1.Potential categories and influencing factors of fatigue trajectory in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Dongqing CAI ; Limin DAI ; Huimin DING ; Qun YANG
Modern Clinical Nursing 2024;23(5):24-32
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective To explore the potential categories of fatigue trajectory in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and analyze the influencing factors.Methods Convenience sampling method was used to select 426 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy who were hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in Jiangsu Province from April 2022 to April 2023.General information and disease related data of the patients were collected,and the Chinese version of Multi-dimensional Fatigue Scale,Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale,Social support Rating Scale,pain number rating scale and Tampa scale of kinetophobia were used to investigate at discharge(T1).The Chinese version of multi-dimensional fatigue scale was used to investigate 3 months after discharge(T2),6 months after discharge(T3),and 12 months after discharge(T4).A mixed growth model was used to identify the potential categories of fatigue trajectory and logistic regression were employed to analyze the influencing factors of fatigue.Results 414 patients finished the study.Three categories of fatigue trajectory in the patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were identified:significantly increasing group(19.6%),slowly increasing group(47.8%),and decreasing group(32.6%).Logistic regression analysis showed that age,sleep,social support,number of comorbidities,body mass index(BMI),pain and fear of exercise were the factors influencing the potential categories of fatigue trajectory in the DPN patients.Conclusions There are three potential categories of fatigue trajectories in DPN patients.Age,sleep disorders,social support,comorbidities,BMI,pain score,and exercise fear were influencing factors of fatigue in patients with DPN.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Potential profile analysis and influencing factors of self-management in prediabetic patients
Huimin DING ; Limin DAI ; Dongqing CAI ; Qun YANG
Chinese Journal of Nursing 2024;59(9):1057-1064
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective To explore the potential categories of self-management behavior in prediabetes patients and analyze the influencing factors of different potential categories.Methods A convenient sampling method was used to select pre-diabetic patients treated in physical examination centers and endocrinology outpatient clinics in 2 tertiary A hospitals in Jiangsu Province from September 2022 to June 2023.General data questionnaire,Prediabetic Disease Knowledge Questionnaire,Prediabetes Self-management Scale,Diabetes Self-efficacy Scale and Social Support Rating Scale were used for investigation.Results A total of 445 subjects were included in this study,with an average age of(44.92±4.98)years.4 potential categories of self-management behavior were identified,namely low self-management(16.4%),static self-management(19.1%),dynamic self-management(25.6%)and high self-management(38.9%).Occupational status,marital status,family per capita monthly income,family history of diabetes,disease knowledge,self-efficacy and social support were the influencing factors of self-management behavior in prediabetes patients(P<0.05).Conclusion There are significant category characteristics of self-management behavior in patients with prediabetes.Medical staff can identify the category characteristics and influencing factors early,and provide bases for medical staff to formulate targeted clinical intervention measures to help patients improve their self-management level.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients (version 2024)
Yao LU ; Yang LI ; Leiying ZHANG ; Hao TANG ; Huidan JING ; Yaoli WANG ; Xiangzhi JIA ; Li BA ; Maohong BIAN ; Dan CAI ; Hui CAI ; Xiaohong CAI ; Zhanshan ZHA ; Bingyu CHEN ; Daqing CHEN ; Feng CHEN ; Guoan CHEN ; Haiming CHEN ; Jing CHEN ; Min CHEN ; Qing CHEN ; Shu CHEN ; Xi CHEN ; Jinfeng CHENG ; Xiaoling CHU ; Hongwang CUI ; Xin CUI ; Zhen DA ; Ying DAI ; Surong DENG ; Weiqun DONG ; Weimin FAN ; Ke FENG ; Danhui FU ; Yongshui FU ; Qi FU ; Xuemei FU ; Jia GAN ; Xinyu GAN ; Wei GAO ; Huaizheng GONG ; Rong GUI ; Geng GUO ; Ning HAN ; Yiwen HAO ; Wubing HE ; Qiang HONG ; Ruiqin HOU ; Wei HOU ; Jie HU ; Peiyang HU ; Xi HU ; Xiaoyu HU ; Guangbin HUANG ; Jie HUANG ; Xiangyan HUANG ; Yuanshuai HUANG ; Shouyong HUN ; Xuebing JIANG ; Ping JIN ; Dong LAI ; Aiping LE ; Hongmei LI ; Bijuan LI ; Cuiying LI ; Daihong LI ; Haihong LI ; He LI ; Hui LI ; Jianping LI ; Ning LI ; Xiying LI ; Xiangmin LI ; Xiaofei LI ; Xiaojuan LI ; Zhiqiang LI ; Zhongjun LI ; Zunyan LI ; Huaqin LIANG ; Xiaohua LIANG ; Dongfa LIAO ; Qun LIAO ; Yan LIAO ; Jiajin LIN ; Chunxia LIU ; Fenghua LIU ; Peixian LIU ; Tiemei LIU ; Xiaoxin LIU ; Zhiwei LIU ; Zhongdi LIU ; Hua LU ; Jianfeng LUAN ; Jianjun LUO ; Qun LUO ; Dingfeng LYU ; Qi LYU ; Xianping LYU ; Aijun MA ; Liqiang MA ; Shuxuan MA ; Xainjun MA ; Xiaogang MA ; Xiaoli MA ; Guoqing MAO ; Shijie MU ; Shaolin NIE ; Shujuan OUYANG ; Xilin OUYANG ; Chunqiu PAN ; Jian PAN ; Xiaohua PAN ; Lei PENG ; Tao PENG ; Baohua QIAN ; Shu QIAO ; Li QIN ; Ying REN ; Zhaoqi REN ; Ruiming RONG ; Changshan SU ; Mingwei SUN ; Wenwu SUN ; Zhenwei SUN ; Haiping TANG ; Xiaofeng TANG ; Changjiu TANG ; Cuihua TAO ; Zhibin TIAN ; Juan WANG ; Baoyan WANG ; Chunyan WANG ; Gefei WANG ; Haiyan WANG ; Hongjie WANG ; Peng WANG ; Pengli WANG ; Qiushi WANG ; Xiaoning WANG ; Xinhua WANG ; Xuefeng WANG ; Yong WANG ; Yongjun WANG ; Yuanjie WANG ; Zhihua WANG ; Shaojun WEI ; Yaming WEI ; Jianbo WEN ; Jun WEN ; Jiang WU ; Jufeng WU ; Aijun XIA ; Fei XIA ; Rong XIA ; Jue XIE ; Yanchao XING ; Yan XIONG ; Feng XU ; Yongzhu XU ; Yongan XU ; Yonghe YAN ; Beizhan YAN ; Jiang YANG ; Jiangcun YANG ; Jun YANG ; Xinwen YANG ; Yongyi YANG ; Chunyan YAO ; Mingliang YE ; Changlin YIN ; Ming YIN ; Wen YIN ; Lianling YU ; Shuhong YU ; Zebo YU ; Yigang YU ; Anyong YU ; Hong YUAN ; Yi YUAN ; Chan ZHANG ; Jinjun ZHANG ; Jun ZHANG ; Kai ZHANG ; Leibing ZHANG ; Quan ZHANG ; Rongjiang ZHANG ; Sanming ZHANG ; Shengji ZHANG ; Shuo ZHANG ; Wei ZHANG ; Weidong ZHANG ; Xi ZHANG ; Xingwen ZHANG ; Guixi ZHANG ; Xiaojun ZHANG ; Guoqing ZHAO ; Jianpeng ZHAO ; Shuming ZHAO ; Beibei ZHENG ; Shangen ZHENG ; Huayou ZHOU ; Jicheng ZHOU ; Lihong ZHOU ; Mou ZHOU ; Xiaoyu ZHOU ; Xuelian ZHOU ; Yuan ZHOU ; Zheng ZHOU ; Zuhuang ZHOU ; Haiyan ZHU ; Peiyuan ZHU ; Changju ZHU ; Lili ZHU ; Zhengguo WANG ; Jianxin JIANG ; Deqing WANG ; Jiongcai LAN ; Quanli WANG ; Yang YU ; Lianyang ZHANG ; Aiqing WEN
Chinese Journal of Trauma 2024;40(10):865-881
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Patients with severe trauma require an extremely timely treatment and transfusion plays an irreplaceable role in the emergency treatment of such patients. An increasing number of evidence-based medicinal evidences and clinical practices suggest that patients with severe traumatic bleeding benefit from early transfusion of low-titer group O whole blood or hemostatic resuscitation with red blood cells, plasma and platelet of a balanced ratio. However, the current domestic mode of blood supply cannot fully meet the requirements of timely and effective blood transfusion for emergency treatment of patients with severe trauma in clinical practice. In order to solve the key problems in blood supply and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma, Branch of Clinical Transfusion Medicine of Chinese Medical Association, Group for Trauma Emergency Care and Multiple Injuries of Trauma Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Young Scholar Group of Disaster Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association organized domestic experts of blood transfusion medicine and trauma treatment to jointly formulate Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients ( version 2024). Based on the evidence-based medical evidence and Delphi method of expert consultation and voting, 10 recommendations were put forward from two aspects of blood support mode and transfusion strategies, aiming to provide a reference for transfusion resuscitation in the emergency treatment of severe trauma and further improve the success rate of treatment of patients with severe trauma.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Interference of P2X4 receptor expression in tumor-associated macrophages suppresses migration and invasion of glioma cells.
Xue Zhi YANG ; Hong SHEN ; Qun LI ; Zi Chao DAI ; Rong Qiang YANG ; Guo Bin HUANG ; Rui CHEN ; Fang WANG ; Jing Ling SONG ; Hai Rong HUA
Journal of Southern Medical University 2022;42(5):658-664
		                        		
		                        			OBJECTIVE:
		                        			To investigate the effect of interference of P2X4 receptor expression in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) on invasion and migration of glioma cells.
		                        		
		                        			METHODS:
		                        			C57BL/6 mouse models bearing gliomas in the caudate nucleus were examined for glioma pathology with HE staining and expressions of Iba-1 and P2X4 receptor with immunofluorescence assay. RAW264.7 cells were induced into TAMs using conditioned medium from GL261 cells, and the changes in mRNA expressions of macrophage polarization-related markers and the mRNA and protein expressions of P2X4 receptor were detected with RT-qPCR and Western blotting. The effect of siRNA-mediated P2X4 interference on IL-1β and IL-18 mRNA and protein expressions in the TAMs was detected with RT-qPCR and Western blotting. GL261 cells were cultured in the conditioned medium from the transfected TAMs, and the invasion and migration abilities of the cells were assessed with Transwell invasion and migration experiment.
		                        		
		                        			RESULTS:
		                        			The glioma tissues from the tumor-bearing mice showed a significantly greater number of Iba-1-positive cells, where an obviously increased P2X4 receptor expression was detected (P=0.001), than the brain tissues of the control mice (P < 0.001). The M2 macrophage markers (Arg-1 and IL-10) and M1 macrophage markers (iNOS and TNF-α) were both significantly up-regulated in the TAMs derived from RAW264.7 cells (all P < 0.01), but the up-regulation of the M2 macrophage markers was more prominent; the expression levels of P2X4 receptor protein and mRNA were both increased in the TAMs (P < 0.05). Interference of P2X4 receptor expression significantly lowered the mRNA(P < 0.01)and protein (P < 0.01, P < 0.05)expression levels of IL-1β and IL-18 in the TAMs and obviously inhibited the ability of the TAMs to promote invasion and migration of the glioma cells (P < 0.05).
		                        		
		                        			CONCLUSION
		                        			Interference of P2X4 receptor in the TAMs suppresses the migration and invasion of glioma cells possibly by lowering the expressions of IL-1β and IL-18.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Animals
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Culture Media, Conditioned
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glioma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Interleukin-18
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mice
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mice, Inbred C57BL
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			RNA, Messenger
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Receptors, Purinergic P2X4/metabolism*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Tumor-Associated Macrophages
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
5.A multi-center retrospective study of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer based on real-world data.
Xue Wei DING ; Zhi Chao ZHENG ; Qun ZHAO ; Gang ZHAI ; Han LIANG ; Xin WU ; Zheng Gang ZHU ; Hai Jiang WANG ; Qing Si HE ; Xian Li HE ; Yi An DU ; Lu Chuan CHEN ; Ya Wei HUA ; Chang Ming HUANG ; Ying Wei XUE ; Ye ZHOU ; Yan Bing ZHOU ; Dan WU ; Xue Dong FANG ; You Guo DAI ; Hong Wei ZHANG ; Jia Qing CAO ; Le Ping LI ; Jie CHAI ; Kai Xiong TAO ; Guo Li LI ; Zhi Gang JIE ; Jie GE ; Zhong Fa XU ; Wen Bin ZHANG ; Qi Yun LI ; Ping ZHAO ; Zhi Qiang MA ; Zhi Long YAN ; Guo Liang ZHENG ; Yang YAN ; Xiao Long TANG ; Xiang ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2021;24(5):403-412
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective: To explore the effect of perioperative chemotherapy on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients under real-world condition. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out. Real world data of gastric cancer patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy and surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy in 33 domestic hospitals from January 1, 2014 to January 31, 2016 were collected. Inclusion criteria: (1) gastric adenocarcinoma was confirmed by histopathology, and clinical stage was cT2-4aN0-3M0 (AJCC 8th edition); (2) D2 radical gastric cancer surgery was performed; (3) at least one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was completed; (4) at least 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) [SOX (S-1+oxaliplatin) or CapeOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin)] were completed. Exclusion criteria: (1) complicated with other malignant tumors; (2) radiotherapy received; (3) patients with incomplete data. The enrolled patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the perioperative chemotherapy group, and those who received only postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy group. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to control selection bias. The primary outcome were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after PSM. OS was defined as the time from the first neoadjuvant chemotherapy (operation + adjuvant chemotherapy group: from the date of operation) to the last effective follow-up or death. PFS was defined as the time from the first neoadjuvant chemotherapy (operation + adjuvant chemotherapy group: from the date of operation) to the first imaging diagnosis of tumor progression or death. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival rate, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the independent effect of perioperative chemo therapy on OS and PFS. Results: 2 045 cases were included, including 1 293 cases in the surgery+adjuvant chemotherapy group and 752 cases in the perioperative chemotherapy group. After PSM, 492 pairs were included in the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, tumor stage before treatment, and tumor location between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy group, patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group had higher proportion of total gastrectomy (χ(2)=40.526, P<0.001), smaller maximum tumor diameter (t=3.969, P<0.001), less number of metastatic lymph nodes (t=1.343, P<0.001), lower ratio of vessel invasion (χ(2)=11.897, P=0.001) and nerve invasion (χ(2)=12.338, P<0.001). In the perioperative chemotherapy group and surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy group, 24 cases (4.9%) and 17 cases (3.4%) developed postoperative complications, respectively, and no significant difference was found between two groups (χ(2)=0.815, P=0.367). The median OS of the perioperative chemotherapy group was longer than that of the surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy group (65 months vs. 45 months, HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.89, P=0.001); the median PFS of the perioperative chemotherapy group was also longer than that of the surgery+adjuvant chemotherapy group (56 months vs. 36 months, HR=0.72, 95% CI:0.61-0.85, P<0.001). The forest plot results of subgroup analysis showed that both men and women could benefit from perioperative chemotherapy (all P<0.05); patients over 45 years of age (P<0.05) and with normal body mass (P<0.01) could benefit significantly; patients with cTNM stage II and III presented a trend of benefit or could benefit significantly (P<0.05); patients with signet ring cell carcinoma benefited little (P>0.05); tumors in the gastric body and gastric antrum benefited more significantly (P<0.05). Conclusion: Perioperative chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Female
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Gastrectomy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoadjuvant Therapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasm Staging
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Prognosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Retrospective Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
6.The Effect and Mechanism of Novel Telomerase Inhibitor Nilo 22 on Leukemia Cells.
Jing-Jing YIN ; Qian TANG ; Jia-Li GU ; Ya-Fang LI ; Hui-Er GAO ; Mei HE ; Ming YANG ; Wen-Shan ZHANG ; Hui XU ; Chao-Qun WANG ; Ying-Hui LI ; Cui-Gai BAI ; Ying-Dai GAO
Journal of Experimental Hematology 2021;29(4):1056-1064
		                        		
		                        			OBJECTIVE:
		                        			To investigate the cytotoxic effect and its mechanism of the micromolecule compound on the leukemia cells.
		                        		
		                        			METHODS:
		                        			The cytotoxic effects of 28 Nilotinib derivatives on K562, KA, KG, HA and 32D cell lines were detected by MTT assays, and the compound Nilo 22 was screen out. Cell apoptosis and cell cycle on leukemia cells were detected by flow cytometry. The effect of compound screened out on leukemogenesis potential of MLL-AF9 leukemia mice GFP
		                        		
		                        			RESULTS:
		                        			Nilo 22 serves as the most outstanding candidate out of 28 Nilotinib derivatives, which impairs leukemia cell lines, but spares normal hematopoietic cell line. Comparing with Nilotinib, Nilo 22 could induce the apoptosis of GFP
		                        		
		                        			CONCLUSION
		                        			Nilo 22 shows a significant cytotoxic effect on mice and human leukemia cells, especially for drug resistance cells. Nilo 22 is a promising anti-leukemia agent to solve the common clinical problems of drug resistance and relapse of leukemia.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Animals
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Apoptosis/drug effects*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cell Cycle/drug effects*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cell Line, Tumor
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Leukemia
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mice
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Myeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein/genetics*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Telomerase/metabolism*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Telomere/metabolism*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
7.Preliminary report on prospective, multicenter, open research of selective surgery after expandable stent combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of obstructive left hemicolon cancer.
Jiagang HAN ; Zhenjun WANG ; Yong DAI ; Xiaorong LI ; Qun QIAN ; Guiying WANG ; Guanghui WEI ; Weigen ZENG ; Liangang MA ; Baocheng ZHAO ; Yanlei WANG ; Kaiyan YANG ; Zhao DING ; Xuhua HU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2018;21(11):1233-1239
		                        		
		                        			OBJECTIVE:
		                        			To evaluate the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior elective surgery following self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) for complete obstructive left hemicolon cancer.
		                        		
		                        			METHODS:
		                        			This prospective, multicenter, open-labelled trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University(2016-ke-161-1) and registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02972541).
		                        		
		                        			INCLUSION CRITERIA:
		                        			(1)age between 18 and 75 years old;(2) adenocarcinoma confirmed by pathology;(3) left hemicolon cancer confirmed by clinical manifestations and imaging examinations with the distance to anal verge > 15 cm; (4) resectable cancer evaluated by imaging examination without distant metastasis; (5) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ≤ 1 or Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) > 70, indicating tolerance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and operation; (6) absence of chemotherapy or radiotherapy within past six months; (7) bone marrow system and hepatorenal function: hemoglobin ≥ 90 g/L, neutrophil ≥ 1.5×10/L, platelet ≥ 80×10/L, total bilirubin ≤ 1.5×ULN(upper limits of normal), serum transaminase ≤ 2.5×ULN, serum creatinine ≤ 1.0×ULN, endogenous creatinine clearance rate > 50 ml/min; (8) sign for informed consent.
		                        		
		                        			EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
		                        			(1) multiple primary colorectal cancer; (2) rejection of operation;(3) presenting peritonitis or bowel perforation before SEMS; (4) unqualified conditions proved by inspector from registration data. According to inclusion criteria, 62 consecutive patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to elective surgery following SEMS for complete obstructive left hemicolon cancer from Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University (n=31), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (n=14), the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (n=13), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (n=2), the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (n=2) between December 2015 and December 2017 were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and elective surgery group according to the investigator's clinical experience and patient's preference. Patients in the elective surgery group received surgery within one to two weeks after SEMS placement without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Those in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group received 2 cycles of CapeOX or 3 cycles of mFOLFOX6 neoadjuvant chemotherapy within one to two weeks after SEMS placement, and then underwent surgery within 3 weeks after finishing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Data between groups were compared using Student t-test, chi-square analysis or Fisher exact test analysis, including basic clinical informations, operational conditions and postoperative complications. The adverse reactions during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy were recorded. Surgical difficulty was assessed using visual analog scales ranging from 1 to 10, where 1 represented the lowest and 10 the highest degree of surgical difficulty, as judged by the surgeon.
		                        		
		                        			RESULTS:
		                        			The study included 38 males and 24 females with mean age of (64.8±8.8) years. The clinical baseline data between 2 groups were not significantly different (all P>0.05) except the average time interval between SEMS and surgery was significantly longer in neoadjuvant chemotherapy group [(61.6±13.5) days vs. (10.4±5.2) days, t=16.679, P<0.001]. There was no stent migration in either group. Three patients had perforation in the elective surgery group; one patient had perforation and one had obstruction in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group; and all these patients received emergent surgery. Adverse reactions of neodajuvant chemotherapy were mainly degree 1 and 2 except one patient with degree 3 diarrhea. Patients in neoadjuvant chemotherapy group had significantly lower rate of stoma [4.8%(1/21) vs. 34.1%(14/41), χ²=6.538, P=0.011], higher rate of laparoscopic surgery [71.4%(15/21) vs. 36.6%(15/41), χ²=6.751, P=0.009], shorter mean operative time (147 minutes vs. 178 minutes, t=-3.255, P=0.002), less mean intraoperative blood loss (47 ml vs. 127 ml, t=-4.129, P<0.001), lower degree of surgical difficulty(3.3 vs. 5.6, t=-5.091, P<0.001), shorter mean postoperative exhausting time (56.2 hours vs. 69.0 hours, t=-2.891, P=0.006), and shorter mean postoperative hospital stay (8.5 days vs. 13.5 days, t=-2.246, P=0.028) as compared with patients in the elective surgery group. Surgical site infection rate and anastomotic leakage rate did not differ significantly between two groups(all P>0.05).
		                        		
		                        			CONCLUSION
		                        			Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior elective surgery following SEMS is a relatively safe and feasible approach in the treatment for obstructive left hemicolon cancer, and is associated with less stoma, more laparoscopic surgery, shorter operative time, less blood loss, lower surgical difficulty, and faster postoperative recovery as compared with conventional elective surgery.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Colorectal Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			surgery
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			therapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Female
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Intestinal Obstruction
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Middle Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoadjuvant Therapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Prospective Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Stents
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Treatment Outcome
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
8.Kelisha Capsules inhibit acetic acid colitis in rats
Yan JIN ; ping Dan QIN ; yan Xin YANG ; dong Yao WANG ; li Chun ZHANG ; Qun DAI
Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine 2017;39(9):1789-1794
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			AIM To observe the effects of Kelisha Capsules (Angelicae dahuricae Radix,Atractylodis Rhizoma,Acori tatarinowii Rhizoma,etc.) on rats with acetic acid colitis.METHODS Seventy rats were randomly divided into normal group,model group,Montmorillonite Powder group,sulfasalazine (SASP) group,low-,medium-and high-dose of Kelisha Capsules groups.Except for the normal group,10% acetic acid solution was injected into the anus of rats in another six groups to establish model for ulcerative colitis.After administration for fourteen days,general conditions and status of feces were observed,the levels of serum IL-1β,IL-6,TNF-α and EGF were measured on the 1 st,10th,14th days by ELISA.After the 15th day,the injury to colon mucosa of rats was observed,and damage indexes were evaluated.RESULTS Compared with the model group,the inflammatory condition of colon mucosa in the Kelisha Capsules groups was improved,which was less obvious than that in the SASP group.Compared with the SASP group,the levels of serum IL-1β,IL-6 and TNF-oα in the Kelisha Capsules groups were increased on the 10th,14th days,and the difference between the low-dose group and the SASP group had statistical significance (P < 0.05).Compared with the Montmorillonite Powder group,the level of serum EGF in the Kelisha Capsules groups was decreased on the 10th,14th days,which was higher than that in the SASP group,and the difference between the high-dose group and the SASP group had statistical significance (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION The effect of Kelisha Capsules on rats with acetic acid colitis is better than that of Montmorillonite Powder,but is not as effective as that of SASP.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.Clinical trial of alteplase injection in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke
Zi-Ran WANG ; Mei ZHENG ; Guang-Jian ZHAO ; Dai-Qun YANG ; Hong-Yan LEI
The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2017;33(5):391-394
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of alteplase withdifferent doses and thrombolysis time in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.Methods A total of 220 patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomly divided into A group(n =90 cases),B group(n =90 cases) and C group (n =40 cases).A group was given 0.6 mg· kg-1 alteplase,the thrombolysis timewas less than 30 minutes;B group wasgiyen 0.6 mg · kg-1 alteplase,the thrombolysis time was about 60 min;C group was given 0.9 mg · kg-1 alteplase,the thrombolysis time was about 60 min.1 d after thrombolysis treatment,all patients were given oral aspirin 100 mg qd for 3 months.The national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) score and adverse drug reactions were compared between three groups.Resnlts 1 h after treatment,the NIHSS in A,B,C groups were (7.11 ±0.83),(8.24 ±0.96),(8.32 ± 1.38) points;1 d after treatment,the NIHSS in A,B,C groups were (7.92 ± 0.93),(8.92 ± 1.03),(9.09 ± 1.17) points;7 d after treatment,the NIHSS in A,B,C groups were (6.63 ± 0.77),(7.31 ± 0.83),(7.36 ± 0.88) points;30 d after treatment,the NIHSS in A,B,C groups were (4.89 ± 0.62),(5.62 ± 0.76),(5.78 ± 0.87) points;90 d after treatment,the NIHSS in A,B,C groups were (3.53 ± 0.58),(4.77 ± 0.55),(4.69 ± 0.61) points.90 d after treatment,the modified rankin scale scores in A,B,C groups were 72.22% (65/90 cases),54.44% (49/90 cases),55.00% (22/40 eases).The differences were statistically significant between A group and B,C groups (P < 0.05),which was not signi-ficant between B group and C group (P > 0.05).The adverse drug reactions were based on gingival bleeding,the incidences of adverse drug reactions in A,B,C groups were 8.89%,12.22%,17.50% without significant difference (P > 0.05).ConclusionAlteplasehasa definitive clinical efficacy in the treatment of acute ischemie strokewith the dose of 0.6 mg· kg-1 and intravenous thrombolysis time < 30 min,which can reduce the financial burden,without increasing the incidence of adverse drug reactions.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.The effects of HIF-1α on the growth of transplanted oral cancer in nude mice and on the expression of CEACAM1 and VEGF-C in the tumor
Yinhua DAI ; Qun DAI ; Wenying ZOU ; Qiong YANG ; Ziyan LIU ; Yaoyu DONG
Journal of Practical Stomatology 2017;33(4):459-463
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective:To explore the effects of HIF-1α on the growth of transplanted oral cancer and on the expression of CEACAM1 and VEGF-C in the tumor.Methods:Nude mouse model of oral cancer was established by transplantation of Tca8113 cells respectively treated by HIF-1α siRNA and negative control siRNA subcutaneously into right axillary region of nude mice.3 weeks after transplantation the mice were sacrificed,the tumor volum and weight were measured.The tumor tissue was examined by ELISA method for the detection HIF-1α protein expression,by real-time quantitative PCR and western blot for the detection of mRNA and protein expression of HIF-1α,CEACAM1 and VEGF-C respectively.Results:The volume and weight of the transplanted tumor in HIF-1 α siRNA group were significantly less than those in the control group(P<0.05),CEACAM1 and VEGF-C mRNA and protein were down-regulate in HIF-1α siRNA group (P<0.05).Conclusion:HIF-1α expression is positively related to the expression of CEACAM1 and VEGF-C in the regulation of oral tumor growth.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail