Network Meta-analysis was used to compare the efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicines in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris. PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and other databases were retrieved by computers from the establishment of the databases to June 2020. Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) of Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of unstable angina pectoris were collected. Two investigators independently screened out the literatures, and extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the included RCTs was evaluated according to the bias risk assessment tool recommended by the Cochrane System Reviewer Manual, and the Stata 13.0 software was used for data analysis and mapping. Through screening, 28 eligible studies were finally included, with the sample size of 2 885 cases, involving 8 Chinese patent medicines. The results of the network Meta-analysis showed that in terms of total effective rate for angina symptom improvement, the order was as follows: Shenshao Capsules > Naoxintong Capsules > Ginkgo Ketone Ester Dripping Pills > Compound Danshen Dripping Pills > Ginkgo Leaf Tablets > Shexiang Baoxin Pills > Tongxinluo Capsules > Yindan Xinnaotong Soft Capsules; in terms of total effective rate for ECG curative effect, the order was as follows: Ginkgo Ketone Ester Dripping Pills>Compound Danshen Dripping Pills > Tongxinluo Capsules > Shenshao Capsules > Shexiang Baoxin Pills > Yindan Xinnaotong Soft Capsules; in terms of hypersensitivity-C-reactive protein curative effect, the order was as follows: Tongxinluo Capsules > Shenshao Capsules > Ginkgo Leaf Tablets>Compound Danshen Dropping Pills> Shexiang Baoxin Pills > Naoxintong Capsules > Yindan Xinnaotong Soft Capsules > Ginkgo Ketone Ester Dropping Pills. Chinese patent medicine combined with conventional therapy can improve the clinical efficacy of unstable angina pectoris. Due to the differences in the quantity and quality of the included studies, the order results of Chinese patent medicines need to be further verified.
Angina, Unstable/drug therapy* ; China ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; Humans ; Medicine, East Asian Traditional ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Nonprescription Drugs

