Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease that affects both children and adults. AD is the cause of considerable morbidity including severe pruritus and impaired quality of life. Treatments for active disease include avoidance of triggering factors, barrier repair, topical medications including topical corticosteroids (TCs) and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), phototherapy, antibacterial agents, and systemic immunosuppressants including cyclosporine. Until recently, the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved systemic treatment options for patients with moderate-to-severe AD were steroids and cyclosporine. Systemic steroids are not recommended by current guidelines and are commonly associated with disease rebound. Instead, clinicians choose from several off-label immunosuppressants. In 2018, the Korean FDA approved dupilumab for adults with moderate-to-severe AD whose disease is not adequately controlled with topical therapies. The implementation of treatment guidelines for AD is challenging. Herein, we review the several treatment modalities for AD and recommend a treatment algorithm.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Calcineurin Inhibitors ; Child ; Cyclosporine ; Dermatitis, Atopic* ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; Phototherapy ; Pruritus ; Quality of Life ; Skin Diseases ; Steroids ; United States Food and Drug Administration

Alopecia ; chemically induced ; diagnosis ; Antirheumatic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; drug therapy ; Biopsy ; methods ; Cyclosporine ; administration & dosage ; Dermatologic Agents ; administration & dosage ; Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome ; diagnosis ; etiology ; physiopathology ; therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prednisolone ; administration & dosage ; Skin ; pathology ; Sulfasalazine ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Symptom Flare Up ; Treatment Outcome ; Vitiligo ; chemically induced ; diagnosis

PURPOSE: The increased tolerability of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), compared to mycophenolate mofetil, among kidney transplant recipients has the potential to facilitate cyclosporine (CsA) minimization. Therefore, a prospective trial to determine the optimum EC-MPS dose in CsA-based immunosuppression regimens is necessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative, parallel, randomized, open-label study was performed for 140 patients from four centers to compare the efficacy and tolerability of low dose CsA with standard dose EC-MPS (the investigational group) versus standard dose CsA with low dose EC-MPS (the control group) for six months in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Graft function, the incidence of efficacy failure [biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR), death, graft loss, loss to follow-up], and adverse events were compared. RESULTS: The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of the investigational group at six months post-transplantation was non-inferior to that of the control group (confidence interval between 57.3 mL/min/1.73m² and 67.4 mL/min/1.73 m², p<0.001). One graft loss was reported in the control group, and no patient deaths were reported in either group. The incidence of BCAR of the investigational group was 8.7%, compared to 18.8% in the control group (p=0.137), during the study period. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in the incidence of discontinuations and serious adverse events (SAE) between the groups. CONCLUSION: CsA minimization using a standard dose of EC-MPS kept the incidence of acute rejection and additional risks as low as conventional immunosuppression and provided therapeutic equivalence in terms of renal graft function and safety issues.
Adult ; Aged ; Cyclosporine/*administration & dosage ; Female ; Graft Rejection/*prevention & control ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/*administration & dosage ; Incidence ; Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mycophenolic Acid/*administration & dosage ; Prospective Studies ; Tablets, Enteric-Coated ; Time Factors

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine and cyclosporine for treatment of low-risk and intermediate-risk-1 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients.

METHODSThe clinical data of 27 cases of low risk and intermediate-risk-1 MDS during the past 3 years in Tongji hospital were analyzed retrospectively. These MDS patients were divided into 2 groups: decitabine group (11 cases) and cyclosporine group (16 cases). The MDS patients in the 2 groups were treated with ultra low dose of decitabine and cyclosporine A; the curetive efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated.

RESULTSIn the 11 patients with low-risk and intermediate-risk-1 MDS treated with 2 courses of ultra-low-dose decitabine, 4 cases (36.4%) achieved a hematological improvement, 7 cases (63.6%) showed ineffective, including non-remission in 6 cases (54.5 %) and death in 1 patient (9.1%), total effective rate were 36.4%; 3 cases died within the first year and the overall survival (OS) rate was 72.7%. The causes of death mainly were severe myelosuppression and the associated infection and bleeding. In the 16 patients with low-risk and intermediate-risk-1 MDS treated with cyclosporine (CsA), 10 cases (62.5%) achieved a hematological improvement, 6 cases (37.5%) showed ineffective, the total efficiency of 62.5%; no patients died within 1 year, the 1-year OS was 100%. Changes in neutrophils, hemoglobin and platelet were not significantly different between the two group.

CONCLUSIONThe clinical efficacy of decitabine on low-risk and intermediate-risk-1 MDS has not confirmed to be superior to cyclosporine (P = 0.252). However, the side effects of serious infection and myelosuppression were more severe in decitabine group than that in the cyclosporine group. Moreover, the 1-year overall survival rate in decitabine group is much lower than that in the cyclosporine group (P = 0.027). In regard to the small number of cases and short follow-up time in our this study, the more patients and longer follow-up time are needed to study.

Azacitidine ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Cyclosporine ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes ; drug therapy ; Pancytopenia ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome

INTRODUCTIONAtopic dermatitis is a common, chronic pruritic condition affecting both children and adults, which has a negative impact on the quality of life. These guidelines were developed by an expert workgroup appointed by the Dermatological Society of Singapore, to provide doctors with information to assist in the management of their patients with atopic dermatitis. The workgroup members are experienced dermatologists with interest and expertise in eczemas.

MATERIALS AND METHODSWorkgroup members arrived at a consensus on the topics to be included. Relevant studies from the literature were assessed for best evidence, supplemented by the collective experience of the workgroup.

RESULTSFor mild atopic dermatitis, emollients, mild potency topical steroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors are recommended. For moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, the use of emollients, moderate-to-potent topical steroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, wet dressings, antimicrobials for secondary skin infection, phototherapy, and systemic therapy (e.g. prednisolone, cyclosporine, azathioprine or methotrexate) may be warranted. Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis should be managed in conjunction with a dermatologist.

CONCLUSIONGood outcomes can be achieved with an individualised therapeutic approach combined with adequate patient and parental education.

Administration, Cutaneous ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; therapeutic use ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Azathioprine ; therapeutic use ; Calcineurin Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Coinfection ; complications ; drug therapy ; Cyclosporine ; therapeutic use ; Dermatitis, Atopic ; complications ; immunology ; therapy ; Dermatology ; Disease Management ; Emollients ; therapeutic use ; Food Hypersensitivity ; immunology ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Methotrexate ; therapeutic use ; Patient Education as Topic ; Phototherapy ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Referral and Consultation ; Severity of Illness Index ; Singapore

Administration, Cutaneous ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; therapeutic use ; Azathioprine ; therapeutic use ; Calcineurin Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Cyclosporine ; therapeutic use ; Dermatitis, Atopic ; immunology ; therapy ; Disease Management ; Food Hypersensitivity ; immunology ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Patient Education as Topic ; Phototherapy ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Severity of Illness Index ; Singapore

INTRODUCTIONWhile corticosteroids are an effective choice of treatment for severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), their long-term use is restricted due to side effects. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) 0.05% in the treatment of VKC.

METHODSA total of 30 patients with VKC that was resistant to topical corticosteroids, antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers were treated with topical CsA 0.05%. Patients were evaluated at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 after the initiation of therapy. Symptoms and signs observed before and after treatment were recorded and scores were assigned. Scores for symptoms and signs, the need for topical corticosteroids and ocular side effects were evaluated.

RESULTSAt baseline, the median values of the symptom and sign scores were 10.0 (range 5.0-18.0) and 6.0 (range 2.0-13.0), respectively. At Week 4 of treatment with topical CsA 0.05%, the median values of the symptom and sign scores were 3.0 (range 0-14.0) and 3.0 (range 0-8.0), respectively. The reductions in the symptom and sign scores were statistically significant. The reduction in the need for corticosteroid was statistically significant by Week 12 of therapy. No significant side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONTopical CsA 0.05%, which can help to reduce corticosteroid usage, is an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of resistant VKC. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy and possibility of recurrence.

Administration, Topical ; Adolescent ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; administration & dosage ; Adult ; Child ; Cohort Studies ; Conjunctivitis, Allergic ; drug therapy ; Cornea ; drug effects ; Cyclosporine ; administration & dosage ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Eye ; drug effects ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; administration & dosage ; Male ; Recurrence ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo compare the therapeutic effects of prednisone combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus cyclosporin A (CsA) in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).

METHODSThe clinical data of 164 SRNS children who were treated with prednisone combined with MMF or CsA between January 2004 and December 2013 were collected, and the clinical effect of prednisone combined with MMF (MMF group, 112 children) or CsA (CsA group, 52 children) was analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTSAt 1 month after treatment, the CsA group had a significantly higher remission rate than the MMF group (67.3% vs 42.9%; P<0.05). At 3 months after treatment, the CsA group also had a significantly higher remission rate than the MMF group (78.8% vs 63.3%; P<0.05). The 24-hour urinary protein excretion in both groups changed significantly with time (P<0.05) and differed significantly between the two groups (P<0.05). There were no serious adverse events in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONSPrednisone combined with MMF or CsA is effective and safe for the treatment of SRNS in children, and within 3 months of treatment, CsA has a better effect than MMF.

Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cyclosporine ; administration & dosage ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; administration & dosage ; Infant ; Male ; Mycophenolic Acid ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Nephrotic Syndrome ; drug therapy ; Prednisone ; administration & dosage ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare, acute, serious, and potentially fatal skin disease, in which cell death causes the epidermis to separate from the dermis. It is thought to be a hypersensitivity complex that affects the skin and mucous membranes, and is caused by certain medications, infections, genetic factors, underlying immunologic disease, or more rarely, cancers. We report two cases of TEN associated with deflazacort (DFZ), a derivative of prednisolone, used in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome (NS). The skin eruption appeared on the 4(th) and 5(th) weeks after DFZ administration, while NS was in remission. The widespread lesions were managed by intensive supportive treatment, discontinuation of DFZ, and oral administration of cyclosporine. Both patients showed a rapid improvement in symptoms of TEN without any complications or relapse of NS.
Administration, Oral ; Cell Death ; Cyclosporine* ; Dermis ; Epidermis ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Immune System Diseases ; Mucous Membrane ; Nephrotic Syndrome* ; Prednisolone ; Recurrence ; Skin ; Skin Diseases ; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome*

Behcet's disease (BD) involves multisystem vasculitis of unknown origin. Ocular manifestations of BD mostly include bilateral panuveitis and retinal vasculitis, which are very challenging to treat. Interferon alfa-2a (IFN) has been recently introduced for treating refractory Behcet uveitis, mainly in Germany and Turkey. Nonetheless, there is so far no consensus about the ideal treatment regimen of IFN for Behcet uveitis. We report our experience of IFN treatment in five Korean BD patients with refractory uveitis. All patients complained of oral ulcers; one patient had a positive pathergy test and 2 showed the presence of HLA-B51. Immunosuppressive agents used prior to IFN treatment included cyclosporine and methotrexate. The IFN treatment was commenced with a dose of 6-9 MIU/day for 7 days, adjusted according to individual ocular manifestations, tapered down to 3 MIU three times in a week, and then discontinued. All patients showed positive response to IFN treatment; 50% of them showed complete response without additional major ocular inflammation during the follow-up period. Other BD symptoms also improved after IFN treatment in most cases. After treatment, the relapse rate and the required dose of oral corticosteroid were decreased in most cases, showing a significant steroid-sparing effect. However, the visual acuity was not improved in most cases due to irreversible macular sequelae. Despite the small sample size of this study, we suggest that, in Korean patients, IFN is an effective treatment modality for BD uveitis as was observed in German and Turkish patients.
Adult ; Behcet Syndrome/complications/diagnosis/*drug therapy ; Chronic Disease ; Cyclosporine/therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage ; Interferon-alpha/*therapeutic use ; Male ; Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use ; Recurrence ; Remission Induction ; Treatment Outcome ; Turkey ; Uveitis/diagnosis/*drug therapy/etiology ; Visual Acuity