Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is expected to increase in Africa and South Africa. Due to the low numbers of rheumatologists in South Africa, specialist physicians also have to care for patients with RA. Furthermore several new developments have taken place in recent years which improved the management and outcome of RA. Classification criteria were updated, assessment follow-up tools were refined and above all, several new biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were developed. Therefore it is imperative for specialist physicians to update themselves with the newest developments in the management of RA. This article provides an overview of the newest developments in the management of RA in the South African context. This approach may well apply to countries with similar specialist to patient ratios and disease profiles.
Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis/*drug therapy/epidemiology ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Humans ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' ; Prevalence ; *Rheumatologists/standards ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; South Africa/epidemiology ; *Specialization ; Treatment Outcome

Adalimumab ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antirheumatic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; drug therapy ; immunology ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Autoantibodies ; immunology ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin A ; immunology ; Middle Aged ; Nephritis ; etiology ; immunology

Controlled clinical trials of integrative therapies available to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) improved dramatically in the past 20 years, largely because of the growing need and the methodologies improvement. Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. F., a typical example of popular use herb, has been extensively studied in trials. However, clear and convincing evidence of integrative therapy, effectiveness and safety, remains insufficient to make decision. Many research efforts are hampered by standing problems with 'syndrome' recruitment failure. In addition, the outcome multiplicity induces the findings inefficiency to generalize to RA patients at large. Development of validated syndrome outcomes and methodologies has also been critical. Current efforts to enhance the understanding of integrative treatment options for patients with RA include the development of drug-specific rather than disease-specific strategies, studies in predictive biomarkers, and development of peer-review trial protocol for regular clinical trials.
Antirheumatic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; drug therapy ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Humans ; Integrative Medicine ; Tripterygium ; chemistry

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the impact on mortality of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 100 RA-ILD patients who visited our tertiary care medical center between 2004 and 2011, identified those treated with an anti-TNF agent, divided patients into non-survivor and survivor groups and evaluated their clinical characteristics and causes of death. RESULTS: A total of 24 RA-ILD patients received anti-TNF therapy, of whom six died (25%). Mean age at initiation of anti-TNF therapy was significantly higher in the nonsurvivor versus survivor group (76 years [range, 66 to 85] vs. 64 years [range, 50 to 81], respectively; p = 0.043). The mean duration of anti-TNF treatment in the non-survivor group was shorter (7 months [range, 2 to 14] vs. 23 months [range, 2 to 58], respectively; p = 0.030). The duration of anti-TNF therapy in all nonsurviving patients was < 12 months. Pulmonary function test results at ILD diagnosis, and cumulative doses of disease-modifying drugs and steroids, did not differ between groups. Five of the six deaths (83%) were related to lung disease, including two diffuse alveolar hemorrhages, two cases of acute exacerbation of ILD, and one of pneumonia. The sixth patient died of septic shock following septic arthritis of the knee. CONCLUSIONS: Lung complications can occur within months of initial anti-TNF treatment in older RA-ILD patients; therefore, anti-TNF therapy should be used with caution in these patients.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications/diagnosis/*drug therapy/immunology/mortality ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis/etiology/*mortality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/*antagonists & inhibitors

We evaluated the utility of follow-up interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) for the diagnosis of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) or new tuberculosis in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha). The study participants (n=127) had a negative IGRA screening before receiving anti-TNFalpha and were evaluated by follow-up IGRA. We retrospectively examined data of the subjects according to age, gender, tuberculosis prophylaxis, concomitant medications, IGRA conversion and anti-TNFalpha, including type and treatment duration. The median duration of anti-TNFalpha was 21.5 months, and the median age was 35.3 yr. Of the 127 patients, IGRA conversion was found in 10 patients (7.9%). There was no significant variation between IGRA conversion rate and any risk factors except for age. IGRA conversion rate was not significantly different between AS and rheumatoid arthritis (P=0.12). IGRA conversion was observed in AS patients receiving anti-TNFalpha in Korea. A follow-up IGRA test can be helpful for identifying LTBI or new tuberculosis in AS patients receiving anti-TNFalpha.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/*adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Interferon-gamma/*blood ; Latent Tuberculosis/*blood/*chemically induced/diagnosis ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing/blood/*drug therapy ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (5 and 10 mg twice daily) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with active RA was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases as well as manual searches. RESULTS: Five RCTs, including three phase-II and two phase-III trials involving 1,590 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The three phase-II RCTs included 452 patients with RA (144 patients randomized to 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 156 patients randomized to 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, and 152 patients randomized to placebo) who were included in this meta-analysis. The American College of Rheumatology 20% response rate was significantly higher in the tofacitinib 5- and 10-mg groups than in the control group (relative risk [RR], 2.445; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.229 to 4.861; p = 0.011; and RR, 2.597; 95% CI, 1.514 to 4.455; p = 0.001, respectively). The safety outcomes did not differ between the tofacitinib 5- and 10-mg groups and placebo groups with the exception of infection in the tofacitinib 10-mg group (RR, 2.133; 95% CI, 1.268 to 3.590; p = 0.004). The results of two phase-III trials (1,123 patients) confirmed the findings in the phase-II studies. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib at dosages of 5 and 10 mg twice daily was found to be effective in patients with active RA that inadequately responded to methotrexate or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and showed a manageable safety profile.
Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/*drug therapy ; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic ; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic ; Humans ; Janus Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors ; Methotrexate/therapeutic use ; Piperidines/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Pyrimidines/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Pyrroles/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Treatment Outcome

There is no consensus on whether it is safe to re-administer tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) flared after withdrawal of TNFalpha inhibitors due to active tuberculosis (TB). We evaluated the safety of restarting anti-TNFalpha therapy in patients with TNFalpha-associated TB. We used data of 1,012 patients with RA or AS treated with TNFalpha inhibitors at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between January 2003 and July 2013 to identify patients who developed active TB. Demographic and clinical data including the results of tuberculin skin tests (TST) and interferon-gamma releasing assays (IGRA) were collected. Fifteen patients developed active TB. Five cases were occurred in RA and 10 cases in AS. Nine of 15 patients had a negative TST or IGRA and 6 TST-positive patients had received prophylaxis prior to initiating anti-TNFalpha therapy. All patients discontinued TNFalpha inhibitors with starting the treatment of TB. Eight patients were re-administered TNFalpha inhibitors due to disease flares and promptly improved without recurrence of TB. TNFalpha inhibitors could be safely resumed after starting anti-TB regimen in patients with RA or AS.
Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/*drug therapy ; Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Immunoglobulin G/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Interferon-gamma Release Tests ; Male ; Methotrexate/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification ; Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor/therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing/*drug therapy ; Tuberculin Test ; Tuberculosis/*chemically induced/microbiology ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/*antagonists & inhibitors

INTRODUCTIONRheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients taking disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) may experience treatment failure due to adverse effects or a lack of efficacy/resistance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prescription patterns, the incidence and reasons for failure, and the time to treatment failure of DMARDs in RA patients.

METHODSThe medical records of patients visiting the Rheumatology Clinic were scrutinised retrospectively in order to extract the relevant data, including demographics, clinical and laboratory investigations and drug usage, for analysis.

RESULTSMore than 60% of the 474 eligible patients were started on a combination of DMARDs. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (79.7%) and methotrexate (MTX) (55.6%) were the most common DMARDs prescribed initially. There was a significant difference in survival times among the various treatment groups (p ≤ 0.001). Adverse effect was the main reason for treatment failure of sulfasalazine (SSZ) (88.9%) and MTX (75%), while addition or substitution DMARDs was more common for those taking HCQ (72.2%). Adverse event was reported as the most significant predictor of treatment failure. The most commonly reported adverse effects were bone marrow suppression and hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONA combination of DMARDs was used to initiate therapy in more than 60% of RA patients, with HCQ and MTX being prescribed most frequently. Adverse effects accounted mainly for treatment failures with MTX and SSZ, while lack of efficacy was responsible for major treatment failures with HCQ.

Adult ; Antirheumatic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; drug therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Failure

Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a kind of LE-non-specific bullous skin disease that is rarely induced by a medication. We describe the first case of bullous SLE to develop after administration of methimazole. A 31-yr-old woman presented with generalized erythematous patches, multiple bullae, arthralgia, fever, conjunctivitis, and hemolytic anemia. Biopsy of her bulla showed linear deposition of lgG, lgA, C3, fibrinogen, and C1q at dermo-epidermal junction. She was diagnosed as bullous SLE and treated with prednisolone, dapsone, hydroxychloroquine, and methotrexate. Our experience suggests that SLE should be considered as a differential diagnosis when bullous skin lesions develop in patients being treated for hyperthyroidism.
Adult ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use ; Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use ; Antithyroid Agents/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Blister/chemically induced/pathology ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Graves Disease/diagnosis/drug therapy ; Humans ; Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use ; Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/chemically induced/*diagnosis/drug therapy ; Lupus Nephritis/diagnosis/drug therapy ; Methimazole/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Prednisolone/therapeutic use ; Skin/pathology

Pseudomembranous colitis is mainly caused by antibiotics and Clostridium difficile infection. But conditions such as gastrointestinal surgery, antacid medication, anti-neoplastic agent or immunosuppressive agent which influences the normal flora of colon can induce colitis without the administration of any antibiotics. We experienced a 13 year-old male who was taking low-dose methotrexate for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis complained diarrhea and abdominal pain for 3 weeks. Sigmoidoscopic findings revealed diffuse patch yellowish pseudomembranes on the rectum. Histologic finding was compatible to pseudomembranous colitis. His symptom was improved after stop taking methotrexate and the administration of metronidazole. If a patient treated with immunosuppressive agents or antineoplastic agents complains diarrhea, fever or abdominal pain and has not improved with conservative care, pseudomembranous colitis should be taken into account as a differential diagnosis and prompt treatment is required for better prognosis.
Abdominal Pain/etiology ; Adolescent ; Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use ; Antirheumatic Agents/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Juvenile Rheumatoid/*drug therapy ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Diarrhea/etiology ; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/*diagnosis/drug therapy/pathology ; Humans ; Male ; Methotrexate/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Metronidazole/therapeutic use ; Sigmoidoscopy ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed