica KHOLINNE ; Made Bramantya KARNA ; Anak Agung Gde Yuda ASMARA
The Ewha Medical Journal 2024;47(4):e51-
		                        		
		                        			 Objectives:
		                        			Conservative treatment for distal radius fractures typically involves closed reduction and immobilization with a plaster cast. However, no consensus exists regarding the best method and duration for immobilization. This study investigated the functional outcomes associated with different plaster cast application techniques in the treatment of stable distal radius fractures. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A systematic search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for studies in the last 5 years. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials that investigated non-operative treatments for distal radius fractures. We excluded studies with short-term follow-up (less than 3 months), ongoing trials, those that did not directly address fractures, and studies involving the use of sugar-tong splints or non-circular immobilization. The outcomes evaluated included subjective measures (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score; Mayo Wrist Score; and visual analog scale) and objective outcomes (complication rate and radiological parameters). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			We included seven articles from 2017 to 2022. These studies reported a total of 542 fractures, predominantly in women, with a mean age of over 50 years. Both short and long arm casts demonstrated similar functional and radiological outcomes. A longer immobilization period (>3 weeks) should be considered to prevent re-displacement. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			In stable fractures treated conservatively, the use of both short and long arm casts resulted in comparable functional outcomes in older patients. Immobilization for at least 3 weeks is recommended, as it provided similar clinical and radiological outcomes compared to longer periods of immobilization (level of evidence: 2A). 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Basic to advanced elbow arthroscopy: the history, basic set up, and indications
Erica KHOLINNE ; In-ho JEON ; Jae-Man KWAK
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2024;27(3):386-395
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Elbow arthroscopy presents challenges; however, its indications and advantages over traditional open surgery are swiftly evolving. Despite being less widely performed than on other joints such as the knee, shoulder, ankle, and hip, arthroscopic management of the elbow has potential. The goals of this review are to describe and broaden the current applications of elbow arthroscopy. Additionally, we will provide insights and strategies to enhance the effectiveness of elbow arthroscopy. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.Comparison of the long-term outcomes of cast immobilization methods in distal radius fractures:a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Maria Florencia DESLIVIA ; Claudia SANTOSA ; Sherly Desnita SAVIO ; Erica KHOLINNE ; Made Bramantya KARNA ; Anak Agung Gde Yuda ASMARA
The Ewha Medical Journal 2024;47(4):e51-
		                        		
		                        			 Objectives:
		                        			Conservative treatment for distal radius fractures typically involves closed reduction and immobilization with a plaster cast. However, no consensus exists regarding the best method and duration for immobilization. This study investigated the functional outcomes associated with different plaster cast application techniques in the treatment of stable distal radius fractures. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A systematic search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for studies in the last 5 years. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials that investigated non-operative treatments for distal radius fractures. We excluded studies with short-term follow-up (less than 3 months), ongoing trials, those that did not directly address fractures, and studies involving the use of sugar-tong splints or non-circular immobilization. The outcomes evaluated included subjective measures (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score; Mayo Wrist Score; and visual analog scale) and objective outcomes (complication rate and radiological parameters). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			We included seven articles from 2017 to 2022. These studies reported a total of 542 fractures, predominantly in women, with a mean age of over 50 years. Both short and long arm casts demonstrated similar functional and radiological outcomes. A longer immobilization period (>3 weeks) should be considered to prevent re-displacement. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			In stable fractures treated conservatively, the use of both short and long arm casts resulted in comparable functional outcomes in older patients. Immobilization for at least 3 weeks is recommended, as it provided similar clinical and radiological outcomes compared to longer periods of immobilization (level of evidence: 2A). 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Return to sports following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a narrative review
Shafira Widya UTAMI ; Savina Rifky PRATIWI ; Mitchel ; Karina Sylvana GANI ; Erica KHOLINNE
The Ewha Medical Journal 2024;47(2):e21-
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 A Bankart lesion is a tear of the labrum, the ring of cartilage that encircles the shoulder joint socket, that can occur when the shoulder is dislocated. This injury frequently affects young athletes and is associated with shoulder instability. This review was performed to provide an overview of anterior shoulder instability, with an emphasis on rehabilitation and the return to sports following arthroscopic Bankart repair. We searched the Google Scholar and PubMed academic databases through February 18th, 2024, utilizing keywords including “arthroscopic Bankart repair” and “return to sports”. Our findings indicate that athletes who undergo arthroscopic Bankart repair exhibit higher rates of returning to sports compared to those who receive other anterior shoulder stabilization procedures. Several factors are considered when determining readiness to return to athletics, including time elapsed since surgery, type of sport, strength, range of motion, pain, and proprioception. Surgeons typically advise athletes to wait approximately 6 months after surgery before resuming sports activities. They also recommend that athletes regain at least 80% of the strength of the uninjured shoulder or achieve strength levels comparable to those prior to the injury. Additionally, patients are expected to attain a full range of motion without pain, which should be symmetrical to the uninjured side, and demonstrate improved proprioception in the shoulder. The sport in which an athlete participates can also influence the timeline for return. Those involved in overhead sports, like baseball or tennis, often experience lower success rates in returning to their sport compared to athletes from other disciplines. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail