Perioperative treatment is critical to improve the outcomes of patients with advanced gastric cancer. There are three therapeutic modes of perioperative treatment for resectable gastric cancer: neoadjuvant chemotherapy+ D1/D2 surgery+ adjuvant chemotherapy, D0/D1 surgery+ adjuvant radiochemotherapy, and D2 surgery+ adjuvant chemotherapy. Over the decades, a large number of clinical studies had been conducted to optimize the perioperative treatment mode of gastric cancer, including the postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and perioperative chemotherapy, and to explore the feasibility of preoperative radiochemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. After nearly 20 years of development and exploration, although the perioperative treatment mode for advanced gastric cancer has become standardized, there are still some core issues that need to be solved urgently, including the selection of population for perioperative treatment, the limitation of efficaly evaluation criteria, insufficient emphasis on laparoscopic exploration before neoadjuvant treatment, and lack of exploration in esophagogastric junction cancer. We should fully integrate the current clinical research data into clinical practice, adopt a multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment mode, and follow the principles of standardized diagnosis and treatment based on a multi-dimensional analysis of patient characteristics, and formulate the most reasonable treatment strategy to ultimately benefit patients.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage* ; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Esophagogastric Junction ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Perioperative Care ; Stomach Neoplasms/therapy*

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness, safety, and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Methods: This study is a prospective randomized controlled clinical study (NCT01962246). AEG patients who were treated at the Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from February 2012 to June 2016 were included. All of the enrolled patients were diagnosed with type II or III locally advanced AEG gastric cancer (T2-4N0-3M0 or T1N1-3M0) by gastroscopy and CT before operation; the longitudinal axis of the lesion was ≤ 8 cm; no anti-tumor treatment was previously given and no contraindications of chemotherapy and surgery were found. Case exclusion criteria: serious diseases accompanied by liver and kidney, cardiovascular system and other vital organs; allergy to capecitabine or oxaliplatin drugs or excipients; receiving any form of chemotherapy or other research drugs; pregnant or lactating women; patients with diseases resulting in difficulty to take capecitabine or with concurrent tumors. Based on sample size estimation, a total of 150 AEG patients were enrolled. Using the random number table method, the enrolled patients were divided into the nCRT group and the direct operation group with 75 cases in each group. The nCRT group received XELOX chemotherapy (capecitabine+ oxaliplatin) before surgery and concurrent radiotherapy (45 Gy, 25 times, 1.8 Gy/d, 5 times/week). Clinical efficacy of the nCRT group was evaluated by the solid tumor efficacy evaluation standard (RECIST1.1) and the tumor volume reduction rate was measured on CT. After completing the preoperative examination in the direct operation group, and 8-10 weeks after the end of nCRT in the nCRT group, surgery was performed. Laparoscopic exploration was initially performed. According to the Japanese "Regulations for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer", a transabdominal radical total gastrectomy combined with perigastric lymph node dissection was performed. The primary outcome was the 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rate (DFS); the secondary outcomes were R0 resection rate, the toxicity of chemotherapy, and surgical complications. The follow-up ended on December 31, 2019. The postoperative recurrence, metastasis and survival time of the two groups were collected. Results: After excluding patients with incomplete clinical data, patients or family members requesting to withdraw informed consent, and those failing to follow the treatment plan, 63 cases in the nCRT group and 69 cases in the direct operation group were finally enrolled in the study. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics of the two groups (all P>0.05). Sixty-three patients in the nCRT group were evaluated by RECIST1.1 after treatment, the image based effective rate was 42.9% (27/63), and the stable disease rate was 98.4% (62/63); the tumor volume before and after nCRT measured on CT was (58.8±24.4) cm(3) and (46.6±25.7) cm(3), respectively, the effective rate of tumor volume reduction measured by CT was 47.6% (30/63). Incidences of neutrophilopenia [65.1% (41/63) vs. 40.6% (28/69), χ(2)=7.923, P=0.005], nausea [81.0% (51/63) vs. 56.5% (39/69), χ(2)=9.060, P=0.003] and fatigue [74.6% (47/63) vs. 42.0% (29/69), χ(2)=14.306, P=0.001] in the nCRT group were significantly higher than those in the direct surgery group. Radiation gastritis/esophagitis and radiation pneumonia were unique adverse reactions in the nCRT group, with incidences of 52.4% (33/63) and 15.9%(10/63), respectively. The classification of tumor regression of 63 patients in nCRT group presented as 11 cases of grade 0 (17.5%), 20 cases of grade 1 (31.7%), 28 cases of grade 2 (44.4%), and 5 cases of grade 3 (7.9%). Eleven (17.5%) patients achieved pathologic complete response. Sixty-one (96.8%) patients in the nCRT group underwent R0 resection, which was higher than 87.0% (60/69) in the direct surgery group (χ(2)=4.199, P=0.040). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes in the specimens in the nCRT group and the direct operation group was 27.6±12.4 and 26.8±14.6, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (t=-0.015, P=0.976). The pathological lymph node metastasis rate and lymph node ratio in the two groups were 44.4% (28/63) vs. 76.8% (53/69), and 4.0% (70/1 739) vs. 21.9% (404/1 847), respectively with statistically significant differences (χ(2)=14.552, P<0.001, and χ(2)=248.736, P<0.001, respectively). During a median follow-up of 52 (27-77) months, the 3-year DFS rate in the nCRT group and the direct surgery group was 52.4% and 39.1% (P=0.049), and the 3-year OS rate was 63.4% and 52.2% (P=0.019), respectively. According to whether the tumor volume reduction rate measured by CT was ≥ 12.5%, 63 patients in the nCRT group were divided into the effective group (n=30) and the ineffective group (n=33). The 3-year DFS rate of these two subgracps was 56.6% and 45.5%, respectively without significant difference (P=0.098). The 3-year OS rate was 73.3% and 51.5%,respectively with significant difference (P=0.038). The 3-year DFS rate of patients with the tumor regression grades 0, 1, 2 and 3 was 81.8%, 70.0%, 44.4%, and 20.0%, repectively (P=0.024); the 3-year OS rate was 81.8%, 75.0%, 48.1% and 40.0%, repectively (P=0.048). Conclusion: nCRT improves treatment efficacy of Siewert type II and III AEG patients, and the long-term prognosis is good.
Adenocarcinoma/therapy* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Capecitabine/administration & dosage* ; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Esophagogastric Junction/surgery* ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage* ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms/therapy*

Objective: To explore the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (CapeOX) or oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) regimen neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Clinical data of patients diagnosed as advanced gastric cancer undergoing CapeOX/SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy and standard laparoscopic radical operation for gastric cancer in Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from April 2016 to April 2019 were retrospectively collected. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age≥18 years; (2) gastric adenocarcinoma was confirmed by histopathology and the clinical stage was T3-4aN+M0; (3) tumor could be resectable; (4) preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy was CapeOX or SOX regimen without radiotherapy or other regimen chemotherapy; (5) no other concurrent malignant tumor; (6) the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ≤ 1; (7) no bone marrow suppression; (8) normal liver and kidney function. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with recurrent gastric cancer; (2) patients receiving emergency surgery due to tumor perforation, bleeding, obstruction, etc.; (3) allergy to oxaliplatin, S-1, capecitabine or any drug excipients; (4) diagnosed with coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, or the New York Heart Association class III or IV; (5) pregnant or lactating women. A total of 118 patients were enrolled as the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, and 379 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received surgery combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy over the same period simultaneously were included as the adjuvant chemotherapy group. After propensity score matching was performed including gender, age, ECOG score, tumor site, clinical stage, chemotherapy regimen and other factors by 1:1 ratio, there were 40 cases in each group. The differences between the two groups in general conditions, efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, intraoperative conditions, postoperative conditions, histopathological results, chemotherapy-related adverse events, and survival status were compared and analyzed. Results: Comparison of baseline demographics between the two groups showed no statistically significant difference (all P>0.05). In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, 5.0% (2/40) of patients achieved clinical complete response, 57.5% (23/40) achieved partial response, 32.5% (13/40) remained stable disease, and 5.0% (2/40) had disease progression before surgery. Objective response rate was 62.5% (25/40), and disease control rate was 95.0% (38/40). There were no statistically significant differences between neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and adjuvant chemotherapy group in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node harvested, length of postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative mortality and morbidity (all P>0.05). Postoperative complications were well managed with conservative treatment. No Clavien-Dindo IV or V complications were observed in both groups. Pathological results showed that the proportion of patients with pathological stage T1 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the adjuvant chemotherapy group [27.5% (11/40) vs. 5.0% (2/40)], while the proportion of patients with pathological stage T3 was significantly lower than that in the adjuvant chemotherapy group [20.0% (8/40) vs. 45.0% (18/40)], with statistically significant difference (χ(2)=15.432, P=0.001). In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, there were 4 cases of tumor regression grade 0, 8 cases of grade 1, 16 cases of grade 2, and 12 cases of grade 3. The pathological complete response rate was 10% (4/40), the overall pathological response rate was 70.0% (28/40). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events between neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and adjuvant chemotherapy group [40% (16/40) vs. 37.5% (15/40), P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in OS (43 months vs. 40 months) and 3-year OS rate (66.1% vs. 59.8%) between neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and adjuvant chemotherapy group (P=0.428). The disease-free survival (DFS) and 3-year DFS rates of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group were significantly superior to those of the adjuvant chemotherapy group (36 months vs. 28 months, 51.4% vs. 35.8%, P=0.048). Conclusion: CapeOX or SOX regimen neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a safe, effective and feasible treatment mode for advanced gastric cancer without increasing surgical risk and can improve the DFS of patients.
Adenocarcinoma/surgery* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Capecitabine/administration & dosage* ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Drug Combinations ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage* ; Oxonic Acid/administration & dosage* ; Radiotherapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery* ; Tegafur/administration & dosage* ; Treatment Outcome

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with S-1 (SOX) as adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 radical gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods: A descriptive case series study was applied. Case inclusion criteria: (1) locally advanced gastric cancer confirmed by endoscopic biopsy or surgical specimen pathology as gastric adenocarcinoma; (2) receiving D2 radical gastric resection followed by SOX regimen adjuvant chemotherapy. Case exclusion criteria: (1) postoperative pathological TNM stage I or IV; (2) acute complications and emergency surgeries; (3) receiving neoadjuvant therapy; (4) concurrent malignancies and complications compromising patients' treatment or survival; (5) without receiving adjuvant SOX chemotherapy. A total of 94 patients with stage II-III gastric cancer who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy and postoperative adjuvant SOX chemotherapy at department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Chemotherapy-related adverse events, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed and log rank test was used to analyze the difference between groups. P<0.2 or clinically significant indicators in univariate analysis were included in Cox regression model for multivariate survival analysis. Results: Among these 94 patients, there were 65 males and 29 females with an average age of (58.2±12.1) years; 33 patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, 11 patients with family history of gastrointestinal tumors; 59 patients with tumors locating in the antrum or pylorus, 16 patients in the gastric body, 19 patients in the gastric fundus or cardia; 29 patients underwent total gastrectomy, 5 patients underwent proximal subtotal gastrectomy, and 60 patients underwent distal subtotal gastrectomy. In this study, 73 patients (77.7%) completed at least 5 cycles of adjuvant SOX regimen chemotherapy. Grade 3-4 adverse reactions included thrombocytopenia (23.4%, 22/94), nausea and vomiting (18.1%, 17/94) and peripheral neurotoxicity (6.4%, 6/94). Eighty-nine patients (94.7%) completed follow-up with a median follow-up time of 32 months. The 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 89.8% and 83.7%, respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year PFS rates were 81.4% and 78.1%, respectively. Taking 5 chemotherapy cycles as the cut-off point, the 3-year OS rate and 3-year PFS rate were 72.2% and 53.9% in the adjuvant chemotherapy < 5 cycles group, and 93.7% and 87.1% in the adjuvant chemotherapy ≥5 cycles group, respectively; the differences were statistically significant (P=0.029, P=0.006). Univariate analysis showed that the adjuvant chemotherapy < 5 cycles group was associated with worse 3-year OS (P=0.029). Multivariate analysis showed that insufficient chemotherapy cycle (HR=9.419, 95% CI: 2.330-38.007, P=0.002) was an independent risk factor for 3-year OS. Meanwhile, univariate analysis showed that the adjuvant chemotherapy <5 cycles (P=0.006), preoperative CEA > 4.70 μg/L (P=0.035) and adjacent organ resection (P=0.024) were associated with worse 3-year PFS. Multivariate analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy <5 cycles (HR=10.493, 95% CI: 2.466-44.655, P=0.001) and adjacent organ resection (HR=127.518, 95% CI: 8.885-1 830.136, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for 3-year PFS. Conclusions: Oxaliplatin combined with S-1 as an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer has high efficacy and low incidence of adverse reactions. At least 5 cycles of SOX regimen adjuvant chemotherapy can significantly improve prognosis of patients with stage II-III gastric cancer.
Adenocarcinoma/surgery* ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Dissection ; Drug Combinations ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes/pathology* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage* ; Oxonic Acid/administration & dosage* ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery* ; Tegafur/administration & dosage* ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of low-dose decitabine on levels of soluble CD44 and GDF11, and hematopoietic function in elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with senile myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) admitted to our hospital from October 2015 to October 2017 were divided into group A, B and C according to their treatment, each with 33 cases.The patients in group A were treated with low-dose decitabine, the patients in group B were treated with usual dose of decitabine, and the patients in group C were treated with low-dose decitabine plus G-GSF, cytarabine, and aclarithromycin. The changes of soluble CD44, GDF11 levels and hematopoietic function (sTfR/E) were compared before and after treatment. The clinical remission rate and adverse reaction rate in 3 groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Before treatment, the levels of CD44, GDF11 and sTfR/E were not significantly different between the 3 groups (P＞0.05). After treatment, the levels of CD44 and GDF11 were significantly decreased in these groups, while the serum levels of sTfR/E were significantly increased, and there was no significant difference between the 3 groups (P＞0.05). After treatment, the total effective rates of A, B, and C 3 group were 82.3%, 81.8%, and 78.8%, respectively, without statistically significant difference (P＞0.05). During the treatment, the incidence of non-hemotoxic adverse reactions in group A was 8.8%, significantly lower than that in group B and C (30.3%, 27.3%) (P＜0.05, P＜0.05), the incidence of hemotoxic adverse reactions in group A was 39.4%, significantly lower than that 63.6% and 66.7% in group B and C (P＜0.05, P＜0.05). CONCLUSION Low-dose decitabine alone is effective in treating elderly patients with MDS as compared with conventional dose and combination therapy, moreover can significantly reduce the levels of CD44 and GDF11, improve hematopoietic function and low the adverse reactions. Thereby the low dose of decitabine may be a new choice for clinical treatment of MDS.
Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Azacitidine ; Bone Morphogenetic Proteins ; Decitabine ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Growth Differentiation Factors ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; Hyaluronan Receptors ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes ; drug therapy ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by poor differentiation, high malignancy and rapid growth fast, short double time, early and extensive metastatic malignancy. In clinical, chemotherapy is the main treatment method, while resistance to multiple chemotherapy drugs in six to nine months has been a major clinical challenge in SCLC treatment. Therefore, It has important clinical value to building SCLC aninimal model which is similar to patients with SCLC. Animal model of xenotransplantation (PDX) from the patients with small cell lung cancer can well retain the characteristics of primary tumor and is an ideal preclinical animal model. The study is aimed to establish SCLC PDX animal model and induce the chemoresistance model to help to study the mechanism of chemoresistance and individual treatment. METHODS: Fresh surgical excision or puncture specimens from SCLC patients were transplanted into B-NSGTM mice subcutaneous tissues with severe immunodeficiency in one hour after operation the B-NSGTM mice subcutaneous in 1 hour, and inject chemotherapy drugs intraperitoneally after its tumor growed to 400 mm³ with EP which is cisplatin 8 mg/kg eight days and etoposide 5 mg/kg every two days until 8 cycles. Measure the tumor volum and mice weights regularly, then re-engrafted the largest tumor and continue chemotherapy. RESULTS: Nine cases were conducted for B-NSG mice modeling. Three of nine cases could be engrafted to new B-NSG mice at least two generation. The SCLC PDX animal models have been established successfully. After adopting chemotherapy drugs, the chemoresistance PDX models have been established. High homogeneity was found between xenograft tumor and patient's tumor in histopathology, immunohistochemical phenotype (Syn, CD56, Ki67). CONCLUSIONS The SCLC PDX animal model and the chemoresistance PDX animal model have been successfully constructed, the success rate is 33%, which provides a platform for the clinical research, seeking for biological markers and choosing individual treatment methods of SCLC.
Animals ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; pharmacology ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; Disease Models, Animal ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Etoposide ; administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Interleukin Receptor Common gamma Subunit ; deficiency ; genetics ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; pathology ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mice, Inbred NOD ; Mice, Knockout ; Mice, SCID ; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; pathology ; Transplantation, Heterologous ; methods ; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, prognosis and safety of decitabine combined with low-dose CAG regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia （AML）. METHODS: The clinical data of 40 elderly patients with relapsed/refractory AML （69-85 years old） admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to August 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. 40 patients were divided into combination therapy group and CAG group according to different treatment methods. 20 patients of the combination therepy group were treated with decitabine combined with low-dose CAG （decitabine, 15 mg/m, d 1; aclarithromycin, 10 mg/m, d 3-6; Cytidine, 10 mg/m, d 1-14; recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor （G-CSF） for injection, 200 μg/（m·d）, d 1-14）. 20 patients of CAG group were treated by the standard CAG protocol （acralmycin 20 mg/m, d 1-4; cytarabine for injection, 15 mg/m, d 1-14; G-CSF 400 μg/（m·d）, d 1-14）. One course of treatment lasted for 2 weeks, after 2 courses of continuous medication, the complete remission rate （CR）, overall remission rate （ORR）, overall survival （OS）, 1-year survival rate, hemoglobin, white blood cells, platelets improvement, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared. RESULTS: In combination therapy group the CR was 55.00% （11/20）, OR was 85.00% （17/20）, but in the CAG group CR was 30.00% （6/20）, and OR was 50.00% （10/20）. Till to February 2018, out of 40 patients 17 survived, 20 died, and 3 failed to be followed-up. The median follow-up time was 12 （2 to 35） months; the median survival time in the comtination therapy group was 13 （2-35） months, and the 1-year OS rate was 70.00%, and the median survival time of the CAG group was 10 （2-31） months, and the 1-year OS rate was 50.00%, without staistical significance between the 2 groups （P>0.05）. After treatment, the WBC and Plt counts in the combination therapy group were higher than those in the CAG group, but the Hb level was lower than that in the CAG group with statistically significant difference （P<0.05）. In the combination therapy group, the incidence of lung infection, nausea and vomiting was higher than that of the CAG group （65.00% vs 25.00%, 50.00% vs 20.00%）, with statistically significant difference （P<0.05）. CONCLUSION Decitabine combined with low-dose CAG regimen is effective for the treatment of relapsed/refractory AML in the elderly. Compared with the standard CAG regimen, the long-term efficacy of this regimen is not different significantly, but its adverse reactions are increase, thus the preventive treatment should be given in time.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Cytarabine ; administration & dosage ; Decitabine ; administration & dosage ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ; drug therapy ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the evaluation value of preoperative peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) on the prognosis of patients with stage III colon cancer undergoing radical resection and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Electronic medical record were retrospectively retrived for stage III colon cancer patients who underwent radical surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from December 2007 to December 2013. Inclusion criteria were pathologically comfirmed colon adenocarcinoma, complete clinicopathological data, and postoperative XELOX (oxaliplatin + capecitabine) chemotherapy with follow-up of at least 3 months. Patients with neoadjuvant anti-tumor therapy, infectious disease, other malignant tumors and death of non-tumor causes within 3 months after operation were excluded. A total of 258 patients were included in this retrospective cohort study, including 146 males and 112 females with median age of 55 (22 to 85) years. Tumors of 100(38.8%) patients were located in the right hemicolon, and of 158 (61.2%) in the left hemicolon. Tumors of 194(75.2%) patients were highly and moderately differentiated, and of 64 (24.8%) were poorly differentiated. According to the TNM tumor pathological stage of AJCC 7th edition, 196 (76.0%) patients were stage IIIA to IIIB, and 62(24.0%) patients were stage IIIC. The median preoperative CEA was 3.8 (0.3 to 287.5) μg /L and the median cycle of the adjuvant chemotherapy was 6 (1 to 8). The cut-off value of preoperative LMR in prediction of 3-year overall survival (OS) outcome was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. All patients were divided into low LMR group and high LMR group according to the critical value. Clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups were compared by using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rate were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between two groups were assessed with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed through Cox regression model. RESULTS: ROC curve showed that the cut-off value of preoperative LMR in predicting 3-year overall survival was 4.29. Then 143 patients were divided into low LMR group (LMR<4.29) and 115 patients into high LMR group (LMR ≥ 4.29). Compared with high LMR group, the low LMR group presented higher proportions of male [62.2%(89/143) vs. 50.4%(58/115), χ²=4.167, P=0.041], right hemicolon cancer [44.8% (64/143) vs. 31.3% (36/115), χ²=4.858, P=0.028], and the largest tumor diameter>4 cm [60.1% (86/143) vs. 33.0% (38/115), χ²=18.748, P<0.001]. During a median follow-up of 46.0 (range, 3.0 to 74.0) months, 3-year disease-free survival rate was 83.8% in high LMR group and 78.9% in low LMR group, which was not significantly different (P=0.210). While 3-year overall survival rate in low LMR group was significant lower than that in high LMR group (86.6% vs. 97.2%, P=0.018). Univariate analysis revealed that preoperative low LMR (HR=2.841, 95%CI: 1.146 to 7.043, P=0.024), right hemicolon cancer (HR=2.865, 95%CI: 1.312 to 6.258, P=0.008) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy≥6 cycles (HR=0.420, 95%CI: 0.188 to 0.935, P=0.034) were the risk factors for poor overall survival. Multivariate analysis identified that preoperative low LMR (HR=2.550, 95%CI: 1.024 to 6.347, P=0.004) and right hemicolon cancer (HR=2.611, 95%CI: 1.191 to 5.723, P=0.017) were the independent risk factors for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative peripheral blood LMR level represents an effective prognostic predictor for patients with stage III colon cancer receiving radical therapy. Low LMR indicates the poor prognosis and such patients require aggressive postoperative treatment strategy.
Adenocarcinoma ; blood ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; administration & dosage ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Colonic Neoplasms ; blood ; drug therapy ; surgery ; therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Leukocyte Count ; methods ; Lymphocytes ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monocytes ; Preoperative Care ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the complications and clinical outcome of children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing mitoxantrone-cytarabine-etoposide (MAE) induction therapy. METHODS: A total of 170 children with AML were given MAE induction therapy, and the complications and remission rate were analyzed after treatment. RESULTS: The male/female ratio was 1.33:1 and the mean age was 7.4 years (range 1-15 years). Leukocyte count at diagnosis was 29.52×10/L [range (0.77-351)×10/L]. Of all children, 2 had M0-AML, 24 had M2-AML, 2 had M4-AML, 48 had M5-AML, 3 had M6-AML, 7 had M7-AML, 69 had AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22), and 15 had AML with inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22). The most common complication was infection (158/170, 92.9%). Among these 158 patients, 22 (13.9%) had agranulocytosis with pyrexia (with no definite focus of infection), and 136 (86.1%) had definite focus of infection (including bloodstream infection). Other complications included non-infectious diarrhea, bleeding, and drug-induced hepatitis. Treatment-related mortality was observed in 10 children, among whom 8 had severe infection, 1 had multiple organ failure, and 1 had respiratory failure. Remission rate was evaluated for 156 children and the results showed a complete remission rate of 85.3%, a partial remission rate of 4.5%, and a non-remission rate of 10.3%. CONCLUSIONS Induction therapy with the MAE regimen helps to achieve a good remission rate in children with AML after one course of treatment. Infection is the main complication and a major cause of treatment-related mortality.
Adolescent ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cytarabine ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Etoposide ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ; drug therapy ; Male ; Mitoxantrone ; Remission Induction

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of dose-modified regimen of 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin and irinotecan (mFOLFOXIRI) for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODSData of 312 CRC patients confirmed by pathology receiving triplet drug alone or combined with target therapy between October 2012 and December 2016 at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively analyzed. CRC patients who had previously completed adjuvant therapy (or neoadjuvant therapy) within 6 months or palliative chemotherapy were excluded, meanwhile those with poor general condition (ECOG score > 2) or grade 2 neuropathy and allergy to oxaliplatin were excluded as well. Regimen of mFOLFOXIRI: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² dissolved in 5% glucose solution 500 ml by intravenous infusion for 2 h; irinotecan 150 to 165 mg/m² dissolved in 0.9% sodium chloride 250 ml by intravenous infusion for 90 min; following intravenous infusion of leucovorin 400 mg/m² for 2 h, day 1; 5-FU 2800 mg/m², 48-h continuous intravenous infusion; once every 2 weeks. Therapy could be combined with a targeted drug, bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every two weeks; cetuximab 500 mg/m² every two weeks. Side effect was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE 4.0.3). The objective response rate was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) after administering at least four cycles of chemotherapy.

RESULTSThe median age was 52 years (range 16-73) in the whole group; 113 patients (36.2%) had locally advanced CRC, and 199 (63.8%) had metastatic CRC. Most patients (274/312, 87.8%) did not receive any treatment earlier. There were a total of 1651 chemotherapy cycles in the whole group, with a median of 6(1-19) cycles. Of these 1651 cycles, 124 cycles of chemotherapy(7.5%) were dose-adjusted; 176 cycles of chemotherapy(10.7%) were delayed for median 5(3-13) days; 124 cycles(7.5%) required dose decrease. The overall relative dose intensity was >90%; the specific drug dose intensity was 93.6%(2620 mg×m⁻²×d⁻¹) for fluorouracil, 97.8%(83 mg×m⁻²×d⁻¹) for oxaliplatin, and 94.2%(155 mg×m⁻²×d⁻¹) for irinotecan. Twenty-three patients (7 of intestinal perforation, 7 of intestinal obstruction, 1 of grade 4 hematologic toxicity, and 8 of grade 3 fatigue) refused subsequent chemotherapy due to intolerable toxicity. Main grade 3 or 4 adverse events in patients were neutropenia in 69 cases (22.1%), fatigue in 35 cases (11.2%), and anemia in 28 cases (8.9%). Twenty serious adverse events (6.4%) occurred, including 13 patients of febrile neutropenia (4.2%), 7 patients of intestinal perforation (2.2%, 4 patients in upper rectum, 2 in sigmoid colon, and 1 in transverse colon cancer), and 9 of them had subsequent sepsis (2.9%). All the patients with intestinal perforation underwent emergency operation. No treatment-related deaths occurred. In 199 patients with metastatic CRC, because 22 patients did not receive image evaluation, the preliminary efficacy of 177 patients was actually evaluated. A total of 113 objective response events were observed. The overall response rate was 63.8%(113/177), partial response rate was 61.6%(109/177), clinically complete response rate was 2.3%(4/177), stable disease was 29.9% (53/177), progressive disease was 6.2%(11/177), and the disease control rate was 93.8%(166/177). In 127 patients receiving triplet drug, objective response rate was 40.9% for those with less than four cycles and 81.1% for those with more than four cycles (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONThe mFOLFOXIRI regimen with reduced dose can be safely used in advanced CRC and has achieved promising results in terms of short-term efficacy.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Camptothecin ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Fluorouracil ; administration & dosage ; Humans ; Leucovorin ; administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; administration & dosage ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult