Dyspepsia is a common problem, and when dyspeptic symptoms develop within a short period of time, organic diseases such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer diseases, pancreatoduodenal diseases, and gastrointestinal cancers should be suspected. Furthermore, functional dyspepsia (FD) should be considered if chronic or recurrent symptoms persist after eliminating underlying disease. FD is classified as epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) or postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), but these two conditions may overlap. Patients with the EPS subtype can be treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), whereas patients with the PDS subtype may be managed primarily with prokinetics, and patients with EPS and PDS can be co-administered PPIs and prokinetics. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy can be administered on a test-and-treat basis when PPIs and prokinetics are ineffective or to younger patients with chronic dyspepsia, and tricyclic antidepressants can be used as a secondary treatment because they are effective in patients with the EPS subtype. In addition, because the pathophysiology of FD is diverse, dietary education and stress management are required in addition to medical therapy, and should substantially aid treatment and long-term management. Here, we introduce and summarize recently published guidelines for the treatment of FD.
Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Dyspepsia ; Education ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; Peptic Ulcer ; Proton Pump Inhibitors

BACKGROUND: The pain-relief properties of tricyclic antidepressants can be attributed to several actions. Recent observations suggest that adenosine is involved in the antinociceptive effect of amitriptyline. The A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) is the only adenosine subtype overexpressed in inflammatory and cancer cells. This study was performed to investigate the role of A3AR in the anti-nociceptive effect of amitriptyline. METHODS: Spinal nerve-ligated neuropathic pain was induced by ligating the L5 and L6 spinal nerves of male Sprague-Dawley rats. The neuropathic rats were randomly assigned to one of the following three groups (8 per group): a neuropathic pain with normal saline group, a neuropathic pain with amitriptyline group, and a neuropathic pain with amitriptyline and 3-ethyl-5-benzyl- 2-methyl-4-phenylethynyl-6-phenyl-1,4-(±)-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate (MRS) group. Amitriptyline or saline was administered intraperitoneally and 3-ethyl-5-benzyl-2-methyl-4-phenylethynyl-6-phenyl-1,4-(±)-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate (MRS-1191), an A3AR antagonist, was injected subcutaneously immediately before amitriptyline administration. The level of extracellular signal-regulated kinase P44/42 (ERK1/2), cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB), and proinflammatory cytokines were assessed using immunoblotting or reverse-transciption polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Amitriptyline increased the mechanical withdrawal threshold of the neuropathic rats. The level of phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-CREB proteins, and proinflammatory cytokines produced by spinal nerve ligation were significantly reduced by amitriptyline administration. However, the use of MRS-1191 before amitriptyline administration not only reduced the threshold of mechanical allodynia, but also increased the signaling protein and proinflammatory cytokine levels, which were reduced by amitriptyline. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the anti-nociceptive effect of amitriptyline involves the suppression of ERK1/2 and CREB signaling proteins, and A3AR activation also affects the alleviation of the inflammatory response.
Adenosine ; Amitriptyline ; Animals ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein ; Cytokines ; Humans ; Hyperalgesia ; Immunoblotting ; Ligation ; Male ; Neuralgia ; Phosphotransferases ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Receptors, Purinergic P1 ; Spinal Nerves

BACKGROUND: It is well known that patients with neurological disorders are vulnerable to depression. However, in Korea, National Health Insurance services had banned non-psychiatrists from prescribing antidepressants for more than 2 months until January 2017. Now, neurologists are able to prescribe antidepressants to patients with only four neurological disorders. Due to this recent change in national health insurance policy, there will be a large change in the prescription pattern of antidepressants. In this study, we performed an analysis of antidepressant prescription patterns in Korea prior to this recent policy change. METHODS: The source population of this retrospective cohort study is the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database. We analyzed the claim database for patients who have one of four major neurologic disorders and had healthcare documentation submitted by healthcare providers between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2016. RESULTS: During 2012–2016, antidepressant prescription rates of 6.21% (127,192 of a total 2,048,165 patients), 9.93% (81,861 out of 824,290), 10.12% (173,582 of 1,714,776), and 13.36% (48,530 of 363,347) were found for cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, dementia, and Parkinson's disease respectively. The most frequently prescribed antidepressant in cerebrovascular disease and epilepsy was tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). In Parkinson's disease and dementia, the most frequently used antidepressant was selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prescription rate of antidepressants was much lower than the estimated rates reported in other countries. TCAs were the primarily prescribed antidepressant. It is now expected that TCAs will be replaced by newer antidepressants.
Antidepressive Agents ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Cerebrovascular Disorders ; Cohort Studies ; Delivery of Health Care ; Dementia ; Depression ; Epilepsy ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Korea ; National Health Programs ; Nervous System Diseases ; Parkinson Disease ; Prescriptions ; Retrospective Studies ; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors

Antidepressant drugs can be advantageous in treating psychiatric and non-psychiatric illnesses, including spinal disorders. However, spine surgeons remain unfamiliar with the advantages and disadvantages of the use of antidepressant drugs as a part of the medical management of diseases of the spine. Our review article describes a systematic method using the PubMed/Medline database with a specific set of keywords to identify such benefits and drawbacks based on 17 original relevant articles published between January 2000 and February 2018; this provides the community of spine surgeons with available cumulative evidence contained within two tables illustrating both observational (10 studies; three cross-sectional, three case-control, and four cohort studies) and interventional (seven randomized clinical trials) studies. While tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline) and duloxetine can be effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain caused by root compression, venlafaxine may be more appropriate for patients with spinal cord injury presenting with depression and/or nociceptive pain. Despite the potential associated consequences of a prolonged hospital stay, higher cost, and controversial reports regarding the lowering of bone mineral density in the elderly, antidepressants may improve patient satisfaction and quality of life following surgery, and reduce postoperative pain and risk of delirium. The preoperative treatment of preexisting psychiatric diseases, such as anxiety and depression, can improve outcomes for patients with spinal cord injury-related disabilities; however, a preoperative platelet function assay is advocated prior to major spine surgical procedures to protect against significant intraoperative blood loss, as serotonergic antidepressants (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and bupropion can increase the likelihood of bleeding intraoperatively due to drug-induced platelet dysfunction. This comprehensive review of this evolving topic can assist spine surgeons in better understanding the benefits and risks of antidepressant drugs to optimize outcomes and avoid potential hazards in a spine surgical setting.
Aged ; Antidepressive Agents ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Anxiety ; Blood Platelets ; Bone Density ; Bupropion ; Case-Control Studies ; Cohort Studies ; Delirium ; Depression ; Duloxetine Hydrochloride ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Methods ; Neuralgia ; Nociceptive Pain ; Pain, Postoperative ; Patient Satisfaction ; Quality of Life ; Risk Assessment ; Serotonin ; Spinal Cord ; Spinal Cord Injuries ; Spine ; Surgeons ; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride

Randomized trials have shown that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have better safety profiles than classical tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). However, an increasing number of studies, including meta-analyses, naturalistic studies, and longer-term studies suggested that SSRIs and SNRIs are no less safe than TCAs. We focused on comparing the common side effects of TCAs with those of newer generation antidepressants including SSRIs, SNRIs, mirtazapine, and bupropion. The main purpose was to investigate safety profile differences among drug classes rather than the individual antidepressants, so studies containing comparison data on drug groups were prioritized. In terms of safety after overdose, the common belief on newer generation antidepressants having fewer side effects than TCAs appears to be true. TCAs were also associated with higher drop-out rates, lower tolerability, and higher cardiac side-effects. However, evidence regarding side effects including dry mouth, gastrointestinal side effects, hepatotoxicity, seizure, and weight has been inconsistent, some studies demonstrated the superiority of SSRIs and SNRIs over TCAs, while others found the opposite. Some other side effects such as sexual dysfunction, bleeding, and hyponatremia were more prominent with either SSRIs or SNRIs.
Antidepressive Agents* ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Bupropion ; Depressive Disorder ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Hemorrhage ; Hyponatremia ; Mouth ; Seizures ; Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors ; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors

Herpes zoster (HZ) is the result of reactivation and multiplication of latent varicella zoster virus that persisted in latent form within the sensory ganglia following an earlier attack of varicella. It occurs most frequently in older adults and immunosuppressed individuals. Classically, the rash presents as painful, erythematous, maculopapular, and vesicular lesions that typically involve single dermatome, and usually do not cross the midline. The diagnosis is mainly made clinically, except in patients with atypical manifestations in which laboratory virologic testing is required. HZ has been associated with several complications, of which postherpetic neuralgia is the most common and debilitating. The treatment of HZ includes the use of antiviral agents, analgesics for control of acute zoster pain, good skin care for healing, and prevention of secondary bacterial infection. Antiviral agents should be started within 72 hours of onset to reduce the severity of the infection, the duration of the eruptive phase, and the intensity of acute pain. The options for treating postherpetic neuralgia include lidocaine patch, high dose capsaicin patch, gabapentin, pregabalin, opioids, and tricyclic antidepressants. A live attenuated zoster vaccine reduces the incidence of by one-half and the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia by two-thirds. We herein review the recent data on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of HZ including HZ vaccine.
Acute Pain ; Adult ; Analgesics ; Analgesics, Opioid ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Antiviral Agents ; Bacterial Infections ; Capsaicin ; Chickenpox ; Diagnosis ; Epidemiology ; Exanthema ; Ganglia, Sensory ; Herpes Zoster Vaccine ; Herpes Zoster ; Herpesvirus 3, Human ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lidocaine ; Neuralgia, Postherpetic ; Pregabalin ; Skin Care

The fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) could be approached by various treatments modalities including education, aerobic exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, pregabalin, and so on. If other treatments fail, opioids including morphine should be considered. In this case report, we describe the case of a 44-year-old woman who was diagnosed with FMS three years ago, and suffered from severe intractable pain, side effects from other drugs, and opioid tolerance. Administration of morphine via an implantable drug delivery system resulted in significant improvement in the patient's pain intensity, fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score, and sleep disturbance. Our case demonstrates that an implantable drug delivery system with morphine can be a potential treatment option for refractory fibromyalgia patients.
Adult ; Analgesics, Opioid ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Cognitive Therapy ; Drug Delivery Systems* ; Education ; Exercise ; Female ; Fibromyalgia* ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Morphine* ; Norepinephrine ; Pain, Intractable ; Pregabalin ; Serotonin

Irritable bowel syndrome is a group of symptoms that includes abdominal pain and changes in the form and frequency of stool. Since its symptoms are usually long-lasting, the disease significantly degrades quality of life. Several pharmacological therapies have been suggested according to the type of symptoms (e.g., abdominal pain, constipation, or diarrhea). In order to control abdominal pain, smooth muscle antispasmodics, antidepressants including tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or 5-HT3 antagonists can be used. To improve constipation, dietary fiber or laxatives, 5-HT4 agonists, and chloride channel activators are available. Opioid agonists, mixed opioid agonists/antagonists such as eluxadoline, and bile salt sequestrants can be considered for diarrhea. In addition, probiotics and non-absorbable oral antibiotics can be used for the normalization of the gut microbiome and the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, respectively. It is necessary to understand the characteristics of each drug and their combinations, because any single regimen cannot improve all symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. In this review, the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and adverse events associated with drugs used for irritable bowel syndrome are summarized.
Abdominal Pain ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Antidepressive Agents ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Bile ; Chloride Channel Agonists ; Constipation ; Diarrhea ; Dietary Fiber ; Drug Therapy* ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; Humans ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome* ; Laxatives ; Muscle, Smooth ; Parasympatholytics ; Probiotics ; Quality of Life ; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists ; Serotonin 5-HT4 Receptor Agonists ; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors

Irritable bowel syndrome is a group of symptoms that includes abdominal pain and changes in the form and frequency of stool. Since its symptoms are usually long-lasting, the disease significantly degrades quality of life. Several pharmacological therapies have been suggested according to the type of symptoms (e.g., abdominal pain, constipation, or diarrhea). In order to control abdominal pain, smooth muscle antispasmodics, antidepressants including tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or 5-HT3 antagonists can be used. To improve constipation, dietary fiber or laxatives, 5-HT4 agonists, and chloride channel activators are available. Opioid agonists, mixed opioid agonists/antagonists such as eluxadoline, and bile salt sequestrants can be considered for diarrhea. In addition, probiotics and non-absorbable oral antibiotics can be used for the normalization of the gut microbiome and the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, respectively. It is necessary to understand the characteristics of each drug and their combinations, because any single regimen cannot improve all symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. In this review, the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and adverse events associated with drugs used for irritable bowel syndrome are summarized.
Abdominal Pain ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Antidepressive Agents ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Bile ; Chloride Channel Agonists ; Constipation ; Diarrhea ; Dietary Fiber ; Drug Therapy* ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; Humans ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome* ; Laxatives ; Muscle, Smooth ; Parasympatholytics ; Probiotics ; Quality of Life ; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists ; Serotonin 5-HT4 Receptor Agonists ; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors

The demand for rapid and broad clinical toxicology screens is on the rise. Recently, a new rapid toxicology screening test, the Triage TOX Drug Screen (Alere Inc., USA), which can simultaneously detect 11 drugs of abuse and therapeutic drugs with an instrument-read cartridge, was developed. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of this new on-site immunoassay using 105 urine specimens; the results were compared with those obtained by using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-TMS). Precision was evaluated according to the CLSI EP12-A2 for analyte concentrations near the cutoff, including C₅₀ and±30% of C₅₀, for each drug using standard materials. The C₅₀ specimens yielded 35–65% positive results and the ±30% concentration range of all evaluated drugs encompassed the C₅–C₉₅ interval. The overall percent agreement of the Triage TOX Drug Screen was 92.4–100% compared with UPLC-TMS; however, the Triage TOX Drug Screen results showed some discordant cases including acetaminophen, amphetamine, benzodiazepine, opiates, and tricyclic antidepressants. The overall performance of the Triage TOX Drug Screen assay was comparable to that of UPLC-TMS for screening of drug intoxication in hospitals. This assay could constitute a useful screening method for drugs of abuse and therapeutic drugs in urine.
Acetaminophen ; Amphetamine ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Benzodiazepines ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Immunoassay ; Mass Screening ; Methods ; Street Drugs* ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry ; Toxicology ; Triage*