1.Analysis of the diagnosis and treatment of 24 cases of hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor.
Ben LIU ; Wen Yi ZHOU ; Yu Ting XIAO ; Yu Hao CHENG ; Yi Heng GE ; Sheng Dan NIE ; Pin LYU
Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2022;30(8):889-894
Objective: To investigate hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) diagnosis and treatment plan. Methods: 24 cases diagnosed with PEComa clinical manifestations, serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), imaging findings, surgical methods, postoperative hospital stay, pathological results and prognosis were analyzed retrospectively from September 2015 to September 2020. Results: Majority of patients were females (79.2%), aged 41.5±11.4 years. Tumors were predominantly located in the right liver (50.0%). 76.7% of the cases were mostly clinically asymptomatic. AFP, CEA and CA199 indices were all negative. CT mostly showed low density tumor in the plain scan phase, enhanced in the enhancement phase, and enhanced and weakened in portal venous and equilibrium phase (66.7%). MRI manifestations of most tumors were hypointense on T1WI and hyperintense on T2WI (72.7%). B-ultrasound mostly showed hyperechoic mass in the tumor area with punctate vascular shadow (52.9%). Postoperative hospital stay was 9.0±2.4 days for laparoscopic surgery patients (n=13), 13.4±6.3 days for traditional laparotomy (hereinafter referred to as laparotomy, n=10), and 3 days for 1 patient with microwave ablation. All postoperative pathological results were positive for HMB45 and Melan-A. Follow-up results: 21 cases survived normally, with no tumor recurrence in the recent physical examination; two cases had tumor recurrence and they died two and three years after surgery, and one case was lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Hepatic PEComa more commonly occurs in middle-aged women, with no specific features for tumor markers and clinical manifestations. Some imaging findings are specific, so its features can be combined as a basis for diagnosis. Postoperative pathological examination results can confirm the diagnosis. Therefore, surgery remains the initial treatment plan. Microwave ablation and laparoscopic surgery are recommended as the preferred option because of shorter hospital stays and less trauma than open surgery.
Adult
;
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis*
;
Carbohydrates
;
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Liver/pathology*
;
MART-1 Antigen
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
;
Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
alpha-Fetoproteins
2.Performances of CYFRA 21-1, Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Their Combination for Lung Cancer Diagnosis
Jin Ju KIM ; Hyo Jun AHN ; Yongjung PARK
Laboratory Medicine Online 2020;10(1):66-74
carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for the diagnosis of lung cancer and to establish the optimal cut-off values.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,176 subjects with CYFRA 21-2 and CEA data; they were classified into 93 lung cancer cases and 1,083 total controls, including 146 age-matched controls. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the relationship between the concentration of each tumor marker and lung cancer diagnosis. The diagnostic efficiencies of tumor markers were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated. The optimal cut-offs for CYFRA 21-1 and CEA were also estimated.RESULTS: Age, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA concentrations were independently associated with lung cancer diagnosis. Diagnostic efficiency of each tumor marker and its' combination was different according to the histological types of lung cancer. For non-small cell lung cancer, the AUCs for the two-marker combination were the highest: 0.8661 and 0.7559 for total and age-matched controls, respectively. For squamous cell carcinoma, the AUCs for CYFRA 21-1 were the highest: 0.9245 and 0.8428 for total and age-matched controls, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CYFRA 21-1 and CEA for lung cancer diagnosis were improved when the cutoffs determined based on this study were applied.CONCLUSIONS: CYFRA 21-1 and CEA could be useful markers for diagnosing lung cancer and single or combination of markers may be useful according to different histological types of lung cancer.]]>
Area Under Curve
;
Biomarkers, Tumor
;
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
;
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
;
Diagnosis
;
Keratin-19
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
Lung
;
Medical Records
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Retrospective Studies
;
ROC Curve
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
3.Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in pleural effusion and serum and their ratio for differential diagnosis of pleural effusion resulting from tuberculosis and lung cancer.
Ruicheng LI ; Zhaowei GAO ; Ke DONG ; Huiping WANG ; Huizhong ZHANG
Journal of Southern Medical University 2019;39(2):175-180
OBJECTIVE:
To study the clinical value of detecting carcinoembryonic antigen levels in pleural effusion (PCEA) and serum (SCEA) and their ratio (P/S) in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusions resulting from tuberculosis and lung cancer.
METHODS:
This retrospectively study was conducted among 82 patients with pleural effusion caused by pulmonary tuberculous (TB; control group) and 120 patients with pleural effusion resulting from lung cancer in our hospital between April, 2016 and March, 2018. PCEA, SCEA and P/S were compared between the two groups and among the subgroups of lung cancer patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SqCa), adenocarcinoma (ACA), small cell carcinoma (SCLC). The receiveroperating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to confirm the optimal critical value to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of different combinations of PCEA, SCEA and P/S.
RESULTS:
PCEA, SCEA and P/S were significantly higher in the overall cancer patients and in all the 3 subgroups of cancer patients than in the patients with TB ( < 0.05). The areas under the ROC curve of PCEA, SCEA and P/S were 0.925, 0.866 and 0.796, respectively; PCEA had the highest diagnostic value, whose diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accurate rate, and diagnostic threshold were 83.33%, 96.34, 88.61%, and 3.26 ng/ml, respectively; SCEA had the lowest diagnostic performance; the diagnostic performance of P/S was between that of SCEA and PCEA, but its combination with SCEA greatly improved the diagnostic performance and reduced the rates of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Parallel tests showed that the 3 indexes combined had significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity than each or any two of the single indexes ( < 0.05), but the diagnostic specificity did not differ significantly. The area under the ROC curve of combined detections of the 3 indexes was 0.941 for diagnosis of lung cancer-related pleural effusion, higher than those of any other combinations of the indexes.
CONCLUSIONS
The combined detection of PCEA, SCEA and P/S has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of lung cancer-related pleural effusion and provides important information for rapid and accurate diagnosis of suspected cases.
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
;
analysis
;
blood
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
blood
;
complications
;
Pleural Effusion
;
blood
;
diagnosis
;
immunology
;
Pleural Effusion, Malignant
;
blood
;
chemistry
;
diagnosis
;
ROC Curve
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
;
complications
4.Indication for and Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIa (T3N0M0) Colon Cancer
Chul Hyo JEON ; Min Ki KIM ; In Kyu LEE
Annals of Coloproctology 2019;35(5):254-261
PURPOSE: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in stage IIa colon cancer is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing survival in patients with stage IIa colon cancer, the role of AC, and the indications for AC utilization by surgical oncologists. METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2010, 736 patients with stage IIa colon cancer underwent curative resection in 1 of 6 participating hospitals. Factors related to survival were identified and analyzed according to whether AC was administered or not. After high- and low-risk groups were identified, their respective results were analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) of stage IIa colon cancer was 90.3%. With the exception of poorly differentiated histology, indications for AC did not include typical high-risk factors. The indications for AC were significantly younger patients, higher body mass index (BMI), lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and higher histologic grade. BMI, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, and harvested lymph node (LN) count were significant factors for disease-free survival, while BMI and ASA physical status classification were significant factors for OS in the chemotherapy group. In the high-risk group, AC was associated with increased OS in univariate analysis. BMI and harvested LN count were statistically significant in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Surgical oncologists consider the patient's condition and postoperative course rather than high-risk factors to determine use of AC. Regardless of AC use, both the extent of surgery and the patient's subsequent status affected the survival rate in the high-risk group. None of the factors identified influenced survival rate in the low-risk group.
Body Mass Index
;
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
;
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Classification
;
Colon
;
Colonic Neoplasms
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Drug Therapy
;
Humans
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Surgeons
;
Survival Rate
5.Tumor Marker Kinetics as Prognosticators in Patients with Unresectable Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Palliative Chemotherapy
Jae Woo LEE ; Yong Tae KIM ; Sang Hyub LEE ; Jun Hyuk SON ; Jin Woo KANG ; Ji Kon RYU ; Dong Kee JANG ; Woo Hyun PAIK ; Ban Seok LEE
Gut and Liver 2018;12(1):102-110
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine the prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 in gallbladder cancer (GBC) during palliative chemotherapy. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-three patients with pathologically confirmed unresectable GBC were included. Differences in serum CEA and CA 19-9 levels before and after chemotherapy were measured. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Kaplan-Meier analyses of CEA, CA 19-9, and combined changes were performed to assess the optimal cutoff values and survival rates. RESULTS: Patients with decreased tumor markers had significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with increased tumor markers. The pre- and postchemotherapy CA 19-9 ratio had the highest area-under-the-curve values for predicting 3-month PFS and 1-year OS. In the multivariate analysis, increases in serum CA 19-9 during palliative chemotherapy in patients with unresectable GBC was an independent prognosticator of poor PFS and OS, with hazard ratios of 2.20 (p=0.001) and 1.67 (p=0.020), respectively. Patients with increases >10-fold were considered to have progressive disease, whereas individuals with increases >3-fold were likely to benefit from early imaging follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CA 19-9 kinetics was a reliable prognosticator of PFS and OS in patients with unresectable GBC who underwent palliative chemotherapy.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Biomarkers, Tumor
;
CA-19-9 Antigen
;
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Drug Therapy
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Gallbladder Neoplasms
;
Gallbladder
;
Humans
;
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
;
Kinetics
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
ROC Curve
;
Survival Rate
6.Clinical Significance of Discordance between Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and RECIST in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
In Ho KIM ; Ji Eun LEE ; Ji Hyun YANG ; Joon Won JEONG ; Sangmi RO ; Seong Taek OH ; Jun Gi KIM ; Moon Hyung CHOI ; Myung Ah LEE
Cancer Research and Treatment 2018;50(1):283-292
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic implications of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels that are inconsistent with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) responses in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 360 patients with at least one measurable lesion who received first-line palliative chemotherapy. CEA-response was defined as CEA-complete response (CR; CEA normalization), CEA-partial response (PR; ≥ 50% decrease in CEA levels), CEA-progressive disease (PD; ≥ 50% increase in CEA levels), and CEA-stable disease (SD; non-CR/PR/PD). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated according to CEA-response. RESULTS: In RECIST-PR patients, poorer CEA-response was associated with disease progression at the subsequent evaluation. In RECIST-SD patients, CEA-CR and -PR were associated with lower disease progression rates than CEA-PD at the subsequent evaluation. Correlations between survival outcome and CEA-response in same-category RECIST patients were assessed. In RECIST-PR patients, discordant CEA-response (CEA-PD/SD) was associated with poorer survival than CEA-CR/PR (median OS and PFS, 44.0 and 15.4 [CEA-CR], 28.9 and 12.5 [CEA-PR], 21.0 and 9.8 [CEA-SD], and 13.0 and 7.0 [CEA-PD] months, respectively; all p < 0.001). In RECIST-SD patients, favorable CEA-response produced better survival (median OS and PFS, 26.8 and 21.0 [CEA-CR], 21.0 and 11.0 [CEA-PR], 16.1 and 8.2 [CEA-SD], and 12.2 and 6.0 [CEA-PD] months, respectively; all p < 0.001). RECIST-PD patients with CEA-CR showed longer OS than those with CEA-PD. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that discordant CEA-response is a powerful prognostic factor for RECIST-PR and RECIST-SD patients. CONCLUSION: Among patients of the same RECIST-response categories, CEA-response patterns are significantly prognostic and strongly predictive of subsequent evaluation outcomes.
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
;
Colorectal Neoplasms
;
Disease Progression
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Drug Therapy
;
Humans
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Prognosis
;
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
;
Retrospective Studies
7.Declined Preoperative Aspartate Aminotransferase to Neutrophil Ratio Index Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma after Hepatectomy.
Lingyun LIU ; Wei WANG ; Yi ZHANG ; Jianting LONG ; Zhaohui ZHANG ; Qiao LI ; Bin CHEN ; Shaoqiang LI ; Yunpeng HUA ; Shunli SHEN ; Baogang PENG
Cancer Research and Treatment 2018;50(2):538-550
PURPOSE: Various inflammation-based prognostic biomarkers such as the platelet to lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, are related to poor survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of the aspartate aminotransferase to neutrophil ratio index (ANRI) in ICC after hepatic resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 184 patients with ICC after hepatectomy were retrospectively reviewed. The cut-off value of ANRI was determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve. Preoperative ANRI and clinicopathological variables were analyzed. The predictive value of preoperative ANRI for prognosis of ICC was identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off value of ANRI was 6.7. ANRI was associated with tumor size, tumor recurrence, white blood cell, neutrophil count, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine transaminase. Univariate analysis showed that ANRI, sex, tumor number, tumor size, tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, resection margin, clinical TNM stage, neutrophil count, and carcinoembryonic antigen were markedly correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with ICC. Multivariable analyses revealed that ANRI, a tumor size > 6 cm, poor tumor differentiation, and an R1 resection margin were independent prognostic factors for both OS and DFS. Additionally, preoperative ANRI also had a significant value to predict prognosis in various subgroups of ICC, including serum hepatitis B surface antigen‒negative and preoperative elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 patients. CONCLUSION: Preoperative declined ANRI is a noninvasive, simple, and effective predictor of poor prognosis in patients with ICC after hepatectomy.
Alanine Transaminase
;
Aspartate Aminotransferases*
;
Aspartic Acid*
;
Biomarkers
;
Blood Platelets
;
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
;
Cholangiocarcinoma*
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Hepatectomy*
;
Hepatitis B
;
Humans
;
Leukocytes
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Lymphocytes
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Neutrophils*
;
Prognosis*
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
ROC Curve
8.Which Patients with Isolated Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis Will Truly Benefit from Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Colon Cancer?.
Sung Uk BAE ; Hyuk HUR ; Byung Soh MIN ; Seung Hyuk BAIK ; Kang Young LEE ; Nam Kyu KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2018;50(3):712-719
PURPOSE: The prognosis of patientswith colon cancer and para-aortic lymph node metastasis (PALNM) is poor. We analyzed the prognostic factors of extramesenteric lymphadenectomy for colon cancer patients with isolated PALNM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients with PALNM who underwent curative resection between October 1988 and December 2009. RESULTS: In univariate analyses, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were higher in patients with ≤ 7 positive para-aortic lymph node (PALN) (36.5% and 27.5%) than in those with > 7 PALN (14.3% and 14.3%; p=0.010 and p=0.027, respectively), and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level > 5 was also correlated with a lower 5-year OS and DFS rate of 21.5% and 11.7% compared with those with CEA ≤ 5 (46.3% and 41.4%; p=0.122 and 0.039, respectively). Multivariate analysis found that the number of positive PALN (hazard ratio [HR], 3.291; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.309 to 8.275; p=0.011) was an independent prognostic factor for OS and the number of positive PALN (HR, 2.484; 95% CI, 0.993 to 6.211; p=0.052) and preoperative CEA level (HR, 1.953; 95% CI, 0.940 to 4.057; p=0.073) were marginally independent prognostic factors for DFS. According to our prognostic model, the 5-year OS and DFS rate increased to 59.3% and 53.3%, respectively, in patients with ≤ 7 positive PALN and CEA level ≤ 5. CONCLUSION: PALN dissection might be beneficial in carefully selected patients with a low CEA level and less extensive PALNM.
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
;
Colon*
;
Colonic Neoplasms*
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Humans
;
Lymph Node Excision*
;
Lymph Nodes*
;
Lymphatic Metastasis
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Neoplasm Metastasis*
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
9.Chemotherapy versus Best Supportive Care in Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Jun Ho JI ; Young Saing KIM ; Inkeun PARK ; Soon Il LEE ; Rock Bum KIM ; Joon Oh PARK ; Sung Yong OH ; In Gyu HWANG ; Joung Soon JANG ; Haa Na SONG ; Jung Hun KANG
Cancer Research and Treatment 2018;50(3):791-800
PURPOSE: Although chemotherapy is recommended by various guidelines for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), the evidence supporting its use over best supportive care (BSC) is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival benefit of chemotherapy over that of BSC in advanced BTC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Advanced BTC patientswith a good performance status (Eastern CooperativeOncologyGroup [ECOG] 0-2) were eligible for the study. Data were retrospectively collected from four tertiary cancer centers and analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM). Of the 604 patients enrolled, 206 received BSC and 398 received chemotherapy. PSM analysis was performed using the following variables: age, ECOG status, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, white blood cell level, albumin level, total bilirubin level, and aspartate aminotransferase level. The sample size of each group was 164 patients after PSM. Median survival was compared between the two groups by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were investigated using Cox proportional regression analysis. RESULTS: In post-PSM analysis, the respective median survival for the chemotherapy and BSC groups was dependent on the following prognostic factors: total population, 12.0 months vs. 7.5 months (p=0.001); locally advanced disease, 16.7 months vs. 13.4 months (p=0.490); cancer antigen 19-9 ≤ 100 IU/mL, 12.7 months vs. 10.6 months (p=0.330); and CEA ≤ 3.4 ng/mL, 17.1 months vs. 10.6 months (p=0.052). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy improved overall survival of patients with advanced BTC who had a good performance status. However, this survival benefit was not observed in BTC patients with locally advanced disease or with lower tumor marker. Individualized approach is needed for initiation of palliative chemotherapy in advanced BTC.
Aspartate Aminotransferases
;
Biliary Tract Neoplasms
;
Biliary Tract*
;
Bilirubin
;
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
;
Drug Therapy*
;
Humans
;
Leukocytes
;
Methods
;
Propensity Score*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sample Size
;
Survival Analysis
10.Perioperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Ratio Is a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Stage II Colorectal Cancer
Jinsun WOO ; Jungbin KIM ; Inseok PARK ; Hyunjin CHO ; Geumhee GWAK ; Keun Ho YANG ; Byung Noe BAE ; Ki Hwan KIM
Annals of Coloproctology 2018;34(1):4-10
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio could be used as a determinant for adjuvant therapy after curative surgery in stage II colorectal cancer. METHODS: Data for 119 patients with stage II colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery between 2010 and 2013 were collected. The perioperative CEA ratio was defined as the postoperative/preoperative serum CEA level, and the patients were grouped according to their perioperative CEA ratios: high ratio (≥0.5) and low ratio ( < 0.5). Overall survival rates were calculated, and their prognostic significances were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall survival rates of the high and the low perioperative CEA groups were 68.2% and 86.8%, respectively (P = 0.033). In patients with normal preoperative CEA levels ( < 5 ng/mL), the high perioperative CEA ratio group showed a worse survival rate than the low perioperative CEA ratio group (71.7% vs. 100.0%, P = 0.007). In patients with high preoperative CEA levels (≥5 ng/mL), the high perioperative CEA ratio group showed a worse survival rate than the low perioperative CEA ratio group (33.3% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.036). In the multivariate analysis, perioperative CEA ratio (P = 0.046), age (P = 0.034), and venous invasion (P = 0.015) were independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSION: The perioperative CEA ratio is a prognostic indicator for stage II colorectal cancer. Patients with normal preoperative serum CEA levels might also be considered for adjuvant therapy if their perioperative CEA ratios are higher than 0.5.
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
;
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Colorectal Neoplasms
;
Humans
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Prognosis
;
Survival Rate

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail