Objective: To investigate the timing of pericardial drainage catheter removal and restart of the anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) suffered from perioperative pericardial tamponade during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation and uninterrupted dabigatran. Methods: A total of 20 patients with pericardial tamponade, who underwent AF catheter ablation with uninterrupted dabigatran in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2019 to August 2021, were included in this retrospective analysis. The clinical characteristics of enrolled patients, information of catheter ablation procedures, pericardial tamponade management, perioperative complications, the timing of pericardial drainage catheter removal and restart of anticoagulation were analyzed. Results: All patients underwent pericardiocentesis and pericardial effusion drainage was successful in all patients. The average drainage volume was (427.8±527.4) ml. Seven cases were treated with idarucizumab, of which 1 patient received surgical repair. The average timing of pericardial drainage catheter removal and restart of anticoagulation in 19 patients without surgical repair was (1.4±0.7) and (0.8±0.4) days, respectively. No new bleeding, embolism and death were reported during hospitalization and within 30 days following hospital discharge. Time of removal of pericardial drainage catheter, restart of anticoagulation and hospital stay were similar between patients treated with idarucizumab or not. Conclusion: It is safe and reasonable to remove pericardial drainage catheter and restart anticoagulation as soon as possible during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with uninterrupted dabigatran independent of the idarucizumab use or not in case of confirmed hemostasis.
Humans ; Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy* ; Dabigatran/therapeutic use* ; Cardiac Tamponade/complications* ; Anticoagulants/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Drainage/adverse effects* ; Catheter Ablation ; Catheters/adverse effects*

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of transanal drainage tube (TDT) in reducing the incidence of anastomotic leak following anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for relevant studies published from inception to October 2022 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. The primary outcomes included total incidence of anastomotic leak, grade B and C anastomotic leak rates, reoperation rate, anastomotic bleeding rate, and overall complication rate. Results: Three randomized controlled trials involving 1115 patients (559 patients in the TDT group and 556 in the non-TDT group) were included. Meta-analysis showed that the total incidences of anastomotic leak and of grade B anastomotic leak were 5.5% (31/559) and 4.5% (25/559), respectively, in the TDT group and 7.9% (44/556) and 3.8% (21/556), respectively, in the non-TDT group. These differences are not statistically significant (P=0.120, P=0.560, respectively). Compared with the non-TDT group, the TDT group had a lower incidence of grade C anastomotic leak (1.6% [7/559] vs. 4.5% [25/556]) and reoperation rate (0.9% [5/559] vs. 4.3% [24/556]), but a higher incidence of anastomotic bleeding (8.2% [23/279] vs. 3.6% [10/276]). These differences were statistically significant (P=0.003, P=0.001, P=0.030, respectively). The overall complication rate was 26.5%(74/279) in the TDT group and 27.2% (75/276) in the non-TDT group. These differences are not statistically significant (P=0.860). Conclusions: TDT did not significantly reduce the total incidence of anastomotic leak but may have potential clinical benefits in preventing grade C anastomotic leak. Notably, placement of TDT may increase the anastomotic bleeding rate.
Humans ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Rectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Drainage ; Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects* ; Reoperation/adverse effects* ; Hemorrhage ; Retrospective Studies

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics, treatment experiences and prognostic factors for descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 22 patients with DNM diagnosed and treated in Henan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2016 to August 2022, including 16 males and 6 females, aged 29-79 years. After admission, all patients underwent CT scanning of the maxillofacial, cervical, and thoracic regions to confirm their diagnoses. Emergency incision and drainage were performed. The neck incision was treated with continuous vacuum sealing drainage. According to the prognoses, the patients were divided into cure group and death group, and the prognostic factors were analyzed. SPSS 25.0 software was used to analyze the clinical data. Rusults: The main complaints were dysphagia (45.5%, 10/22) and dyspnea (50.0%, 11/22). Odontogenic infection accounted for 45.5% (10/22) and oropharyngeal infection accounted for 54.5% (12/22). There were 16 cases in the cured group and 6 cases in the death group, with a total mortality rate of 27.3%. The mortality rates of DNM typeⅠand typeⅡwere respectively 16.7% and 40%. Compared with the cured group, the death group had higher incidences for diabetes, coronary heart disease and septic shock (all P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the cure group and the death group in procalcitonin level (50.43 (137.64) ng/ml vs 2.92 (6.33) ng/ml, M(IQR), Z=3.023, P<0.05) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ) score (16.10±2.40 vs 6.75±3.19, t=6.524, P<0.05). Conclution: DNM is rare, with high mortality, high incidence of septic shock, and the increased procalcitonin level and APACHE Ⅱ score combined diabetes and coronary heart disease are the poor prognostic factors for DNM. Early incision and drainage combined with continuous vacuum sealing drainage technique is a better way to treat DNM.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Mediastinitis/diagnosis* ; Shock, Septic/complications* ; Retrospective Studies ; Procalcitonin ; Prognosis ; Drainage/adverse effects* ; Necrosis/therapy*

Objective: To examine the feasibility and technical considerations of thorough debridement using uniportal thoracoscopic surgery for tuberculous empyema complicated by chest wall tuberculosis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 38 patients who underwent comprehensive uniportal thoracoscopy debridement for empyema complicated by chest wall tuberculosis in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, from March 2019 to August 2021. There were 23 males and 15 females, aged (M(IQR)) 30 (25) years (range: 18 to 78 years). The patients were cleared of chest wall tuberculosis under general anesthesia and underwent an incision through the intercostal sinus, followed by the whole fiberboard decortication method. Chest tube drainage was used for pleural cavity disease and negative pressure drainage for chest wall tuberculosis with SB tube, and without muscle flap filling and pressure bandaging. If there was no air leakage, the chest tube was removed first, followed by the removal of the SB tube after 2 to 7 days if there was no obvious residual cavity on the CT scan. The patients were followed up in outpatient clinics and by telephone until October 2022. Results: The operation time was 2.0 (1.5) h (range: 1 to 5 h), and blood loss during the operation was 100 (175) ml (range: 100 to 1 200 ml). The most common postoperative complication was prolonged air leak, with an incidence rate of 81.6% (31/38). The postoperative drainage time of the chest tube was 14 (12) days (range: 2 to 31 days) and the postoperative drainage time of the SB tube was 21 (14) days (range: 4 to 40 days). The follow-up time was 25 (11) months (range: 13 to 42 months). All patients had primary healing of their incisions and there was no tuberculosis recurrence during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Uniportal thoracoscopic thorough debridement combined with postoperative standardized antituberculosis treatment is safe and feasible for the treatment of tuberculous empyema with chest wall tuberculosis, which could achieve a good long-term recovery effect.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Abscess/complications* ; Empyema, Pleural/etiology* ; Empyema, Tuberculous/complications* ; Retrospective Studies ; Thoracic Wall ; Debridement/adverse effects* ; China ; Chest Tubes/adverse effects* ; Tuberculosis/complications* ; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted ; Drainage

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical significance and related factors of drainage tube after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy(PELD). METHODS: The clinical data of 151 patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent PELD from January 2019 to September 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the drainage tube was used after operation, the patients were divided into drainage tube group and non drainage tube group. The placement time and total drainage volume were recorded. The characteristics of patients, such as age, gender, body mass index, lumbar disc herniation segment, smoking history, basic diseases and whether taking anticoagulants, were analyzed by single factor and multiple factor. RESULTS: Drainage tubes were used in 32 patients after PELD. There were statistical differences in visual analogue scale(VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Assiciation(JOA) scores between postoperative and preoperative of that in two groups(P<0.05). There were statistical differences in VAS and JOA scores at discharge between two groups(P<0.05), while there were no statistical differences at other time points(P>0.05). Univariate analysis showed that age, basic diseases and whether taking anticoagulants were related to the use of drainage tube, but gender, body mass index, lumbar disc herniation segment and smoking history were not significantly related to the use of drainage tube. Multivariate analysis showed that elderly patients, complicated with hypertension and diabetes, taking anticoagulants were related to the use of drainage tube. CONCLUSION The use of drainage tube after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy can improve the symptoms of lumbar and leg pain in early stage. For elderly patients with hypertension, diabetes and taking anticoagulants drugs, drainage tube can be considered after transforaminal endoscopy.
Aged ; Diskectomy/adverse effects* ; Diskectomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects* ; Drainage ; Endoscopy ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery* ; Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic transcystic drainage and common bile duct exploration in the treatment of patients with difficult biliary stones. METHODS: Between April 2020 and December 2021, eighteen patients with difficult biliary stones received laparoscopic transcystic drainage (C-tube technique) and common bile duct exploration. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively collected. The safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic transcystic drainage and common bile duct exploration were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the eighteen patients with difficult biliary stones, thirteen patients received traditional laparoscopic transcystic drainage, and the remaining five received modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage. The mean surgical duration were (161±59) min (82-279 min), no bile duct stenosis or residual stone was observed in the patients receiving postoperative cholangiography via C-tube. The maximum volume of C-tube drainage was (500±163) mL/d (180-820 mL/d). Excluding three patients with early dislodgement of C-tube, among the fifteen patients with C-tube maintained, the median time of C-tube removal was 8 d (5-12 d). The duration of hospital stay was (12±3) d (7-21 d) for the 18 patients. Five C-tube related adverse events were observed, all of which occurred in the patients with traditional laparoscopic transcystic drainage, including two abnormal position of the C-tube, and three early dislocation of the C-tube. All the 5 adverse events caused no complications. Only one grade one complication occurred, which was in a patient with modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage. The patient demonstrated transient fever after C-tube removal, but there was no bile in the drainage tube and the subsequent CT examination confirmed no bile leakage. The fever spontaneously relieved with conservative observation, and the patient recovered uneventfully with discharge the next day. All the 18 patients were followed up for 1-20 months (median: 9 months). Normal liver function and no recurrence of stone were detected with ultrasonography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic transcystic drainage combined with common bile duct exploration is safe and feasible in the treatment of patients with difficult biliary stones. The short-term effect is good. Modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage approach may reduce the incidence of C-tube dislocation and bile leak.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Gallstones/etiology* ; Drainage/methods* ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects* ; Common Bile Duct/surgery*

Duodenal injury is a serious abdominal organ injury. Duodenal fistula is one of the most serious complications in gastrointestinal surgery, which is concerned for its critical status, difficulty in treatment and high mortality. Thoracic and abdominal compound closed injury and a small part of open injury are common causes of duodenal injury. Iatrogenic or traumatic injury, malnutrition, cancer, tuberculosis, Crohn's disease etc. are common causes of duodenal fistula, however, there has been still lacking of ideal diagnosis and treatment by now. The primary treatment strategy of duodenal fistula is to determine the cause of disease and its key point is prevention, including perioperative parenteral and enteral nutrition support, improvement of hypoproteinemia actively, avoidance of stump ischemia by excessive separate duodenum intraoperatively, performance of appropriate duodenum stump suture to ensure the stump blood supply, and avoidance of postoperative input loop obstruction, postoperative stump bleeding or hematoma etc. Once duodenal fistula occurs, a simple and reasonable operation can be selected and performed after fluid prohibition, parenteral and enteral nutrition, acid suppression, enzyme inhibition, anti-infective treatment and maintaining water salt electrolyte and acid-base balance. Double tube method, duodenal decompression and peritoneal drainage can reduce duodenal fistula-related complications, and then reduce the mortality, which can save the lives of patients.
Abdominal Injuries ; complications ; Anti-Infective Agents ; therapeutic use ; Decompression, Surgical ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Drainage ; Duodenal Diseases ; diagnosis ; etiology ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Duodenum ; blood supply ; injuries ; surgery ; Enteral Nutrition ; Humans ; Hypoproteinemia ; therapy ; Intestinal Fistula ; diagnosis ; etiology ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Ischemia ; prevention & control ; Nutritional Support ; Parenteral Nutrition ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Suture Techniques ; Thoracic Injuries ; complications

Intestinal fistula, as a serious complication after abdominal surgery, not only leads to a series of pathophysiological changes such as fluid loss, malnutrition and organ dysfunction, but also causes the severe abdominal infection, which often threatens the life of patients. How to make the diagnosis and give the treatment of intestinal fistula is the key to save the lives of high-risk patients. In our hospital, during the past course of diagnosis and treatment for intestinal fistula complicated with severe abdominal infection, based on the combination of literatures at home and abroad with our clinical experiences for many years, an effective three-stage prevention and treatment strategy was formed gradually, which included early diagnosis, effective treatment of infection source, open drainage of abdominal infection and early enteral nutrition support. This strategy subverts the traditional concept of surgery alone, and becomes an effective means to save patients with severe abdominal infection.
Clinical Protocols ; standards ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Drainage ; methods ; Early Diagnosis ; Enteral Nutrition ; methods ; Humans ; Intestinal Fistula ; complications ; diagnosis ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Intraabdominal Infections ; etiology ; therapy ; Nutritional Support ; methods ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo examine the relationship between gastric conduit width and postoperative early delayed gastric emptying (DGE) in patients with middle-lower esophageal carcinoma who underwent Ivor-Lewis operation.

METHODSClinical data of 282 consecutive patients with middle-lower esophageal cancer who underwent the Ivor-Lewis operation by same surgical team in our department from January 2013 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to the width of gastric conduit: width > 5.0 cm as broad group (n=93); width 3.0-5.0 cm as moderate group (n=70); width < 3.0 cm as narrow group (n=119). The gastric conduits of patients in narrow group were completely positioned the esophageal bed and fixed to the pericardium posterior wall. None of patients received pyloroplasty or pylorotomy. Perioperative data, operation-associated complications, and postoperative upper gastrointestinal radiographic results(1 week and 4 weeks after operation) were compared among groups.

RESULTSThe baseline data among these groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, tumor TNM staging, pathological types, serum albumin level, and the rate of receiving neoadjuvant therapy(all P>0.05). There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay among groups(all P>0.05). No patients died during perioperative peried. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 cases, one from broad group and another from narrow group. The incidences of arrhythmia and postoperative pulmonary complications, including infection, atelectasis, pneumothorax, and pleural effusion were similar among groups (all P>0.05). The average amount of gastric juice drainage in narrow group was (98±57) ml/day, which was markedly lower than that in broad group [(157±62) ml/day, P=0.000] and in moderate group [(123±68) ml/day, P=0.008]. One week after operation, the overall incidence of DGE was 10.6%(30/282), the incidence of DGE in broad, moderate, narrow groups was 17.2%(16/93), 14.3%(10/70), and 3.4%(4/119) respectively, and broad and moderate groups had higher incidence as compared to narrow group (P=0.001 and P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONDuring the Ivor-Lewis operation, application of a narrow gastric conduit (width < 3.0 cm), which completely position the esophageal bed with fixation to the pericardium posterior wall, can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative early DGE.

Anastomotic Leak ; etiology ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Carcinoma ; surgery ; Drainage ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Esophagectomy ; adverse effects ; Gastric Juice ; secretion ; Gastroparesis ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Operative Time ; Pericardium ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Upper Gastrointestinal Tract ; anatomy & histology ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors of intra-abdominal infection(IAI) after colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODSClinical and follow-up data of 773 colorectal cancer patients undergoing operation in our hospital from October 2011 to December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into intra-abdominal cavity infection group (110 cases, IAI group) and non intra-abdominal infection group(663 cases, non-IAI group). All the patients administered prophylactic antibiotics 30 minutes to 2 hours before operation. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the risk factors of IAI.

RESULTSPreoperative factors associated with postoperative IAI included hepatic cirrhosis, kidney diseases, diabetes or other basic diseases, prophylactic use of drugs, hypoalbuminemia, anemia, intestinal obstruction, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) anesthetic grading score (all P<0.05). Postoperative factors associated with postoperative IAI included use of laparoscopy or stapler, united exenteration, existence of anastomotic fistula, time of drainage tube placement, operation time and tumor staging (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative diabetes(OR=2.36, 95% CI:1.45 to 4.76, P<0.01), combined exenteration (OR=2.02, 95% CI:1.02 to 4.00, P<0.01), anastomotic leak (OR=4.41, 95% CI:1.77 to 10.99, P=0.001), operation time≥140 minutes (OR=2.88, 95% CI:1.78 to 4.67, P<0.01) and period of postoperative drainage≥10 days(OR=4.57, 95% CI:2.78 to 7.52, P<0.01) were independent risk factors of postoperative IAI, while the use of stapler was protective factor (OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.60, P<0.01). Compared with prophylactic use of cephamycins plus metronidazole, cefuroxime plus metronidazole had a higher rate of IAI(OR=2.10, 95% CI:1.23 to 3.58, P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONSPrevention of postoperative IAI is required for colorectal cancer patients, particularly in those with preoperative diabetes, combined exenteration, anastomotic leak, operation time longer than 140 minutes and postoperative drainage period longer than 10 days. Preoperative use of cephamycins plus metronidazole has better efficacy in prevention of postoperative IAI.

Anastomotic Leak ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Drainage ; Humans ; Intestinal Obstruction ; Intraabdominal Infections ; epidemiology ; Laparoscopy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors