1.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Gaps and Similarities in Research Use LOINC Codes Utilized in Korean University Hospitals: Towards Semantic Interoperability for Patient Care
Kuenyoul PARK ; Min-Sun KIM ; YeJin OH ; John Hoon RIM ; Shinae YU ; Hyejin RYU ; Eun-Jung CHO ; Kyunghoon LEE ; Ha Nui KIM ; Inha CHUN ; AeKyung KWON ; Sollip KIM ; Jae-Woo CHUNG ; Hyojin CHAE ; Ji Seon OH ; Hyung-Doo PARK ; Mira KANG ; Yeo-Min YUN ; Jong-Baeck LIM ; Young Kyung LEE ; Sail CHUN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(1):e4-
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			The accuracy of Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) mappings is reportedly low, and the LOINC codes used for research purposes in Korea have not been validated for accuracy or usability. Our study aimed to evaluate the discrepancies and similarities in interoperability using existing LOINC mappings in actual patient care settings. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We collected data on local test codes and their corresponding LOINC mappings from seven university hospitals. Our analysis focused on laboratory tests that are frequently requested, excluding clinical microbiology and molecular tests. Codes from nationwide proficiency tests served as intermediary benchmarks for comparison. A research team, comprising clinical pathologists and terminology experts, utilized the LOINC manual to reach a consensus on determining the most suitable LOINC codes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			A total of 235 LOINC codes were designated as optimal codes for 162 frequent tests.Among these, 51 test items, including 34 urine tests, required multiple optimal LOINC codes, primarily due to unnoted properties such as whether the test was quantitative or qualitative, or differences in measurement units. We analyzed 962 LOINC codes linked to 162 tests across seven institutions, discovering that 792 (82.3%) of these codes were consistent. Inconsistencies were most common in the analyte component (38 inconsistencies, 33.3%), followed by the method (33 inconsistencies, 28.9%), and properties (13 inconsistencies, 11.4%). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			This study reveals a significant inconsistency rate of over 15% in LOINC mappings utilized for research purposes in university hospitals, underlining the necessity for expert verification to enhance interoperability in real patient care. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Gaps and Similarities in Research Use LOINC Codes Utilized in Korean University Hospitals: Towards Semantic Interoperability for Patient Care
Kuenyoul PARK ; Min-Sun KIM ; YeJin OH ; John Hoon RIM ; Shinae YU ; Hyejin RYU ; Eun-Jung CHO ; Kyunghoon LEE ; Ha Nui KIM ; Inha CHUN ; AeKyung KWON ; Sollip KIM ; Jae-Woo CHUNG ; Hyojin CHAE ; Ji Seon OH ; Hyung-Doo PARK ; Mira KANG ; Yeo-Min YUN ; Jong-Baeck LIM ; Young Kyung LEE ; Sail CHUN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(1):e4-
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			The accuracy of Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) mappings is reportedly low, and the LOINC codes used for research purposes in Korea have not been validated for accuracy or usability. Our study aimed to evaluate the discrepancies and similarities in interoperability using existing LOINC mappings in actual patient care settings. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We collected data on local test codes and their corresponding LOINC mappings from seven university hospitals. Our analysis focused on laboratory tests that are frequently requested, excluding clinical microbiology and molecular tests. Codes from nationwide proficiency tests served as intermediary benchmarks for comparison. A research team, comprising clinical pathologists and terminology experts, utilized the LOINC manual to reach a consensus on determining the most suitable LOINC codes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			A total of 235 LOINC codes were designated as optimal codes for 162 frequent tests.Among these, 51 test items, including 34 urine tests, required multiple optimal LOINC codes, primarily due to unnoted properties such as whether the test was quantitative or qualitative, or differences in measurement units. We analyzed 962 LOINC codes linked to 162 tests across seven institutions, discovering that 792 (82.3%) of these codes were consistent. Inconsistencies were most common in the analyte component (38 inconsistencies, 33.3%), followed by the method (33 inconsistencies, 28.9%), and properties (13 inconsistencies, 11.4%). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			This study reveals a significant inconsistency rate of over 15% in LOINC mappings utilized for research purposes in university hospitals, underlining the necessity for expert verification to enhance interoperability in real patient care. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Gaps and Similarities in Research Use LOINC Codes Utilized in Korean University Hospitals: Towards Semantic Interoperability for Patient Care
Kuenyoul PARK ; Min-Sun KIM ; YeJin OH ; John Hoon RIM ; Shinae YU ; Hyejin RYU ; Eun-Jung CHO ; Kyunghoon LEE ; Ha Nui KIM ; Inha CHUN ; AeKyung KWON ; Sollip KIM ; Jae-Woo CHUNG ; Hyojin CHAE ; Ji Seon OH ; Hyung-Doo PARK ; Mira KANG ; Yeo-Min YUN ; Jong-Baeck LIM ; Young Kyung LEE ; Sail CHUN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(1):e4-
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			The accuracy of Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) mappings is reportedly low, and the LOINC codes used for research purposes in Korea have not been validated for accuracy or usability. Our study aimed to evaluate the discrepancies and similarities in interoperability using existing LOINC mappings in actual patient care settings. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We collected data on local test codes and their corresponding LOINC mappings from seven university hospitals. Our analysis focused on laboratory tests that are frequently requested, excluding clinical microbiology and molecular tests. Codes from nationwide proficiency tests served as intermediary benchmarks for comparison. A research team, comprising clinical pathologists and terminology experts, utilized the LOINC manual to reach a consensus on determining the most suitable LOINC codes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			A total of 235 LOINC codes were designated as optimal codes for 162 frequent tests.Among these, 51 test items, including 34 urine tests, required multiple optimal LOINC codes, primarily due to unnoted properties such as whether the test was quantitative or qualitative, or differences in measurement units. We analyzed 962 LOINC codes linked to 162 tests across seven institutions, discovering that 792 (82.3%) of these codes were consistent. Inconsistencies were most common in the analyte component (38 inconsistencies, 33.3%), followed by the method (33 inconsistencies, 28.9%), and properties (13 inconsistencies, 11.4%). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			This study reveals a significant inconsistency rate of over 15% in LOINC mappings utilized for research purposes in university hospitals, underlining the necessity for expert verification to enhance interoperability in real patient care. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Gaps and Similarities in Research Use LOINC Codes Utilized in Korean University Hospitals: Towards Semantic Interoperability for Patient Care
Kuenyoul PARK ; Min-Sun KIM ; YeJin OH ; John Hoon RIM ; Shinae YU ; Hyejin RYU ; Eun-Jung CHO ; Kyunghoon LEE ; Ha Nui KIM ; Inha CHUN ; AeKyung KWON ; Sollip KIM ; Jae-Woo CHUNG ; Hyojin CHAE ; Ji Seon OH ; Hyung-Doo PARK ; Mira KANG ; Yeo-Min YUN ; Jong-Baeck LIM ; Young Kyung LEE ; Sail CHUN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(1):e4-
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			The accuracy of Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) mappings is reportedly low, and the LOINC codes used for research purposes in Korea have not been validated for accuracy or usability. Our study aimed to evaluate the discrepancies and similarities in interoperability using existing LOINC mappings in actual patient care settings. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We collected data on local test codes and their corresponding LOINC mappings from seven university hospitals. Our analysis focused on laboratory tests that are frequently requested, excluding clinical microbiology and molecular tests. Codes from nationwide proficiency tests served as intermediary benchmarks for comparison. A research team, comprising clinical pathologists and terminology experts, utilized the LOINC manual to reach a consensus on determining the most suitable LOINC codes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			A total of 235 LOINC codes were designated as optimal codes for 162 frequent tests.Among these, 51 test items, including 34 urine tests, required multiple optimal LOINC codes, primarily due to unnoted properties such as whether the test was quantitative or qualitative, or differences in measurement units. We analyzed 962 LOINC codes linked to 162 tests across seven institutions, discovering that 792 (82.3%) of these codes were consistent. Inconsistencies were most common in the analyte component (38 inconsistencies, 33.3%), followed by the method (33 inconsistencies, 28.9%), and properties (13 inconsistencies, 11.4%). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			This study reveals a significant inconsistency rate of over 15% in LOINC mappings utilized for research purposes in university hospitals, underlining the necessity for expert verification to enhance interoperability in real patient care. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.The Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Spine Chordoma: A Nationwide Multicenter Retrospective Study
Hangeul PARK ; Yunhee CHOI ; Sungjoon LEE ; Sun-Ho LEE ; Eun-Sang KIM ; Sun Woo JANG ; Jin Hoon PARK ; Yunseong CHO ; Giwuk JANG ; Yoon HA ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Heon YOO ; Sung Uk LEE ; Seung-Ho SEO ; Ki-Jeong KIM ; Seil SOHN ; Chun Kee CHUNG
Neurospine 2024;21(3):942-953
		                        		
		                        			 Objective:
		                        			Chordoma, a rare malignant tumor originating from embryonal notochord remnants, exhibits high resistance to conventional treatments, making surgical resection imperative. However, the factors influencing prognosis specifically for cervical spine chordoma have not been clearly identified. We investigate the prognosis of cervical spine chordoma with factors influential in a nationwide multicenter retrospective study. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			This study included all patients diagnosed with cervical spine chordoma at 7 tertiary referral centers from January 1998 to March 2023, excluding those with clivus and thoracic spine chordomas extending into the cervical spine. Local recurrence (LR) was identified through follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, either as reappearance in completely resected tumors or regrowth in residual tumors. The study assessed LR and overall survival, analyzing factors influencing LR and death. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Forty-five patients with cervical spine chordoma had a mean age of 46.4 years. Over a median follow-up of 52 months, LR and distant metastasis were observed in 21 (46.7%) and 4 patients (8.9%), respectively, and 16 patients (36%) were confirmed dead. The 5-year and 10-year cumulative LR rates were 51.3% and 60%, respectively, while the 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 82% and 53%. Age was the only significant factor affecting mortality (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.07; p=0.015). Notably, the degree of resection and adjuvant therapy did not statistically significantly impact local tumor control and mortality. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			This study, the largest multicenter retrospective analysis of cervical spine chordoma in Korea, identified age as the only factor significantly affecting patient survival. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail