PURPOSE: To assess the rates of infectious complications before and after the change of prophylactic antibiotic regimens in prostate needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 5,577 patients who underwent prostate needle biopsy at Asan Medical Center between August 2005 and July 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Group 1 (n=1,743) included patients treated between 2005 and 2009 with fluoroquinolone for 3 days, group 2 (n=2,723) included those treated between 2009 and 2012 with ceftriaxone once before the biopsy and fluoroquinolone before biopsy and continue therapy for 3 days, and group 3 (n=1,111) received the same treatment for more than 7 days after the biopsy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models addressed risk factors associated with infectious complication after prostate needle biopsy. RESULTS: Infectious complication after prostate needle biopsy developed in 18 (group 1), seven (group 2), and two patients (group 3) (p=0.001). In group 1, seven patients with infectious complication had positive blood cultures and harbored fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli, four had ceftriaxone susceptible isolates, and three had extended spectrum beta-lactamase-positive E. coli. Two patients in group 1 required intensive care because of septic shock. In multivariable analysis, the patients with combination of fluoroquinolone and ceftriaxone had significantly lower infectious complication rate than the fluoroquinolon alone (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis with ceftriaxone and fluoroquinolone before prostate needle biopsy decreased the risk of potentially serious infectious complications.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis/*methods ; Biopsy, Needle/adverse effects/methods ; Ceftriaxone/*therapeutic use ; Cross Infection/epidemiology/etiology/*prevention & control ; Drug Evaluation/methods ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Escherichia coli/drug effects ; Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology/prevention & control ; Fluoroquinolones/*therapeutic use ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostatic Neoplasms/*pathology ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Young Adult

Infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) appear to be increasing, which reflects the high prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae. Identifying patients at high risk for antibiotic resistance with history taking is an important initial step. Targeted prophylaxis with a prebiopsy rectal swab culture or augmented antibiotic prophylaxis can be considered for patients at high risk of antibiotic resistance. If infectious complications are suspected, the presence of urosepsis should be evaluated and adequate antibiotic treatment should be started immediately.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Biopsy/*adverse effects ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy/*prevention & control ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate/*pathology ; *Ultrasound, High-Intensity Focused, Transrectal ; Urinary Tract Infections/*drug therapy/microbiology

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is an essential procedure for diagnosing prostate cancer. The American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline recommends fluoroquinolone alone for 1 day during TRUS-Bx. However, this recommendation may not be appropriate in regions where the prevalence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli is high. We investigated the real practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for TRUS-Bx in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 77 hospitals performing TRUS-Bx were identified and an e-mail was sent to the Urology Department of those hospitals. The questions in the e-mail included the choice of antibiotics before and after the procedure and the duration of antibiotic therapy after TRUS-Bx. RESULTS: A total of 54 hospitals (70.0%) responded to the e-mail. Before TRUS-Bx, all hospitals administered intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. The percentage of hospitals that used quinolone, cephalosporin, and aminoglycoside alone was 48.1%, 20.4%, and 9.3%, respectively. The percentage of hospitals that used two or more antibiotics was 22.2%. After biopsy, all 54 hospitals prescribed oral antibiotics. The percentage of hospitals that prescribed quinolone alone, cephalosporin alone, or a combination of two or more antibiotics was 77.8%, 20.4%, and 1.8%, respectively. The duration of antibiotic use was more than 3 days in most hospitals (79.6%). Only four hospitals (7.4%) followed the AUA recommendation of a 1-day regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The AUA recommendation was not followed by most hospitals in Korea. This clinical behavior might reflect the high quinolone resistance rate in Korea, and further studies on the most efficient prophylactic antibiotics after TRUS-Bx in Korea are warranted.
Aminoglycosides/*administration & dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*administration & dosage ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis/*methods ; Biopsy/adverse effects ; Cephalosporins/*administration & dosage ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Escherichia coli Infections/*prevention & control ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate/pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology ; Quinolones/*administration & dosage ; Republic of Korea

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is an essential procedure for diagnosing prostate cancer. The American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline recommends fluoroquinolone alone for 1 day during TRUS-Bx. However, this recommendation may not be appropriate in regions where the prevalence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli is high. We investigated the real practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for TRUS-Bx in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 77 hospitals performing TRUS-Bx were identified and an e-mail was sent to the Urology Department of those hospitals. The questions in the e-mail included the choice of antibiotics before and after the procedure and the duration of antibiotic therapy after TRUS-Bx. RESULTS: A total of 54 hospitals (70.0%) responded to the e-mail. Before TRUS-Bx, all hospitals administered intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. The percentage of hospitals that used quinolone, cephalosporin, and aminoglycoside alone was 48.1%, 20.4%, and 9.3%, respectively. The percentage of hospitals that used two or more antibiotics was 22.2%. After biopsy, all 54 hospitals prescribed oral antibiotics. The percentage of hospitals that prescribed quinolone alone, cephalosporin alone, or a combination of two or more antibiotics was 77.8%, 20.4%, and 1.8%, respectively. The duration of antibiotic use was more than 3 days in most hospitals (79.6%). Only four hospitals (7.4%) followed the AUA recommendation of a 1-day regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The AUA recommendation was not followed by most hospitals in Korea. This clinical behavior might reflect the high quinolone resistance rate in Korea, and further studies on the most efficient prophylactic antibiotics after TRUS-Bx in Korea are warranted.
Aminoglycosides/*administration & dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*administration & dosage ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis/*methods ; Biopsy/adverse effects ; Cephalosporins/*administration & dosage ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Escherichia coli Infections/*prevention & control ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate/pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology ; Quinolones/*administration & dosage ; Republic of Korea

PURPOSE: Complications after prostate biopsy have increased and various causes have been reported. Growing evidence of increasing quinolone resistance is of particular concern. In the current retrospective study, we evaluated the incidence of infectious complications after prostate biopsy and identified the risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included 1,195 patients who underwent a prostate biopsy between January 2007 and December 2012 at Chung-Ang University Hospital. Cases of febrile UTI that occurred within 7 days were investigated. Clinical information included age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, hypertension, diabetes, body mass index, and biopsy done in the quinolone-resistance era. Patients received quinolone (250 mg intravenously) before and after the procedure, and quinolone (250 mg) was orally administered twice daily for 3 days. We used univariate and multivariate analysis to investigate the predictive factors for febrile UTI. RESULTS: Febrile UTI developed in 39 cases (3.1%). Core numbers increased from 2007 (8 cores) to 2012 (12 cores) and quinolone-resistant bacteria began to appear in 2010 (quinolone-resistance era). In the univariate analysis, core number> or =12 (p=0.024), body mass index (BMI)>25 kg/m2 (p=0.004), and biopsy done in the quinolone-resistance era (p=0.014) were significant factors. However, in the multivariate analysis adjusted for core number, the results were not significant, with the exception of BMI>25 kg/m2 (p=0.011) and biopsy during the quinolone-resistance era (p=0.035), which were significantly associated with febrile UTI. CONCLUSIONS: Quinolone resistance is the main cause of postbiopsy infections in our center. We suggest that further evaluation is required to validate similar trends. Novel strategies to find alternative prophylactic agents are also necessary.
Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods ; Cross Infection/etiology/prevention & control ; *Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Fluoroquinolones/*therapeutic use ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy/*adverse effects/methods ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostatic Neoplasms/*pathology ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology/*etiology/prevention & control

Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Dry Socket ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Humans ; Inflammation ; drug therapy ; Mandible ; Molar, Third ; microbiology ; surgery ; Surgical Wound Infection ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Tooth Extraction ; adverse effects ; Tooth, Impacted ; microbiology ; surgery

Dental surgery is very common, and it is important for our dental colleagues to understand the medical history and chronic medications of our co-managed patients. Antibiotic prophylaxis is currently recommended only for patients at high risk for infective endocarditis when undergoing high-risk dental procedures. Good dental hygiene can prevent more infective endocarditis than prophylactic antibiotic therapy, as transient bacteraemia is common in daily activities such as the brushing and flossing of teeth. Most dental surgeries can generally be performed on patients taking a daily dose of aspirin, but the dentist must be able to assess the risk-benefit ratio of employing local measures of haemostasis versus stopping the antiplatelet therapy. Patients on antiplatelet with recent coronary artery stenting should be referred to their primary cardiologist regarding the cessation of these agents before any surgery.
Angioplasty ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; methods ; Aspirin ; therapeutic use ; Dental Care for Chronically Ill ; methods ; Dentists ; Drug Interactions ; Endocarditis ; prevention & control ; Humans ; Hyperlipidemias ; complications ; Macrolides ; adverse effects ; Male ; Mitral Valve Prolapse ; complications ; Myocardial Ischemia ; complications ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; Simvastatin ; adverse effects ; Streptococcal Infections ; prevention & control ; Tooth Extraction ; methods ; Viridans Streptococci ; metabolism

BACKGROUND: Minocycline-induced pigmentation of bone (black bone) is well described in tooth-bearing intra-oral bone, but is less known in periarticular bone in patients who have undergone total joint arthroplasty. On a retrospective basis, we investigated the short-term clinico-radiological results of total joint arthroplasties in which the patient developed minocycline-induced periarticular black bone. METHODS: We found 5 cases (0.08%), in 4 patients, of periarticular bone pigmentation revealed during total joint arthroplasties (2 hips, 2 knees, and 1 ankle) in our series of total joint surgeries (6,548 cases) over a 10-year time period in our 3 institutes. Their mean age was 56 years at surgery. All patients had received long-term minocycline treatment. Mean dosage and duration of minocycline was 160 mg/day and 2.2 years, respectively. Minocycline had been prescribed for reactive arthritis (one), rheumatoid arthritis (two) and late infection after total joint arthroplasty (two patients). Mean follow-up period was 3.4 years after the surgeries. RESULTS: All cases had black or brown pigmentation in the periarticular bones during the surgery. There was no pigmentation in the cartilage or soft tissues of the joints. The mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score or Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) scale for rheumatoid arthritis foot and ankle joints at latest follow-up (case 1, 66; case 2, 87; case 3, 77; case 4, 77; case 5, 80) improved compared to those of pre-surgery (case 1, 47; case 2, 45; case 3, 55; case 4, 34; case 5, 55). No implant loosening was noted on radiographic examination during the follow-up period. No abnormal bone formation, bone necrosis, hemosiderin deposition, malignancy or metallic debris was found on histological examination. CONCLUSIONS: No clinico-radiological symptoms of total joint arthroplasties showed in the patients with minocycline-induced periariticular black bone in the short-term. Systemic minocycline treatment has the potential to induce significant black pigmentation of many tissues. In particular, minocycline-induced pigmentation of periarticular bone may be accelerated by inflammation due to rheumatic or pyogenic arthritis. Surgeons should recognize the risk of bone pigmentation in inflamed joints due to the systemic treatment of minocycline and explore its influence on periarticular bone and total joint arthroplasty in the long-term.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects ; Arthritis/drug therapy/*pathology/prevention & control ; Arthroplasty, Replacement/*methods ; Bone and Bones/*drug effects/pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minocycline/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin/pathology ; Skin Pigmentation

BACKGROUNDA prior study showed significant antibiotic resistance to quinolone in our population. In this study we aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a single versus a combined prophylactic antibiotic regimen before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUGPB).

METHODSA prospective randomized study was conducted at a university hospital. Patients undergoing TRUGPB were randomized into an amoxicillin-clavulanate alone (1 mg; one dose before and two doses after biopsy) or an amoxicillin-clavulanate + ciprofloxacin group (250 mg; one dose before and two doses after biopsy). Patients were surveyed for infection symptoms by phone on days 3 and 30 after TRUGPB. We defined an infective complication as the occurrence of symptoms including fever, chills or rigor within 30 days after prostate biopsy, requiring medical treatment or hospitalization, aided by a territory-wide electronic medical record system.

RESULTSBetween November 2007 and July 2009, 367 patients were randomized to either amoxicillin-clavulanate alone or amoxicillin-clavulanate + ciprofloxacin group. The infection rates after TRUGPB were 3.91% in the former group (7 out of 179 patients) versus 0.53% (1 out of 188 patients) in the latter. Sixty-three percent (5/8) of patients with infective complications needed hospitalization. There was no intensive care unit admission or mortality during the study period.

CONCLUSIONSCombining prophylactic antibiotics with amoxicillin-clavulanate + ciprofloxacin significantly reduced the incidence of infective complications after TRUGPB. We recommended a combination regimen, especially in centre with high incidence of post-TRUGPB infection.

Amoxicillin ; therapeutic use ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; methods ; Biopsy, Needle ; adverse effects ; methods ; Ciprofloxacin ; therapeutic use ; Clavulanic Acid ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; surgery ; Rectum ; Ultrasonography

OBJECTIVETo investigate the reasonable proposal of prophylactic antibiotics use in selective colorectal operation.

METHODSOne hundred and sixty-five patients underwent colorectal surgery were randomized to Treatment 1 (55 cases), Treatment 2 (50 cases) and Control (60 cases) group. The Treatment 1 group was given oral MgSO4 solution at the night before operation, and Cefradine 2.0 g (I.V.) during the induction of anesthesia, continued with tow times of intravenous Cefradine 2.0 g and 0.5% Metronidazole 100 ml at an interval of 12 hours in 24 hours after the operation. The Treatment 2 group was given the same treatment as Treatment 1, but the antibiotics would not be withdrawn until 3-5 d after operation. On the basis of the treatment of Treatment 2 group, the Control group was given oral antibiotics 2-3 days before operation. Postoperative complications including surgical site infection, stoma leakage, dysbacteriosis, and WBC, body temperature, days of hospitalization and antibiotic expenses in the three groups were observed and compared.

RESULTSThere was no significant differences in surgical site infection, stoma leakage, WBC counting and its change, body temperature and hospital stay among the three groups (P > 0.05). The incidence rate of dysbacteriosis in Control group was significantly higher than that in Treatment 1 group (P < 0.05). The antibiotic expenses in the Treatment 1 group was significantly lower than those of the other two groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSProphylactic antibiotic use during the induction of anesthesia and 24 hours after operation was reasonable in selective colorectal operation, it can prevent the surgical site infection effectively with good social-economic effects and fewer side effects.

Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; adverse effects ; methods ; Colorectal Surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Surgical Wound Infection ; prevention & control