Recent advances in robotics technology and artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked increased interest in humanoid robots that resemble humans and social robots capable of interacting socially. Alongside this trend, a new field of robot research called human-robot interaction (HRI) is gaining prominence. The aim of this review paper is to introduce the fundamental concepts of HRI and social robots, examine their current applications in the medical field, and discuss the current and future prospects of HRI and social robots in spinal care. HRI is an interdisciplinary field where robotics, AI, social sciences, design, and various disciplines collaborate organically to develop robots that successfully interact with humans as the ultimate goal. While social robots are not yet widely deployed in clinical environments, ongoing HRI research encompasses various areas such as nursing and caregiving support, social and emotional assistance, rehabilitation and cognitive enhancement for the elderly, medical information provision and education, as well as patient monitoring and data collection. Although still in its early stages, research related to spinal care includes studies on robotic support for rehabilitation exercises, assistance in gait training, and questionnaire-based assessments for spinal pain. Future applications of social robots in spinal care will require diverse HRI research efforts and active involvement from spinal specialists.

Recent advances in robotics technology and artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked increased interest in humanoid robots that resemble humans and social robots capable of interacting socially. Alongside this trend, a new field of robot research called human-robot interaction (HRI) is gaining prominence. The aim of this review paper is to introduce the fundamental concepts of HRI and social robots, examine their current applications in the medical field, and discuss the current and future prospects of HRI and social robots in spinal care. HRI is an interdisciplinary field where robotics, AI, social sciences, design, and various disciplines collaborate organically to develop robots that successfully interact with humans as the ultimate goal. While social robots are not yet widely deployed in clinical environments, ongoing HRI research encompasses various areas such as nursing and caregiving support, social and emotional assistance, rehabilitation and cognitive enhancement for the elderly, medical information provision and education, as well as patient monitoring and data collection. Although still in its early stages, research related to spinal care includes studies on robotic support for rehabilitation exercises, assistance in gait training, and questionnaire-based assessments for spinal pain. Future applications of social robots in spinal care will require diverse HRI research efforts and active involvement from spinal specialists.

Recent advances in robotics technology and artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked increased interest in humanoid robots that resemble humans and social robots capable of interacting socially. Alongside this trend, a new field of robot research called human-robot interaction (HRI) is gaining prominence. The aim of this review paper is to introduce the fundamental concepts of HRI and social robots, examine their current applications in the medical field, and discuss the current and future prospects of HRI and social robots in spinal care. HRI is an interdisciplinary field where robotics, AI, social sciences, design, and various disciplines collaborate organically to develop robots that successfully interact with humans as the ultimate goal. While social robots are not yet widely deployed in clinical environments, ongoing HRI research encompasses various areas such as nursing and caregiving support, social and emotional assistance, rehabilitation and cognitive enhancement for the elderly, medical information provision and education, as well as patient monitoring and data collection. Although still in its early stages, research related to spinal care includes studies on robotic support for rehabilitation exercises, assistance in gait training, and questionnaire-based assessments for spinal pain. Future applications of social robots in spinal care will require diverse HRI research efforts and active involvement from spinal specialists.

Objective: This study investigated the relationship between intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) improvement after decompression surgery for cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM) and postoperative neurological outcomes, and preoperative factors influencing MEP improvement. Methods: MEP amplitudes were measured prospectively before and after decompression in 38 patients with CCM. The patients were categorized into three groups according to whether the intraoperative MEP slightly decreased, slightly increased, or significantly increased. Functional outcomes were assessed using the recovery rate (RR) and absolute improvement (AI) of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score on postoperative days (PODs) 7 and 28. The preoperative characteristics and intraoperative MEP changes among the three groups were compared. Additionally, the correlation between the increase in MEP amplitude during surgery and the extent of improvement in functional outcomes was investigated. Results: The significantly increased MEP group had a lower baseline MEP amplitude (152.46 µV; p=0.009). In the slightly decreased MEP group, the RR was 27.98 ± 32.29% at POD 7 (p=0.010) and 11.61 ± 69.84% at POD 28 (p=0.200); the AI was 0.79 ± 0.80 at POD 7 (p=0.010) and 0.79 ± 1.42 at POD 28 (p=0.100). In the slightly increased MEP group, the RR was 23.75 ± 28.36% at POD 7 (p=0.040) and 28.47 ± 43.38% at POD 28 (p=0.070); the AI was 1.00 ± 1.21 at POD 7 (p=0.030) and 1.08±1.88 at POD 28 (p=0.100). In the significantly increased MEP group, the RR was 41.06 ± 32.01% at POD 7 (p=0.009) and 59.78 ± 34.52% at POD 28 (p=0.006); the AI was 3.08 ± 2.07 at POD 7 (p=0.009) and 4.33 ± 2.54 at POD 28 (p=0.006). Greater intraoperative MEP improvement correlated with better postoperative recovery at 1 month (RR, p=0.010; AI, p<0.001). Conclusion Intraoperative MEP monitoring is valuable for predicting postoperative neurological outcomes in CCM patients, particularly those with lower baseline MEP amplitudes. Significant intraoperative MEP improvements are associated with better functional recovery. These findings underscore the importance of MEP monitoring in optimizing surgical strategies and predicting neurological recovery.

Recent advances in robotics technology and artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked increased interest in humanoid robots that resemble humans and social robots capable of interacting socially. Alongside this trend, a new field of robot research called human-robot interaction (HRI) is gaining prominence. The aim of this review paper is to introduce the fundamental concepts of HRI and social robots, examine their current applications in the medical field, and discuss the current and future prospects of HRI and social robots in spinal care. HRI is an interdisciplinary field where robotics, AI, social sciences, design, and various disciplines collaborate organically to develop robots that successfully interact with humans as the ultimate goal. While social robots are not yet widely deployed in clinical environments, ongoing HRI research encompasses various areas such as nursing and caregiving support, social and emotional assistance, rehabilitation and cognitive enhancement for the elderly, medical information provision and education, as well as patient monitoring and data collection. Although still in its early stages, research related to spinal care includes studies on robotic support for rehabilitation exercises, assistance in gait training, and questionnaire-based assessments for spinal pain. Future applications of social robots in spinal care will require diverse HRI research efforts and active involvement from spinal specialists.

Recent advances in robotics technology and artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked increased interest in humanoid robots that resemble humans and social robots capable of interacting socially. Alongside this trend, a new field of robot research called human-robot interaction (HRI) is gaining prominence. The aim of this review paper is to introduce the fundamental concepts of HRI and social robots, examine their current applications in the medical field, and discuss the current and future prospects of HRI and social robots in spinal care. HRI is an interdisciplinary field where robotics, AI, social sciences, design, and various disciplines collaborate organically to develop robots that successfully interact with humans as the ultimate goal. While social robots are not yet widely deployed in clinical environments, ongoing HRI research encompasses various areas such as nursing and caregiving support, social and emotional assistance, rehabilitation and cognitive enhancement for the elderly, medical information provision and education, as well as patient monitoring and data collection. Although still in its early stages, research related to spinal care includes studies on robotic support for rehabilitation exercises, assistance in gait training, and questionnaire-based assessments for spinal pain. Future applications of social robots in spinal care will require diverse HRI research efforts and active involvement from spinal specialists.

Purpose: To investigate whether the signal or morphological changes in the adjacent bone or soft tissue after intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) occur due to postprocedural inflammation or infectious spondylodiscitis. Materials and Methods: Ten patients (female:male = 5:5; age range, 18–71 years; mean age: 36.5 years) who underwent lumbar IDET between January 2018 and December 2020 and complained of fever or pain were included in this study. The presence and extent of bone marrow and paraspinal soft tissue signal changes were evaluated using the first follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after IDET. Signal changes in the treated discs and the presence and extent of epidural enhancement were evaluated. Additionally, we investigated the presence and margins of subchondral erosions in the vertebral body. Results: Two radiologists analyzed the imaging findings by consensus. Six patients were diagnosed with postprocedural inflammation and four with infectious spondylodiscitis, which was confirmed by specimen culture after surgery. All 10 patients showed signal changes in the bone marrow of the vertebral bodies adjacent to the treated disc. Signal changes in the paraspinal soft tissue were observed in only five patients: three with infectious spondylodiscitis and two with postprocedural inflammation. In six patients with postprocedural inflammation, subchondral erosions had well-defined margins with a sclerotic rim and in four patients with infectious spondylodiscitis, subchondral erosions had ill-defined margins. Epidural enhancement showed an extensive pattern in all cases of infectious spondylodiscitis and localized patterns in cases of postprocedural inflammation. Conclusion MRI or computed tomography findings of well-defined subchondral erosions with a sclerotic rim and more localized signal changes in the paraspinal soft tissue or epidural space might aid in the differentiation of infectious spondylodiscitis and postprocedural inflammation in patients who underwent IDET.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the association of redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina (RNRCEs) with the degree and duration of symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Materials and Methods: Between January 2017 and December 2018, 224 patients demonstrating central canal stenosis on lumbar spine MRI were included. Various imaging findings associated with spinal canal stenosis were investigated, as were the presence, level, type, and length of RNRCEs, and the presence of nerve root swelling. Clinically, the degree of symptoms and symptom changes after treatment were investigated. Multinomial logistic regression was used for statistical analysis. Results: RNRCEs were present in 142 patients (63.4%). Most RNRCEs were observed above the level of stenosis (47.3%). RNRCE was associated with the number of stenoses and symptom duration (p < 0.05). The presence, level, type, and length of RNRCE and nerve root swelling significantly affected the severity of symptoms (p < 0.05). The type of treatment influenced symptom changes (p < 0.05). Conclusion The recognition and assessment of RNRCEs on spinal MRI are clinically important because the presence, level, type, and length of a RNRCE may be associated with the degree of symptoms and help predict the clinical outcome according to treatment methods.

Objective: Gait impairment reduces a patient’s quality of life. Exoskeletons and wearable robotics enable patients with gait disturbance to stand up and walk. An exoskeleton was developed for use in patients with stroke and spinal cord injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of overground exoskeleton-assisted gait training (OEGT) in spine diseases with gait disturbance. Methods: This was a single-group preliminary study. Five participants with gait disorders because of root dysfunction accompanying spinal stenosis were included in this study. All participants underwent surgical treatment and an exoskeleton training protocol scheduled for 2 or 3 days per week for 4 weeks. Each session was 60 minutes. Clinical tests were performed before (T1) and at the end of the training (T2). Results: One patient dropped out of the study because of medical issues that were not associated with the exoskeleton. Exoskeleton-assisted rehabilitation was feasible for all participants. All participants showed positive changes in gait performance, balance, proximal muscle strength, psychological state, and satisfaction with the rehabilitation. However, there was no significant improvement in neurological deficits. Conclusion OEGT is a feasible rehabilitation method for patients with gait disorders caused by degenerative spinal disease.