BACKGROUNDSpinal anesthesia was considered as a reasonable anesthetic option in severe preeclampsia when cesarean delivery is indicated, and there is no indwelling epidural catheter or contraindication to spinal anesthesia. However, the ideal dose of intrathecal bupivacaine has not been quantified for cesarean delivery for severe preeclamptic patients. This study aimed to determine the ED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine for severely preeclamptic patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.

METHODSTwo hundred severely preeclamptic patients are undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging study. Patients received 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, or 10 mg intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine with 2.5 μg sufentanil. Successful spinal anesthesia was defined as a T6 sensory level achieved within 10 minutes after intrathecal drug administration and/or no epidural supplement was required during the cesarean section. The ED 50 and ED 95 were calculated with a logistic regression model.

RESULTSED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine for successful spinal anesthesia were 5.67 mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.20-6.10 mg) and 8.82 mg (95% CI: 8.14-9.87 mg) respectively. The incidence of hypotension in Group 8 mg and Group 10 mg was higher than that in Group 4 mg and Group 6 mg (P < 0.05). The sensory block was significantly different among groups 10 minutes after intrathecal injection (P < 0.05). The use of lidocaine in Group 4 mg was higher than that in other groups (P < 0.05). The use of phenylephrine in Group 8 mg and Group 10 mg was higher than that in the other two groups (P < 0.05). The lowest systolic blood pressure before the infant delivery of Group 8 mg and Group 10 mg was lower than the other two groups (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of muscle relaxation in Group 4 mg was lower than other groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in patients' satisfaction and the newborns' Apgar score and the blood gas analysis of umbilical artery serum (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONOur study showed that the ED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine for severely preeclamptic patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery were 5.67 mg and 8.82 mg, respectively. In addition, decreasing the dose of intrathecal bupivacaine could reduce the incidence of maternal hypotension.

Adult ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; Anesthesia, Spinal ; adverse effects ; methods ; Blood Pressure ; physiology ; Bupivacaine ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cesarean Section ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the characteristics of selective spinal anesthesia using 1 mg of bupivacaine combined with fentanyl or sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients were randomized into two groups. The Fentanyl group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.2 mL+fentanyl 20 microg+5% dextrose 1.4 mL, and the Sufentanil group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.2 mL+sufentanil 5 microg+5% dextrose 1.7 mL intrathecally. Intraoperative and postoperative characteristics were evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients in each group completed the study. The median peak sensory block level was similar between two groups, but sensory regression time was longer in the Sufentanil group than the Fentanyl group (p=0.017). All patients were able to move themselves to the bed without any aid when they arrived at the admission room. Pain scores were lower in the Sufentanil group than the Fentanyl group at postoperative 6, 12, and 18 hours (p=0.001). Compared to the Fentanyl group, the Sufentanil group required less postoperative analgesia (p=0.023) and the time to the first analgesic request was longer (p=0.025). Twenty-four of 26 patients (92.3%) in each group showed "good" satisfaction level. CONCLUSION: Selective spinal anesthesia using 1 mg of bupivacaine with fentanyl or sufentanil provided appropriate sensory block level with spared motor function for transurethral resection of the prostate in elderly patients. Intrathecal sufentanil was superior to fentanyl in postoperative analgesic quality.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesics, Opioid/*administration & dosage ; Anesthesia, Spinal/*methods ; Anesthetics, Local/*administration & dosage ; Bupivacaine/*administration & dosage ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Fentanyl/*administration & dosage ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Male ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate/*surgery ; Sufentanil/*administration & dosage ; Time Factors ; *Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the characteristics of selective spinal anesthesia using 1 mg of bupivacaine combined with fentanyl or sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients were randomized into two groups. The Fentanyl group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.2 mL+fentanyl 20 microg+5% dextrose 1.4 mL, and the Sufentanil group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.2 mL+sufentanil 5 microg+5% dextrose 1.7 mL intrathecally. Intraoperative and postoperative characteristics were evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients in each group completed the study. The median peak sensory block level was similar between two groups, but sensory regression time was longer in the Sufentanil group than the Fentanyl group (p=0.017). All patients were able to move themselves to the bed without any aid when they arrived at the admission room. Pain scores were lower in the Sufentanil group than the Fentanyl group at postoperative 6, 12, and 18 hours (p=0.001). Compared to the Fentanyl group, the Sufentanil group required less postoperative analgesia (p=0.023) and the time to the first analgesic request was longer (p=0.025). Twenty-four of 26 patients (92.3%) in each group showed "good" satisfaction level. CONCLUSION: Selective spinal anesthesia using 1 mg of bupivacaine with fentanyl or sufentanil provided appropriate sensory block level with spared motor function for transurethral resection of the prostate in elderly patients. Intrathecal sufentanil was superior to fentanyl in postoperative analgesic quality.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesics, Opioid/*administration & dosage ; Anesthesia, Spinal/*methods ; Anesthetics, Local/*administration & dosage ; Bupivacaine/*administration & dosage ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Fentanyl/*administration & dosage ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Male ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate/*surgery ; Sufentanil/*administration & dosage ; Time Factors ; *Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of pre-amputation pain block on the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation in the central nervous system of amputated rats, and the association between pre-amputation pain block and chronic amputation-related pain. METHODS: Thirty-six adult male SD rats were randomly assigned to an NA group (n=12), a PA group (n=12) and a PAB group (n=12). Group NA was intraplantarly injected saline l00 μL while group PA and group PAB were intraplantarly injected complete Freund adjuvant (CFA) 100 μL. The sciatic nerve of group NA and group PA were freed from surrounding tissue, and that of group PAB was blocked by bupivacaine under pentobarbital sodium anesthesia 5 days after the injection. Thermal withdrawal latency (TWL) was measured before and after the injection. All rats were amputated at the scheduled survival time. The expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NR2B) was measured by immunohistochemistry in L4-6 of the spinal cord and the anterior cingulated cortex 7 days after the amputation procedure. RESULTS: The TWL after intraplantar administration of CFA in group PA and group PAB decreased significantly compared with the baseline value (P<0.05), while the saline treated control group remained unchanged. Besides the basic value, the TWL of group PA was shorter than that of group NA at the above-mentioned time-points (P<0.05). Compared with the basic value and group NA, the TWL of group PAB after the block increased significantly (P<0.05). Compared with group NA and group PAB, group PA had a remarkably high expression of NR2B (P<0.05), while there was no difference between group PA and group PAB. CONCLUSION Pre-amputation pain may activate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor of the central nervous system, which may lead acute postoperative pain to chronic pain. It is necessary to treat pre-amputation pain.
Amputation ; Animals ; Bupivacaine ; administration & dosage ; Freund's Adjuvant ; administration & dosage ; Gyrus Cinguli ; metabolism ; Male ; Nerve Block ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative ; prevention & control ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate ; metabolism ; Sciatic Nerve ; Spinal Cord ; metabolism

A 49-year-old female presented with bilateral abducens nerve palsies. She had 75 prism diopter esotropia. The extraocular movement of the lateral rectus was -1 limitation for the right eye and -4 limitations for the left. After performing orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 2 mL of bupivacain (5 mg/mL) was injected into the left lateral rectus (LR). One month after injection, a further orbital MRI was performed. Subsequently, recession of both medial rectus (6 mm) and resection of the left LR (9 mm) were performed. After one month, bupivacaine had no hypertrophic effects. There was little change in angle of deviation. The orbital MRI scan showed a 1.91% increase in volume compared to the muscle prior to the injection. Histological findings showed no muscle fibers of the left LR muscle, only the fiber nucleus and the collagen that replaced the fibers. We report on the changes in stiffness and muscle volume and on the histology of the muscle one month after injecting bupivacaine into the paralyzed left LR muscle combined with standard surgical treatment.
Abducens Nerve/*pathology ; Abducens Nerve Diseases/*drug therapy/pathology ; Anesthetics, Local/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Bupivacaine/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Middle Aged

PURPOSE: Total knee replacement is one of the most painful orthopedic procedures, and effective pain relief is essential for early mobility and discharge from hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether addition of single-injection femoral nerve block to epidural analgesia would provide better postoperative pain control, compared to epidural analgesia alone, after total knee replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients received a single-injection femoral nerve block with 0.25% levobupivacaine (30 mL) combined with epidural analgesia (femoral nerve block group) and 40 patients received epidural analgesia alone (control group). Pain intensity and volume of patient-controlled epidural analgesia medication and rescue analgesic requirements were measured in the first 48 hours after surgery at three time periods; 0-6 hours, 6-24 hours, and 24-48 hours. Also, side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and pruritus were evaluated. RESULTS: Median visual analog scale at rest and movement was significantly lower until 48 hours in the femoral nerve block group. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia volume was significantly lower throughout the study period, however, rescue analgesia requirements were significantly lower only up to 6 hours in the femoral nerve block group. The incidences of nausea and vomiting and rescue antiemetic requirement were significantly lower in the femoral nerve block group up to 6 hours. CONCLUSION: The combination of femoral nerve block with epidural analgesia is an effective pain management regimen in patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement.
Aged ; Analgesia, Epidural/*methods ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/*methods ; Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage/therapeutic use ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/*methods ; Bupivacaine/administration & dosage/analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Female ; Femoral Nerve/*drug effects ; Humans ; Injections ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Block/*methods

BACKGROUNDIntrathecal anesthesia is commonly used for cesarean section. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine have all been used as intrathecal drugs. The minimum effective local anesthetic dose (MLAD) of intrathecal ropivacaine for non-obstetric patients has been reported. However, few data are available on the MLAD of hyperbaric ropivacaine for obstetric patients and the relative potency to bupivacaine has not been fully determined. In this study, we sought to determine the MLAD of intrathecal ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective cesarean section and to define their relative potency ratio.

METHODSWe enrolled forty parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and randomized them to one of two groups to receive intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine or bupivacaine. The initial dose was 10 mg, and was increased in increments of 1 mg, using the technique of up-down sequential allocation. Efficacy was accepted if adequate sensory dermatomal anesthesia to pin prick to T7 or higher was attained within 20 minutes after intrathecal injection, and required no supplementary epidural injection for procedure until at least 50 minutes after the intrathecal injection.

RESULTSThe intrathecal MLAD was 9.45 mg (95%confidence interval (CI), 8.45 - 10.56 mg) for ropivacaine and 7.53 mg (95%CI, 7.00 - 8.10 mg) for bupivacaine. The relative potency ratio was 0.80 (95%CI, 0.74 - 0.85) for ropivacaine/bupivacaine when given intrathecally in cesarean section.

CONCLUSIONRopivacaine is 20% less potent than bupivacaine during intrathecal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Adult ; Amides ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Anesthetics, Local ; Bupivacaine ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Cesarean Section ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Pregnancy ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of sufentanil administered intrathecally at different doses on the clinical effect of bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopy.

METHODSSixty patients with ectopic pregnancy undergoing elective laparoscopy (ASA class I-II) were randomized into 4 groups (groups A, B, C and D), and received spinal anesthesia with 15 mg bupivacaine and sufentanil at 0, 2.5, 5 and 7.5 microg, respectively. When the patients complained of discomforts, showed bodily movements, had heart rate over 100 beats/min, or showed blood pressure increment by 20%, additional doses of propofol were given. The onset time of sensory block, time to Bromage scale 3 motor block, time to the highest sensory block level, time of operation and recovery from anesthesia, and the total dosages of propofol were recorded along with the sedative score and the side effects.

RESULTSThe 4 groups were comparable for age, body weight, height and operation time (range 60-65 min) (P>0.05). Both the onset time of sensory block and the time of Bromage scale 3 motor block in groups C and D were significantly shorter than those in groups A and B (P<0.05). The time of the highest sensory block in group D was shorter than that in group A (P<0.05). Compared to the group A, the dose of propofol was reduced in groups B, C, and D by 7.1%, 28.1%, and 34.8%, respectively; propofol doses in groups C and D were significantly lower than those in groups A and B (P<0.05). Pruritus associated with the spinal anesthesia occurred in 4 (26.7%), 3 (20%), and 6 (40%) cases in groups B, C and D, respectively.

CONCLUSIONSIntrathecal sufentanil dose-dependently affect the effect of bupivacaine spinal anesthesia, and larger sufentanil dose produces better effects but more side effects. According to our results, 5.0 microg is the optimal dose for sufentanil.

Adult ; Analgesics, Opioid ; administration & dosage ; Anesthesia, Obstetrical ; methods ; Anesthesia, Spinal ; methods ; Anesthetics, Local ; administration & dosage ; Bupivacaine ; administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Ectopic ; surgery ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

Although levobupivacaine (LBUP) is less cardiotoxic than racemic bupivacaine (RBUP), the resuscitation from the LBUP-induced cardiovascular collapse (CVC) has not been easy as expected. Following the recent reports that proposed the resuscitative action of insulin for the RBUP-induced CVC, a controlled trial was performed to assess the feasibility of insulin for the LBUP-induced CVC. Fourteen dogs were randomly allocated into two groups: the RBUP and LBUP groups. Each group received continuous intravenous infusions of RBUP or LBUP until the mean arterial pressure (MAP) reached 40 mmHg. Then, an intravenous bolus of insulin (2 U/kg) was administered. Both groups were successfully resuscitated. At CVC, a decrease of cardiac output and an increase of systemic vascular resistance were observed but to a lesser degree in the LBUP group (p<0.05). After insulin injection, the MAP further declined to under 40 mmHg for several minutes, which was more protracted in the LBUP group (p<0.05). The CVCs induced by LBUP or RBUP in anesthetized dogs could be successfully resuscitated by insulin. Compared with RBUP, however, the less degree of vasoconstriction by LBUP and the innate vasodilatory property of insulin yielded a delayed increment of MAP during the immediate resuscitation period in the LBUP-induced CVC.
Treatment Outcome ; Overdose ; Male ; Insulin/*administration & dosage ; Heart Arrest/*chemically induced/physiopathology/*prevention & control ; Drug Combinations ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Dogs ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods ; Cardiac Output/*drug effects ; Bupivacaine/*adverse effects/analogs & derivatives ; Blood Pressure/*drug effects ; Blood Flow Velocity/drug effects ; Animals ; Anesthetics, Local

Background: Laparoscopic surgery is as very safe as traditional open surgery. A laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a surgical procedure during which the doctor removes your gallbladde. Objectives: This study was to assess the effect of local and intraperitoneal bupivacain infiltration on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the side effects of this technique. Subjects and method: In study group (n = 37), 25 mg bupivacain 0.25 % and 75 mg were infiltrated at Trocat incisions and at intraperitoneal surgery site, respectively. In placebo group (n = 44): no infiltration was used. VAS was measured controlling patient's pain during at rest, following inspiratory effort and movement; IV perfalgan requirement and the side effects of the technique were observed. Results: VAS at rest, following inspiratory effort and movement as well as perfalgan requirement during postoperative 6 hours were lower in study group (p < 0.05). \r\n", u'A significant decrease of heart rate after 10 - 30 minute of intraperitoneal infiltration of bupivacain was noted. Conclusions: Local and intraperitoneal bupivacain infiltrations had an effectiveness on pain relief during 6 hours after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moderate bradycardia was a main side effect of this technique. \r\n', u' \r\n', u'
Cholecystectomy/ methods ; Bupivacaine/ administration & ; dosage