INTRODUCTION: Ischaemic stroke is a severe complication of dermal filler injections that remains poorly described and understood. This study aims to characterise the clinical features and outcomes of patients who experience strokes following facial dermal filler injections. METHOD: A systematic review and retrospective analysis of ischaemic strokes caused by dermal filler injections and reported over the past 3 decades, were conducted. Cases involving autologous fat were also compared against those that did not. RESULTS: Fifty-five cases from 45 studies were analysed. Their median age was 32 years (18-61), and most were women (49/55, 89%). Injections frequently occurred at the glabella (17/53, 32%) and temples (12/53, 23%), and autologous fat was most often used (33/55, 60%). Half (29/55, 53%) had ocular symptoms at presentation. Hemiparesis/hemiplegia (30/55, 55%) and confusion/ reduced consciousness/alertness (26/55, 47%) were the predominant stroke symptoms. Most infarcts were unilateral (45/54, 83%) and large (32/48, 67%). Treatment primarily involved corticosteroids (12/41, 29%) and antiplatelet agents (11/41, 27%), while hyaluronidase injections (3/41, 7%) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (2/41, 5%) were rarely used. Less than half (22/55, 40%) experienced good functional recovery. Those injected with autologous fat were likelier to be symptomatic from their strokes (100% versus [vs] 68%, P=0.0012), develop larger strokes (93% vs 24%, P<0.0001) and experience non-ambulatory outcomes (44% vs 73%, =0.0381). CONCLUSION Strokes are rare complications of dermal fillers. Injections using autologous fat risk larger strokes and worse ambulatory outcomes. An hour of post-procedural observation appears reasonable, and those with ocular complications should undergo brain imaging even in the absence of stroke symptoms.
Humans ; Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage* ; Female ; Ischemic Stroke/chemically induced* ; Adult ; Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Middle Aged ; Male ; Face ; Adolescent ; Young Adult

INTRODUCTION: Localised swelling at sites of filler injections has been reported in the Moderna mRNA-1273 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine trial. METHODS: We conducted a review of the existing data and literature on the potential pathophysiology for this adverse event and its potential management. RESULTS: Data from the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine Phase 3 trial and one case series were available. Three out of 30,400 subjects developed possible filler reaction in the Moderna trial. Two other cases were reported after emergency use authorisation. Reactions occurred at a mean of 1.4 days post-vaccination. Fillers were injected at a mean of 14.1 months before vaccination. Areas involved included lips, infraorbital areas and tear troughs. Treatment included observation, corticosteroids, antihistamine, hyaluronidase and 5-fluorouracil. CONCLUSION Rare, self-limiting adverse reactions to dermal fillers have been reported following COVID-19 vaccination. Clinicians should be aware of this clinical phenomenon and its management, as vaccination is carried out globally.
Humans ; 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/adverse effects* ; Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects* ; COVID-19/prevention & control* ; COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage* ; Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage* ; Edema/chemically induced* ; Injection Site Reaction/etiology*

Cosmetic facial filler-related ophthalmic artery occlusion is rare but is a devastating complication, while the exact pathophysiology is still elusive. Cerebral angiography provides more detailed information on blood flow of ophthalmic artery as well as surrounding orbital area which cannot be covered by fundus fluorescein angiography. This study aimed to evaluate cerebral angiographic features of cosmetic facial filler-related ophthalmic artery occlusion patients. We retrospectively reviewed cerebral angiography of 7 patients (4 hyaluronic acid [HA] and 3 autologous fat-injected cases) showing ophthalmic artery and its branches occlusion after cosmetic facial filler injections, and underwent intra-arterial thrombolysis. On selective ophthalmic artery angiograms, all fat-injected patients showed a large filling defect on the proximal ophthalmic artery, whereas the HA-injected patients showed occlusion of the distal branches of the ophthalmic artery. Three HA-injected patients revealed diminished distal runoff of the internal maxillary and facial arteries, which clinically corresponded with skin necrosis. However, all fat-injected patients and one HA-injected patient who were immediately treated with subcutaneous hyaluronidase injection showed preserved distal runoff of the internal maxillary and facial arteries and mild skin problems. The size difference between injected materials seems to be associated with different angiographic findings. Autologous fat is more prone to obstruct proximal part of ophthalmic artery, whereas HA obstructs distal branches. In addition, hydrophilic and volume-expansion property of HA might exacerbate blood flow on injected area, which is also related to skin necrosis. Intra-arterial thrombolysis has a limited role in reconstituting blood flow or regaining vision in cosmetic facial filler-associated ophthalmic artery occlusions.
Adipose Tissue/transplantation ; Adult ; Aged ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases/*etiology/*radiography/therapy ; Cerebral Angiography ; Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects ; Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage/*adverse effects ; Face ; Female ; Humans ; Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/administration & dosage ; Injections, Subcutaneous ; Ophthalmic Artery/*radiography ; Retinal Artery Occlusion/*etiology/*radiography/therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Transplantation, Autologous/adverse effects ; Young Adult