1.Associations of cholecystectomy with the risk of colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.
Lanlan CHEN ; Zhongqi FAN ; Xiaodong SUN ; Wei QIU ; Wentao MU ; Kaiyuan CHAI ; Yannan CAO ; Guangyi WANG ; Guoyue LV
Chinese Medical Journal 2023;136(7):840-847
		                        		
		                        			BACKGROUND:
		                        			Cholecystectomy is a standard surgery for patients suffering from gallbladder diseases, while the causal effects of cholecystectomy on colorectal cancer (CRC) and other complications are still unknown.
		                        		
		                        			METHODS:
		                        			We obtained genetic variants associated with cholecystectomy at a genome-wide significant level ( P value <5 × 10 -8 ) as instrumental variables (IVs) and performed Mendelian randomization (MR) to identify the complications of cholecystectomy. Furthermore, the cholelithiasis was also treated as the exposure to compare its causal effects to those of cholecystectomy, and multivariable MR analysis was carried out to judge whether the effect of cholecystectomy was independent of cholelithiasis. The study was reported based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization guidelines.
		                        		
		                        			RESULTS:
		                        			The selected IVs explained 1.76% variance of cholecystectomy. Our MR analysis suggested that cholecystectomy cannot elevate the risk of CRC (odds ratio [OR] =1.543, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.607-3.924). Also, it was not significant in either colon or rectum cancer. Intriguingly, cholecystectomy might decrease the risk of Crohn's disease (OR = 0.078, 95% CI: 0.016-0.368) and coronary heart disease (OR = 0.352, 95% CI: 0.164-0.756). However, it might increase the risk of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (OR = 7.573, 95% CI: 1.096-52.318). Cholelithiasis could increase the risk of CRC in the largest population (OR = 1.041, 95% CI: 1.010-1.073). The multivariable MR analysis suggested that genetic liability to cholelithiasis could increase the risk of CRC in the largest population (OR = 1.061, 95% CI: 1.002-1.125) after adjustment of cholecystectomy.
		                        		
		                        			CONCLUSIONS
		                        			The study indicated that cholecystectomy might not increase the risk of CRC, but such a conclusion needs further proving by clinical equivalence. Additionally, it might increase the risk of IBS, which should be paid attention to in clinical practice.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mendelian Randomization Analysis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Irritable Bowel Syndrome
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholelithiasis/complications*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholecystectomy/adverse effects*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Genome-Wide Association Study
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
4.Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on quality of recovery during early period after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Zhihua MI ; Ju GAO ; Xiaoping CHEN ; Yali GE ; Kaixin LU
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2018;38(3):256-260
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on the quality of recovery during the early period after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the dosage of anesthetic and analgesic.
METHODSOne hundred patients who received laparoscopic cholecystectomy with gradeⅠand Ⅱ of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) criteria were randomly assigned into an observation group and a control group according to random number table, 50 cases in each group. The patients in the two groups were treated with conventional endotracheal intubation anesthesia, anesthesia induction and maintenance. The patients in the observation group were treated with TEAS (2 Hz/100 Hz, 8 to 12 mA) at bilateral Hegu (LI 4) and Neiguan (PC 6), as well as Zusanli (ST 36) and the non-acupoint 2 outboard from Zusanli (ST 36) from 30 min before anesthesia induction to the end of operation. The patients in the control group were applied by stimulation electrode in the corresponding points without electrical stimulation. The dosage of intraoperative remifentanil and the analgesic dosage of dezocine for postoperation were recorded. The recovery time, extubation time, the changes of heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during extubation were recorded. The quality of recovery was assessed by the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40) 1 day before surgery (T),and 4 h (T), 8 h (T), 24 h (T), 48 h (T) after surgery. The patient's cognitive function was assessed by mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scale at the 5 time points. The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting were recorded at T through T.
RESULTSThe dosages of intraoperative remifentanil and dezocine in the observation group were less than those in the control group; the recovery time and extubation time were shorter than those in the control group; the HR of extubation was lower than that in the control group (all <0.05). There was no statistic difference about MAP between the two groups (>0.05). Compared with T, the total scores of QoR-40 decreased in the two groups at T, T, T (all <0.05), and the total scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (all <0.05). The emotional state, physical comfort, psychological support, self-care ability, pain scores at T in the observation group and at T, T, T in the control group were lower than those at T (all <0.05). The emotional state, physical comfort, psychological support, self-care ability, pain scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group at T, T, T (all <0.05). Compared with T, the MMSE scores in the two groups decreased at T and T (all <0.05). At T, T, T, the MMSE scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (all <0.05). At T and T, the incidence rates of nausea and vomiting were 22.0% (11/50), 12.0% (6/50) respectively in the observation group, which were lower than 32.0% (16/50) and 24.0% (12/50) in the control group (both <0.05). At T and T, the incidence rates of nausea and vomiting were 6.0% (3/50), 2.0% (1/50) respectively in the observation group, which were not significantly different from 8.0% (4/50) and 4.0% (2/50) in the control group (both >0.05).
CONCLUSIONTEAS can improve the quality of recovery during the early period after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and reduce the dosage of anesthetic and analgesic.
Acupuncture Points ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting ; therapy ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
5.Timing of Cholecystectomy after Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis.
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2015;66(4):209-214
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an alternative treatment to resolve acute inflammation in patients with severe comorbidities. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy for the patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in patients who underwent cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy from January 2010 through November 2014. Seventy-four patients were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups by the operation timing. Group I patients underwent cholecystectomy within 10 days after percutaneous cholecystostomy (n=30) and group II patients underwent cholecystectomy at more than 10 days after percutaneous cholecystostomy (n=44). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in conversion rate to open surgery, operation time, perioperative complications rate, and days of hospital stay after operation. However, complications related to cholecystostomy such as catheter dislodgement occurred significantly more often in group II than group I (group I:group II=0%:18.2%; p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy did not influence postoperative outcomes. However, late surgery caused more complications related to cholecystostomy than early surgery. Therefore, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be considered over late surgery after percutaneous cholecystostomy insertion.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Aged, 80 and over
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholecystitis, Acute/*diagnosis/surgery
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholecystostomy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Female
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Length of Stay
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Middle Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Postoperative Complications
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Retrospective Studies
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
6.Randomized Trial of Immediate Postoperative Pain Following Single-incision Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Wei GUO ; Yang LIU ; Wei HAN ; Jun LIU ; Lan JIN ; Jian-She LI ; Zhong-Tao ZHANG ;
Chinese Medical Journal 2015;128(24):3310-3316
BACKGROUNDWe undertook a randomized controlled trial to ascertain if single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) was more beneficial for reducing postoperative pain than traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC). Moreover, the influencing factors of SILC were analyzed.
METHODSA total of 552 patients with symptomatic gallstones or polyps were allocated randomly to undergo SILC (n = 138) or TLC (n = 414). Data on postoperative pain score, operative time, complications, procedure conversion, and hospital costs were collected. After a 6-month follow-up, all data were analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle.
RESULTSAmong SILC group, 4 (2.9%) cases required conversion to TLC. Mean operative time of SILC was significantly longer than that of TLC (58.97 ± 21.56 vs. 43.38 ± 19.02 min, P < 0.001). The two groups showed no significant differences in analgesic dose, duration of hospital stay, or cost. Median pain scores were similar between the two groups 7 days after surgery, but SILC-treated patients had a significantly lower median pain score 6 h after surgery (10-point scale: 3 [2, 4] vs. 4 [3, 5], P = 0.009). Importantly, subgroup analyses of operative time for SILC showed that a longer operative time was associated with greater prevalence of pain score >5 (≥100 min: 5/7 patients vs. <40 min, 3/16 patients, P = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONSThe primary benefit of SILC appears to be slightly less pain immediately after surgery. Surgeon training seems to be important because the shorter operative time for SILC may elicit less pain immediately after surgery.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; adverse effects ; Female ; Gallstones ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative ; diagnosis ; Polyps ; surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
7.Clinical Review and Case Report of Ceftriaxone-associated Gallbladder Pseudolithiasis in Adult.
Hwa Kyung JUNG ; Dong Shik LEE
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2014;63(6):378-381
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Although ceftriaxone can be used safely in most instances, it can sometimes induce biliary sludge or stone formation. Most of the patients remain asymptomatic and children are more susceptible to develop this condition, but adults can be affected as well. Because sludge or stones disappear after discontinuing ceftriaxone, this condition is referred to as ceftriaxone-associated pseudolithiasis. A 54-year-old woman was admitted to a local clinic for management of ileus. During admission, she had received ceftriaxone and metronidazole, and had been on nil per os for the past 6 days. She was then referred to our hospital for cholecystectomy due to persistent right upper quadrant pain. Although imaging studies showed gallbladder sludge, pseudolithiasis was suspected because of ceftriaxone administration history and prolonged fasting. After careful watch-and-wait, the condition resolved spontaneously after ceftriaxone discontinuation. Our clear understanding on ceftriaxone-associated gallbladder pseudolithiasis allowed us to avoid an unnecessary cholecystectomy. Herein, we report the case of a 54-year-old woman with ceftriaxone-associated gallbladder pseudolithiasis that was successfully managed by ceftriaxone discontinuation alone.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Adult
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Anti-Bacterial Agents/*adverse effects
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Ceftriaxone/*adverse effects
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholecystectomy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholecystolithiasis/*diagnosis/epidemiology/etiology
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Female
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Gallbladder/ultrasonography
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Middle Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Retrospective Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Tomography, X-Ray Computed
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
8.Efficacy on analgesia with electric stimulation of long-term retaining needle after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Gui-Jie YU ; Guo-Qiang FU ; Fu-Rong LI ; Lian-Hong LI ; Feng GUO ; Hui XUE ; Kun HE ; Jian WANG
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2014;34(2):169-172
OBJECTIVETo observe the clinical effect of electric stimulation of long-term retaining needle on analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and the impacts on the post-surgical flatus time.
METHODSUnder static absorptive composite general anesthesia, 90 cases of LC were randomized into three groups, 30 cases in each one. In the control group, the analgesia was not applied after LC. In the analgesia-pumper group, the patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was used. In the needle-retaining group, the electric acupuncture stimulator was used. The needles were inserted transversely at Riyue (GB 24), Qichong (ST 30) and Yanglingquan (GB 34) and fixed with sterile sticker. Separately, in 8 h and 24 h after surgery, the electric acupuncture stimulation with disperse-dense wave, 2 Hz/100 Hz frequency was applied continuously for 30 min. Visual analogue scale (VAS), adverse reactions such as vomiting and nausea and the postoperative flatus time in 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 36 h after surgery were observed and recorded in the three groups.
RESULTSIn 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after surgery, VAS scores in the needle-retaining group and the analgesia-pumper group were all lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). The analgesia effect at the above time points in the needle-retaining group was better than that in the analgesia-pumper group (all P < 0.05). There was not adverse reaction in the needle-retaining group. But there were 3 cases of somnolence, 6 cases of nausea and 3 cases of vomiting in the analgesia-pumper group, and 2 cases of nausea and 1 case of vomiting in the control group. The flatus time was quite earlier in the needle-retaining group as compared with the other two groups [(14.77 +/- 4.99) h vs (18.50 +/- 4.22) h, P < 0.01; (14.77 +/- 4.99) h vs (18.17 +/- 4.69) h, P < 0.05].
CONCLUSIONThe electric stimulation of long-term retaining needle is safe and effective in analgesia after LC. It avoids the adverse reactions of analgesics and promotes postoperative flatus.
Acupuncture Analgesia ; instrumentation ; Adult ; Aged ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; adverse effects ; Electroacupuncture ; instrumentation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Management ; Pain, Postoperative ; etiology ; therapy
9.Delayed presentation of port-site metastasis from an unknown gastrointestinal malignancy following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Siddharth RAO ; Anil RATHOD ; Ashok KAMBLE ; Dilip GUPTA
Singapore medical journal 2014;55(5):e73-6
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Port-site metastasis (PSM) is often encountered during laparoscopic surgery in patients with malignancy. We report a 45-year-old woman who presented with a single PSM from papillary adenocarcinoma after undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for calculus cholecystitis. Post cholecystectomy, a diagnosis of chronic cholecystitis was confirmed on histopathology. The patient presented with a mass at the site of epigastric port 28 months after surgery. PSM was suspected on clinical examination, which was supported by findings on computed tomography and further confirmed by fine-needle aspiration cytology of the lump. The patient underwent surgical clearance of the mass, and histopathological examination proved the lesion to be papillary adenocarcinoma. The site of the primary tumour was not detected even after thorough examination. Based on the histopathology report following local surgical clearance, the patient was started on chemotherapy. This case is unusual because of the long delay prior to the presentation of PSM and the unknown primary malignancy.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Adenocarcinoma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			diagnosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			surgery
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Biopsy, Fine-Needle
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			adverse effects
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholecystitis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			surgery
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Female
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			diagnosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			surgery
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Laparoscopy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			adverse effects
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Middle Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasm Metastasis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasms, Unknown Primary
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			diagnosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			surgery
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Tomography, X-Ray Computed
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
10.A Case of Acute Cholecystitis after Colonoscopy.
Jung Ho YUN ; Woo Jin JEONG ; Woo Sung CHANG ; Min Hyeong JO ; Jong Kyu PARK ; Sang Jin LEE ; Young Don KIM ; Gab Jin CHEON
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2013;61(1):42-45
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			A 43-year-old man, who received total gastrectomy five years ago for advanced gastric cancer, underwent a screening colonoscopy and abdominal CT scan. Abdominal CT scan revealed no abnormal findings. Colonoscopy revealed polyps at the rectum, which were removed by polypectomy. The patient did not complain of abdominal pain or discomfort throughout the procedure. But, he developed right upper quadrant abdominal pain on the next day after colonoscopy. Abdominal CT scan revealed the distended gallbladder with mild wall thickening and suspicious sandy stones or sludge in the gallbladder. The patient underwent an open cholecystectomy. Pathology was compatible with acute cholecystitis. We should be aware of and consider cholecystitis in the differential diagnosis for patients with abdominal pain after colonoscopy.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Adult
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholecystectomy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cholecystitis, Acute/*diagnosis/etiology/pathology
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Colonoscopy/*adverse effects
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Diagnosis, Differential
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Gallbladder/pathology
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Gallstones/diagnosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Polyps/pathology
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Tomography, X-Ray Computed
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail