Background: Allograft is predominantly used interbody spacers for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The corticocancellous allograft has weaker mechanical strength as it is an artificial composite of the cancellous and cortical parts. Additionally, whether utilizing a firmer allograft, such as the cortical ring, leads to better outcomes is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of cortical ring and cortico-cancellous allografts in ACDF. Methods: Patients who underwent ACDF using allograft and were followed up for > 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, including fusion rates (assessed by interspinous motion [ISM], intra-graft bone bridging, and extra-graft bone bridging), subsidence, allograft complications (e.g., allograft fracture and resorption), and patient-reported outcome measures (neck pain visual analog scale [VAS], arm pain VAS, and neck disability index), were assessed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the allograft used: cortical ring and cortico-cancellous allograft groups. Subgroup analysis was subsequently conducted in singleand multi-level operation groups. Results: A total of 227 patients were included. Of them, 134 (59.0%) and 93 (41.0%) underwent ACDF using cortical ring and corticocancellous allograft, respectively. In single-level operations, the cortico-cancellous allograft significantly frequented allograft resorption (24 / 66, 36.4%) than the cortical ring allograft (1 / 28, 3.7%) (p = 0.001). The cortico-cancellous allograft group demonstrated significantly greater subsidence. However, the fusion rates did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. In multi-level operations, the cortico-cancellous allograft (5 / 27, 18.5%) resulted in a significantly higher fracture rate than the cortical ring allograft (5 / 105, 4.7%) (p = 0.030). The fusion rate at 1-year postoperative assessed using ISM (63.2% vs. 55.5%) and intra-graft bone bridging (66.7% vs. 40.7%) was higher in the cortical ring group; however, the difference was not significant. The patient-reported outcomes at 1-year postoperative did not demonstrate significant intergroup differences both in single- and multi-level operations. Conclusions Allograft resorption or fracture occurs more frequently with cortico-cancellous than cortical ring allografts. Despite the frequent occurrence of allograft-related complications with cortico-cancellous allografts, the fusion rate was not significantly affected. Due to the higher rate of allograft resorption or fractures and greater subsidence with cortico-cancellous allografts, cortical ring allografts might yield more stable results in ACDF.

Background: Allograft is predominantly used interbody spacers for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The corticocancellous allograft has weaker mechanical strength as it is an artificial composite of the cancellous and cortical parts. Additionally, whether utilizing a firmer allograft, such as the cortical ring, leads to better outcomes is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of cortical ring and cortico-cancellous allografts in ACDF. Methods: Patients who underwent ACDF using allograft and were followed up for > 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, including fusion rates (assessed by interspinous motion [ISM], intra-graft bone bridging, and extra-graft bone bridging), subsidence, allograft complications (e.g., allograft fracture and resorption), and patient-reported outcome measures (neck pain visual analog scale [VAS], arm pain VAS, and neck disability index), were assessed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the allograft used: cortical ring and cortico-cancellous allograft groups. Subgroup analysis was subsequently conducted in singleand multi-level operation groups. Results: A total of 227 patients were included. Of them, 134 (59.0%) and 93 (41.0%) underwent ACDF using cortical ring and corticocancellous allograft, respectively. In single-level operations, the cortico-cancellous allograft significantly frequented allograft resorption (24 / 66, 36.4%) than the cortical ring allograft (1 / 28, 3.7%) (p = 0.001). The cortico-cancellous allograft group demonstrated significantly greater subsidence. However, the fusion rates did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. In multi-level operations, the cortico-cancellous allograft (5 / 27, 18.5%) resulted in a significantly higher fracture rate than the cortical ring allograft (5 / 105, 4.7%) (p = 0.030). The fusion rate at 1-year postoperative assessed using ISM (63.2% vs. 55.5%) and intra-graft bone bridging (66.7% vs. 40.7%) was higher in the cortical ring group; however, the difference was not significant. The patient-reported outcomes at 1-year postoperative did not demonstrate significant intergroup differences both in single- and multi-level operations. Conclusions Allograft resorption or fracture occurs more frequently with cortico-cancellous than cortical ring allografts. Despite the frequent occurrence of allograft-related complications with cortico-cancellous allografts, the fusion rate was not significantly affected. Due to the higher rate of allograft resorption or fractures and greater subsidence with cortico-cancellous allografts, cortical ring allografts might yield more stable results in ACDF.

Background: Allograft is predominantly used interbody spacers for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The corticocancellous allograft has weaker mechanical strength as it is an artificial composite of the cancellous and cortical parts. Additionally, whether utilizing a firmer allograft, such as the cortical ring, leads to better outcomes is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of cortical ring and cortico-cancellous allografts in ACDF. Methods: Patients who underwent ACDF using allograft and were followed up for > 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, including fusion rates (assessed by interspinous motion [ISM], intra-graft bone bridging, and extra-graft bone bridging), subsidence, allograft complications (e.g., allograft fracture and resorption), and patient-reported outcome measures (neck pain visual analog scale [VAS], arm pain VAS, and neck disability index), were assessed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the allograft used: cortical ring and cortico-cancellous allograft groups. Subgroup analysis was subsequently conducted in singleand multi-level operation groups. Results: A total of 227 patients were included. Of them, 134 (59.0%) and 93 (41.0%) underwent ACDF using cortical ring and corticocancellous allograft, respectively. In single-level operations, the cortico-cancellous allograft significantly frequented allograft resorption (24 / 66, 36.4%) than the cortical ring allograft (1 / 28, 3.7%) (p = 0.001). The cortico-cancellous allograft group demonstrated significantly greater subsidence. However, the fusion rates did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. In multi-level operations, the cortico-cancellous allograft (5 / 27, 18.5%) resulted in a significantly higher fracture rate than the cortical ring allograft (5 / 105, 4.7%) (p = 0.030). The fusion rate at 1-year postoperative assessed using ISM (63.2% vs. 55.5%) and intra-graft bone bridging (66.7% vs. 40.7%) was higher in the cortical ring group; however, the difference was not significant. The patient-reported outcomes at 1-year postoperative did not demonstrate significant intergroup differences both in single- and multi-level operations. Conclusions Allograft resorption or fracture occurs more frequently with cortico-cancellous than cortical ring allografts. Despite the frequent occurrence of allograft-related complications with cortico-cancellous allografts, the fusion rate was not significantly affected. Due to the higher rate of allograft resorption or fractures and greater subsidence with cortico-cancellous allografts, cortical ring allografts might yield more stable results in ACDF.

Background: Allograft is predominantly used interbody spacers for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The corticocancellous allograft has weaker mechanical strength as it is an artificial composite of the cancellous and cortical parts. Additionally, whether utilizing a firmer allograft, such as the cortical ring, leads to better outcomes is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of cortical ring and cortico-cancellous allografts in ACDF. Methods: Patients who underwent ACDF using allograft and were followed up for > 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, including fusion rates (assessed by interspinous motion [ISM], intra-graft bone bridging, and extra-graft bone bridging), subsidence, allograft complications (e.g., allograft fracture and resorption), and patient-reported outcome measures (neck pain visual analog scale [VAS], arm pain VAS, and neck disability index), were assessed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the allograft used: cortical ring and cortico-cancellous allograft groups. Subgroup analysis was subsequently conducted in singleand multi-level operation groups. Results: A total of 227 patients were included. Of them, 134 (59.0%) and 93 (41.0%) underwent ACDF using cortical ring and corticocancellous allograft, respectively. In single-level operations, the cortico-cancellous allograft significantly frequented allograft resorption (24 / 66, 36.4%) than the cortical ring allograft (1 / 28, 3.7%) (p = 0.001). The cortico-cancellous allograft group demonstrated significantly greater subsidence. However, the fusion rates did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. In multi-level operations, the cortico-cancellous allograft (5 / 27, 18.5%) resulted in a significantly higher fracture rate than the cortical ring allograft (5 / 105, 4.7%) (p = 0.030). The fusion rate at 1-year postoperative assessed using ISM (63.2% vs. 55.5%) and intra-graft bone bridging (66.7% vs. 40.7%) was higher in the cortical ring group; however, the difference was not significant. The patient-reported outcomes at 1-year postoperative did not demonstrate significant intergroup differences both in single- and multi-level operations. Conclusions Allograft resorption or fracture occurs more frequently with cortico-cancellous than cortical ring allografts. Despite the frequent occurrence of allograft-related complications with cortico-cancellous allografts, the fusion rate was not significantly affected. Due to the higher rate of allograft resorption or fractures and greater subsidence with cortico-cancellous allografts, cortical ring allografts might yield more stable results in ACDF.

Tattooing is an invasive procedure that involves the introduction of permanent pigments into the dermis, and is categorized as a medical procedure in Korea. Despite the medical, cosmetic, and aesthetic purposes of tattooing, legislative proposals to allow non-medical personnel to perform tattooing have consistently been rejected on public health grounds, prioritizing health and safety considerations. Professional organizations have maintained a consistent position, highlighting the risks of allowing non-medical individuals to perform tattooing. These risks include procedural complications, use of unsafe practices, and inadequate legal frameworks to ensure accountability.Addressing such issues requires careful consideration beyond economic or convenience factors, with an emphasis on public health policies. To address these concerns, the Korean Dermatological Research Foundation convened its 1st Policy Forum on October 6, 2024. The forum discussed the safety aspects, medical complications, and legal implications of tattooing performed by non-medical personnel. These findings highlight the significant risks and regulatory gaps associated with such practices, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review and stringent regulations to protect public health.

Tattooing is an invasive procedure that involves the introduction of permanent pigments into the dermis, and is categorized as a medical procedure in Korea. Despite the medical, cosmetic, and aesthetic purposes of tattooing, legislative proposals to allow non-medical personnel to perform tattooing have consistently been rejected on public health grounds, prioritizing health and safety considerations. Professional organizations have maintained a consistent position, highlighting the risks of allowing non-medical individuals to perform tattooing. These risks include procedural complications, use of unsafe practices, and inadequate legal frameworks to ensure accountability.Addressing such issues requires careful consideration beyond economic or convenience factors, with an emphasis on public health policies. To address these concerns, the Korean Dermatological Research Foundation convened its 1st Policy Forum on October 6, 2024. The forum discussed the safety aspects, medical complications, and legal implications of tattooing performed by non-medical personnel. These findings highlight the significant risks and regulatory gaps associated with such practices, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review and stringent regulations to protect public health.

Purpose: This study aims to systematically analyze the radioactive waste generated from treatments using radioactive Iodine-131 (I-131), Lutetium-177 (Lu-177), and Actinium-225 (Ac-225) to facilitate safe waste management practices. Methods: I-131 is primarily used in thyroid cancer treatment, while Lu-177 and Ac-225 are used to treat prostate cancer. Radioactive waste generated after these treatments was collected from patients at the Korea Cancer Center Hospital and categorized into clothing, slippers, syringes, and other items. The radioactivity concentration of each item was measured using a calibrated highpurity germanium detector. Using measurements, the self-disposal date of each waste item was calculated according to the permissible disposal levels defined by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) under domestic nuclear safety regulations. Results: For the I-131 radioactive waste, clothing, towels, and tableware exhibited high radioactivity concentrations, with most items exceeding the permissible self-disposal levels.Conversely, the type and quantity of waste generated from Lu-177 and Ac-225 that were intravenously injected were relatively minimal, with certain items below the self-disposal thresholds, enabling immediate disposal. For Ac-225, no permissible self-disposal concentration is specified by the NSSC, unlike other therapeutic nuclides. Hence, additional studies are required to establish clear guidelines. Conclusions These findings provide valuable data for optimizing radioactive waste management, potentially reducing disposal time and costs, minimizing radiation exposure, and enhancing hospital safety practices.

Purpose: This study aims to systematically analyze the radioactive waste generated from treatments using radioactive Iodine-131 (I-131), Lutetium-177 (Lu-177), and Actinium-225 (Ac-225) to facilitate safe waste management practices. Methods: I-131 is primarily used in thyroid cancer treatment, while Lu-177 and Ac-225 are used to treat prostate cancer. Radioactive waste generated after these treatments was collected from patients at the Korea Cancer Center Hospital and categorized into clothing, slippers, syringes, and other items. The radioactivity concentration of each item was measured using a calibrated highpurity germanium detector. Using measurements, the self-disposal date of each waste item was calculated according to the permissible disposal levels defined by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) under domestic nuclear safety regulations. Results: For the I-131 radioactive waste, clothing, towels, and tableware exhibited high radioactivity concentrations, with most items exceeding the permissible self-disposal levels.Conversely, the type and quantity of waste generated from Lu-177 and Ac-225 that were intravenously injected were relatively minimal, with certain items below the self-disposal thresholds, enabling immediate disposal. For Ac-225, no permissible self-disposal concentration is specified by the NSSC, unlike other therapeutic nuclides. Hence, additional studies are required to establish clear guidelines. Conclusions These findings provide valuable data for optimizing radioactive waste management, potentially reducing disposal time and costs, minimizing radiation exposure, and enhancing hospital safety practices.

Purpose: This study aims to systematically analyze the radioactive waste generated from treatments using radioactive Iodine-131 (I-131), Lutetium-177 (Lu-177), and Actinium-225 (Ac-225) to facilitate safe waste management practices. Methods: I-131 is primarily used in thyroid cancer treatment, while Lu-177 and Ac-225 are used to treat prostate cancer. Radioactive waste generated after these treatments was collected from patients at the Korea Cancer Center Hospital and categorized into clothing, slippers, syringes, and other items. The radioactivity concentration of each item was measured using a calibrated highpurity germanium detector. Using measurements, the self-disposal date of each waste item was calculated according to the permissible disposal levels defined by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) under domestic nuclear safety regulations. Results: For the I-131 radioactive waste, clothing, towels, and tableware exhibited high radioactivity concentrations, with most items exceeding the permissible self-disposal levels.Conversely, the type and quantity of waste generated from Lu-177 and Ac-225 that were intravenously injected were relatively minimal, with certain items below the self-disposal thresholds, enabling immediate disposal. For Ac-225, no permissible self-disposal concentration is specified by the NSSC, unlike other therapeutic nuclides. Hence, additional studies are required to establish clear guidelines. Conclusions These findings provide valuable data for optimizing radioactive waste management, potentially reducing disposal time and costs, minimizing radiation exposure, and enhancing hospital safety practices.

Tattooing is an invasive procedure that involves the introduction of permanent pigments into the dermis, and is categorized as a medical procedure in Korea. Despite the medical, cosmetic, and aesthetic purposes of tattooing, legislative proposals to allow non-medical personnel to perform tattooing have consistently been rejected on public health grounds, prioritizing health and safety considerations. Professional organizations have maintained a consistent position, highlighting the risks of allowing non-medical individuals to perform tattooing. These risks include procedural complications, use of unsafe practices, and inadequate legal frameworks to ensure accountability.Addressing such issues requires careful consideration beyond economic or convenience factors, with an emphasis on public health policies. To address these concerns, the Korean Dermatological Research Foundation convened its 1st Policy Forum on October 6, 2024. The forum discussed the safety aspects, medical complications, and legal implications of tattooing performed by non-medical personnel. These findings highlight the significant risks and regulatory gaps associated with such practices, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review and stringent regulations to protect public health.