1.Arthroscopic matched osteoplasty of the radial head for painful radiocapitellar osteoarthritis: surgical technique and case series
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2024;27(3):309-315
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Radiocapitellar arthritis can cause pain, loss of motion, and impaired elbow function. Current surgical treatment options are limited. We have developed an original and simple surgical technique to address this, called arthroscopic matched osteoplasty of the radial head (AMOR). In AMOR, the radial head is partially resected and recontoured to match the capitellum and decompress the degenerate radiocapitellar articulation while preserving the ulnohumeral articulation where the cartilage is usually well preserved. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Indications and the surgical technique of the AMOR procedure are described. A retrospective observational service evaluation study was conducted from electronic patient records. Collected clinical outcomes included range of motion, pain level, subjective functional score, and general satisfaction with the results of the procedure. The radiographic outcome was radiocapitellar joint space. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Between 2017 and 2021, eight consecutive patients underwent AMOR as part of an arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty procedure. Radiographically, the mean radiocapitellar joint space improved from an average of 1.7 mm to 4.6 mm. Clinically, the mean pain score decreased from 8/10 to 3/10. Six of the eight patients (75%) were satisfied with their results. In two cases, initial improvement following surgery lasted less than 1 year, and one of these patients underwent total elbow arthroplasty for painful ulnohumeral osteoarthritis. There were no complications of surgery recorded. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			AMOR is a safe treatment option for painful radiocapitellar osteoarthritis and can be incorporated as an “add-on” procedure by surgeons performing elbow osteocapsular arthroplasty in cases with a positive grip and grind test and radiographic evidence of radiocapitellar OA.Level of evidence: IV. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Arthroscopic matched osteoplasty of the radial head for painful radiocapitellar osteoarthritis: surgical technique and case series
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2024;27(3):309-315
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Radiocapitellar arthritis can cause pain, loss of motion, and impaired elbow function. Current surgical treatment options are limited. We have developed an original and simple surgical technique to address this, called arthroscopic matched osteoplasty of the radial head (AMOR). In AMOR, the radial head is partially resected and recontoured to match the capitellum and decompress the degenerate radiocapitellar articulation while preserving the ulnohumeral articulation where the cartilage is usually well preserved. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Indications and the surgical technique of the AMOR procedure are described. A retrospective observational service evaluation study was conducted from electronic patient records. Collected clinical outcomes included range of motion, pain level, subjective functional score, and general satisfaction with the results of the procedure. The radiographic outcome was radiocapitellar joint space. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Between 2017 and 2021, eight consecutive patients underwent AMOR as part of an arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty procedure. Radiographically, the mean radiocapitellar joint space improved from an average of 1.7 mm to 4.6 mm. Clinically, the mean pain score decreased from 8/10 to 3/10. Six of the eight patients (75%) were satisfied with their results. In two cases, initial improvement following surgery lasted less than 1 year, and one of these patients underwent total elbow arthroplasty for painful ulnohumeral osteoarthritis. There were no complications of surgery recorded. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			AMOR is a safe treatment option for painful radiocapitellar osteoarthritis and can be incorporated as an “add-on” procedure by surgeons performing elbow osteocapsular arthroplasty in cases with a positive grip and grind test and radiographic evidence of radiocapitellar OA.Level of evidence: IV. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Arthroscopic matched osteoplasty of the radial head for painful radiocapitellar osteoarthritis: surgical technique and case series
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2024;27(3):309-315
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Radiocapitellar arthritis can cause pain, loss of motion, and impaired elbow function. Current surgical treatment options are limited. We have developed an original and simple surgical technique to address this, called arthroscopic matched osteoplasty of the radial head (AMOR). In AMOR, the radial head is partially resected and recontoured to match the capitellum and decompress the degenerate radiocapitellar articulation while preserving the ulnohumeral articulation where the cartilage is usually well preserved. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Indications and the surgical technique of the AMOR procedure are described. A retrospective observational service evaluation study was conducted from electronic patient records. Collected clinical outcomes included range of motion, pain level, subjective functional score, and general satisfaction with the results of the procedure. The radiographic outcome was radiocapitellar joint space. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Between 2017 and 2021, eight consecutive patients underwent AMOR as part of an arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty procedure. Radiographically, the mean radiocapitellar joint space improved from an average of 1.7 mm to 4.6 mm. Clinically, the mean pain score decreased from 8/10 to 3/10. Six of the eight patients (75%) were satisfied with their results. In two cases, initial improvement following surgery lasted less than 1 year, and one of these patients underwent total elbow arthroplasty for painful ulnohumeral osteoarthritis. There were no complications of surgery recorded. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			AMOR is a safe treatment option for painful radiocapitellar osteoarthritis and can be incorporated as an “add-on” procedure by surgeons performing elbow osteocapsular arthroplasty in cases with a positive grip and grind test and radiographic evidence of radiocapitellar OA.Level of evidence: IV. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Arthroscopic matched osteoplasty of the radial head for painful radiocapitellar osteoarthritis: surgical technique and case series
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2024;27(3):309-315
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Radiocapitellar arthritis can cause pain, loss of motion, and impaired elbow function. Current surgical treatment options are limited. We have developed an original and simple surgical technique to address this, called arthroscopic matched osteoplasty of the radial head (AMOR). In AMOR, the radial head is partially resected and recontoured to match the capitellum and decompress the degenerate radiocapitellar articulation while preserving the ulnohumeral articulation where the cartilage is usually well preserved. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Indications and the surgical technique of the AMOR procedure are described. A retrospective observational service evaluation study was conducted from electronic patient records. Collected clinical outcomes included range of motion, pain level, subjective functional score, and general satisfaction with the results of the procedure. The radiographic outcome was radiocapitellar joint space. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Between 2017 and 2021, eight consecutive patients underwent AMOR as part of an arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty procedure. Radiographically, the mean radiocapitellar joint space improved from an average of 1.7 mm to 4.6 mm. Clinically, the mean pain score decreased from 8/10 to 3/10. Six of the eight patients (75%) were satisfied with their results. In two cases, initial improvement following surgery lasted less than 1 year, and one of these patients underwent total elbow arthroplasty for painful ulnohumeral osteoarthritis. There were no complications of surgery recorded. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			AMOR is a safe treatment option for painful radiocapitellar osteoarthritis and can be incorporated as an “add-on” procedure by surgeons performing elbow osteocapsular arthroplasty in cases with a positive grip and grind test and radiographic evidence of radiocapitellar OA.Level of evidence: IV. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Prosthetic resurfacing of engaging posterior capitellar defects in recurrent posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow
Dani ROTMAN ; Jorge Rojas LIEVANO ; Shawn W. O’DRISCOLL
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2023;26(3):287-295
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) is a common mechanism of recurrent elbow instability. While the essential lesion is a deficiency in the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL), there are often associated concomitant bony lesions, such as an Osborne-Cotterill lesions (posterior capitellar fractures) and marginal radial head fractures, that compromise stability. Currently, there is no standard treatment for posterior capitellar deficiency associated with recurrent PLRI. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We conducted a retrospective review of five patients with recurrent PLRI of the elbow associated with a posterior capitellar impaction fracture engaging with the radial head during normal range of motion. The patients were treated surgically with LUCL reconstruction or repair and off-label reconstruction of the capitellar joint surface using a small metal prosthesis designed for metatarsal head resurfacing (HemiCAP toe classic). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Five patients (three adolescent males, two adult females) were treated between 2007 and 2018. At a median follow-up of 5 years, all patients had complete relief of their symptomatic instability. No patients had pain at rest, but two patients had mild pain (visual analog scale 1–3) during physical activity. Three patients rated their elbow as normal, one as almost normal, and one as greatly improved. On short-term radiographic follow-up there were no signs of implant loosening. None of the patients needed reoperation. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			Recurrent PLRI of the elbow associated with an engaging posterior capitellar lesion can be treated successfully by LUCL reconstruction and repair and filling of the capitellar defect with a metal prosthesis. This treatment option has excellent clinical results in the short-medium term.Level of evidence: IV. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail