Purpose: This study aimed to improve the reimbursement policies in the service of Korean Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) to enhance their utilization in practice. Methods: The study was conducted in three stages: 1) reviewing other countries’ APN systems; 2) conducting focus group interviews and online surveys with APNs to gather opinions on their roles, practices, and reimbursement status; and 3) proposal for improving reimbursement policies based on expert consultations. The data was collected between March and June 2023. Results: In the United States, APNs can be reimbursed at 85~100 % of physician fees for services provided under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. In Japan, reimbursement is only available for 38 tasks performed among specially trained Certified Nurses. Master’s level APN education has been created but not nationally legislated. The results of focus group interviews reveal low awareness and legal limitations of Korean APNs’ roles. The results of online surveys indicate high professional pride but low satisfaction with little reimbursement system, and 71.4% of respondents denote the APN field’s integration. Also, expansion of current reimbursement to other APN fields and regular evaluation of roles and reimbursement were recommended. Conclusion In this study, it is necessary to clarify APNs’ roles, and scope of practice, and establish benefits and reimbursement systems for professional APNs’ health services. This study suggests improvements to enhance the Korean APN system and healthcare quality in Korea.

Purpose: This study aimed to improve the reimbursement policies in the service of Korean Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) to enhance their utilization in practice. Methods: The study was conducted in three stages: 1) reviewing other countries’ APN systems; 2) conducting focus group interviews and online surveys with APNs to gather opinions on their roles, practices, and reimbursement status; and 3) proposal for improving reimbursement policies based on expert consultations. The data was collected between March and June 2023. Results: In the United States, APNs can be reimbursed at 85~100 % of physician fees for services provided under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. In Japan, reimbursement is only available for 38 tasks performed among specially trained Certified Nurses. Master’s level APN education has been created but not nationally legislated. The results of focus group interviews reveal low awareness and legal limitations of Korean APNs’ roles. The results of online surveys indicate high professional pride but low satisfaction with little reimbursement system, and 71.4% of respondents denote the APN field’s integration. Also, expansion of current reimbursement to other APN fields and regular evaluation of roles and reimbursement were recommended. Conclusion In this study, it is necessary to clarify APNs’ roles, and scope of practice, and establish benefits and reimbursement systems for professional APNs’ health services. This study suggests improvements to enhance the Korean APN system and healthcare quality in Korea.

Purpose: This study aimed to improve the reimbursement policies in the service of Korean Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) to enhance their utilization in practice. Methods: The study was conducted in three stages: 1) reviewing other countries’ APN systems; 2) conducting focus group interviews and online surveys with APNs to gather opinions on their roles, practices, and reimbursement status; and 3) proposal for improving reimbursement policies based on expert consultations. The data was collected between March and June 2023. Results: In the United States, APNs can be reimbursed at 85~100 % of physician fees for services provided under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. In Japan, reimbursement is only available for 38 tasks performed among specially trained Certified Nurses. Master’s level APN education has been created but not nationally legislated. The results of focus group interviews reveal low awareness and legal limitations of Korean APNs’ roles. The results of online surveys indicate high professional pride but low satisfaction with little reimbursement system, and 71.4% of respondents denote the APN field’s integration. Also, expansion of current reimbursement to other APN fields and regular evaluation of roles and reimbursement were recommended. Conclusion In this study, it is necessary to clarify APNs’ roles, and scope of practice, and establish benefits and reimbursement systems for professional APNs’ health services. This study suggests improvements to enhance the Korean APN system and healthcare quality in Korea.

Purpose: This study aimed to improve the reimbursement policies in the service of Korean Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) to enhance their utilization in practice. Methods: The study was conducted in three stages: 1) reviewing other countries’ APN systems; 2) conducting focus group interviews and online surveys with APNs to gather opinions on their roles, practices, and reimbursement status; and 3) proposal for improving reimbursement policies based on expert consultations. The data was collected between March and June 2023. Results: In the United States, APNs can be reimbursed at 85~100 % of physician fees for services provided under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. In Japan, reimbursement is only available for 38 tasks performed among specially trained Certified Nurses. Master’s level APN education has been created but not nationally legislated. The results of focus group interviews reveal low awareness and legal limitations of Korean APNs’ roles. The results of online surveys indicate high professional pride but low satisfaction with little reimbursement system, and 71.4% of respondents denote the APN field’s integration. Also, expansion of current reimbursement to other APN fields and regular evaluation of roles and reimbursement were recommended. Conclusion In this study, it is necessary to clarify APNs’ roles, and scope of practice, and establish benefits and reimbursement systems for professional APNs’ health services. This study suggests improvements to enhance the Korean APN system and healthcare quality in Korea.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the nationwide intention to delegate clinical practice of medical specialists in accordance with the enactment of the scope of practice for advanced practice nurses (APNs). Methods: Data were collected from October to December 2021 using Google Surveys. In total, 147 medical specialists from 12 provinces responded to the survey. The survey questionnaire was categorized into four legislative draft duties, according to the scope of practice (a total of 41 tasks): Twenty-nine tasks on treatments, injects, etc., performed under the guidance of a physician and other activities necessary for medical treatment (treatment domain); two tasks on collaboration and coordination; six tasks on education, counseling, and quality improvement; four regarding other necessary tasks. Participants were asked whether they were willing to delegate the tasks to APN. Results: The intention to delegate tasks to APN was higher for non-invasive tasks such as blood sampling (97.3%) or simple dressing (96.6%). Invasive tasks such as endotracheal tube insertion (10.2%), sampling: bone marrow biopsy & aspiration (23.8%) showed low intention to delegate in the treatment domain. Participants who were older, male, and had more work careers with APN, showed a higher intention to delegate tasks. Conclusion To prevent confusion in the clinical setting, a clear agreement on the scope of APN practice as APN delegated by physicians should be established. Based on this study, legal practices that APN can perform legally should be established.

Purpose: : The purpose of this study was to understand and describe the experiences of the advanced nurse practitioner (APN) system used by healthcare providers including APNs, doctors who worked with APNs, and APN master’s course professors at a graduate school. Methods: : Qualitative data were collected via snowball sampling. The participants were nine APNs, six doctors, and three professors. They were divided into three focus groups, each of which consisted of all three types of healthcare providers. Data were collected via interviews with the three focus groups conducted from September to October 2019. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. The transcribed data then underwent qualitative content analysis. Results: : Based on the data, we extracted four themes and 14 categories. The themes were “Role and system of APNs started according to healthcare environment changes”, “Optimal healthcare provider to ensure quality of care”, “Confused role and system of APNs due to incomplete medical law”, and “Tasks for the stable operation of the APN system.” Conclusion : For quality treatment and safety of patients, a legal basis must be established for the APN system. For its stable operation, social consensus regarding legislation about APNs’ scope of practice is required. Finally, a discussion is necessary about the integration of APNs’ 13 fields.

Purpose: : The purpose of this study was to understand and describe the experiences of the advanced nurse practitioner (APN) system used by healthcare providers including APNs, doctors who worked with APNs, and APN master’s course professors at a graduate school. Methods: : Qualitative data were collected via snowball sampling. The participants were nine APNs, six doctors, and three professors. They were divided into three focus groups, each of which consisted of all three types of healthcare providers. Data were collected via interviews with the three focus groups conducted from September to October 2019. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. The transcribed data then underwent qualitative content analysis. Results: : Based on the data, we extracted four themes and 14 categories. The themes were “Role and system of APNs started according to healthcare environment changes”, “Optimal healthcare provider to ensure quality of care”, “Confused role and system of APNs due to incomplete medical law”, and “Tasks for the stable operation of the APN system.” Conclusion : For quality treatment and safety of patients, a legal basis must be established for the APN system. For its stable operation, social consensus regarding legislation about APNs’ scope of practice is required. Finally, a discussion is necessary about the integration of APNs’ 13 fields.

Background and Objectives: The directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into motor neurons is critical for the development of disease modelling and therapeutics to intervene degenerative motor neuron diseases. Cell surface receptor Cdo functions as a coreceptor for Sonic hedgehog (Shh) with Boc and Gas1 in the patterning of ventral spinal cord neurons including motor neurons. However, the discrete function of Cdo is not fully understood. Methods: and Results: In this study, we examined the role of Cdo in motor neuron generation by utilizing in vitro differentiation of Cdo＋/＋ and Cdo−/− embryonic stem cells (ESCs). In response to Shh, Cdo−/− ESCs exhibited impaired expression of motor neuron specification markers while dorsal interneuron specification markers were significantly increased, compared to Cdo＋/＋ ESCs. Reactivation of Shh signalling pathway with Smoothened (Smo) agonist (SAG) restored motor neuron specification in Cdo−/− ESCs. In addition, electrophysiological analysis revealed the immature electrical features of Cdo−/− ESCs-derived neurons which was restored by SAG. Conclusions Taken together, these data suggest that Cdo as a Shh coreceptor is required for the induction of motor neuron generation by fully activating Shh signalling pathway and provide additional insights into the biology of motor neuron development.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to propose a common scope of practice (SOP) for 13 specialties of Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) in Korea.METHODS: The first draft of a common SOP was extracted from domestic and international laws with a literature review by 17 experts from the Korean Association of Advanced Practice Nurses (KAAPN). Then, the common SOP was finalized after comparing the activities of APNs in clinical settings.RESULTS: A total of 70 duties were identified and six categories were suggested for the common SOP. The SOP proposed by the KAAPN featured the following: 1) identification of and discrimination between health problems; 2) prescription and implementation of diagnostic tests; 3) treatment of injuries and diseases while implementing measures to prevent exacerbation; 4) prescription of medicinal products in line with 1) to 3); 5) referral and consultation; and 6) education and counseling. It was then confirmed that the proposed six categories in the common SOP reflected all the duties performed by APNs in clinical practice, including all 40 activities.CONCLUSION: The results of this study can be used as evidence for the legalization of a common SOP for APNs. Given the increasing multidisciplinary team approach adopted in Korean hospitals, it may be desirable to establish a broader SOP to reflect the diverse duties of APNs.
Counseling ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Education ; International Law ; Korea ; Prescriptions ; Professional Practice ; Referral and Consultation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared the efficacy and safety of the second-generation everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and the third generation biolimus-eluting stent (BES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We analyzed 629 consecutive patients (mean age 65.1 +/- 11.2 years, 426 males) with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from February 2008 to April 2012. They were divided into two groups according to stent type (EES group, n = 426; BES group, n = 203). The primary end-point was 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, non-target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization. The secondary end-point was 2-year target lesion failure (TLF). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except that the patients with EES had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (34.7 vs. 22.7%, p = 0.002) and were older (67.1 +/- 11.3 vs. 64 +/- 12.9 years, p = 0.039) compared with the patients with BES. After propensity score matching, 2-year clinical outcomes showed no differences in composite MACEs or TLF between the two groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that stent type was not a predictor of 2-year mortality or MACEs. However, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.037, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.014-1.060, p = 0.001), diabetes mellitus (HR 2.247, 95% CI 1.426-3.539, p = 0.001) and a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 45% (HR 3.007, 95% CI 1.978-4.573, p = 0.001) were independent predictors for 2-year MACEs in patients undergoing EES or BES. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BES had similar clinical 2-year outcomes compared with EES patients with AMI.
Diabetes Mellitus ; Humans ; Mortality ; Myocardial Infarction* ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Prevalence ; Prognosis ; Propensity Score ; Stents* ; Stroke Volume