1.Progress in targeted inhibition of aerobic glycolysis combined with immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma.
Kun ZHANG ; Mengyao RU ; Jiayuan WANG ; Jumei ZHAO ; Lan SHEN
Chinese Journal of Cellular and Molecular Immunology 2024;40(1):74-79
Tumor aerobic glycolysis is one of the main features of tumor metabolic reprogramming. This abnormal glycolytic metabolism provides bioenergy and biomaterials for tumor growth and proliferation. It is worth noting that aerobic glycolysis will not only provide biological materials and energy for tumor cells, but also help tumor cells to escape immune surveillance through regulation of immune microenvironment, thereby resisting tumor immunotherapy and promoting tumor progression. Based on the pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma, this paper describes the characteristics of aerobic glycolysis, the effect of glycolytic metabolism on the immune microenvironment of renal cell carcinoma, the effect of glycolysis inhibitors on the immune microenvironment of renal cell carcinoma, and the prospect of glycolysis inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.
Humans
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy*
;
Immunotherapy
;
Glycolysis
;
Metabolic Reprogramming
;
Kidney Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Tumor Microenvironment
2.Efficacy and safety evaluation of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Jun WANG ; Wen Su WEI ; Li Juan JIANG ; Zhi Ling ZHANG ; Sheng Jie GUO ; Hui HAN ; Fang Jian ZHOU ; Pei DONG
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2023;45(8):704-708
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy versus TKI monotherapy as the second-line regimen for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal carcinoma (nccRCC) who failed first-line TKI therapy. Methods: The clinicopathological data of 67 patients with metastatic nccRCC who failed first-line TKI therapy between October 2011 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 22 patients who received TKI monotherapy and 45 patients who received TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor as the second-line therapy. The efficacy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0/1.1 (RECIST 1.0/1.1), the Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curves, and the Log rank test was used to analyze the differences in the survival between the two groups. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) after treatment were observed in both groups. Results: The overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 37.3% (25/67) and 56.7% (38/67), respectively. The overall second-line progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months and Overall Survival (OS) was 25.2 months. The ORR and DCR of patients in the combination therapy group were 48.9% (22/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively, which were significantly improved compared with the TKI monotherapy group [13.6% (3/22) and 27.3% (6/22), respectively] (P=0.007 and P=0.001, respectively). The median PFS of 9.2 months for second-line treatment was longer in patients in the combination therapy group than in the TKI monotherapy group (5.2 months, P=0.001), but the median OS was not statistically different between the two groups (28.2 months vs 20.8 months, P=0.068). Common treatment-related AEs included hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, stomatitis, hand-foot syndrome, and hypothyroidism. The incidence of hypothyroidism was higher in the combination therapy group [40.0% (18/45)] than in the TKI monotherapy group [22.7% (5/22), P=0.044]; the incidence of other treatment-related AEs between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Immune-targeted combination therapy was more effective than TKI monotherapy alone and was well tolerated in the treatment of metastatic nccRCC patients who failed first-line TKIs.
Humans
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy*
;
Immunotherapy/adverse effects*
;
Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy*
;
Retrospective Studies
3.Efficacy and safety evaluation of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Jun WANG ; Wen Su WEI ; Li Juan JIANG ; Zhi Ling ZHANG ; Sheng Jie GUO ; Hui HAN ; Fang Jian ZHOU ; Pei DONG
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2023;45(8):704-708
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy versus TKI monotherapy as the second-line regimen for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal carcinoma (nccRCC) who failed first-line TKI therapy. Methods: The clinicopathological data of 67 patients with metastatic nccRCC who failed first-line TKI therapy between October 2011 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 22 patients who received TKI monotherapy and 45 patients who received TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor as the second-line therapy. The efficacy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0/1.1 (RECIST 1.0/1.1), the Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curves, and the Log rank test was used to analyze the differences in the survival between the two groups. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) after treatment were observed in both groups. Results: The overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 37.3% (25/67) and 56.7% (38/67), respectively. The overall second-line progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months and Overall Survival (OS) was 25.2 months. The ORR and DCR of patients in the combination therapy group were 48.9% (22/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively, which were significantly improved compared with the TKI monotherapy group [13.6% (3/22) and 27.3% (6/22), respectively] (P=0.007 and P=0.001, respectively). The median PFS of 9.2 months for second-line treatment was longer in patients in the combination therapy group than in the TKI monotherapy group (5.2 months, P=0.001), but the median OS was not statistically different between the two groups (28.2 months vs 20.8 months, P=0.068). Common treatment-related AEs included hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, stomatitis, hand-foot syndrome, and hypothyroidism. The incidence of hypothyroidism was higher in the combination therapy group [40.0% (18/45)] than in the TKI monotherapy group [22.7% (5/22), P=0.044]; the incidence of other treatment-related AEs between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Immune-targeted combination therapy was more effective than TKI monotherapy alone and was well tolerated in the treatment of metastatic nccRCC patients who failed first-line TKIs.
Humans
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy*
;
Immunotherapy/adverse effects*
;
Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy*
;
Retrospective Studies
4.Establishment of a mutation prediction model for evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy in renal carcinoma.
Cai Peng QIN ; Yu Xuan SONG ; Meng Ting DING ; Fei WANG ; Jia Xing LIN ; Wen Bo YANG ; Yi Qing DU ; Qing LI ; Shi Jun LIU ; Tao XU
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2022;54(4):663-668
OBJECTIVE:
To establish a mutation prediction model for efficacy assessment, the genomic sequencing data of renal cancer patients from the MSKCC (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center) pan-cancer immunotherapy cohort was used.
METHODS:
The genomic sequencing data of 121 clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the MSKCC pan-cancer immunotherapy cohort were obtained from cBioPortal database (http://www.cbioportal.org/) and they were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify mutated genes associated with ICI treatment efficacy, and we constructed a comprehensive prediction model for drug efficacy of ICI based on mutated genes using nomogram. Survival analysis and time-dependent receiver operator characteristic curves were performed to assess the prognostic value of the model. Transcriptome and genomic sequencing data of 538 renal cell carcinoma patients were obtained from the TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). Gene set enrichment analysis was used to identify the potential functions of the mutated genes enrolled in the nomogram.
RESULTS:
We used multivariate Cox regression analysis and identified mutations in PBRM1 and ARID1A were associated with treatment outcomes in the patients with renal cancer in the MSKCC pan-cancer immunotherapy cohort. Based on this, we established an efficacy prediction model including age, gender, treatment type, tumor mutational burden (TMB), PBRM1 and ARID1A mutation status (HR=4.33, 95%CI: 1.42-13.23, P=0.01, 1-year survival AUC=0.700, 2-year survival AUC=0.825, 3-year survival AUC=0.776). The validation (HR=2.72, 95%CI: 1.12-6.64, P=0.027, 1-year survival AUC=0.694, 2-year survival AUC=0.709, 3-year survival AUC=0.609) and combination (HR=2.20, 95%CI: 1.14-4.26, P=0.019, 1-year survival AUC=0.613, 2-year survival AUC=0.687, 3-year survival AUC=0.526) sets confirmed these results. Gene set enrichment analysis indicated that PBRM1 was involved in positive regulation of epithelial cell differentiation, regulation of the T cell differentiation and regulation of humoral immune response. In addition, ARID1A was involved in regulation of the T cell activation, positive regulation of T cell mediated cyto-toxicity and positive regulation of immune effector process.
CONCLUSION
PBRM1 and ARID1A mutations can be used as potential biomarkers for the evaluation of renal cancer immunotherapy efficacy. The efficacy prediction model established based on the mutation status of the above two genes can be used to screen renal cancer patients who are more suitable for ICI immunotherapy.
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics*
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy*
;
Humans
;
Immunotherapy/methods*
;
Kidney Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Mutation
5.Treatment and prognosis of multiple primary malignant neoplasms complicated with renal cell carcinoma.
Min QIU ; Yan Yan LIAN ; Min LU ; Bin Shuai WANG ; Xiao Jun TIAN ; Jian LU ; Cheng LIU ; Shu Dong ZHANG ; Min JIANG ; Lu Lin MA
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2022;54(4):680-685
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the treatment and prognosis of multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPMN) complicated with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and to make risk stratification.
METHODS:
A retrospective study of 27 cases of MPMN with RCC in two centers, including the different tumors of MPMN, specific treatment methods, and the interval between primary cancers. At the same time, the survival conditions, including recurrence, metastasis and survival, were followed up for statistical analysis. The interval between the two kinds of primary cancer within 6 months was simultaneous MPMNs, and more than 6 months was metachronous MPMNs. For simple risk stratification of cases, as long as one of the MPMNs had a stage Ⅲ or higher malignancy, which was defined as high risk.
RESULTS:
Among the 27 patients, 20 were male and 7 were female, with age at the time of diagnosis was 42-82 years, with an average age of (61.3±11.7) years. The age at the diagnosis of renal cancer was 43-87 years, with an average age of (66.0±11.3) years. There were 21 cases with duplex primary malignant neoplasms, 4 cases with triple primary malignant neoplasms, and 2 cases with quadruple primary malignant neoplasms. The interval between first cancer and second cancer was 0-360 months, with a median of 18 months. There were 17 cases of metachronous multiple primary malignant neoplasms and 10 cases of simultaneous multiple primary malignant neoplasms. The most common system of MPMN with comorbid RCC involved urologic system, digestive system and respiratory system. The most common locations of MPMN with comorbid RCC were bladder cancer, lung cancer and colon cancer. Follow-up time calcu- lated from the last cancer was 2-156 months, with a median of 32 months. And 14 cases survived and 13 cases died, with 11 cases being tumor related. Tumor stage was the risk factor of prognosis. Any kind of tumor stage in stage Ⅲ or above had a relatively poor prognosis.
CONCLUSION
MPMN complicated with RCC is relatively rare. Standard treatment should be used for each cancer type during the treatment process. The prognosis mainly depends on the highest stage of each tumor. Simple risk stratification shows that the prognosis of the high-risk group is worse. This simple stratification method may be helpful to predict the prognosis.
Aged
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy*
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Kidney Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/therapy*
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
7.Consensus on clinical diagnosis and treatment of fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma.
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2022;60(11):961-968
Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-RCC) is an independent pathological subtype of renal cell carcinoma with a clear driver gene and a high degree of malignancy. Recent studies have found that patients with somatic FH mutations have similar clinico-biological behavior and poor prognosis to patients with germline FH mutations. FH-RCC has the characteristics of early age of onset, atypical imaging manifestations, variable pathological patterns, difficult clinical diagnosis and poor effect on traditional drug treatment, thus greatly endangering the life and health of patients. Under the organization of the Rare Kidney Cancer Collaborative Group, Genitourinary Cancer Committee, China Anti-Cancer Association, this guideline was developed based on basic research, clinical cohort and evidence-based medicine evidence, including imaging manifestations, pathological diagnosis, genetic testing, surgical and systemic treatment options, and provided recommendations and references for the diagnosis and treatment norms.
Humans
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy*
;
Fumarate Hydratase/genetics*
;
Consensus
;
Kidney Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Immunohistochemistry
8.Immunotherapy Based on Tumor Microenvironment in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Song-Chen HAN ; Hua-Qi YIN ; Tao XU
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2022;44(2):305-312
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common lethal urological cancer,the distant metastasis of which is the leading cause of death.Although targeted agents have remarkably improved the overall prognosis of RCC patients,nearly all the patients eventually acquire therapeutic resistance.With the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors,immunotherapy based on tumor microenvironment (TME) has shown a broad scope in clinical application.The deepening understanding of TME leads to the changes of therapeutic strategies for advanced RCC,and the combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy is exhibiting a promising prospect.Herein,we reviewed the TME characteristics,candidate predictive biomarkers,and possible targets for future development of drugs against RCC.
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy*
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
;
Immunotherapy
;
Kidney Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Male
;
Tumor Microenvironment
9.Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of renal cell cancer bone metastasis (2021 edition).
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2021;43(10):1007-1015
Bone is a common metastatic site of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), with about 30% of metastatic RCC patients are suffering from bone metastasis. More than 70% of RCC patients with bone metastasis may experience skeletal related events (SREs), which may severely impair patients' quality of life and even shorten their survival time. Therefore, SREs prevention has become one of the treatment objectives of RCC bone metastasis. Bone-modifying agents are the basic treatment of bone metastases in addition to anti-tumor therapy. The treatment of RCC bone metastasis also requires multi-disciplinary team and individualized comprehensive treatment strategies. To standardize the diagnosis and treatment of RCC bone metastasis in China, the expert group of Genitourinary Oncology Committee, Chinese Anti-cancer Association has formulated the expert consensus for the reference of clinical practice, to improve the general therapeutic level of RCC with bone metastasis and benefit more patients.
Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy*
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy*
;
Consensus
;
Humans
;
Kidney Neoplasms
;
Quality of Life
10.Retrospective study of diagnosis and treatment of renal oncocytoma.
Min QIU ; Yong Wang ZHANG ; Yue Yang FEI ; Cheng LIU ; Shao Hui DENG ; Wei HE ; Min LU ; Jian LU ; Xiao Fei HOU ; Lu Lin MA
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2019;51(4):689-693
OBJECTIVE:
To summarize the experience of diagnosis and surgical treatment of renal oncocytoma, and to evaluate the surgical results based on follow-up results, in order to find the best strategy.
METHODS:
In the study, 21 cases with renal oncocytoma from December 2003 to April 2016 in Peking University Third Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including 4 males, and 17 females, with 10 cases on the right side and 11 cases on the left side. Their age was between 15 to 80 years (average: 58 years). Ultrasound or CT examination after admission was conducted. Ultrasound examination showed solid nodules. CT manifestations were solid masses with enhancement, and the tumor size was between 1.5 cm to 6.5 cm (average: 3.3 cm). Of the 21 cases, 9 were located in the middle of kidney, 7 were located in the upper pole, and 5 were located in the lower pole. After preoperative examination, according to the size and location of the tumor, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy or laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed, respectively.
RESULTS:
All the operations were successful, in which 17 cases underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (including 3 cases which were converted to open surgery), and 4 cases underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. The operation time ranged from 75 to 274 min (mean: 144 min), and the blood loss ranged from 10 to 1 000 mL (mean: 115 mL). The postoperative hospital stay time ranged from 6 to 13 d (average: 8.2 d). The pathological results were all renal oncocytoma. In the study, 17 cases were followed up while 4 cases were lost to follow-up. The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 175 months (mean: 44 months). One case died in 20 months after operation with unknown reason, and there were no recurrence or metastasis in the other 16 cases.
CONCLUSION
Renal oncocytoma is a benign tumor with good prognosis. Enhanced CT is an effective diagnostic method in assistant examination, but it is difficult to differentiate clear cell carcinoma only from the naked eye. It is worthwhile to measure CT value at different stages of the tumor by picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), and to compare with CT value of adjacent kidney tissue may improve the diagnostic efficiency of CT. Laparoscopic surgery is an effective treatment for renal oncocytoma. We recommend laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the patients with renal oncocytoma as the best choice if conditions permit.
Adenoma, Oxyphilic/therapy*
;
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Kidney Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Laparoscopy
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Nephrectomy
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Young Adult

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail