Humans ; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ; Endovascular Procedures ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Postoperative Complications ; Risk Factors ; Aortic Rupture/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies

Humans ; Aortic Dissection/surgery* ; Aortic Rupture/surgery* ; Death ; Treatment Outcome

Aortic Valve/surgery* ; Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery* ; Cardiac Catheterization ; Heart Rupture ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ; Humans ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects* ; Treatment Outcome

Aortic Rupture ; diagnostic imaging ; microbiology ; surgery ; Blood Pressure ; physiology ; Humans ; Klebsiella pneumoniae ; pathogenicity ; Male ; Middle Aged

We report a case of a morbidly obese man with an aortic aneurysm, in whom dental surgery was performed before elective cardiac surgery. His aortic aneurysm required emergency surgery. However, because of his morbid obesity, elective cardiac surgery was planned. Considering the high risk of infective endocarditis, dental surgery was required. Our patient was at a high risk of aortic rupture caused by hypertension and breathing difficulty in the supine position. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an anti-anxiety, sedative, and analgesic medicine that can stabilize circulatory dynamics and minimize blood pressure fluctuations. We administered intravenous DEX for sedation of the patient in Fowler's position. In conclusion, our understanding of the risk factors of DEX enabled us to perform safe invasive oral treatment.
Anesthesia, Local* ; Anesthetics, Local ; Aortic Aneurysm ; Aortic Rupture ; Blood Pressure ; Dexmedetomidine* ; Emergencies ; Endocarditis ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Obesity, Morbid ; Oral Surgical Procedures ; Respiration ; Risk Factors ; Supine Position ; Surgery, Oral* ; Thoracic Surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with those of open repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the outcomes of 114 patients with DTAA and proximal landing zones 3 or 4 after TEVAR to those of 53 patients after conventional open repairs. Thirty-day and late mortality were the primary endpoints, and early morbidities, aneurysm-related death, and re-intervention were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The TEVAR group was older and had more incidences of dissecting aneurysm. The mean follow-up was 36+/-26 months (follow-up rate, 97.8%). The 30-day mortality in the TEVAR and open repair groups were 3.5% and 9.4% (p=0.11). Perioperative stroke and paraplegia incidences were similar between the groups [5.3% vs. 7.5% (p=0.56) and 7.5% vs. 3.5% (p=0.26), respectively]. Respiratory failure occurred more in the open repair group (1.8% vs. 26.4%, p<0.01). The incidence of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis was higher in the open repair group (1.8% vs. 9.4%, p<0.01). The cumulative survival rate was higher in the TEVAR group at 2 to 5 years (79.6% vs. 58.3%, p=0.03). The free from re-intervention was lower in the TEVAR group (65.3% vs. 100%, p=0.02), and the free from aneurysm-related death in the TEVAR and open repair groups were 88.5% and 86.1% (p=0.45). CONCLUSION: TEVAR is safe and effective for treating DTAAs with improved perioperative and long-term outcomes compared with open repair.
Age Factors ; Aged ; Aneurysm, Dissecting/*epidemiology/surgery ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/mortality/*surgery ; Aortic Rupture/mortality/*surgery ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Endovascular Procedures ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Republic of Korea ; Stroke/etiology ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo compare the perioperative outcome between the endovascular repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

METHODSFrom January 2006 to January 2013, totally 66 patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) treated by surgery were retrospectively analyzed in Department of vascular surgery, People's Liberation Army General Hospital. According to the repair method, all the subjects were divided into EVAR group and OSR group. EVAR group included 40 patients, 30 patients were male, 10 patients were female, aged from 47 to 78 with a mean of (71 ± 7) years. OSR group included 26 patients, 21 patients were male, aged from 45 to 87 with a mean of (72 ± 9) years. The difference of the operation time, the amount of suspended red blood cells, ICU stay time, case fatality rate, adverse event rate and the difference of the two intervention rate were compared between the 2 groups by χ(2) test and t test.

RESULTSThere were significant differences between the 2 groups in operation time, the amount of suspended red blood cells, ICU stay time, case fatality rate, adverse event rate ((183 ± 44) minutes vs. (384 ± 108) minutes, t = -10.59, P = 0.00; (0.4 ± 0.8) units vs. (1.1 ± 1.8) units, t = -2.19, P = 0.03; (3.0 ± 1.8) d vs. (8.5 ± 5.1) d, t = -6.34, P = 0.00; 20.0% (8/40) vs. 46.2% (12/26), χ(2) = 5.10, P = 0.02; 25.0% (10/40) vs. 53.8% (14/26), χ(2) = 5.67, P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in frozen plasma quantities and the two intervention rate between the 2 groups (t = -1.98, P = 0.05; χ(2) = 0.49, P = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONSEVAR decreases the perioperative mortality and adverse event of rAAA compared with OSR. More studies are necessary to compare the middle and long-outcome between EVAR and OSR of rAAA.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; surgery ; Aortic Rupture ; surgery ; Endovascular Procedures ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Perioperative Period ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgical Procedures ; methods

OBJECTIVETo evaluate and report surgical management and experience of atypical ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA).

METHODSClinical data of 52 RAAA patients from May 2002 to February 2015 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Thirty-three cases were included into this study based on atypical clinical presentation and etiology, including 6 infected RAAA, 5 inflammatory RAAA, 1 traumatic aortic rupture, 6 tuberculotic RAAA, 2 aoritc-vena cava fistula, 3 intestinal fistula and 5 spine erosion cases. Two of them refused operation during preparation, 19 of them received emergency open repair and 13 of them received endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with 1 case converted to open surgery.

RESULTSThe systolic blood pressure of atypical RAAA before operation was (88±16) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), duration time from admission to diagnosis making was (17±10) hours. Perioperative death occurred in 1 patient because of hemorrhagic shock induced acidosis. During follow-up for 3 to 72 months, no operation related complications occured, such as artificial graft infection.

CONCLUSIONSEmergent operation including open surgery and EVAR is crucial for RAAA treatment. Early diagnosis, excellent operative techniques and comprehensive perioperative management are measures conducive to reduce the mortality rate of RAAA.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; surgery ; Aortic Rupture ; surgery ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgical Procedures

Adult ; Aortic Rupture ; surgery ; therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Septal Occluder Device ; Sinus of Valsalva ; surgery ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo compare the clinical efficacies of endovascular aortic repair(EVAR)and open surgical repair(OSR)for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm(rAAA).

METHODSThe clinical data of 28 rAAA patients undergoing emergent treatment between February 2002 and February 2013 in PUMC Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Among them 13 cases were treated by EVAR and 15 cases by OSR.

RESULTSBefore the surgery,the general conditions,comorbidities,and hemodynamics were not significantly different between these two groups(all P>0.05),although the EVAR group had significantly higher mean age than OSR group(P=0.041). In the perioperative period,the EVAR group showed significantly lower 30-day mortality(P=0.044),less blood loss(P=0.005),less blood transfusion(P=0.003),less infusion quantity(P=0.000),shorter length of procedure(P=0.001),and shorter hospital stay(P=0.020). Also,the EVAR group had no severe perioperative complications and showed superior 1-year follow up survival(P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSEVAR is an effective treatment for rAAA and can improve the clinical outcomes. EVAR may be adopted as the first-line treatment for rAAA,especially for the aged.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; surgery ; Aortic Rupture ; surgery ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgical Procedures ; methods