1.Dental implant treatment in vascularized bone flaps after jaw reconstruction.
West China Journal of Stomatology 2023;41(2):123-128
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Jaw defects caused by various reasons often seriously affect appearance and function. The goal of the treatment of oral and maxillofacial tumors should include the cure of the tumor and the restoration of premorbid function. The development of microsurgery and digital surgery technology has promoted the development of jaw reconstruction with vascularized free bone flap. Good appearance and improved predictability could be obtained with the help of preope-rative visual design. How to rehabilitate occlusal function on the reconstructed jaw and improve the quality of life of patients has become an important research direction. This article discusses the challenge of jaw reconstruction, the selection of vascularized bone flap, the choice of implant timing, the treatment of peri-implant soft tissue, and the influence of radiotherapy on implants after jaw reconstruction.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implants
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Plastic Surgery Procedures
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Free Tissue Flaps/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Quality of Life
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implantation, Endosseous
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Fibula/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Bone Transplantation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mandibular Reconstruction
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
2.Clinical decision making of implant guidance methods guided by new classification of surgical area mouth ope-ning.
Haiyang YU ; Jiacheng WU ; Nan HU
West China Journal of Stomatology 2023;41(2):134-139
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			When selecting implant guidance methods or judging whether the patient can be implanted, many doctors ignore or only use visual inspection to estimate a patient's mouth opening. This phenomenon often leads to failure to complete the implantation due to insufficient mouth opening or the deflection of the implant due to limited angle, resulting in the high incidence of corresponding complications. The main reason is that doctors lack accurate analysis and control of the overall geometric conditions of the intraoral surgical area, and three-dimensional position blocking of surgical instruments occurs during the operation. In the past, mouth opening was defined as the distance between the incisor edges of the upper and lower central incisors when the patient opens his mouth widely, and the implant area could be in any missing tooth position. When it is in the posterior tooth area, the specific measurement scheme of the mouth opening could not be simply equivalent to the previous measurement method in the anterior tooth area. However, how to measure quickly and conveniently the mouth opening of any surgical area to determine whether it could be implanted and meet the needs of the selected guidance method remains unclear. This paper introduces new concepts, establishes new classification and corresponding accurate measurement scheme of implant area, and establishes a decision tree of implant methods guided by the actually measured value. Results provide a quantitative basis for rational formulation and implementation of implant treatment.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mouth
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Incisor
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Clinical Decision-Making
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implants
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
3.Clinical efficacy of simple taper retentive implants in immediate posterior dental implantation for 5-7 years.
Bihui REN ; Shuigen GUO ; Yehao XU ; Jieting DAI ; Hongwu WEI
West China Journal of Stomatology 2023;41(3):341-349
		                        		
		                        			OBJECTIVES:
		                        			This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of simple taper retentive implants in the posterior dental area after immediate implantation for 5-7 years.
		                        		
		                        			METHODS:
		                        			Selected from January 2015 to December 2017 in the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University dental clinic line tooth area immediately after the implant prosthesis, a total of 38 patients, 53 implants, were deep into (bone under 2 mm or higher) and the upper structure was repaired. In addition, after the completion of tracking observation of 60-90 months, the implant surrounding bone health was recorded and analyzed.
		                        		
		                        			RESULTS:
		                        			After 5-7 years of follow-up, 1 of the 53 implants failed to fall out, and the implant retention rate was 98.1%. The amount of bone resorption in the proximal and distal margins 5-7 years after implant restoration was (0.16±0.94) mm and (-0.01±1.29) mm, respectively, and the difference in bone height between the proximal and distal margins of the implant and the immediate post-restoration period was not statistically significant (P>0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in the effects of periodontitis, implant site inflammation, and smoking on peri-implant marginal bone resorption (P>0.05).
		                        		
		                        			CONCLUSIONS
		                        			The single taper-retained implant broadens the indications for immediate implant placement in the posterior region, and its deep sub-osseous placement (≥2 mm below the bone) avoids to a certain extent the disturbance of the implant by external stimuli and the exposure of the cervical abutment of the implant, with the good long-term stability of the marginal bone around the implant.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implantation, Endosseous
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implants
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Immediate Dental Implant Loading
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Follow-Up Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implants, Single-Tooth
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Treatment Outcome
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Restoration Failure
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
5.Simultaneous implantation and tooth preparation technology guided by 3D-printed guide.
Nan HU ; Chunxu LIU ; Jing GAO ; Chenyang XIE ; Jiayi YU ; Luming JIA ; Haiyang YU
West China Journal of Stomatology 2023;41(4):483-490
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Using digital technologies in concurrently performing missing tooth implantation and preparation of remaining teeth is a solution to reduce the number of visits and improve efficiency. This paper proposes a digital process for simultaneously implanting and preparing teeth. It integrates implant surgical guide and 3D-printed tooth preparation guide into a single guide and completes guided implant placement and precise tooth preparation. Based on "repair-oriented" virtual implant planning, the implant surgical guide can improve the efficiency and predictability of implant placement, and its linear accuracy is about 1 mm. The tooth preparation guide precisely guides tooth preparation and restoration space visualization, ensuring the quality of the tooth preparation. The two guides have different design accuracy requirements, and thus their combination improves the overall guiding accuracy requirements. The concurrent application of the two guides minimizes the clinical operation time, number of visits, and economic burden of patients.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Surgery, Computer-Assisted
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implantation, Endosseous
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Printing, Three-Dimensional
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Technology
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Tooth Preparation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Computer-Aided Design
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implants
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Imaging, Three-Dimensional
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
6.Clinical decision and related factors influencing implant direction in the esthetic area.
West China Journal of Stomatology 2023;41(5):512-520
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Implant treatment in the esthetic area requires stable osseointegration and successful esthetic outcomes. Achieving this goal requires careful consideration of accurate implant axis and ideal three-dimensional position. Owing to the high esthetics and the special anatomical structure of the maxillary, a successful implant means a synthesized deli-beration of the residual bone dimensions, soft-tissue thickness, and the relationship of the residual alveolar ridge with the planned restoration. This article offers an in-depth analysis of the clinical decisions and key factors affecting the implant direction in the esthetic area.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implants
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Esthetics, Dental
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Osseointegration
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Maxilla/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implants, Single-Tooth
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
7.Role of collagen membrane in modified guided bone regeneration surgery using buccal punch flap approach: A retrospective and radiographical cohort study.
Deng Hui DUAN ; Hom Lay WANG ; En Bo WANG
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2023;55(6):1097-1104
		                        		
		                        			OBJECTIVE:
		                        			To investigate whether the placement of absorbable collagen membrane increase the stability of alveolar ridge contour after guided bone regeneration (GBR) using buccal punch flap.
		                        		
		                        			METHODS:
		                        			From June 2019 to June 2023, patients who underwent GBR using buccal punch flap simultaneously with a single implant placement in posterior region (from first premolar to second molar) were divided into coverage group, in which particular bone graft was covered by collagen membrane and non-coverage group. Cone beam CT (CBCT) was taken before surgery (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and 3-7 months after surgery (T2), and the thickness of the buccal bone plate at different levels (0, 2, 4, and 6 mm) below the smooth-rough interface of the implant (BBT-0, -2, -4, -6) was mea-sured after superimposition of CBCT models using Mimics software.
		                        		
		                        			RESULTS:
		                        			A total of 29 patients, including 15 patients in coverage group and 14 patients in non-coverage group, were investigated in this study. At T0, T1, and T2, there was no significant difference in BBT between the two groups (P>0.05). At T1, BBT-0 was (2.50±0.90) mm in the coverage group and (2.97±1.28) mm in the non-coverage group, with corresponding BBT-2 of (3.65±1.08) mm and (3.58±1.26) mm, respectively. At T2, BBT-0 was (1.22±0.55) mm in the coverage group and (1.70±0.97) mm in the non-coverage group, with corresponding BBT-2 of (2.32±0.94) mm and (2.57±1.26) mm, respectively. From T1 to T2, there were no statistically significant differences in the absolute values [(0.47±0.54)-(1.33±0.75) mm] and percentages [(10.04%±24.81%)-(48.43%±18.32%)] of BBT change between the two groups. The thickness of new bone formation in the buccal bone plate from T0 to T2 ranged from (1.27±1.09) mm to (2.75±2.15) mm with no statistical difference between the two groups at all levels.
		                        		
		                        			CONCLUSION
		                        			In the short term, the GBR using buccal punch flap with or without collagen membrane coverage can effectively repair the buccal implant bone defect. But collagen membrane coverage showed no additional benefit on alveolar ridge contour stability compared with non-membrane coverage.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cohort Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Retrospective Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Collagen
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Bone Regeneration
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implantation, Endosseous
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
8.Research advances in the use of dynamic navigation technology for implantation in the edentulous jaw.
Xin Yue ZHANG ; Bo Xiang WANG ; Li Xuan XIAO ; Hui Ming WANG
Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2022;57(10):1079-1083
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			The use of dynamic navigation technology in edentulous jaw implant restoration can solve many problems associated with traditional edentulous jaw implant restoration. The benefits of dynamic navigation include fine positioning guidance, restoration-guided surgery, good aesthetic results, and the possibility of simultaneous conceptual design and real-time implant guidance, as well as the transition from "blind" to "direct" vision during the implantation. It can guide clinicians and adjust the plan in real time, improve the efficiency of communication between the clinician, technician, and patient throughout the process and so on. The workflow, current clinical application and challenges, accuracy analysis, and limitations of the dynamic navigation technology in the edentulous jaw are discussed in this paper, as well as an outlook on its future development, with the goal of contributing to the clinical development of dynamic navigation-guided implantology in the edentulous jaw.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implants
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Esthetics, Dental
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Jaw, Edentulous/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Technology
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
9.Clinical points of digital dental implant traction technique in mandibular reconstruction.
Chen Ping ZHANG ; Jian Nan LIU
Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2022;57(12):1189-1194
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			At present, mandibular defect repair and reconstruction is not only a simple sense of mandibular continuity restoration, but also a restoration of the physiologically positional relationship and movement balance of the upper and lower jaws. Eventually, the implantation of osseointegrated dental implants and implant-supported dental restoration should be accomplished to complete the reconstruction of the functional mandible. The technique can integrate multiple procedures such as fibular bone grafting, simultaneous dental implants and traction osteogenesis, and the perfect integration with digital technology can significantly improve the accuracy of digital dental implant traction technique. This paper will summarize and conclude the key points of the application of digital dental implant traction technique in mandibular defect reconstruction, in order to provide new ideas for the development of digital technique.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mandibular Reconstruction
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implants
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mandibular Neoplasms/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Fibula/transplantation*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Bone Transplantation/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mandible/surgery*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
10.Accuracy of two different registration methods of dynamic navigation system for dental implant placement.
Fei Fei MA ; Tai WEI ; Feng SUN ; Yu MA
Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2022;57(12):1225-1229
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective: To compare cusp and U-tube registration methods of dynamic navigation system in dental implant placement. Methods: Twenty resin mandible models and 40 implants were utilized, with implants being placed by a single researcher using one of the two registration methods selected at random. Accuracy was measured through the superimposition of the final and planned implant positions. Angular deviation, three-dimensional (3D) entry deviation, and 3D apex deviation were analyzed. Results: The 3D entry deviation, and 3D apex deviation and angular deviation of cusp group and U-tube group were (1.07±0.46) and (0.93±0.54) mm, (1.16±0.55) and (1.03±0.53) mm, 2.06°±0.98°and 1.62°±0.97°. No significant differences (t=0.91, P=0.368; t=0.79, P=0.436; t=1.42, P=0.164) were observed when comparing these two registration methods. Conclusions: Both the cusp and U-tube registration methods are highly accurate when implemented in vitro. The cusp registration technique can also overcome several of the limitations of the U-tube approach, and it is convenient for clinic.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dental Implants
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mandible/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Imaging, Three-Dimensional
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Computer-Aided Design
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail