OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic transcystic drainage and common bile duct exploration in the treatment of patients with difficult biliary stones. METHODS: Between April 2020 and December 2021, eighteen patients with difficult biliary stones received laparoscopic transcystic drainage (C-tube technique) and common bile duct exploration. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively collected. The safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic transcystic drainage and common bile duct exploration were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the eighteen patients with difficult biliary stones, thirteen patients received traditional laparoscopic transcystic drainage, and the remaining five received modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage. The mean surgical duration were (161±59) min (82-279 min), no bile duct stenosis or residual stone was observed in the patients receiving postoperative cholangiography via C-tube. The maximum volume of C-tube drainage was (500±163) mL/d (180-820 mL/d). Excluding three patients with early dislodgement of C-tube, among the fifteen patients with C-tube maintained, the median time of C-tube removal was 8 d (5-12 d). The duration of hospital stay was (12±3) d (7-21 d) for the 18 patients. Five C-tube related adverse events were observed, all of which occurred in the patients with traditional laparoscopic transcystic drainage, including two abnormal position of the C-tube, and three early dislocation of the C-tube. All the 5 adverse events caused no complications. Only one grade one complication occurred, which was in a patient with modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage. The patient demonstrated transient fever after C-tube removal, but there was no bile in the drainage tube and the subsequent CT examination confirmed no bile leakage. The fever spontaneously relieved with conservative observation, and the patient recovered uneventfully with discharge the next day. All the 18 patients were followed up for 1-20 months (median: 9 months). Normal liver function and no recurrence of stone were detected with ultrasonography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic transcystic drainage combined with common bile duct exploration is safe and feasible in the treatment of patients with difficult biliary stones. The short-term effect is good. Modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage approach may reduce the incidence of C-tube dislocation and bile leak.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Gallstones/etiology* ; Drainage/methods* ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects* ; Common Bile Duct/surgery*

Objective To establish a nomogram for predicting the distant metastasis risk of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in elderly patients. Methods We extracted data of patients with diagnosis of pNETs at age ≥65 years old between 1973 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All eligible patients were divided randomly into a training cohort and validation cohort. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on the training cohort to identify independent factors for distant metastasis. A nomogram was developed based on the independent risk factors using rms packages of R software, and was validated internally by the training cohort and externally by the validation cohort using C-index and calibration curves. Results A total of 411 elderly patients were identified, of which 260 were assigned to training cohort and 151 to validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated the tumor site (body/tail of pancreas: odds ratio [
Aged ; Humans ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nomograms ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; Prognosis ; Risk Factors

Objective To investigate the impact of prior non-pancreatic cancer on the survival outcomes of patients with localized pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). Methods We reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and selected patients with localized PanNETs diagnosed between 1973 and 2015. We divided the patients into two groups according to the presence or absence of prior non-pancreatic malignancy. Before and after propensity score matching, we compared the clinicopathological characteristics and studied the overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Results A total of 357 (12.9%) of 2778 patients with localized PanNETs had prior cancer. A total of 1211 cases with only a localized PanNET and 133 cases with a localized PanNET and prior cancer had complete data and met the inclusion criteria of the current study. Patients with prior cancer were associated with advanced age (>65 years, 57.9% prior cancer
Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasms, Second Primary ; Neuroendocrine Tumors/epidemiology* ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology* ; Propensity Score

Background: The enteric reconstruction procedure of pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains to be the critical factor influencing the mortality and morbidity. No widely accepted surgical procedure for the pancreaticojejunostomy has been erected yet. We have developed a new technique of pancreaticojejunostomy named "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy." The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy." Methods: This is a prospective single-arm observational study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy." Patients with diseases, in whom a pancreaticoduodenectomy is indicated, would be recruited from Peking University Third Hospital. The hypothesis to be tested is that a "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy" will reduce fistula rate from around 20% to less than 10%. A sample size of 120 patients will be needed. The primary endpoint is the incidence rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The secondary endpoints of the study are anastomosis time, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidities besides the POPF such as the hemorrhage. Enrolled patients will undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy and be followed up for 3 months. The relevant data will be monitored and recorded. Conclusions: The current trial will explore the therapeutic value of the newly raised pancreaticojejunostomy procedure as the "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy." Its theoretical base and pragmatic feature will promise high external validity. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov: NCT03366038; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and to compare the merits and demerits of laparoscopic and endoscopic approach in removing common bile duct stones in patients with gastrojejunostomy after gastrectomy. METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2016, 25 patients with common bile duct stones after gastrojejunostomy received laparoscopic or endoscopic treatment in our centers. They were divided into laparoscopic group and endoscopic group based on treatment approaches for common bile duct stones, including 15 patients in laparoscopic group and 10 in endoscopic group. The clinical characteristics and outcomes between the two groups were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 25 patients with gastrojejunostomy, the method of reconstruction was Billroth II in 21 patients and Roux-en-Y in 4 patients. Six patients received laparoscopic or endoscopic treatment during the acute cholangitis state. Among the laparoscopic group, 5 patients with stones more than 1 cm, 7 patients with multiple stones, while in the endoscopic group, 3 patients with stones more than 1 cm and 4 patients with multiple stones. Fourteen patients in the laparoscopic group with coexisting gallbladder stones, and 6 of their common bile duct stones were successfully removed by transcystic approach without T tube drainage. Stone removals were successful in 4 patients of the endoscopic group by a single performance, including 3 patients with single small stone and one patient with multiple small stones. Two patients in the laparoscopic group were converted to open surgery for severe adhesion and one patient in the endoscopic group turned to laparoscopic operation for failing of finding papilla in the Roux-en-Y anastomotic status. The median hospital stays were 12 d and 10 d, respectively in the laparoscopic and endoscopic group. There were 3 patients with postoperative complications, including one patient with paralytic ileus in the laparoscopic group and 2 patients with biliary pancreatitis or bacteremia in the endoscopic group, and all of them recovered uneventfully with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION Both laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches are feasible for removing stones in the common bile duct in patients with gastrojejunostomy after gastrectomy, and they complement each other. In addition, both techniques are difficult to conduct, and a technical competence should be considered in selection of each method.
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; Common Bile Duct ; Gastric Bypass ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Retrospective Studies

Objective:To explore the surgical strategies for the treatment of T1 b gallbladder cancer patients diagnosed intraoperatively or postoperatively.Methods:A retrospective analysis of 42 patients with T1 b gallbladder cancers was performed.There were 14 patients diagnosed intraoperatively and 28 patients diagnosed postoperatively.The reevaluations of T stages were conducted in the 28 T1 b gallbladder cancer patients diagnosed postoperatively by the professional pathologist.After T stage reevaluation,25 confirmed T1 b patients with complete follow-up data were divided into simple cholecystectomy group and radical resection group,and the clinicopathologic characteristics between the two groups were analyzed.Results:Only 2 of the 14 T1 b gallbladder cancer patients diagnosed by the intraoperative frozen specimen proved to be T1b on postoperative paraffin pathology,and for the remaining 13 patients,T2 was in 11 patients,and T3 in one patient.The rate of misdiagnosis was 85.7％ by the intraoperative frozen specimens,postoperative T stages were equal or higher than intraoperative T stages.Two of the 28 postoperatively diagnosed T1b patients were proved to be T2 after reevaluation,the rate of misdiagnosis was 7.1％,the reevaluated T stages were equal to or higher than the previous stages.Twenty-five confirmed T1 b gallbladder cancer patients had complete follow-up data,11 of whom underwent simple cholecystectomy and the remaining 14 radical resections.No patient had vessel or perineural invasion on pathology in the 25 confirmed T1b patients.Metastasis was absent in all the 30 lymph nodes examined,which achieved from 14 patients with radical resection.The survival rate after simple cholecystectomy was comparable to that after radical resection (P =0.361).Only one patient with radical resection had abdominal cavity implantation relapse,who received gallbladder compression during operation and 2 years later died from metastasis.Conclusion:Intraoperatively diagnosed T1 b gallbladder cancer should receive radical resection.Reevaluation of the T stage is necessary and the initial step for postoperative diagnosed T1b gallbladder cancer patients.The pros and cons of radical surgery for definitive T1b patients should be carefully evaluated,and systemic chemotherapy is recommended for those with bile spillover.

BACKGROUNDLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been considered to be safe and feasible. However, few studies focused on the comparison between the anatomic and nonanatomic LLR. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative factors and outcomes of the anatomic and nonanatomic LLR, especially the area of liver parenchymal transection and blood loss per unit area.

METHODSIn this study, surgical and oncological data of patients underwent pure LLR procedures for malignant liver tumor were prospectively collected. Blood loss per unit area of liver parenchymal transection was measured and considered as an important parameter. All procedures were conducted by a single surgeon.

RESULTSDuring nearly 5 years, 84 patients with malignant liver tumor received a pure LLR procedure were included. Among them, 34 patients received anatomic LLR and 50 received nonanatomic LLR, respectively. Patients of the two groups were similar in terms of demographic features and tumor characteristics, despite the tumor size was significantly larger in the anatomic LLR group than that in the nonanatomic LLR group (4.77 ± 2.57 vs. 2.87 ± 2.10 cm, P = 0.001). Patients who underwent anatomic resection had longer operation time (364.09 ± 131.22 vs. 252.00 ± 135.21 min, P < 0.001) but less blood loss per unit area (7.85 ± 7.17 vs. 14.17 ± 10.43 ml/cm 2 , P = 0.018). Nonanatomic LLR was associated with more blood loss when the area of parenchymal transection was equal to the anatomic LLR. No mortality occurred during the hospital stay and 30 days after the operation. Moreover, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. The disease-free and overall survival rates showed no significant differences between the anatomic LLR and nonanatomic LLR groups.

CONCLUSIONSBoth anatomic and nonanatomic pure LLR are safe and feasible. Measuring the area of parenchymal transection is a simple and effective method to estimate the outcomes of the liver resection surgery. Blood loss per unit area is an important parameter which is comparable between the anatomic LLR and nonanatomic LLR groups.

Aged ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Length of Stay ; Liver ; pathology ; surgery ; Liver Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in human, and colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) is one of the most common leading causes of death in these patients. In recent years, along with the update of diagnosis and treatment concept and advancement of operative technique, more and more patients with CLM get surgical treatment opportunities and the outcomes are improved. In clinical practice of CLM, depending on evidence-based medicine, standardized diagnosis and treatment is particularly important, which includes diagnosis and treatment by multidisciplinary team, accurate evaluation of the resectability of CLM, standardized surgical resection and essential comprehensive treatment.
Colorectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; secondary ; surgery ; therapy ; Prognosis

OBJECTIVETo explore the clinical application technology of completely laparoscopy hepodectomy (LH).

METHODSFrom June 2006 to December 2011, the 126 cases of LH were performed, the data including operating time, blood loss and postoperative complications, etc, were analyzed retrospectively. The patients included 87 males and 39 female and they were 28-83 years old with an average age of 44.5 years old. The parenchyma was transected using laparoscopic ultrasonic scalpel and ligasure, accomplished with endoscopic linear stapler. Of all the patients, the diseases performed LH including primary liver carcinoma (45 cases), liver hemoangioma (58 cases), colon carcinoma with livermetastasis (23 cases), liver focar (5 cases), liver granuloma (1 case), liver adenoma (4 cases). The operations included left hemihepatectomy (n = 17), left lateral lobectomy (n = 34), right hemihepatectomy (n = 15), segmentectomy (n = 22), local resection (n = 59).

RESULTSOf all the patients, mean blood loss was 180 ml (10-1250 ml), mean surgical time was 142 minutes (43-220 minutes), mean postoperative hospital day was 2.2 days (3-12 days). Postoperative complications including eight cases of bile leakage, recovered after 1-3 weeks by appropriately draining. The patients with malignant tumor were followed up for 18 months (12-46 months), recurrence happened in 12 cases and four cases was died of recurrence and metastasis.

CONCLUSIONSLH is a safe, feasible and effective procedure for the treatment of benign liver disease and malignant liver neoplasm as long as the patient is properly selected, it should be recommended for radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; surgery ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Liver Neoplasms ; surgery ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo discuss the relevant factors of biliary complications after liver transplantation and to investigate the value of comprehensive management for the complications.

METHODSThe data of 366 patients undergoing liver transplantation from October 2000 to March 2012 was analyzed retrospectively, and the risk factors were analyzed by univariate analysis and Stepwise Logistic regression. The cases with biliary leak were administered thorough drainage. The cases with anastomotic biliary stricture were administered sacculus dilatation through percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) and endoscopicretrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). If necessary, some cases were placed biliary tract brackets. The patients with nonanastomotic biliary stricture were treated with PTC plus choledochoscope.

RESULTSAll the 366 patients were followed up for 58.5 (10 to 129) months. Biliary complications after liver transplantation were diagnosed in 42 cases among these patients. The incidence for biliary complications was 11.5%. The univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the second warm ischemia period and the blood loss and the damage of blood supply and the diameter of biliary anastmosis were significantly associated with biliary complications after liver transplantations (Wald = 9.474 to 17.208, P < 0.05). Twelve cases with biliary leak were cured through abdominal and nasobiliary drainage. Twenty-two cases with anastomotic biliary stricture were administered sacculus dilatation through ERCP or PTC and were cured, including 6 cases were placed biliary tract brackets. Among 8 cases with nonanastomotic biliary stricture, 6 cases were cured through PTC associating with choledochoscope. One case was treated second liver transplantation and another case got worse.

CONCLUSIONSIschemic injury and the diameter of anastmosis are risk factors for biliary complications after liver transplantations. The interventional management of biliary stricture and bile leakage after liver transplantation is safe and effective.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biliary Fistula ; therapy ; Biliary Tract Diseases ; epidemiology ; therapy ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Transplantation ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Young Adult