Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted global infrastructure. We surveyed laboratories to analyze the changes in testing methods and procedures to improve future pandemic preparedness. Methods: This study surveyed laboratory physicians and technologists in South Korea and analyzed responses from 126 of 323 institutions. The survey was conducted in May 2023 using the proficiency test of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service and examined the diagnostic procedures, personnel, equipment, and quality control. The survey comprised 15 questions covering respondent demographics, public-private proficiency projects, COVID-19 testing procedures, and laboratory status. Results: Of the 126 laboratories, 66.7% performed bacterial smear and culture, 65.9% had biosafety level 2 facilities, and 39.7% had separate nucleic acid extraction areas. Furthermore, 98.4% of the laboratories had biological safety cabinets, the median number of PCR machines was four units, and 77.8% had autoclaves. The median numbers of personnel managing and conducting tests were one and three, respectively. Additionally, 88.1% of the laboratories found the COVID-19 proficiency test helpful, with key benefits in terms of accuracy and skill improvement. COVID-19 tests were primarily used for symptomatic or contact person testing, pre-admission screening, and periodic proactive testing. Specialized testing laboratories conducted up to 50,000 tests daily, and tertiary hospitals conducted up to 1,500 tests.Emergency, pooled, and rapid antigen tests were widely used. Most respondents wanted future tests for respiratory viruses, bacteria, and viral diarrhea, indicating a willingness to participate. Conclusion Aggressive testing and collaboration between health agencies and laboratories are crucial for managing emerging diseases. Systematic preparations are essential to maintain and strengthen laboratory capabilities for future infectious disease outbreaks.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted global infrastructure. We surveyed laboratories to analyze the changes in testing methods and procedures to improve future pandemic preparedness. Methods: This study surveyed laboratory physicians and technologists in South Korea and analyzed responses from 126 of 323 institutions. The survey was conducted in May 2023 using the proficiency test of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service and examined the diagnostic procedures, personnel, equipment, and quality control. The survey comprised 15 questions covering respondent demographics, public-private proficiency projects, COVID-19 testing procedures, and laboratory status. Results: Of the 126 laboratories, 66.7% performed bacterial smear and culture, 65.9% had biosafety level 2 facilities, and 39.7% had separate nucleic acid extraction areas. Furthermore, 98.4% of the laboratories had biological safety cabinets, the median number of PCR machines was four units, and 77.8% had autoclaves. The median numbers of personnel managing and conducting tests were one and three, respectively. Additionally, 88.1% of the laboratories found the COVID-19 proficiency test helpful, with key benefits in terms of accuracy and skill improvement. COVID-19 tests were primarily used for symptomatic or contact person testing, pre-admission screening, and periodic proactive testing. Specialized testing laboratories conducted up to 50,000 tests daily, and tertiary hospitals conducted up to 1,500 tests.Emergency, pooled, and rapid antigen tests were widely used. Most respondents wanted future tests for respiratory viruses, bacteria, and viral diarrhea, indicating a willingness to participate. Conclusion Aggressive testing and collaboration between health agencies and laboratories are crucial for managing emerging diseases. Systematic preparations are essential to maintain and strengthen laboratory capabilities for future infectious disease outbreaks.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted global infrastructure. We surveyed laboratories to analyze the changes in testing methods and procedures to improve future pandemic preparedness. Methods: This study surveyed laboratory physicians and technologists in South Korea and analyzed responses from 126 of 323 institutions. The survey was conducted in May 2023 using the proficiency test of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service and examined the diagnostic procedures, personnel, equipment, and quality control. The survey comprised 15 questions covering respondent demographics, public-private proficiency projects, COVID-19 testing procedures, and laboratory status. Results: Of the 126 laboratories, 66.7% performed bacterial smear and culture, 65.9% had biosafety level 2 facilities, and 39.7% had separate nucleic acid extraction areas. Furthermore, 98.4% of the laboratories had biological safety cabinets, the median number of PCR machines was four units, and 77.8% had autoclaves. The median numbers of personnel managing and conducting tests were one and three, respectively. Additionally, 88.1% of the laboratories found the COVID-19 proficiency test helpful, with key benefits in terms of accuracy and skill improvement. COVID-19 tests were primarily used for symptomatic or contact person testing, pre-admission screening, and periodic proactive testing. Specialized testing laboratories conducted up to 50,000 tests daily, and tertiary hospitals conducted up to 1,500 tests.Emergency, pooled, and rapid antigen tests were widely used. Most respondents wanted future tests for respiratory viruses, bacteria, and viral diarrhea, indicating a willingness to participate. Conclusion Aggressive testing and collaboration between health agencies and laboratories are crucial for managing emerging diseases. Systematic preparations are essential to maintain and strengthen laboratory capabilities for future infectious disease outbreaks.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted global infrastructure. We surveyed laboratories to analyze the changes in testing methods and procedures to improve future pandemic preparedness. Methods: This study surveyed laboratory physicians and technologists in South Korea and analyzed responses from 126 of 323 institutions. The survey was conducted in May 2023 using the proficiency test of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service and examined the diagnostic procedures, personnel, equipment, and quality control. The survey comprised 15 questions covering respondent demographics, public-private proficiency projects, COVID-19 testing procedures, and laboratory status. Results: Of the 126 laboratories, 66.7% performed bacterial smear and culture, 65.9% had biosafety level 2 facilities, and 39.7% had separate nucleic acid extraction areas. Furthermore, 98.4% of the laboratories had biological safety cabinets, the median number of PCR machines was four units, and 77.8% had autoclaves. The median numbers of personnel managing and conducting tests were one and three, respectively. Additionally, 88.1% of the laboratories found the COVID-19 proficiency test helpful, with key benefits in terms of accuracy and skill improvement. COVID-19 tests were primarily used for symptomatic or contact person testing, pre-admission screening, and periodic proactive testing. Specialized testing laboratories conducted up to 50,000 tests daily, and tertiary hospitals conducted up to 1,500 tests.Emergency, pooled, and rapid antigen tests were widely used. Most respondents wanted future tests for respiratory viruses, bacteria, and viral diarrhea, indicating a willingness to participate. Conclusion Aggressive testing and collaboration between health agencies and laboratories are crucial for managing emerging diseases. Systematic preparations are essential to maintain and strengthen laboratory capabilities for future infectious disease outbreaks.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted global infrastructure. We surveyed laboratories to analyze the changes in testing methods and procedures to improve future pandemic preparedness. Methods: This study surveyed laboratory physicians and technologists in South Korea and analyzed responses from 126 of 323 institutions. The survey was conducted in May 2023 using the proficiency test of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service and examined the diagnostic procedures, personnel, equipment, and quality control. The survey comprised 15 questions covering respondent demographics, public-private proficiency projects, COVID-19 testing procedures, and laboratory status. Results: Of the 126 laboratories, 66.7% performed bacterial smear and culture, 65.9% had biosafety level 2 facilities, and 39.7% had separate nucleic acid extraction areas. Furthermore, 98.4% of the laboratories had biological safety cabinets, the median number of PCR machines was four units, and 77.8% had autoclaves. The median numbers of personnel managing and conducting tests were one and three, respectively. Additionally, 88.1% of the laboratories found the COVID-19 proficiency test helpful, with key benefits in terms of accuracy and skill improvement. COVID-19 tests were primarily used for symptomatic or contact person testing, pre-admission screening, and periodic proactive testing. Specialized testing laboratories conducted up to 50,000 tests daily, and tertiary hospitals conducted up to 1,500 tests.Emergency, pooled, and rapid antigen tests were widely used. Most respondents wanted future tests for respiratory viruses, bacteria, and viral diarrhea, indicating a willingness to participate. Conclusion Aggressive testing and collaboration between health agencies and laboratories are crucial for managing emerging diseases. Systematic preparations are essential to maintain and strengthen laboratory capabilities for future infectious disease outbreaks.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between metabolic syndrome and tooth loss among adults aged 19years and older using data from the nationally representative Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Methods: A total of 49,468 adults aged 19 years and older who participated in the 2007∼2018 KNHANES were included in the final analysis. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine tooth loss according to sociodemographic factors and the presence of metabolic syndrome. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors influencing tooth loss. Results: Sociodemographic factors and components of metabolic syndrome were identified as potential risk factors for tooth loss.The prevalence of tooth loss was higher among individuals in older age groups, those with lower educational and income levels, those engaged in agricultural or fishery-related occupations, and those residing in rural areas (p＜0.001). Adults with metabolic syndrome exhibited a relatively higher prevalence of tooth loss (p＜0.001), with a 1.19-fold increased likelihood of tooth loss compared to those without metabolic syndrome (p＜0.001). Conclusion Efforts are needed to develop oral health education programs and integrate systemic health management strategiesaimed at improving oral health among adults with metabolic syndrome.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between metabolic syndrome and tooth loss among adults aged 19years and older using data from the nationally representative Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Methods: A total of 49,468 adults aged 19 years and older who participated in the 2007∼2018 KNHANES were included in the final analysis. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine tooth loss according to sociodemographic factors and the presence of metabolic syndrome. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors influencing tooth loss. Results: Sociodemographic factors and components of metabolic syndrome were identified as potential risk factors for tooth loss.The prevalence of tooth loss was higher among individuals in older age groups, those with lower educational and income levels, those engaged in agricultural or fishery-related occupations, and those residing in rural areas (p＜0.001). Adults with metabolic syndrome exhibited a relatively higher prevalence of tooth loss (p＜0.001), with a 1.19-fold increased likelihood of tooth loss compared to those without metabolic syndrome (p＜0.001). Conclusion Efforts are needed to develop oral health education programs and integrate systemic health management strategiesaimed at improving oral health among adults with metabolic syndrome.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between metabolic syndrome and tooth loss among adults aged 19years and older using data from the nationally representative Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Methods: A total of 49,468 adults aged 19 years and older who participated in the 2007∼2018 KNHANES were included in the final analysis. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine tooth loss according to sociodemographic factors and the presence of metabolic syndrome. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors influencing tooth loss. Results: Sociodemographic factors and components of metabolic syndrome were identified as potential risk factors for tooth loss.The prevalence of tooth loss was higher among individuals in older age groups, those with lower educational and income levels, those engaged in agricultural or fishery-related occupations, and those residing in rural areas (p＜0.001). Adults with metabolic syndrome exhibited a relatively higher prevalence of tooth loss (p＜0.001), with a 1.19-fold increased likelihood of tooth loss compared to those without metabolic syndrome (p＜0.001). Conclusion Efforts are needed to develop oral health education programs and integrate systemic health management strategiesaimed at improving oral health among adults with metabolic syndrome.

Background: Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for the appropriate treatment of bloodstream infections. The QMAC-dRAST system (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) can directly perform RAST using positive blood culture samples with microscopic imaging. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the QMAC-dRAST system for AmpCβ-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. Methods: Eighty isolates (20 Morganella morganii, 20 Serratia marcescens, 10 Klebsiella aerogenes, 10 Enterobacter cloacae, and 20 Citrobacter freundii) and 14 antimicrobial agents were included in the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). The performance of the QMAC-dRAST system was evaluated by simulating the clinical blood culturing process. We conducted a comparative evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST and Vitek 2 systems (bioMérieux Inc., France). Broth microdilution tests were performed as the reference method to resolve any discrepancies in the AST results between the two systems. Results: For 20 M. morganii and 20 S. marcescens, the categorical agreement (CA) between the QMAC-dRAST and Vitek 2 systems increased from 55.4% to 83.8% after AST algorithm optimization. Moreover, the discrepancy rates decreased as follows: from 19.1% to 5.4% very major errors (VME), from 38.3% to 4.3% major errors (ME), and from 14.6% to 12.1% minor errors (mE) for the QMAC-dRAST system compared to the Vitek 2 system. For all 80 tested isolates, the QMAC-dRAST system showed 93.0% CA, 1.7% VME, 2.3% ME, and 4.9% mE. Conclusion The QMAC-dRAST system was comparable to the Vitek 2 system after AST algorithm optimization for AmpC β-lactamase-producers, which are major pathogens and require time to express the enzyme. However, further modifications of the AST algorithm are still warranted.