BACKGROUND: Adverse cutaneous drug reactions (ACDRs) are common and are responsible for increased morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic costs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to investigate the common drugs and clinical patterns related to ACDRs using an electronic drug adverse reaction reporting system at a single secondary referral center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the ACDR database between January 2014 and April 2016 at the Ilsan Paik Hospital. RESULTS: The study analyzed 320 patients with ACDRs (male:female ratio=93:227; mean age 50.8±17.8 years). Using a Korean causality evaluation algorithm, the percentage of drugs with a possible relationship with ACDRs was calculated to be 50.6%, while the percentage with a probable relationship was 44.7%. Antibiotics (44.0%), radiocontrast media (15.1%), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (14.3%) were the most commonly implicated drugs. Antibiotics, including cephalosporins (30.6%) and quinolones (10.2%), were responsible for the majority of the ACDRs. Acetic acid (5.9%) and propionic acid (5.9%) derivatives of NSAIDs were also common causative agents. The most common clinical presentations were maculopapular exanthema (33.4%), pruritus (30.9%), and urticaria (25.7%). Severe ACDRs were significantly associated with older age, eosinophilia, and underlying heart and renal diseases (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics, radiocontrast media, and NSAIDs were identified as common causes of ACDRs. Older age, eosinophilia, heart disease, and renal disease were associated with severe ACDRs.
Acetic Acid ; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; Cephalosporins ; Contrast Media ; Diethylpropion ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Eosinophilia ; Exanthema ; Heart ; Heart Diseases ; Humans ; Mortality ; Pruritus ; Quinolones ; Retrospective Studies* ; Secondary Care Centers* ; Urticaria

PURPOSE: The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is increasing. However, studies on the prevalence of ADRs in children are rare. The aim of this study was to investigate the causative drugs and clinical features of ADRs for children in a tertiary university hospital of Korea. METHODS: We retrospectively collected ADRs by a computerized self-reporting system in Asan Medical Center. ADRs of children under the age 18 were collected from January 2005 to August 2015, and we analyzed only ADRs containing current symptoms among total ADR data. RESULTS: A total of 1,408 ADR cases were reported, There were 764 male (54.3%) and 644 female patients (45.7%), and the mean age was 11.5±5.8 years (range, 0–18 years). Antibiotics (n=479, 34.0%) were the most common causative drugs, followed by tramadol (n=173, 12.3%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) and acetylsalicylic acid (n=103, 7.3%), narcotics (n=91, 6.5%), antineoplastics (n=87, 6.2%), and sedatives (n=82, 5.8%). The most common clinical features were skin manifestations (n=500, 34.4%). Gastrointestinal symptoms (n=435, 29.9%) were the second most common clinical features, followed by neuropsychiatric symptoms (n=155, 10.7%) and respiratory symptoms (n=123, 8.5%). Among antibiotics, glycopeptides (n=110, 23.0%), third-generation cephalosporins (n=83, 17.3%), and penicillin/β-lactamase inhibitors (n=60, 12.7%) were the most frequently reported causative drugs. CONCLUSION: Antibiotics were the most reported common causative drugs of ADRs in children, followed by tramadol, NSAID, and narcortics. Compared with adults, the prevalence of contrast medium-induced ADR was lower in children with a higher prevalence of sedative-associated ADR. Greater attention to possible ADRs in children is needed among medical personnel.
Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; Antineoplastic Agents ; Aspirin ; Cephalosporins ; Child ; Chungcheongnam-do ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions* ; Female ; Glycopeptides ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Incidence ; Korea ; Male ; Narcotics ; Prevalence ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin Manifestations ; Tramadol

Drug-induced hypersensitivity pneumonitis results from interactions between pharmacologic agents and the human immune system. We describe a 54-year-old man with hypersensitivity pneumonitis caused by cephalosporins with identical R1 side chains. The patient, who complained of cough with sputum, was prescribed ceftriaxone and clarithromycin at a local clinic. The following day, he complained of dyspnea, and chest X-ray revealed worsening of inflammation. Upon admission to our hospital, antibiotics were changed to cefepime with levofloxacin, but his pneumonia appeared to progress. Changing antibiotics to meropenem with ciprofloxacin improved his symptoms and radiologic findings. Antibiotics were de-escalated to ceftazidime with levofloxacin, and his condition improved. During later treatment, he was mistakenly prescribed cefotaxime, which led to nausea, vomiting, dyspnea and fever, and indications of pneumonitis on chest X-ray. We performed bronchoalveolar lavage, and the findings included lymphocytosis (23%), eosinophilia (17%), and a low cluster of differentiation (CD) 4 to CD8 ratio (0.1), informing a diagnosis of drug-induced pneumonitis. After a medication change, his symptoms improved and he was discharged. One year later, he was hospitalized for acute respiratory distress syndrome following treatment with ceftriaxone and aminoglycosides for an upper respiratory tract infection. After steroid therapy, he recovered completely. In this patient, hypersensitivity reaction in the lungs was caused by ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and cefepime, but not by ceftazidime, indicating that the patient's hypersensitivity pneumonitis was to the common R1 side chain of the cephalosporins.
Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic* ; Aminoglycosides ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Bronchoalveolar Lavage ; Cefotaxime ; Ceftazidime ; Ceftriaxone ; Cephalosporins* ; Ciprofloxacin ; Clarithromycin ; Cough ; Diagnosis ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Dyspnea ; Eosinophilia ; Fever ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Immune System ; Inflammation ; Levofloxacin ; Lung ; Lymphocytosis ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; Pneumonia ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult ; Respiratory Tract Infections ; Sputum ; Thorax ; Vomiting

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is an essential procedure for diagnosing prostate cancer. The American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline recommends fluoroquinolone alone for 1 day during TRUS-Bx. However, this recommendation may not be appropriate in regions where the prevalence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli is high. We investigated the real practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for TRUS-Bx in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 77 hospitals performing TRUS-Bx were identified and an e-mail was sent to the Urology Department of those hospitals. The questions in the e-mail included the choice of antibiotics before and after the procedure and the duration of antibiotic therapy after TRUS-Bx. RESULTS: A total of 54 hospitals (70.0%) responded to the e-mail. Before TRUS-Bx, all hospitals administered intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. The percentage of hospitals that used quinolone, cephalosporin, and aminoglycoside alone was 48.1%, 20.4%, and 9.3%, respectively. The percentage of hospitals that used two or more antibiotics was 22.2%. After biopsy, all 54 hospitals prescribed oral antibiotics. The percentage of hospitals that prescribed quinolone alone, cephalosporin alone, or a combination of two or more antibiotics was 77.8%, 20.4%, and 1.8%, respectively. The duration of antibiotic use was more than 3 days in most hospitals (79.6%). Only four hospitals (7.4%) followed the AUA recommendation of a 1-day regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The AUA recommendation was not followed by most hospitals in Korea. This clinical behavior might reflect the high quinolone resistance rate in Korea, and further studies on the most efficient prophylactic antibiotics after TRUS-Bx in Korea are warranted.
Aminoglycosides/*administration & dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*administration & dosage ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis/*methods ; Biopsy/adverse effects ; Cephalosporins/*administration & dosage ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Escherichia coli Infections/*prevention & control ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate/pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology ; Quinolones/*administration & dosage ; Republic of Korea

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is an essential procedure for diagnosing prostate cancer. The American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline recommends fluoroquinolone alone for 1 day during TRUS-Bx. However, this recommendation may not be appropriate in regions where the prevalence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli is high. We investigated the real practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for TRUS-Bx in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 77 hospitals performing TRUS-Bx were identified and an e-mail was sent to the Urology Department of those hospitals. The questions in the e-mail included the choice of antibiotics before and after the procedure and the duration of antibiotic therapy after TRUS-Bx. RESULTS: A total of 54 hospitals (70.0%) responded to the e-mail. Before TRUS-Bx, all hospitals administered intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. The percentage of hospitals that used quinolone, cephalosporin, and aminoglycoside alone was 48.1%, 20.4%, and 9.3%, respectively. The percentage of hospitals that used two or more antibiotics was 22.2%. After biopsy, all 54 hospitals prescribed oral antibiotics. The percentage of hospitals that prescribed quinolone alone, cephalosporin alone, or a combination of two or more antibiotics was 77.8%, 20.4%, and 1.8%, respectively. The duration of antibiotic use was more than 3 days in most hospitals (79.6%). Only four hospitals (7.4%) followed the AUA recommendation of a 1-day regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The AUA recommendation was not followed by most hospitals in Korea. This clinical behavior might reflect the high quinolone resistance rate in Korea, and further studies on the most efficient prophylactic antibiotics after TRUS-Bx in Korea are warranted.
Aminoglycosides/*administration & dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*administration & dosage ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis/*methods ; Biopsy/adverse effects ; Cephalosporins/*administration & dosage ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Escherichia coli Infections/*prevention & control ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate/pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology ; Quinolones/*administration & dosage ; Republic of Korea

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the multi-function rapid allergic skin test instrument for application in drug allergy testing.

METHODThree hundred patients were planned to be treated with cephalosporins Injection were divided randomly into 3 groups, the new allergic skin test instrument group, normal allergic skin test instrument group, and traditional skin test group, the true positive rate and false positive rate were calculated. Using multifunctional rapid allergy skin test was carried out on 210 cases of volunteers preliminary clinical evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine injections skin test.

RESULTThere were no significance difference between the new allergic skin test instrument group and control group in the true positive rate. As compared with the control group, a significance difference was found between the new allergic skin test instrument group and control group in false positive rate respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONThe multi-function rapid allergic skin test instrument is safe and easy to use, with a higher rate of accuracy and lower false positive rate.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Case-Control Studies ; Cephalosporins ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Drug Hypersensitivity ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Skin Tests ; methods ; Young Adult

No abstract available.
Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*adverse effects ; Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use ; Cephalosporins/*adverse effects ; Consciousness Disorders/diagnosis/drug therapy/*etiology ; Diabetic Nephropathies/complications/*therapy ; Electroencephalography ; Female ; Humans ; Pneumonia, Bacterial/complications/*drug therapy ; *Renal Dialysis ; Status Epilepticus/diagnosis/drug therapy/*etiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Uremia/therapy

OBJECTIVE: To explore the characteristics of autopsy cases of anaphylactic shock induced by cephalosporins and provide the evidences in forensic medicine. METHODS: Twenty cases of anaphylactic shock induced by cephalosporins were collected from April 2005 to August 2009 in judicial expertise center of China Medical University, and the characteristics of the cases were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The age of decedents ranged from 40 to 60 years. Ninety percent of cases were from local medical centers and private clinics. The symptoms of the shock appeared 30 s-150 min after the administration of the drug, and death occurred 10 min-210 min after the appearance of the shock symptoms. In all cases, various degrees of eosinophil infiltration were observed in trachea and the lungs. Serum IgE detected by ELISA method was normal value in 14 cases. CONCLUSION In fatal anaphylactic cases, little specific findings are detected during postmortem and microscope examination. For this reason, the determination of cause of death in these cases requires comprehensive analysis combined with clinic information and excludes other diseases leading to the sudden death.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Anaphylaxis/pathology* ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects* ; Autopsy ; Cause of Death ; Cephalosporins/adverse effects* ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Drug Hypersensitivity/pathology* ; Edema/pathology* ; Female ; Forensic Pathology ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin E/blood* ; Infant ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Larynx/pathology* ; Lung/pathology* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Trachea/pathology* ; Young Adult

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Cephalosporins ; administration & dosage ; Enterobacter cloacae ; Enterobacteriaceae Infections ; drug therapy ; Female ; Gentamicins ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Imipenem ; adverse effects ; Isosorbide Dinitrate ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Male ; Ofloxacin ; adverse effects ; Software

Asthma ; chemically induced ; Cephalosporins ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Exposure ; adverse effects ; Young Adult