PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients' clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Non-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention.
Catheters ; Duodenostomy ; Gastrectomy* ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Sepsis ; Stomach Neoplasms*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is technically challenging in patients with altered gastrointestinal (GI) anatomy. We evaluated the feasibility of cap-assisted ERCP in patients with altered GI anatomy. METHODS: The outcome of ERCP procedures (n=136) was analyzed in 78 patients with Billroth II (B-II) gastrectomy (n=72), Roux-en-Y total gastrectomy (n=4), and hepaticoduodenostomy (n=2). The intubation rate for reaching the papilla of Vater (POV), deep biliary cannulation rate, therapeutic interventions and procedure-related complications were analyzed. All of the procedures were conducted using a cap-fitted forward-viewing endoscope. RESULTS: The rate of access to the POV was 97.1% (132/136). In cases with successful access, selective biliary cannulation was achieved in 98.5% (130/132) of the patients. The successful biliary cannulation rates were 100% (125/125) for B-II gastrectomy, 50% (2/4) for Roux-en-Y gastrectomy and 100% (3/3) for hepaticoduodenostomy. After selective biliary cannulation, therapeutic interventions, including stone extraction (n=57), sphincterotomy (n=54), stent placement (n=37), nasobiliary drainage (n=20), endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (n=7) and mechanical lithotripsy (n=15), were performed successfully. The procedure-related complication rate was 8.8% (12/136), including immediate bleeding (5.9%, 8/136), pancreatitis (2.2%, 3/136), and perforation (0.7%, 1/136). There were no procedure-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Cap-assisted ERCP is efficient and safe in patients with altered GI anatomy.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/*methods ; Duodenostomy/methods ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Gastrectomy/methods ; Gastric Bypass/methods ; Gastrointestinal Tract/*abnormalities ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Outcome

Midgut malrotation includes a range of developmental abnormalities that occur during fetal intestinal rotation. Manifestations of intestinal malrotation are generally seen in the paediatric population and are uncommon in adults. Symptomatic patients may present with either acute abdominal pain due to midgut volvulus, or chronic abdominal pain due to proximal midgut partial obstruction in the presence of congenital bands. A limited number of paediatric cases of duodenal occlusion due to duodenal malrotation has been previously reported in the medical literature. We herein report the case of a 57-year-old woman who presented with duodenal obstruction due to organoaxial partial rotation of the distal duodenum associated with midgut malrotation. This is probably the first of such a case diagnosed in adulthood reported in the medical literature. Our patient underwent Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy and had symptomatic relief following the successful surgery.
Duodenal Obstruction ; congenital ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Duodenostomy ; Duodenum ; abnormalities ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Sri Lanka ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) and esophageal atresia (EA) born at a single neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 97 patients with confirmed TEF and EA who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit between 1990 and 2007. RESULTS: The rate of prenatal diagnosis was 12%. The average gestational age and birth weight were 37(+2) weeks and 2.5+/-0.7 kg, respectively. Thirty-one infants were born prematurely (32%). Type C was the most common. The mean gap between the proximal and distal esophagus was 2 cm. Esophago-esophagostomy was performed in 72 patients at a mean age of 4 days after birth; gastrostomy or duodenostomy were performed in 8 patients. Forty patients exhibited vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheoesophageal, renal, limb (VACTERL) association with at least 2 combined anomalies, and cardiac anomaly was the most common. The most common post-operative complications were esophageal stricture followed by gastroesophageal reflux. Balloon dilatation was performed for 1.3 times in 26 patients at a mean age of 3 months. The mortality and morbidity rates were 24% and 67%, respectively, and the most common cause of death was sepsis. The weight of approximately 40% patients was below the 10th percentile at 2 years of age. CONCLUSION: Mortality and morbidity rates of patients with TEF and EA are high as compared to those of infants with other neonatal surgical diseases. Further efforts must be taken to reduce mortality and morbidity and improve growth retardation.
Anal Canal ; Birth Weight ; Cause of Death ; Dilatation ; Duodenostomy ; Esophageal Atresia ; Esophageal Stenosis ; Esophagus ; Extremities ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Gastrostomy ; Gestational Age ; Heart Defects, Congenital ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive Care, Neonatal ; Kidney ; Limb Deformities, Congenital ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Sepsis ; Spine ; Trachea ; Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Duodenal trauma is an uncommon injury associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Upper gastrointestinal radiological studies and computed tomography may lead to the diagnosis of blunt duodenal trauma. Exploratory laparotomy remains as the ultimate diagnostic test if a high suspicion of duodenal injury continues even in the face of absent or equivocal radiographic signs. The majority of duodenal injuries may be managed by simple repair of the injured site. More complicated injuries require more sophisticated techniques. Here, we report a case of multilevel blunt duodenal injury successfully managed with duodenal diverticulization, Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy and catheter duodenostomy.
Catheters ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Duodenostomy ; Gastric Bypass ; Laparotomy

PURPOSE: Traumatic duodenal injury is rare. There is no consensus on what type of repair should be performed for duodenal perforations with respect to their varying severity. As a result, surgeons are confronted with the dilemma of choosing between several diagnostic tests and many surgical procedures. In this study, we report our experience with treating traumatic duodenal injury and also offer a review of the literature. METHODS: Seventeen patients with duodenal injury following abdominal trauma were treated by several methods between January 1992 and October 2006. Based on review of the medical records, we classified the patients as having grade I through V duodenal injury using the scale constructed by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST). We also noted clinical features, operative management, and outcome. RESULTS: Among 17 patients, one patient who had a duodenal intramural hematoma was treated by conservative management. Seven patients were treated by duodenojejunostomy, with only one complication. The remaining 9 patients underwent various operations, including primary closure alone (n=3), primary closure with jejunal patch (n=1), primary closure with duodenostomy (n=3), and pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=2). The complication rate among patients who underwent surgery within 24 hours after injury was 1 case among 13. However, complications occurred in all 4 surgical cases undertaken more than 24 hours after injury. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis (within 24 hours) and thorough inspection during exploration provide the best means toward reducing complications associated with traumatic duodenal injury.
Consensus ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Duodenostomy ; Early Diagnosis ; Hematoma ; Humans ; Medical Records ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy

PURPOSE: Traumatic duodenal injury is rare. There is no consensus on what type of repair should be performed for duodenal perforations with respect to their varying severity. As a result, surgeons are confronted with the dilemma of choosing between several diagnostic tests and many surgical procedures. In this study, we report our experience with treating traumatic duodenal injury and also offer a review of the literature. METHODS: Seventeen patients with duodenal injury following abdominal trauma were treated by several methods between January 1992 and October 2006. Based on review of the medical records, we classified the patients as having grade I through V duodenal injury using the scale constructed by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST). We also noted clinical features, operative management, and outcome. RESULTS: Among 17 patients, one patient who had a duodenal intramural hematoma was treated by conservative management. Seven patients were treated by duodenojejunostomy, with only one complication. The remaining 9 patients underwent various operations, including primary closure alone (n=3), primary closure with jejunal patch (n=1), primary closure with duodenostomy (n=3), and pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=2). The complication rate among patients who underwent surgery within 24 hours after injury was 1 case among 13. However, complications occurred in all 4 surgical cases undertaken more than 24 hours after injury. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis (within 24 hours) and thorough inspection during exploration provide the best means toward reducing complications associated with traumatic duodenal injury.
Consensus ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Duodenostomy ; Early Diagnosis ; Hematoma ; Humans ; Medical Records ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVETo report clinical experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, duodenostomy, jejunostomy in 120 patients, focusing on its technique and indications.

METHODSOne hundred and twenty patients received percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, duodenostomy, jejunostomy from May 2001 to April 2004, including 75 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), 42 percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ), 2 percutaneous endoscopic duodenostomy (PED), 1 direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ). All tubes established by traditional pull technique.

RESULTSThe average duration of PEG was (9 +/- 4) min, PEJ (17 +/- 6) min, DPEJ 20 min, and PED was 10 and 12 min for 2 patients, respectively. Success rate of the technique was 98.4% (120/122). Major complication rate was 0.8% (1/120), and minor complication rate was 7.5% (9/120). Clinical indications: PEG, PED and PEJ were applied for long-term enteral nutritional support in 88 patients, gastrointestinal decompression in 25 patients, and transfusing external drainage bile to gastrointestinal tract in 5 patients. Two radiation enteritis patients used PEG for gastrointestinal decompression preoperatively and long-term enteral nutritional support postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONPEG, PED PEJ and DPEJ are easily handled, effective and safe, and may be widely used in clinical practice.

Adult ; Aged ; Duodenostomy ; methods ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Enteral Nutrition ; Female ; Gastrostomy ; methods ; Humans ; Jejunostomy ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged

OBJECTIVETo study the treatment of primary malignant duodenal tumor.

METHODThe data of 54 cases of primary malignant duodenal tumor during 1993 approximately 2003 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTSClinical manifestations were jaundice, abdominalgia, obstruction of digest tract and bleeding. Correct diagnosis rates of image examination were endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 92.8%, air barium double radiography 70.8%, gastroscopy 50.0%, CT 21.9%, MRI 21.4%. Tumor location was 1 in duodenal bulb, 45 in descending portion, 3 in horizontal part and none in ascending portion. 48 malignant tumors were operated, 31 pancreaticoduodenectomy, 1 pancreaticoduodenectomy and partial resection of superior mesenteric vein, 6 radical segmental duodenal resection, 1 palliative segmental duodenal resection, 3 duodenal wedge resection, 5 bypass operation (gastrojejunostomy and/or cholangiojejunostomy), 1 jejunostomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 13 cases. The survival rates were 5-year 45.4%, 3-year 45.4%, 1-year 63.2%. Median survival months were 24, 10, 38 and 16 respectively for radical operation group, palliative operation group, with postoperative adjuvant therapy group and without postoperative adjuvant therapy group. No significant survival time was found between radical operation group and palliative operation group, adjuvant therapy group and without postoperative adjuvant therapy group, pancreaticoduodenectomy group and radical segmental duodenal resection group in statistics. Among lymphyaden metastasis, tumor size, tumor depth, tumor thrombi, pathologic type and operative methods, only tumor thrombi had prognostic significance in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONSPancreaticoduodenectomy and radical segmental duodenal resection should be selected for primary malignant duodenal tumor. Bypass operation can prolong survival and improve life-quality. Postoperative adjuvant treatment is advocated.

Abdominal Pain ; etiology ; Adenocarcinoma ; complications ; surgery ; therapy ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Duodenal Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; therapy ; Duodenal Obstruction ; etiology ; Duodenostomy ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatectomy ; methods ; Postoperative Care ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Wound Infection ; Survival Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diagnostic or thepapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the mainstream for the pancreaticobiliary disease. However, the ERCP related complications are serious and sometimes fatal to the patients. We have reviewed our experiences of the operative management for the ERCP injury. METHODS: Medical records of 13 patients who underwent laparotomic surgical intervention for various ERCP injuries from March 1996 to August 2002 at Department of Surgery, the Catholic University of Korea were reviewed. RESULTS: The age range of the patients was from 28 to 85 years. There were 5 females and 8 males. 6 patients showed the duodenal perforations and 4 patients suffered from bleedings around the ampulla of Vater. One of the 4 bleeding patients had huge expanding submucosal hematomas throughout the entire duodenum. We found massive retroperitoneal extraluminal air density in one patient but we could not find any leakage of the contrast media during the upper gastrointestinal series, however, this patient complained aggravated peritoneal irritation sign, so we explored the abdomen. Most of the patients had free abdominal or retroperitoneal air shadows (n=7) on plain chest or abdominal X-ray. We diagnosed the uncontrolled bleeding from the sphincterotomy site using the gastroduodenal fiberscopes in 3 patients. On the computed tomogaphic images, one patient showed a huge duodenal hematoma, another one had a retroperitoneal fluid collection and another one revealed a retroperitoneal air shadow. One patient showed aggravated pancreatitis on the serial CT scan and finally the patient developed a hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis, then we explored the abdomen and tried peripancreatic drainage but we lost the patient in 19 postoperative day due to sepsis. The other 12 patients survived by the various surgical procedures. For the 6 patients, we performed duodenotomic sphincteroplasty, tube duodenostomy and biliary drainage with T-tube. One patient survived with Whipple's procedure, one patient improved by the pyloric exclusion and one patient cured with the duodenal diverticulization. Other procedures were primary repair of the duodenum, transduodenal sphincteroplasty and just cholecystectomy and T-tube choledochostomy. CONCLUSION: There was tendency to uneventful improvement of patients by the early detection and urgent laparotomic surgical intervention of the ERCP complication.
Abdomen ; Ampulla of Vater ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde* ; Cholecystectomy ; Choledochostomy ; Contrast Media ; Drainage ; Duodenostomy ; Duodenum ; Female ; Hematoma ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Korea ; Male ; Medical Records ; Pancreatitis ; Sepsis ; Sphincterotomy, Transhepatic ; Thorax ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed