Purpose: The study aimed to compare the differences in patency between helical interwoven nitinol stents and balloon angioplasty in patients with arteriovenous graft (AVG) malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent helical interwoven nitinol stent placement (n = 15) or balloon angioplasty (n = 25) between January 2016 and September 2021. The primary and secondary patency rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Dialysis was possible post-intervention in all patients who showed no specific complications, including stent fracture. The average primary patency of the stent placement group was longer than that of the balloon angioplasty group but did not differ significantly (8.5 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.319). The mean secondary patency period was 17.6 months in the stent placement group, which was shorter than that in the balloon angioplasty group (18.8 months); however, this difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.660). Conclusion Helical interwoven nitinol stents could maintain patency in patients with AVG malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis, but they did not improve patency compared to balloon angioplasty.

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the differences in patency between helical interwoven nitinol stents and balloon angioplasty in patients with arteriovenous graft (AVG) malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent helical interwoven nitinol stent placement (n = 15) or balloon angioplasty (n = 25) between January 2016 and September 2021. The primary and secondary patency rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Dialysis was possible post-intervention in all patients who showed no specific complications, including stent fracture. The average primary patency of the stent placement group was longer than that of the balloon angioplasty group but did not differ significantly (8.5 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.319). The mean secondary patency period was 17.6 months in the stent placement group, which was shorter than that in the balloon angioplasty group (18.8 months); however, this difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.660). Conclusion Helical interwoven nitinol stents could maintain patency in patients with AVG malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis, but they did not improve patency compared to balloon angioplasty.

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the differences in patency between helical interwoven nitinol stents and balloon angioplasty in patients with arteriovenous graft (AVG) malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent helical interwoven nitinol stent placement (n = 15) or balloon angioplasty (n = 25) between January 2016 and September 2021. The primary and secondary patency rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Dialysis was possible post-intervention in all patients who showed no specific complications, including stent fracture. The average primary patency of the stent placement group was longer than that of the balloon angioplasty group but did not differ significantly (8.5 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.319). The mean secondary patency period was 17.6 months in the stent placement group, which was shorter than that in the balloon angioplasty group (18.8 months); however, this difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.660). Conclusion Helical interwoven nitinol stents could maintain patency in patients with AVG malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis, but they did not improve patency compared to balloon angioplasty.

Background: Humans are exposed to mercury primarily in its highly toxic form, methyl mercury, which is known to have adverse effects on various organs and systems. The negative impact of mercury exposure on the growth, development, and mental health of children, from infancy to adolescence, is well-documented. However, there are no internationally standardized safe limits for mercury exposure. This study investigated the impact of dietary habits and higher body mass index (BMI) on blood mercury levels in adolescents. Methods: This study analyzed the data from the 4th Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2018–2020. The focus was on 825 middle and high school students aged 13–18 years, whose blood mercury levels were measured. A survey on dietary and lifestyle habits was also conducted. Blood mercury levels were categorized by geometric median values, and associations with overweight status and seafood consumption were examined using a generalized linear model. Results: The geometric mean blood mercury level for the entire sample was 1.37 μg/L, with levels of 1.31 μg/L in normal-weight individuals and 1.43 μg/L in overweight individuals, showing a statistically significant difference between the two groups. After adjusting for other variables, blood mercury levels were significantly associated with overweight status (estimate: 0.084; p = 0.018; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.015–0.153), consumption of large fish and tuna more than once a week (estimate: 0.18; p = 0.001; 95% CI: 0.077–0.284), and consumption of fish once a week or more (estimate: 0.147; p = 0.004; 95% CI: 0.043–0.250). Conclusions In adolescents, a higher BMI and an increased consumption of large fish, tuna, and fish were associated with higher blood mercury levels. Notably, a stronger association was found between large fish consumption and blood mercury levels in the overweight group. These findings suggest the need to moderate seafood consumption and establish more proactive mercury exposure standards for adolescents.

Background/Aims: Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) represent a novel therapeutic approach for patients with small coronary artery disease. However, further studies are needed to compare the clinical efficacy of DEBs versus drug-eluting stents (DESs). Methods: In total, 492 patients (age, 67.9 ± 11.0 years; 339 men) with small coronary artery lesions (diameter < 2.75 mm) were randomly assigned to group I (DEB) (n = 104; age, 67.2 ± 10.7 years; 83 men) and group II (DES) (n = 388; age, 68.0 ± 11.1 years; 254 men). For inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis, the study population was stratified into groups I (n = 269) and II (n = 280). We compared the incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between the two groups during 12 months of clinical follow-up. Results: Group I had shorter device lengths (22.4 ± 5.8 mm) compared with group II (27.4 ± 9.3 mm; p < 0.001). Additionally, devices in group I were smaller in diameter (2.4 ± 0.1 mm) compared with those in group II (2.6 ± 0.1 mm; p < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower in group I (53.8% ± 12.6%) than in group II (58.6% ± 11.9%; p < 0.001). After IPTW, no significant differences in LVEF were observed between groups I and II. During 12 months of follow-up, the incidence of total MACE did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions No significant differences were observed in clinical efficacy between DEB and DES for the treatment of small coronary artery disease. Therefore, DEB can be considered a viable alternative to DES in patients with small coronary artery disease.

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed. Results: Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -27.33±2.01 in the lurasidone and QXR group, respectively. The mean difference score was -0.91 (95% confidence interval -6.35–4.53). The lurasidone group showed a greater reduction in PANSS total and negative subscale on week 1 and a greater reduction in end-point CGI-S score compared to the QXR group. Body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in the lurasidone group were reduced, with significantly lower mean change compared to QXR. Endpoint changes in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels were also significantly lower. The most common adverse drug reactions with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea. Conclusion Lurasidone 160 mg/day was found to be non-inferior to QXR 600 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia with comparable efficacy and tolerability. Adverse effects of lurasidone were generally tolerable, and beneficial effects on metabolic parameters can be expected.