The present study evaluated the curative efficacy of Chinese herbal injection on unstable angina pectoris( UAP) by network Meta-analysis. The databases,including Pub Med,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,CNKI,CBM,VIP and Wanfang were searched for randomized controlled trial( RCT) of Chinese herbal injection in the treatment of UAP. All researchers independently screened the articles,extracted the data and evaluated the quality. Open BUGS and Stata were employed for the analysis of the trials that met the quality standards. Fifty-eight studies were finally included in this study,involving 20 intervention measures. In terms of the effective rate,16 injections such as Dengzhan Xixin Injection,Xuesaitong Injection and Danshen Injection combined with western medicine exhibited significant efficacy. In terms of ECG,Puerarin Injection,Ginkgo Leaf Extract and Dipyridamole Injection( GDI),Breviscapine Injection combined with western medicine were superior to western medicine. In terms of the reduction of the angina attack times,Sodium Tanshinone ⅡASulfonate Injection,GDI and Dazhu Hongjingtian Injection combined with western medicine showed better effects than western medicine. In terms of shortening the angina duration,Shenmai Injection combined with western medicine was superior to western medicine. As revealed by the results,Dengzhan Xixin Injection,Xuesaitong Injection,Danshen Injection,Breviscapine Injection,Danshen Ligustrazine Injection combined with western medicine displayed prominent curative efficacy,which were recommended for clinical application. Meanwhile,appropriate intervention measures should be selected according to individual conditions. Limited by the quality of the included trials,the conclusions still need to be further verified.
Angina Pectoris ; Angina, Unstable/drug therapy* ; China ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; Humans ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of Danhong Injection (, DH) on the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and myocardial injury in patients with unstable angina undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with unstable angina were randomly divided into DH group (39 cases) and the control group (39 cases) during elective PCI. Randomization was performed using a random-number table. The DH group received DH at a dosage of 40 mL (mixed with 250 mL saline, covered by a light-proof bag, intravenous drip) during PCI and daily for 7 consecutive days, while the control group only received the same dosage of saline. Both groups received standardized treatment. The IMR and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were measured at maximal hyperemia before and after PCI. Myocardial markers, including myoglobin, creatine kinase (CK), creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), and coronary troponin T (cTnT) values were measured at baseline and 24 h after PCI. RESULTS: Among the 78 patients enrolled, the baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in pre-PCI myocardial markers and coronary physiological indexes between the two groups. However, post-PCI CK and CK-MB levels in the DH group were significantly lower than those in the control group (111.97 ± 80.97 vs. 165.47 ± 102.99, P=0.013; 13.08 ± 6.90 vs. 19.75 ± 15.49, P=0.016). Post-PCI myoglobin and cTNT-positive tend to be lower in the DH group than in the control group but did not reach statistical significance (88.07 ± 52.36 vs. 108.13 ± 90.94, P=0.52; 2.56% vs.7.69%, P=0.065). Compared with the control group, the post-IMR levels of the DH group tended to decrease, but there was no statistical difference (20.73 ± 13.15 vs. 26.37 ± 12.31, P=0.05). There were no statistical differences in post-FFR in both groups. The peri-procedural myocardial injury of the DH group was significantly lower than that of the control group (2.56% vs. 15.38%, P=0.025). During the 30-d follow-up period, no major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in either group. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated benefit of DH in reducing myocardial injury and potential preserving microvascular function in patients with unstable angina undergoing elective PCI.
Angina, Unstable/drug therapy* ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial ; Humans ; Microcirculation ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Pilot Projects ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the combined anti-inflammatory effect of activating blood circulation and detoxifying Chinese medicines in unstable angina (UA) patients. METHODS: This study was an open-labeled, randomized controlled trial conducted in 5 centers in Beijing. A total of 154 patients were randomized into two groups at a 1:1 ratio by random numbers. Based on the conventional treatment, patients in the activating blood circulation (ABC) group were treated with Guanxin Danshen Droping Pill (, 0.4 g, thrice daily), and patients in the activating blood circulation and detoxifying (ABCD) group were treated with Guanxin Danshen Droping Pill (0.4 g, thrice daily) and Andrographis tablet (0.2 g, thrice daily) for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the serum level of high sensitive C reaction protein (hs-CRP), and the secondary outcome index included the serum levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L), thrombomodulin (TM), the score of angina pectoris, the score of blood stasis syndrome, and the score of Chinese medicine symptoms, observed at week 0 and week 4. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients completed the trial (ABC group, n=70; ABCD group, n=74). There were no significant differences in the clinical baseline characteristics between the two groups. When compared with the ABC group, ABCD group showed better performance in reducing the level of inflammatory factors, especially hs-CRP (P<0.05), IL-6 (P<0.01) and TNF-α (P<0.01). In term of clinical symptoms, ABCD group played a better role in improving the scores of angina pectoris and blood stasis syndrome than ABC group (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The combination of Guanxin Danshen Dropping Pill and Andrographis tablet exert significant anti-inflammatory effect on UA patients, which is superior to single Guanxin Danshen Dropping Pill. (Registration No. ChiCTR-TRC-13004072).
Angina Pectoris/drug therapy* ; Angina, Unstable/drug therapy* ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use* ; China ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

To assess the effectiveness and safety of Xueshuantong Injection in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris. Literatures were retrieved in PubMed,the Cochrane Library,EMbase,the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database( CNKI),the Chongqing VIP Chinese Science Database( VIP),the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database( Sino Med) and Wanfang Data. The time limitation ranged from the commencement of each database to April 28,2019. The assessment of ethodological quality was based on the Cochrane Handbook 5.1,and the data were analyzed by using Rev Man 5.3 software. A total of 38 RCTs involving 4 074 patients were included. The included trials were all of low quality. Xueshuantong Injection combined with routine basic treatment( RBT) was superior to RBT alone in alleviating clinical symptoms,with statistically significant differences between the groups( RR = 1. 19,95% CI[1. 15,1. 24]). Xueshuantong Injection combined with RBT was better than RBT alone in the efficiency of anginal symptom( RR = 1.23,95%CI[1.18,1.29]). Xueshuantong Injection combined with RBT reduced the consumption of nitroglycerin,which was more effectively than RBT alone,with statistically significant differences between the groups( RR = 1.64,95%CI[1.23,2.19]). Xueshuantong Injection combined with RBT decreased hs-CRP levels,which was more effectively than RBT alone,with statistically significant differences between the groups( MD =-0.48,95%CI[-0.57,-0.40]). However,there was no statistical difference between groups in the incidence of myocardial infarction. The reported adverse effects of Xueshuantong Injection were mainly dizziness,headache,itchy skin and gastrointestinal symptoms. Xueshuantong Injection combined with RBT can alleviate unstable angina pectoris. However,due to the low quality of included studies,further well-designed multicenter and large-scale RCTs are still needed to evaluate the efficacy of Xueshuantong Injection.
Angina, Unstable/drug therapy* ; China ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Male ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Kudiezi injection in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. Four Chinese databases (CNKI, VIP, WanFang, and SinoMed) and three English databases (Cochrane Library, Medline, and ClinicalTrail.gov) were systematically and comprehensively searched from the establishment of each database to March 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease with Kudiezi injection (KDZ) were screened according to the pre-established inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. The quality of the included studies was evaluated by using the ROB tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration, and RevMan 5.3 software was used for Meta-analysis. A total of 712 articles were retrieved and finally 38 studies were included. The total sample size was 3 812 cases, 1 945 in the experimental group and 1 867 in the control group. The overall quality of the included studies was generally low. The results of Meta-analysis showed that: KDZ combined with conventional or western medicine was superior to conventional or western medicine alone in the effectiveness and electrocardiogram efficacy of angina pectoris and unstable angina. The descriptive analysis showed that KDZ combined with conventional treatment group was superior to conventional treatment group in agina pectoris associated indicators of angina pectoris and unstable angina. Other outcome measures were easily affected by various factors (such as too large heterogeneity of outcome indicators) and could not be concluded. Adverse reactions included in the study report were all mild adverse reactions and did not affect treatment. Based on the results of this study, it can be seen that Kudiezi injection had a certain effect on the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease, especially with significant positive effect on the improvement of the curative effect for angina pectoris and the effect of electrocardiogram. No serious adverse reactions occurred. However, due to the limited number of studies included, the generally low quality of the included studies, and the existence of published biases, the quality of the evidence in this study was low, so that caution should be taken to apply this conclusion. The effectiveness and safety of Kudiezi injection in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease remained to be confirmed in the future with a well-designed and rigorous multi-center randomized controlled trials with standardized report, large sample, and enough follow-up time.
Angina Pectoris ; drug therapy ; Angina, Unstable ; drug therapy ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; therapeutic use ; Heart ; Humans ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of breviscapine injection in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris (UAP). Eight electronic databases and clinical trials registries were searched to collect randomized controlled trials on breviscapine injection in the treatment of UAP. According to the evaluation standards in Cochrane Handbook 5.1, two independent reviewers screened out the literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of the studies included. RevMan 5.3 software was used for Meta quantitative analysis and corresponding description analysis. A total of 36 studies involving 3 058 patients were included, 1 552 cases in the trial group, 1 506 cases in the control group, 1 846 males and 1 212 females. All the clinical studies showed a low quality. Meta-analysis results showed that the combination of breviscapine injection and conventional therapy was superior to conventional therapy in angina pectoris efficacy (RRangina pectoris efficacy=1.29, 95%CI[1.23,1.35],<0.000 01；RRECG1=1.25,95%CI[1.12,1.38],<0.000 1；RRECG2=1.38,95%CI[1.27,1.49],<0.000 01); descriptive analysis of a single study showed that the efficacy of combination of breviscapine injection and conventional therapy was superior to that of conventional therapy alone. In respect of hemorheology, the combination of breviscapine injection and conventional therapy was better than conventional therapy in lowering LBV and EAI (MDLBV=-1.27,95%CI[-1.55,-0.99],<0.000 01；MDEAI=-0.38,95%CI[-0.60,-0.16],=0.000 6), as well as in lowering WBV and HCT in the descriptive analysis of single study. In respect of blood lipid, the combination of breviscapine injection and conventional therapy was better than conventional therapy in lowering TC, TG and LDL-C (MDTC=-0.30,95%CI[-0.51,-0.10],=0.003；MDTG=-0.32,95%CI[-0.77,0.13],=0.16；MDLDL-C=-0.45,95%CI[-0.76,-0.14],=0.004). In reducing the frequency of angina attacks, heart rate, high sensitive C-reactive protein and improving exercise tolerance, the combination of breviscapine injection and conventional therapy was also superior to the conventional therapy alone (MDFAP=-3.30,95%CI[-4.06,-2.54],< 0.000 01；MDHR=-9.38,95%CI[-12.78,-5.98],=0.000 2；MDhs-CRP=-0.56,95%CI[-0.85,-0.27],=0.000 2；MDET=0.88,95%CI[0.41,1.35],=0.000 2). The main adverse reactions in the two groups included headache, dizziness, palpitations, nausea, abdominal distension, skin pruritus, flushes and allergic reactions in the study. The safety of breviscapine injection needs to be further studied and clarified because of the combination of drugs and the incomplete information reported in the original study. The current evidence suggested that the combination of breviscapine injection and conventional therapy had certain advantages in curative effect for the treatment of UAP. Due to the low quality of the study and its own shortcomings, it is necessary to design more rigorous, high-quality, multi-center randomized double-blind controlled trials to increase the strength of the evidence.
Angina Pectoris ; drug therapy ; Angina, Unstable ; drug therapy ; Female ; Flavonoids ; pharmacology ; Humans ; Male ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

BACKGROUND: There is scanty evidence concerning the ability of Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) and Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy and Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ACUITY-HORIZONS) scores to predict out-of-hospital bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to assess and compare the long-term prognostic value of these scores regarding out-of-hospital bleeding risk in such patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of 10,724 patients undergoing PCI between January and December 2013 in Fuwai Hospital, China. All patients were followed up for 2 years and evaluated through the Fuwai Hospital Follow-up Center. Major bleeding was defined as Types 2, 3, and 5 according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Definition criteria. RESULTS: During a 2-year follow-up, 245 of 9782 patients (2.5%) had major bleeding (MB). CRUSADE (21.00 [12.00, 29.75] vs. 18.00 [11.00, 26.00], P < 0.001) and ACUITY-HORIZONS (9.00 [3.00, 14.00] vs. 6.00 [3.00, 12.00], P < 0.001) risk scores were both significantly higher in the MB than non-MB groups. Both scores showed a moderate predictive value for MB in the whole study cohort (area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve [AUROC], 0.565; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.529-0.601, P = 0.001; AUROC, 0.566; 95% CI, 0.529-0.603, P < 0.001, respectively) and in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subgroup (AUROC: 0.579, 95% CI: 0.531-0.627, P = 0.001; AUROC, 0.591; 95% CI, 0.544-0.638, P < 0.001, respectively). However, neither score was a significant predictor in the non-ACS subgroup (P > 0.05). The value of CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS scores did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in the whole cohort, ACS subgroup, or non-ACS subgroup. CONCLUSIONS CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS scores showed statistically significant but relatively limited long-term prognostic value for out-of-hospital MB after PCI with DES in a cohort of Chinese patients. The value of CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS scores did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in the whole cohort, ACS subgroup, or non-ACS subgroup.
Acute Coronary Syndrome ; therapy ; Aged ; Angina, Unstable ; therapy ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction ; therapy ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; Postoperative Hemorrhage ; chemically induced ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; surgery ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Research Design ; Risk ; Risk Assessment ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of Danshen Injection (, DS) as one adjuvant treatment for conventional therapy with Western medicine (WM) for unstable angina pectoris (UAP).

METHODSUsing literature databases, a thorough and systematic retrieval of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DS plus WM with WM was conducted from inception to April 2015. The extracted data from included studies was analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 software. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of included studies, and Begg's and Egger's tests conducted by Stata 12.0 were used to evaluate the potential presence of publication bias.

RESULTSA total of 17 RCTs, which involving 1,433 participants, were identified and reviewed. The meta-analysis indicated that the combined use of DS and WM was significantly superior to WM alone for UAP in terms of the total effectiveness rate of angina pectoris [risk ratio (RR) =1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17, 1.29, P<0.01] and the total effectiveness rate of electrocardiogram (ECG) [RR=1.18, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.30, P=0.001]. Additionally, DS could also further reduce the content of fibrinogen, adjust blood lipid level, correct T wave inversion, and so on. Fifteen adverse drug reactions were reported in two studies, Four of which appeared in the experimental group.

CONCLUSIONBased on the systematic review, the combined use of DS and WM was more effective than WM alone, it can be further widely used in clinic, however, there was no exact conclusion for its safety.

Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic ; therapeutic use ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angina, Unstable ; blood ; drug therapy ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Fibrinogen ; metabolism ; Humans ; Injections ; Lipids ; blood ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Publication Bias ; Treatment Outcome

Acupuncture Therapy ; Adult ; Aged ; Angina, Unstable ; drug therapy ; physiopathology ; therapy ; Cardiovascular Agents ; administration & dosage ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Heart ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged