This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or tacrolimus (TAC) compared with azathioprine (AZA) as maintenance therapy for active lupus nephritis (ALN). Patients with ALN who responded to 24 weeks of induction treatment were enrolled. Patients who received MMF or TAC as induction therapy continued MMF or TAC treatment during the maintenance period, whereas those who received intravenous cyclophosphamide were subjected to AZA treatment. The primary endpoint was the incidence of renal relapse. Secondary endpoints included extrarenal flares and composite endpoints (deaths, end-stage renal disease, or doubling of serum creatinine levels). A total of 123 ALN patients (47 in the MMF group, 37 in the TAC group, and 39 in the AZA group) were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 60 months. Ten MMF-treated patients, ten TAC-treated patients, and eight AZA-treated patients experienced renal relapses (P = 0.844). The cumulative renal relapse rates in the MMF group (P = 0.934) and TAC group (P = 0.673) were similar to the renal relapse rate in the AZA group. No significant difference in the incidence of severe adverse event was observed among the groups. Long-term maintenance therapies with MMF or TAC might have similarly low rates of renal relapse and similar safety profiles compared with AZA.
Humans ; Mycophenolic Acid/adverse effects* ; Azathioprine/adverse effects* ; Tacrolimus/therapeutic use* ; Lupus Nephritis/complications* ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; Treatment Outcome ; Recurrence

INTRODUCTIONAtopic dermatitis is a common, chronic pruritic condition affecting both children and adults, which has a negative impact on the quality of life. These guidelines were developed by an expert workgroup appointed by the Dermatological Society of Singapore, to provide doctors with information to assist in the management of their patients with atopic dermatitis. The workgroup members are experienced dermatologists with interest and expertise in eczemas.

MATERIALS AND METHODSWorkgroup members arrived at a consensus on the topics to be included. Relevant studies from the literature were assessed for best evidence, supplemented by the collective experience of the workgroup.

RESULTSFor mild atopic dermatitis, emollients, mild potency topical steroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors are recommended. For moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, the use of emollients, moderate-to-potent topical steroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, wet dressings, antimicrobials for secondary skin infection, phototherapy, and systemic therapy (e.g. prednisolone, cyclosporine, azathioprine or methotrexate) may be warranted. Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis should be managed in conjunction with a dermatologist.

CONCLUSIONGood outcomes can be achieved with an individualised therapeutic approach combined with adequate patient and parental education.

Administration, Cutaneous ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; therapeutic use ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Azathioprine ; therapeutic use ; Calcineurin Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Coinfection ; complications ; drug therapy ; Cyclosporine ; therapeutic use ; Dermatitis, Atopic ; complications ; immunology ; therapy ; Dermatology ; Disease Management ; Emollients ; therapeutic use ; Food Hypersensitivity ; immunology ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Methotrexate ; therapeutic use ; Patient Education as Topic ; Phototherapy ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Referral and Consultation ; Severity of Illness Index ; Singapore

Administration, Cutaneous ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; therapeutic use ; Azathioprine ; therapeutic use ; Calcineurin Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Cyclosporine ; therapeutic use ; Dermatitis, Atopic ; immunology ; therapy ; Disease Management ; Food Hypersensitivity ; immunology ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Patient Education as Topic ; Phototherapy ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Severity of Illness Index ; Singapore

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated chronic liver disease characterized by hepatocellular inflammation, necrosis, and fibrosis, which can progress to cirrhosis and fulminant hepatic failure. The standard treatment for AIH includes corticosteroids alone or in combination with azathioprine. Although most patients achieve remission using the standard regimen, some patients do not respond due to either drug intolerance or refractory disease; in such cases alternative immunosuppressive agents should be explored. The second-line therapies are cyclophilin inhibitors such as cyclosporine A or tacrolimus, and nowadays mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is widely used if azathioprine-based therapies are not tolerated. Although these are recommended as an alternative to the first-line regimen, there is insufficient evidence for the efficacy of second-line therapies, with the evidence based mainly on expert opinion. Therefore, we report an AIH patient receiving the standard regimen in whom remission did not occur due to side effects to azathioprine, but was successfully treated with MMF in combination with corticosteroids as an alternative to the standard regimen.
Alanine Transaminase/analysis ; Alopecia/etiology ; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/*therapeutic use ; Aspartate Aminotransferases/analysis ; Azathioprine/adverse effects ; Female ; Hepatitis, Autoimmune/*drug therapy/pathology ; Humans ; Liver/enzymology/pathology ; Middle Aged ; Mycophenolic Acid/*therapeutic use ; Pancytopenia/etiology ; Prednisolone/therapeutic use

Autoimmune hepatitis is characterized by autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinemia, and interface hepatitis on histological examination. The features lack diagnostic specificity, and other diseases that may resemble autoimmune hepatitis must be excluded. The clinical presentation may be acute, acute severe (fulminant), or asymptomatic; conventional autoantibodies may be absent; centrilobular necrosis and bile duct changes may be present; and the disease may occur after liver transplantation or with features that suggest overlapping disorders. The diagnostic criteria have been codified, and diagnostic scoring systems can support clinical judgment. Nonstandard autoantibodies, including antibodies to actin, α-actinin, soluble liver antigen, perinuclear antineutrophil antigen, asialoglycoprotein receptor, and liver cytosol type 1, are tools that can support the diagnosis, especially in patients with atypical features. Prednisone or prednisolone in combination with azathioprine is the preferred treatment, and strategies using these medications in various doses can ameliorate treatment failure, incomplete response, drug intolerance, and relapse after drug withdrawal. Budesonide, mycophenolate mofetil, and calcineurin inhibitors can be considered in selected patients as frontline or salvage therapies. Molecular (recombinant proteins and monoclonal antibodies), cellular (adoptive transfer and antigenic manipulation), and pharmacological (antioxidants, antifibrotics, and antiapoptotic agents) interventions constitute future directions in management. The evolving knowledge of the pathogenic pathways and the advances in technology promise new management algorithms.
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/*therapeutic use ; Autoantibodies/*blood ; Azathioprine/therapeutic use ; Biomarkers/blood ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Hepatitis, Autoimmune/*diagnosis/*drug therapy ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/*therapeutic use ; Prednisolone/therapeutic use ; Prednisone/therapeutic use

BACKGROUNDThe long-term outcomes of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) given the immunosuppressive treatment are considered to be preferable. However, little is known about the response of AIH patients with cirrhosis to immunosuppressive treatment. We assessed the effects of immunosuppressive therapy in Chinese AIH patients with cirrhosis from a tertiary hospital.

METHODSPatients with a clinical diagnosis of AIH January 2000 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Two-hundred and fourteen patients who were followed up and satisfied the simplified AIH criteria were included in the study. Among these patients, 87 presented with cirrhosis when initially diagnosed for AIH. Immunosuppressive treatments were employed in 57 AIH patients who did not present with cirrhosis and 39 patients who presented with cirrhosis. Initial responses to immunosuppressive treatment of patients with and without cirrhosis were analyzed. Independent risk factors were assessed for predicting the prognosis of patients. The t-test and Cox regression statistical analysis were used.

RESULTSIn total, 96 AIH patients including 39 with cirrhosis and 57 without cirrhosis underwent immunosuppressive therapy. The overall complete remission after initial immunosuppressive treatment was achieved in 81/96 patients (84.4%), whereas 9/96 (9.4%) achieved incomplete response, and 6/96 (6.3%) occurred treatment failure. Compared to noncirrhotic patients, patients who presented with cirrhosis responded to treatment to a comparable extent regarding complete response (noncirrhosis 50/57 [87.7%] vs. cirrhosis 31/39 [79.5%], P = 0.275), incomplete remission (noncirrhosis 4/57 [7.0%] vs. cirrhosis 5/39 [12.8%], P = 0.338), and treatment failure (noncirrhosis 3/57 [5.3%] vs. cirrhosis 3/39 [7.7%], P = 0.629). Importantly, the remission rate was comparable (54/57 [94.7%] and 36/39 [92.3%], P = 0.629) for noncirrhotic and cirrhotic patients after immunosuppressive therapy. Compared to patients who maintained remission (n = 19) after drug withdrawal, patients who experienced relapse (n = 17) had significantly higher levels of serum immunoglobulin G at entry (15.0 ± 6.5 g/L vs. 22.3 ± 5.8 g/L, t = 2.814, P = 0.004). Moreover, cirrhosis at presentation significantly increased the risk of disease exacerbation (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.603; P = 0.002). The treatment of immunosuppressant (HR: 0.058; P = 0.005) and the level of aspartate aminotransferase at presentation (HR: 1.002; P = 0.017) also increased the risk of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONSThe efficacy of initial immunosuppressive treatment in AIH patients with cirrhosis is comparable to that in those without cirrhosis. Cirrhotic patients not treated by immunosuppressants have poor long-term outcomes.

Aged ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Azathioprine ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Hepatitis, Autoimmune ; complications ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Liver Cirrhosis ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Prednisolone ; therapeutic use ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In patients with corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), cyclosporine or infliximab may be added to the treatment regimen to induce remission. Here, we aimed to compare the efficacy of cyclosporine and infliximab. METHODS: Between January 1995 and May 2012, the medical records of 43 patients with corticosteroid-refractory UC who received either infliximab or cyclosporine as a rescue therapy at a tertiary care hospital in Korea were reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 43 patients, 10 underwent rescue therapy with cyclosporine and the remaining 33 patients received infliximab. A follow-up of 12 months was completed for all patients. The colectomy rate at 12 months was 30% and 3% in the cyclosporine and the infliximab groups, respectively (p=0.034). However, the Cox proportional hazard model indicated that the treatment of rescue therapy was not an independent associate factor for preventing colectomy (p=0.164). In the subgroup analysis, infliximab with azathioprine was superior to cyclosporine for preventing colectomy (hazard ratio of infliximab with azathioprine compared with cyclosporine only, 0.073; 95% confidence interval, 0.008 to 0.629). CONCLUSIONS: No difference between infliximab and cyclosporine with respect to preventing colectomy was noted. However, infliximab with azathioprine may be more effective than cyclosporine alone for preventing colectomy.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Azathioprine/therapeutic use ; Colectomy/statistics & numerical data ; Colitis, Ulcerative/*drug therapy ; Cyclosporine/*therapeutic use ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/*therapeutic use ; Infliximab/*therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Salvage Therapy/*methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the role of thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) and 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) as predictors of clinical response and side effects to azathioprine (AZA), and estimate the optimal AZA dose in Korean pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and nine pediatric IBD patients in whom AZA treatment was required were enrolled. Thiopurine metabolites were monitored since September 2010. Among them, 83 patients who had prescribed AZA for at least 3 months prior to September 2010 were enrolled and followed until October 2011 to evaluate optimal AZA dose, adverse effects and disease activity before and after thiopurine metabolite monitoring. RESULTS: The result of the TPMT genotype was that 102 patients were *1/*1 (wild type), four were *1/*3C, one was *1/*6, one was *1/*16 (heterozygote) and one was *3C/*3C (homozygote). Adverse effects happened in 31 patients pre-metabolite monitoring and in only nine patients post-metabolite monitoring. AZA dose was 1.4+/-0.31 mg/kg/day before monitoring and 1.1+/-0.46 mg/kg/day after monitoring (p<0.001). However, there were no statistical differences in disease activity during metabolite monitoring period (p=0.34). Adverse effects noticeably decreased although reduction of the AZA dose since monitoring. CONCLUSION: TPMT genotype and thiopurine metabolite monitoring could be helpful to examine TPMT genotypes before administering AZA and to measure 6-TGN concentrations during prescribing AZA in IBD patients.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Azathioprine/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Genotype ; Guanine Nucleotides/metabolism ; Humans ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/*drug therapy/metabolism ; Male ; Methyltransferases/genetics/metabolism ; Republic of Korea ; Risk Factors ; Thionucleotides/metabolism ; Treatment Outcome

A 2-year-old girl presented with a one-day history of acute-onset bilateral painful, swollen eyes and a two‑month history of loose stools. Physical examination revealed a right eyelid swelling with proptosis. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a right orbital pseudotumour. The patient responded well to treatment with intravenous antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, three weeks later, she was readmitted with a vasculitic lesion over her left upper chest, with mucous-bloody diarrhoea. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. The patient was treated with intravenous pulse methylprednisolone and sulphasalazine. Two weeks after discharge, she was readmitted for cutaneous vasculitis and worsening diarrhoea. The patient's bowel and extraintestinal diseases resolved upon addition of infliximab to her treatment regimen. Her inflammatory markers also normalised. Azathioprine was subsequently added. Infliximab was discontinued after four doses and prednisolone was tapered off. The patient remained well without any flare-up after 24 months of follow-up.
Azathioprine ; therapeutic use ; Child, Preschool ; Colitis, Ulcerative ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Agents ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Infliximab ; therapeutic use ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Orbital Pseudotumor ; diagnosis ; drug therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Azathioprine (AZA) has been widely used in the therapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). However, studies evaluating the adverse effects of AZA in these two diseases are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the adverse effects of AZA in Korean IBD and AIH patients. METHODS: Patients with IBD or AIH who were treated with AZA at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center (Daegu, Korea) between January 2002 and March 2011 were enrolled. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively in terms of clinical characteristics and adverse effects of AZA. RESULTS: A total of 139 IBD patients and 55 AIH patients were finally enrolled. Thirty IBD patients (21.6%) and eight AIH patients (14.5%) experienced adverse effects of AZA. In particular, the prevalence of leukopenia was significantly higher in the IBD group than in the AIH group (p=0.026). T474C mutation was observed in three of 10 patients who were assessed for thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) genotype. CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients are at increased risk for the adverse effects of AZA compared with AIH patients, of which leukopenia was the most commonly observed. Therefore, IBD patients receiving AZA therapy should be carefully monitored.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Azathioprine/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Base Sequence ; Female ; Genotype ; Hepatitis, Autoimmune/*drug therapy ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/*drug therapy ; Leukopenia/epidemiology/etiology ; Male ; Methyltransferases/chemistry/genetics ; Middle Aged ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult