1.Levels of exposure markers among residents in environmentally vulnerable areas in Korea, the general population in Korea, and Asians in the United States
Kyung-Hwa CHOI ; Dahee HAN ; Sang-Yong EOM ; Yong Min CHO ; Young-Seoub HONG ; Woo Jin KIM
Epidemiology and Health 2025;47(1):e2025007-
This study compares biomarker levels among environmentally vulnerable residents in Korea, the general Korean population, and Asians in the United States. We selected 953 exposed residents and 204 controls from the Forensic Research via Omics Markers in Environmental Health Vulnerable Areas (FROM) study (2021-2023), 4,239 participants from the fourth Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2018-2020), and 996 Asians from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017-March 2020). The analyzed biomarkers included blood and urinary metals, urinary metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nicotine, volatile organic compounds, and serum perfluorocarbon metabolites. The highest median biomarker levels varied by pollution source among older adults. In refineries, blood lead and cadmium (Cd), as well as urinary Cd and 2-hydroxyfluorene, were highest. Abandoned metal mines exhibited the highest blood and urinary mercury, urinary Cd, total arsenic (As), 2-naphthol, and cotinine levels. Coal-fired power plants showed the highest urinary 1- hydroxyphenanthrene levels, while cement factories had the highest urinary As3+ levels. Sprawls demonstrated the highest urinary monomethylarsonic acid, 1-hydroxypyrene, and phenylglyoxylic acid levels, and industrial areas recorded the highest levels of trans, trans-muconic acid, benzylmercapturic acid, and 2-methylhippuric acid. In general, biomarker levels were higher among exposed residents in the FROM study than in the general population; however, urinary 2-hydroxyfluorene and As5+ levels did not differ significantly. Exposure to pollution sources in environmentally vulnerable areas may elevate biomarker levels in residents.
2.Levels of exposure markers among residents in environmentally vulnerable areas in Korea, the general population in Korea, and Asians in the United States
Kyung-Hwa CHOI ; Dahee HAN ; Sang-Yong EOM ; Yong Min CHO ; Young-Seoub HONG ; Woo Jin KIM
Epidemiology and Health 2025;47(1):e2025007-
This study compares biomarker levels among environmentally vulnerable residents in Korea, the general Korean population, and Asians in the United States. We selected 953 exposed residents and 204 controls from the Forensic Research via Omics Markers in Environmental Health Vulnerable Areas (FROM) study (2021-2023), 4,239 participants from the fourth Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2018-2020), and 996 Asians from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017-March 2020). The analyzed biomarkers included blood and urinary metals, urinary metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nicotine, volatile organic compounds, and serum perfluorocarbon metabolites. The highest median biomarker levels varied by pollution source among older adults. In refineries, blood lead and cadmium (Cd), as well as urinary Cd and 2-hydroxyfluorene, were highest. Abandoned metal mines exhibited the highest blood and urinary mercury, urinary Cd, total arsenic (As), 2-naphthol, and cotinine levels. Coal-fired power plants showed the highest urinary 1- hydroxyphenanthrene levels, while cement factories had the highest urinary As3+ levels. Sprawls demonstrated the highest urinary monomethylarsonic acid, 1-hydroxypyrene, and phenylglyoxylic acid levels, and industrial areas recorded the highest levels of trans, trans-muconic acid, benzylmercapturic acid, and 2-methylhippuric acid. In general, biomarker levels were higher among exposed residents in the FROM study than in the general population; however, urinary 2-hydroxyfluorene and As5+ levels did not differ significantly. Exposure to pollution sources in environmentally vulnerable areas may elevate biomarker levels in residents.
3.Levels of exposure markers among residents in environmentally vulnerable areas in Korea, the general population in Korea, and Asians in the United States
Kyung-Hwa CHOI ; Dahee HAN ; Sang-Yong EOM ; Yong Min CHO ; Young-Seoub HONG ; Woo Jin KIM
Epidemiology and Health 2025;47(1):e2025007-
This study compares biomarker levels among environmentally vulnerable residents in Korea, the general Korean population, and Asians in the United States. We selected 953 exposed residents and 204 controls from the Forensic Research via Omics Markers in Environmental Health Vulnerable Areas (FROM) study (2021-2023), 4,239 participants from the fourth Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2018-2020), and 996 Asians from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017-March 2020). The analyzed biomarkers included blood and urinary metals, urinary metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nicotine, volatile organic compounds, and serum perfluorocarbon metabolites. The highest median biomarker levels varied by pollution source among older adults. In refineries, blood lead and cadmium (Cd), as well as urinary Cd and 2-hydroxyfluorene, were highest. Abandoned metal mines exhibited the highest blood and urinary mercury, urinary Cd, total arsenic (As), 2-naphthol, and cotinine levels. Coal-fired power plants showed the highest urinary 1- hydroxyphenanthrene levels, while cement factories had the highest urinary As3+ levels. Sprawls demonstrated the highest urinary monomethylarsonic acid, 1-hydroxypyrene, and phenylglyoxylic acid levels, and industrial areas recorded the highest levels of trans, trans-muconic acid, benzylmercapturic acid, and 2-methylhippuric acid. In general, biomarker levels were higher among exposed residents in the FROM study than in the general population; however, urinary 2-hydroxyfluorene and As5+ levels did not differ significantly. Exposure to pollution sources in environmentally vulnerable areas may elevate biomarker levels in residents.
4.Levels of exposure markers among residents in environmentally vulnerable areas in Korea, the general population in Korea, and Asians in the United States
Kyung-Hwa CHOI ; Dahee HAN ; Sang-Yong EOM ; Yong Min CHO ; Young-Seoub HONG ; Woo Jin KIM
Epidemiology and Health 2025;47(1):e2025007-
This study compares biomarker levels among environmentally vulnerable residents in Korea, the general Korean population, and Asians in the United States. We selected 953 exposed residents and 204 controls from the Forensic Research via Omics Markers in Environmental Health Vulnerable Areas (FROM) study (2021-2023), 4,239 participants from the fourth Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2018-2020), and 996 Asians from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017-March 2020). The analyzed biomarkers included blood and urinary metals, urinary metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nicotine, volatile organic compounds, and serum perfluorocarbon metabolites. The highest median biomarker levels varied by pollution source among older adults. In refineries, blood lead and cadmium (Cd), as well as urinary Cd and 2-hydroxyfluorene, were highest. Abandoned metal mines exhibited the highest blood and urinary mercury, urinary Cd, total arsenic (As), 2-naphthol, and cotinine levels. Coal-fired power plants showed the highest urinary 1- hydroxyphenanthrene levels, while cement factories had the highest urinary As3+ levels. Sprawls demonstrated the highest urinary monomethylarsonic acid, 1-hydroxypyrene, and phenylglyoxylic acid levels, and industrial areas recorded the highest levels of trans, trans-muconic acid, benzylmercapturic acid, and 2-methylhippuric acid. In general, biomarker levels were higher among exposed residents in the FROM study than in the general population; however, urinary 2-hydroxyfluorene and As5+ levels did not differ significantly. Exposure to pollution sources in environmentally vulnerable areas may elevate biomarker levels in residents.
5.Introduction to the forensic research via omics markers in environmental health vulnerable areas (FROM) study
Jung-Yeon KWON ; Woo Jin KIM ; Yong Min CHO ; Byoung-gwon KIM ; Seungho LEE ; Jee Hyun RHO ; Sang-Yong EOM ; Dahee HAN ; Kyung-Hwa CHOI ; Jang-Hee LEE ; Jeeyoung KIM ; Sungho WON ; Hee-Gyoo KANG ; Sora MUN ; Hyun Ju YOO ; Jung-Woong KIM ; Kwan LEE ; Won-Ju PARK ; Seongchul HONG ; Young-Seoub HONG
Epidemiology and Health 2024;46(1):e2024062-
This research group (forensic research via omics markers in environmental health vulnerable areas: FROM) aimed to develop biomarkers for exposure to environmental hazards and diseases, assess environmental diseases, and apply and verify these biomarkers in environmentally vulnerable areas. Environmentally vulnerable areas—including refineries, abandoned metal mines, coal-fired power plants, waste incinerators, cement factories, and areas with high exposure to particulate matter—along with control areas, were selected for epidemiological investigations. A total of 1,157 adults, who had resided in these areas for over 10 years, were recruited between June 2021 and September 2023. Personal characteristics of the study participants were gathered through a survey. Biological samples, specifically blood and urine, were collected during the field investigations, separated under refrigerated conditions, and then transported to the laboratory for biomarker analysis. Analyses of heavy metals, environmental hazards, and adducts were conducted on these blood and urine samples. Additionally, omics analyses of epigenomes, proteomes, and metabolomes were performed using the blood samples. The biomarkers identified in this study will be utilized to assess the risk of environmental disease occurrence and to evaluate the impact on the health of residents in environmentally vulnerable areas, following the validation of diagnostic accuracy for these diseases.
6.Introduction to the forensic research via omics markers in environmental health vulnerable areas (FROM) study
Jung-Yeon KWON ; Woo Jin KIM ; Yong Min CHO ; Byoung-gwon KIM ; Seungho LEE ; Jee Hyun RHO ; Sang-Yong EOM ; Dahee HAN ; Kyung-Hwa CHOI ; Jang-Hee LEE ; Jeeyoung KIM ; Sungho WON ; Hee-Gyoo KANG ; Sora MUN ; Hyun Ju YOO ; Jung-Woong KIM ; Kwan LEE ; Won-Ju PARK ; Seongchul HONG ; Young-Seoub HONG
Epidemiology and Health 2024;46(1):e2024062-
This research group (forensic research via omics markers in environmental health vulnerable areas: FROM) aimed to develop biomarkers for exposure to environmental hazards and diseases, assess environmental diseases, and apply and verify these biomarkers in environmentally vulnerable areas. Environmentally vulnerable areas—including refineries, abandoned metal mines, coal-fired power plants, waste incinerators, cement factories, and areas with high exposure to particulate matter—along with control areas, were selected for epidemiological investigations. A total of 1,157 adults, who had resided in these areas for over 10 years, were recruited between June 2021 and September 2023. Personal characteristics of the study participants were gathered through a survey. Biological samples, specifically blood and urine, were collected during the field investigations, separated under refrigerated conditions, and then transported to the laboratory for biomarker analysis. Analyses of heavy metals, environmental hazards, and adducts were conducted on these blood and urine samples. Additionally, omics analyses of epigenomes, proteomes, and metabolomes were performed using the blood samples. The biomarkers identified in this study will be utilized to assess the risk of environmental disease occurrence and to evaluate the impact on the health of residents in environmentally vulnerable areas, following the validation of diagnostic accuracy for these diseases.
7.Introduction to the forensic research via omics markers in environmental health vulnerable areas (FROM) study
Jung-Yeon KWON ; Woo Jin KIM ; Yong Min CHO ; Byoung-gwon KIM ; Seungho LEE ; Jee Hyun RHO ; Sang-Yong EOM ; Dahee HAN ; Kyung-Hwa CHOI ; Jang-Hee LEE ; Jeeyoung KIM ; Sungho WON ; Hee-Gyoo KANG ; Sora MUN ; Hyun Ju YOO ; Jung-Woong KIM ; Kwan LEE ; Won-Ju PARK ; Seongchul HONG ; Young-Seoub HONG
Epidemiology and Health 2024;46(1):e2024062-
This research group (forensic research via omics markers in environmental health vulnerable areas: FROM) aimed to develop biomarkers for exposure to environmental hazards and diseases, assess environmental diseases, and apply and verify these biomarkers in environmentally vulnerable areas. Environmentally vulnerable areas—including refineries, abandoned metal mines, coal-fired power plants, waste incinerators, cement factories, and areas with high exposure to particulate matter—along with control areas, were selected for epidemiological investigations. A total of 1,157 adults, who had resided in these areas for over 10 years, were recruited between June 2021 and September 2023. Personal characteristics of the study participants were gathered through a survey. Biological samples, specifically blood and urine, were collected during the field investigations, separated under refrigerated conditions, and then transported to the laboratory for biomarker analysis. Analyses of heavy metals, environmental hazards, and adducts were conducted on these blood and urine samples. Additionally, omics analyses of epigenomes, proteomes, and metabolomes were performed using the blood samples. The biomarkers identified in this study will be utilized to assess the risk of environmental disease occurrence and to evaluate the impact on the health of residents in environmentally vulnerable areas, following the validation of diagnostic accuracy for these diseases.
8.Introduction to the forensic research via omics markers in environmental health vulnerable areas (FROM) study
Jung-Yeon KWON ; Woo Jin KIM ; Yong Min CHO ; Byoung-gwon KIM ; Seungho LEE ; Jee Hyun RHO ; Sang-Yong EOM ; Dahee HAN ; Kyung-Hwa CHOI ; Jang-Hee LEE ; Jeeyoung KIM ; Sungho WON ; Hee-Gyoo KANG ; Sora MUN ; Hyun Ju YOO ; Jung-Woong KIM ; Kwan LEE ; Won-Ju PARK ; Seongchul HONG ; Young-Seoub HONG
Epidemiology and Health 2024;46(1):e2024062-
This research group (forensic research via omics markers in environmental health vulnerable areas: FROM) aimed to develop biomarkers for exposure to environmental hazards and diseases, assess environmental diseases, and apply and verify these biomarkers in environmentally vulnerable areas. Environmentally vulnerable areas—including refineries, abandoned metal mines, coal-fired power plants, waste incinerators, cement factories, and areas with high exposure to particulate matter—along with control areas, were selected for epidemiological investigations. A total of 1,157 adults, who had resided in these areas for over 10 years, were recruited between June 2021 and September 2023. Personal characteristics of the study participants were gathered through a survey. Biological samples, specifically blood and urine, were collected during the field investigations, separated under refrigerated conditions, and then transported to the laboratory for biomarker analysis. Analyses of heavy metals, environmental hazards, and adducts were conducted on these blood and urine samples. Additionally, omics analyses of epigenomes, proteomes, and metabolomes were performed using the blood samples. The biomarkers identified in this study will be utilized to assess the risk of environmental disease occurrence and to evaluate the impact on the health of residents in environmentally vulnerable areas, following the validation of diagnostic accuracy for these diseases.
9.Retropharyngeal Ectopic Parathyroid Adenoma Localized by 18F-Fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Case Report
Hyeokjoo JANG ; Seunghyun LEE ; Dahee KIM ; Namki HONG
Journal of Bone Metabolism 2022;29(3):197-203
Ectopic parathyroid adenomas of the retropharyngeal space are relatively rare. Herein, we report a case of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) secondary to a retropharyngeal parathyroid adenoma. A 22-year-old woman presented with elevated serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, revealed during a medical check-up. The patient had a history of ureteral stones and a confirmed low bone mass. Neck 99mTechnetium-sestamibi singlephoton emission computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography did not reveal any suspicious lesions. There was no evidence of hereditary PHPT based on the results of targeted gene sequencing. Surgical exploration was unsuccessful, and the PHPT persisted after the first surgery. Approximately a year after the failed operation, 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) positron emission tomography/CT (PET-CT) became available, and when performed, it revealed increased uptake in the retropharyngeal space of the right side of the neck. The results of parathyroid venous sampling were concordant with a >2-fold elevation of PTH level in the veins on the right side of the neck compared to the peripheral veins. The 1.8 cm-diameter mass was successfully removed resulting in an 87% reduction in intraoperative PTH level (198.0-26.5 pg/mL). Subsequently, normalizations of calcium and PTH levels were achieved. In summary, ectopic parathyroid adenomas, including retropharyngeal lesions, should also be suspected when investigating an elusive case of PHPT. 18F-FCH PET-CT can be a useful complementary modality for detecting culprit lesions.
10.Source Analysis and Effective Control of a COVID-19 Outbreak in a University Teaching Hospital during a Period of Increasing Community Prevalence of COVID-19
Unhee LEE ; Seong Eun KIM ; Seung Yeob LEE ; Hang Nam WI ; Okja CHOI ; Ji-Won PARK ; Dahee KIM ; You Jung KIM ; Hwa Young SHIN ; Mihee KIM ; Eun Ji KIM ; Seung-Ji KANG ; Sook-In JUNG ; Kyung-Hwa PARK
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2021;36(24):e179-
Background:
South Korea has been experiencing a third wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) since mid-November 2020. Our hospital in Gwangju metropolitan city experienced a healthcare-associated COVID-19 outbreak early in the third wave. The first confirmed COVID-19 patient was a symptomatic neurosurgery resident with high mobility throughout the hospital. We analyzed the transmission routes of nosocomial COVID-19 and discussed infection control strategies.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing results according to time point and evaluated transmission routes.
Results:
Since COVID-19 was first confirmed in a healthcare worker (HCW) on 11/13/2020, we performed RT-PCR tests for all patients and caregivers and four complete enumeration surveys for all HCWs. We detected three clusters of nosocomial spread and several sporadic cases. The first cluster originated from the community outbreak spot, where an asymptomatic HCW visited, which led to a total of 22 cases. The second cluster, which included patient-to-patient transmission, originated from a COVID-19 positive caregiver before diagnosis and the third cluster involved a radiologist and a banker. We took measures to isolate Building 1 of the hospital for 17 days and controlled the outbreak during a period of increasing community COVID-19 prevalence. Universal screening of all inpatients upon admission and resident caregivers was made mandatory and hospital-related employees are now screened monthly.
Conclusion
Infection control strategies to prevent the nosocomial transmission of emerging infectious diseases must correspond with community disease prevalence. Our data reinforce the importance of multi-time point surveillance of asymptomatic HCWs and routine surveillance of patients and caregivers during an epidemic.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail