Since exploding rates of modern mental diseases, application of antidepressants has increased. Worryingly, the antidepressant-induced liver injury has gradually become a serious health burden. Furthermore, since most of the knowledge about antidepressant hepatotoxicity are from pharmacovigilance and clinical case reports and lack of observational studies, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood and there is a lack of efficient treatment strategies. In this study, antidepressant paroxetine directly triggered inflammasome activation evidenced by caspase-1 activation and downstream effector cytokines interleukin(IL)-1β secretion. The pretreatment of echinatin, a bioactive component of licorice, completely blocked the activation. This study also found that echinatin effectively inhibited the production of inflammasome-independent tumor necrosis factor α(TNF)-α induced by paroxetine. Mechanistically, the accumulation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species(mtROS) was a key upstream event of paroxetine-induced inflammasome activation, which was dramatically inhibited by echinatin. In the lipopolysaccharide(LPS)-mediated idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury(IDILI) model, the combination of LPS and paroxetine triggered aberrant activation of the inflammasome to induce idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity, which was reversed by echinatin pretreatment. Notably, this study also found that various bioactive components of licorice had an inhibitory effect on paroxetine-triggered inflammasome activation. Meanwhile, multiple antidepressant-induced aberrant activation of the inflammasome could be completely blocked by echinatin pretreatment. In conclusion, this study provides a novel insight for mechanism of antidepressant-induced liver injury and a new strategy for the treatment of antidepressant-induced hepatotoxicity.
Animals ; Humans ; Mice ; Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects* ; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury, Chronic/prevention & control* ; Glycyrrhiza/chemistry* ; Inflammasomes/drug effects* ; Interleukin-1beta/metabolism* ; Lipopolysaccharides/toxicity* ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein ; Paroxetine/adverse effects* ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha ; Chalcones/therapeutic use*

BACKGROUND: Some depressed patients receive acupuncture as an adjunct to their conventional medications. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to provide evidence on whether acupuncture can enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of antidepressants for treating depression, and explore whether acupuncture can reduce the adverse reactions associated with antidepressants. SEARCH STRATEGY: English and Chinese databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until December 1, 2021. INCLUSION CRITERIA: RCTs with a modified Jadad scale score ≥ 4 were included if they compared a group of participants with depression that received acupuncture combined with antidepressants with a control group that received antidepressants alone. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Meta-analysis was performed, and statistical heterogeneity was assessed based on Cochran's Q statistic and its related P-value. Primary outcomes were the reduction in the severity of depression and adverse reactions associated with antidepressants, while secondary outcomes included remission rate, treatment response, social functioning, and change in antidepressant dose. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to evaluate the overall quality of evidence in the included studies. RESULTS: This review included 16 studies (with a total of 1958 participants). Most studies were at high risk of performance bias and at low or unclear risk of selection bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other bias. Analysis of the 16 RCTs showed that, compared with antidepressants alone, acupuncture along with antidepressants reduced the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAMD-17) scores (standard mean difference [SMD] -0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.55 to -0.33, P < 0.01; I² = 14%), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.23, P < 0.01; I² = 79%), and the Side Effect Rating Scale (SERS) scores (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.56 to -0.66, P < 0.01; I² = 89%). Compared with antidepressants alone, acupuncture along with antidepressants improved World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF scores (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.44, P < 0.01; I² = 15%), decreased the number of participants who increased their antidepressant dosages (relative risk [RR] 0.32, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.48, P < 0.01; I² = 0%), and resulted in significantly higher remission rates (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.83, P < 0.01; I² = 0%) and treatment responses (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.47, P < 0.01; I² = 19%) in terms of HAMD-17 scores. The HAMD-17, SDS and SERS scores were assessed as low quality by GRADE and the other indices as being of moderate quality. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture as an adjunct to antidepressants may enhance the therapeutic effectiveness and reduce the adverse drug reactions in patients receiving antidepressants. These findings must be interpreted with caution, as the evidence was of low or moderate quality and there was a lack of comparative data with a placebo control. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION INPLASY202150008.
Acupuncture Therapy/methods* ; Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects* ; Depression/drug therapy* ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/drug therapy* ; Humans

Depression has a high incidence in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and shows adverse effects on their life quality and prognosis. With the advent of new antidepressant drugs, oral antidepressant drugs are increasingly used in CVD patients with depression, and their efficacy and safety have attracted attention. Commonly used antidepressant drugs have many adverse reactions. When applying antidepressant drugs in CVD patients, we should pay special attention to their cardiovascular adverse reactions and their interaction drugs with commonly used CVD drugs. Clinicians should comprehensively evaluate and select appropriate antidepressant drugs for patients.
Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects* ; Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced* ; Cardiovascular System ; Humans ; Incidence ; Patients

Going back to basics prior to mentioning the use of antipsychotics in patients with pain, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) definition of pain can be summarized as an unpleasant experience, composed of sensory experience caused by actual tissue damage and/or emotional experience caused by potential tissue damage. Less used than antidepressants, antipsychotics have also been used for treating this unpleasant experience as adjuvant analgesics without sufficient evidence from research. Because recently developed atypical antipsychotics reduce the adverse reactions of extrapyramidal symptoms, such as acute dystonia, pseudo-parkinsonism, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia caused by typical antipsychotics, they are expected to be used more frequently in various painful conditions, while increasing the risk of metabolic syndromes (weight gain, diabetes, and dyslipidemia). Various antipsychotics have different neurotransmitter receptor affinities for dopamine (D), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), adrenergic (α), histamine (H), and muscarinic (M) receptors. Atypical antipsychotics antagonize transient, weak D₂ receptor bindings with strong binding to the 5-HT(2A) receptor, while typical antipsychotics block long-lasting, tight D₂ receptor binding. On the contrary, antidepressants in the field of pain management also block the reuptake of similar receptors, mainly on the 5-HT and, next, on the norepinephrine, but rarely on the D receptors. Antipsychotics have been used for treating positive symptoms, such as delusion, hallucination, disorganized thought and behavior, perception disturbance, and inappropriate emotion, rather than the negative, cognitive, and affective symptoms of psychosis. Therefore, an antipsychotic may be prescribed in pain patients with positive symptoms of psychosis during or after controlling all sensory components.
Affective Symptoms ; Analgesics ; Antidepressive Agents ; Antipsychotic Agents ; Delusions ; Dopamine ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Dystonia ; Hallucinations ; Histamine ; Humans ; Movement Disorders ; Norepinephrine ; Pain Management ; Prolactin ; Psychomotor Agitation ; Psychotic Disorders ; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A ; Receptors, Neurotransmitter ; Serotonin ; Weight Gain

Acute Disease ; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation ; adverse effects ; Glaucoma, Angle-Closure ; chemically induced ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride ; adverse effects

Randomized trials have shown that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have better safety profiles than classical tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). However, an increasing number of studies, including meta-analyses, naturalistic studies, and longer-term studies suggested that SSRIs and SNRIs are no less safe than TCAs. We focused on comparing the common side effects of TCAs with those of newer generation antidepressants including SSRIs, SNRIs, mirtazapine, and bupropion. The main purpose was to investigate safety profile differences among drug classes rather than the individual antidepressants, so studies containing comparison data on drug groups were prioritized. In terms of safety after overdose, the common belief on newer generation antidepressants having fewer side effects than TCAs appears to be true. TCAs were also associated with higher drop-out rates, lower tolerability, and higher cardiac side-effects. However, evidence regarding side effects including dry mouth, gastrointestinal side effects, hepatotoxicity, seizure, and weight has been inconsistent, some studies demonstrated the superiority of SSRIs and SNRIs over TCAs, while others found the opposite. Some other side effects such as sexual dysfunction, bleeding, and hyponatremia were more prominent with either SSRIs or SNRIs.
Antidepressive Agents* ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Bupropion ; Depressive Disorder ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Hemorrhage ; Hyponatremia ; Mouth ; Seizures ; Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors ; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors

OBJECTIVESThis systemic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) complicated with depression.

METHODSAll databases were retrieved till September 30, 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CHMs with placebo or conventional Western medicine were retrieved. Data extraction, analyses and quality assessment were performed according to the Cochrane standards. RevMan 5.3 was used to synthesize the results.

RESULTSThirteen RCTs enrolling 1,095 patients were included. Subgroup analysis was used to assess data. In reducing the degree of depression, CHMs showed no statistic difference in the 4th week [mean difference (MD)=-1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI)-2.38 to 0.26; n=501; I(2)=73%], but it was associated with a statistically significant difference in the 8th week (MD=-1.00; 95% CI-1.64 to-0.36; n=436; I(2)=48%). Meanwhile, the combination therapy (CHMs together with antidepressants) showed significant statistic differences both in the 4th week (MD=-1.99; 95% CI-3.80 to-0.18; n=90) and in the 8th week (MD=-5.61; 95% CI-6.26 to-4.97; n=242; I(2)=87%). In CHD-related clinical evaluation, 3 trials reported the intervention group was superior to the control group. Four trials showed adverse events in the intervention group was less than that in the control group.

CONCLUSIONSCHMs showed potentially benefits on patients with CHD complicated with depression. Moreover, the effect of CHMs may be similar to or better than antidepressant in certain fields but with less side effects. However, because of small sample size and potential bias of most trials, this result should be interpreted with caution. More rigorous trials with larger sample size and higher quality are warranted to give high quality of evidence to support the use of CHMs for CHD complicated with depression.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antidepressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Case-Control Studies ; Coronary Disease ; complications ; drug therapy ; Depression ; complications ; drug therapy ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Publication Bias ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Risk

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain, including paresthesia/dysesthesia in the lower extremities, always develops and remains for at least one month, to variable degrees, after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). The recently discovered dual analgesic mechanisms of action, similar to those of antidepressants and anticonvulsants, enable nefopam (NFP) to treat neuropathic pain. This study was performed to determine whether NFP might reduce the neuropathic pain component of postoperative pain. METHODS: Eighty patients, who underwent PELD due to herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) at L4-L5, were randomly divided into two equal groups, one receiving NFP (with a mixture of morphine and ketorolac) and the other normal saline (NS) with the same mixture. The number of bolus infusions and the infused volume for 3 days were compared in both groups. The adverse reactions (ADRs) in both groups were recorded and compared. The neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) score was compared in both groups on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 30, 60, and 90. RESULTS: The mean attempted number of bolus infusions, and effective infused bolus volume for 3 days was lower in the NFP group for 3 days. The most commonly reported ADRs were nausea, dizziness, and somnolence, in order of frequency in the NFP group. The median NPSI score, and all 5 median sub-scores in the NFP group, were significantly lower than that of the NS group until postoperative day 30. CONCLUSIONS: NFP significantly reduced the neuropathic pain component, including paresthesia/dysesthesia until 1 month after PELD. The common ADRs were nausea, dizziness, somnolence, and ataxia.
Anticonvulsants ; Antidepressive Agents ; Ataxia ; Diskectomy* ; Diskectomy, Percutaneous ; Dizziness ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; Lower Extremity ; Morphine ; Nausea ; Nefopam* ; Neuralgia ; Pain, Postoperative ; Paresthesia* ; Symptom Assessment

Antidepressive Agents ; adverse effects ; toxicity ; Humans ; Lithium ; adverse effects ; toxicity ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Purpura ; chemically induced ; etiology

Nefopam (NFP) is a non-opioid, non-steroidal, centrally acting analgesic drug that is derivative of the non-sedative benzoxazocine, developed and known in 1960s as fenazocine. Although the mechanisms of analgesic action of NFP are not well understood, they are similar to those of triple neurotransmitter (serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine) reuptake inhibitors and anticonvulsants. It has been used mainly as an analgesic drug for nociceptive pain, as well as a treatment for the prevention of postoperative shivering and hiccups. Based on NFP's mechanisms of analgesic action, it is more suitable for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Intravenous administration of NFP should be given in single doses of 20 mg slowly over 15-20 min or with continuous infusion of 60-120 mg/d to minimize adverse effects, such as nausea, cold sweating, dizziness, tachycardia, or drowsiness. The usual dose of oral administration is three to six times per day totaling 90-180 mg. The ceiling effect of its analgesia is uncertain depending on the mechanism of pain relief. In conclusion, the recently discovered dual analgesic mechanisms of action, namely, a) descending pain modulation by triple neurotransmitter reuptake inhibition similar to antidepressants, and b) inhibition of long-term potentiation mediated by NMDA from the inhibition of calcium influx like gabapentinoid anticonvulsants or blockade of voltage-sensitive sodium channels like carbamazepine, enable NFP to be used as a therapeutic agent to treat neuropathic pain.
Administration, Intravenous ; Administration, Oral ; Analgesia ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic ; Anticonvulsants ; Antidepressive Agents ; Calcium ; Carbamazepine ; Dizziness ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Hiccup ; Long-Term Potentiation ; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action ; N-Methylaspartate ; Nausea ; Nefopam* ; Neuralgia* ; Neurotransmitter Agents ; Nociceptive Pain ; Norepinephrine ; Shivering ; Sleep Stages ; Sodium Channels ; Sweat ; Sweating ; Tachycardia