INTRODUCTION: Paediatric epidurals can present technical challenges due to wide variations in age and weight among children, ranging from neonates to teenagers. This study evaluated the skin-to-epidural distance in the thoracic and lumbar regions to determine the relationship between age, weight and ethnicity and depth to the epidural space in our Singapore paediatric population. METHODS: Data from the Acute Pain Service was prospectively collected over 16 years. Details included patient demographics, level of epidural performed and distance from skin to epidural space. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine the association of weight, age, ethnicity and gender with the depths to the thoracic and lumbar epidural spaces. A simple linear regression was calculated to predict the depth to both thoracic and lumbar epidural spaces based on body weight. Equations were formulated to describe the relationship between weight and depth of epidural space. RESULTS: A total of 616 midline epidurals were studied. Regression analysis was performed for 225 thoracic epidurals and 363 lumbar epidurals. Our study revealed a clear correlation between skin-to-lumbar epidural distance and weight in children. The best correlation was demonstrated between skin-to-lumbar epidural distance and body weight (R = 0.729). This relationship was described by the formula: depth (mm) = (0.63 × weight [kg]) + 9.2. CONCLUSION Skin-to-lumbar epidural distance correlated with weight in children. Our results highlighted the clinical significance of differences between Southeast Asian paediatric populations when compared to other populations.
Adolescent ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; adverse effects ; methods ; Body Weight ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Epidural Space ; anatomy & histology ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; anatomy & histology ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pain Management ; methods ; Pediatrics ; methods ; Regression Analysis ; Singapore ; Skin ; anatomy & histology ; Thoracic Vertebrae ; anatomy & histology

In video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation was considered an optimal method of anesthesia for a long time. However, complications due to general anesthesia and one-lung ventilation have become a problem. In recent years, epidural anesthesia without endotracheal intubation has been attempted in various thoracic surgical procedures with various advantages and disadvantages reported. We compared postoperative pain and prognosis when different anesthesia methods were used in a patient who underwent the same operation twice in the interval of one year. When non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (NIVATS) underwent under epidural anesthesia, postoperative pain score was lower, adverse events were fewer, and the hospital stay was shorter than that of VATS. The patient also expressed high subjective satisfaction. Like previous studies, the results favored NIVATS under epidural anesthesia. However, greater attention and proficiency are required from the anesthesiologist for proper analgesia and sedation.
Analgesia ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; Anesthesia, General ; Humans ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Length of Stay ; Methods ; One-Lung Ventilation ; Pain, Postoperative ; Prognosis ; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted ; Thoracic Surgical Procedures

BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is known to provide good postoperative analgesia in many types of surgery including laparoscopic surgery. However, no study has compared PCEA with patient-controlled intravascular analgesia (PCIA) in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LARP). In this study, the efficacy and side effects of PCEA and PCIA after LARP were compared. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing LARP were randomly divided into two groups: 1) a PCEA group, treated with 0.2% ropivacaine 3 ml and 0.1 mg morphine in the bolus; and 2) a PCIA group, treated with oxycodone 1 mg and nefopam 1 mg in the bolus. After the operation, a blinded observer assessed estimated blood loss (EBL), added a dose of rocuronium, performed transfusion, and added analgesics. The numeric rating scale (NRS), infused PCA dose, and side effects were assessed at 1, 6, 24, and 48 h. RESULTS: EBL, added rocuronium, and added analgesics in the PCEA group were less than those in the PCIA group. There were no significant differences in side-effects after the operation between the two groups. Patients were more satisfied with PCEA than with PCIA. The NRS and accumulated PCA count were lower in PCEA group. CONCLUSIONS: Combined thoracic epidural anesthesia could induce less blood loss during operations. PCEA showed better postoperative analgesia and greater patient satisfaction than PCIA. Thus, PCEA may be a more useful analgesic method than PICA after LARP.
Administration, Intravenous ; Analgesia ; Analgesia, Epidural ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesics ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; Humans ; Injections, Epidural ; Laparoscopes ; Laparoscopy ; Methods ; Morphine ; Nefopam ; Oxycodone ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative ; Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pica ; Prostatectomy ; Thoracic Vertebrae

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been rapidly developing by combining several techniques with evidence-based adjustments, including preoperative education, preoperative carbohydrate loading, epidural or regional anesthesia, early initiation of enteral nutrition, ambulation and multi-modal pain management. The core part of ERAS is to reduce and reverse surgical stress and therefore greatly improve clinical outcome. Under the guidance of ERAS, perioperative management of robotic gastric cancer operation should follow the basic principles of ERAS and clinical pathway to maximize the advantages of the robotic surgery. ERAS protocol is safe and feasible for patients undergoing robotic radical gastrectomy and it can reduce surgical stress, shorten hospital stay, improve quality of life and does not increase complications, whose mechanism may be associated with the reduction of inflammation and insulin resistance, the decrease of resting energy exposure, and the protection of mitochondria function. It is worth emphasizing that it is very important to fully understand the changes of pathophysiology during perioperative period, to strictly implement the ERAS pathway based on optimized evidence-based medicine, to cooperate closely with the multidisciplinary team, to observe and manage the postoperative complications dynamically by systemic classification. The improvement of ERAS program on the outcome of patients should be summarized regularly and the new interventional strategies should be evaluated further according to the international standard.
Anesthesia, Epidural ; Anesthesia, Local ; Convalescence ; Critical Pathways ; Enteral Nutrition ; Gastrectomy ; instrumentation ; methods ; rehabilitation ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Pain Management ; Patient Education as Topic ; Postoperative Care ; methods ; standards ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; Preoperative Care ; Quality of Life ; Recovery of Function ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; rehabilitation ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that measuring the distance from the skin to the ligamentum flavum by ultrasound preceding cervical epidural block can be beneficial in excluding false loss of resistance. However, the measurement value using ultrasound may vary depending on the degree of operator experience. Therefore, we aimed to determine the depth from skin to cervical epidural space by using lateral cervical spine X-ray, which is a more intuitive method. METHODS: We enrolled 102 adult patients who were scheduled to undergo cervical epidural anesthesia for vascular bypass surgery of upper arm. After attaching a steel rod on the needle insertion site, lateral cervical spine X-ray was taken before the epidural procedure. We measured the distance from the steel rod to the midpoint of interlaminar space on the spinolaminar line. The X-ray depth was compared with needle depth. RESULTS: Of the 102 enrolled patients, 18 patients including 13 in whom we were unable to measure X-ray depth were excluded from the analysis. In total, 84 patients were included in the analysis. Concordance correlation coefficient between the X-ray-measured depth and needle depth was 0.925. Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean difference of ± 1.96 SD with 0.06 ± 0.56 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral cervical spine X-ray can be useful for prediction of the midline depth from skin to epidural space, particularly for operators who are not skilled at spine ultrasound or the use the C-arm fluoroscopy.
Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; Arm ; Cervical Vertebrae ; Epidural Space* ; Female ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Ligamentum Flavum ; Methods ; Neck ; Needles ; Skin* ; Spine* ; Steel ; Ultrasonography

BACKGROUNDHypotension induced by combined spinal epidural anesthesia in parturient with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) can easily compromise blood supply to vital organs including uteroplacental perfusion and result in fetal distress. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) with LiDCO rapid system can improve well-being of both HDP parturient and their babies.

METHODSFifty-two stable HDP parturient scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were recruited. After loading with 10 ml/kg lactated Ringer's solution (LR), parturient were randomized to the GDFT and control group. In the GDFT group, individualized fluid therapy was guided by increase in stroke volume (ΔSV) provided via LiDCO rapid system. The control group received the routine fluid therapy. The primary endpoints included maternal hypotension and the doses of vasopressors administered prior to fetal delivery. The secondary endpoints included umbilical blood gas abnormalities and neonatal adverse events.

RESULTSThe severity of HDP was similar between two groups. The total LR infusion (P < 0.01) and urine output (P < 0.05) were higher in the GDFT group than in the control group. Following twice fluid challenge tests, the systolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure, cardiac output and SV in the GDFT group were significantly higher, and the heart rate was lower than in the control group. The incidence of maternal hypotension and doses of phenylephrine used prior to fetal delivery were significantly higher in the control group than in the GDFT group (P < 0.01). There were no differences in the Apgar scores between two groups. In the control group, the mean values of pH in umbilical artery/vein were remarkably decreased (P < 0.05), and the incidences of neonatal hypercapnia and hypoxemia were statistically increased (P < 0.05) than in the GDFT group.

CONCLUSIONSDynamic responsiveness guided fluid therapy with the LiDCO rapid system may provide potential benefits to stable HDP parturient and their babies.

Adult ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; methods ; Anesthesia, Spinal ; methods ; Blood Pressure ; Cesarean Section ; methods ; Female ; Fluid Therapy ; methods ; Humans ; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced ; Infant, Newborn ; Isotonic Solutions ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome

BACKGROUNDSpinal anesthesia was considered as a reasonable anesthetic option in severe preeclampsia when cesarean delivery is indicated, and there is no indwelling epidural catheter or contraindication to spinal anesthesia. However, the ideal dose of intrathecal bupivacaine has not been quantified for cesarean delivery for severe preeclamptic patients. This study aimed to determine the ED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine for severely preeclamptic patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.

METHODSTwo hundred severely preeclamptic patients are undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging study. Patients received 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, or 10 mg intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine with 2.5 μg sufentanil. Successful spinal anesthesia was defined as a T6 sensory level achieved within 10 minutes after intrathecal drug administration and/or no epidural supplement was required during the cesarean section. The ED 50 and ED 95 were calculated with a logistic regression model.

RESULTSED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine for successful spinal anesthesia were 5.67 mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.20-6.10 mg) and 8.82 mg (95% CI: 8.14-9.87 mg) respectively. The incidence of hypotension in Group 8 mg and Group 10 mg was higher than that in Group 4 mg and Group 6 mg (P < 0.05). The sensory block was significantly different among groups 10 minutes after intrathecal injection (P < 0.05). The use of lidocaine in Group 4 mg was higher than that in other groups (P < 0.05). The use of phenylephrine in Group 8 mg and Group 10 mg was higher than that in the other two groups (P < 0.05). The lowest systolic blood pressure before the infant delivery of Group 8 mg and Group 10 mg was lower than the other two groups (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of muscle relaxation in Group 4 mg was lower than other groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in patients' satisfaction and the newborns' Apgar score and the blood gas analysis of umbilical artery serum (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONOur study showed that the ED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine for severely preeclamptic patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery were 5.67 mg and 8.82 mg, respectively. In addition, decreasing the dose of intrathecal bupivacaine could reduce the incidence of maternal hypotension.

Adult ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; Anesthesia, Spinal ; adverse effects ; methods ; Blood Pressure ; physiology ; Bupivacaine ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cesarean Section ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

BACKGROUNDSpinal anesthesia is considered as a reasonable anesthetic option in lower abdominal and lower limb surgery. This study was to determine the dose-response of intrathecal ropivacaine in patients with scarred uterus undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

METHODSSeventy-five patients with scarred uterus undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging study. Patients received 6, 8, 10, 12, or 14 mg intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine with 5 μg sufentanil. Successful spinal anesthesia was defined as a T4sensory level achieved with no need for epidural supplementation. The 50% effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) were calculated with a logistic regression model.

RESULTSED50and ED95of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine for patients with scarred uterus undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) were 8.28 mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.28-9.83 mg) and 12.24 mg (95% CI: 10.53-21.88 mg), respectively.

CONCLUSIONWhen a CSEA technique is to use in patients with scarred uterus for an elective cesarean delivery, the ED50and ED95of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine along with 5 μg sufentanil were 8.28 mg and 12.24 mg, respectively. In addition, this local anesthetic is unsuitable for emergent cesarean delivery, but it has advantages for ambulatory patients.

Adult ; Amides ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; methods ; Anesthesia, Spinal ; methods ; Cesarean Section ; methods ; Cicatrix ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Uterus ; pathology

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine whether head elevation during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) and Caesarean section provided improved hemodynamics and appropriate sensory block height. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four parous women undergoing CSE for elective Caesarean section were randomly assigned to one of two groups: right lateral (group L) or right lateral and head elevated (group HE) position, for insertion of the block. Patients were positioned in the supine wedged position (group L) or the left lateral and head elevated position (group HE) until a block height of T5 to light touch was reached. Group HE was then turned to the supine wedged position with maintenance of head elevation until the end of surgery. Hemodynamics, including the incidence of hypotension, ephedrine dose required, and characteristics of the sensory blocks were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension (16 versus 7, p=0.0035) and the required dose of ephedrine [24 (0-40) versus 0 (0-20), p<0.0001] were greater in group L compared to group HE. In group L, the time to achieve maximal sensory block level (MSBL) was shorter (11.8+/-5.4 min versus 20.1+/-6.3 min, p<0.0001) and MSBL was also higher than in group HE [14 (T2) versus 12 (T4), p=0.0015]. CONCLUSION: Head elevation during CSE and Caesarean section is superior to positioning without head elevation in the lateral to supine position, as it is associated with a more gradual onset, appropriate block height, and improved hemodynamics.
Adult ; Anesthesia, Epidural/*methods ; Anesthesia, Obstetrical/*methods ; Anesthesia, Spinal/*methods ; Blood Pressure/physiology ; Cesarean Section/*methods ; Elective Surgical Procedures/methods ; Female ; Head ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypotension ; Patient Positioning/*methods ; Pregnancy ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: This study examined the sparing effect of sufentanil on the median effective concentration (EC50) of epidural ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing elective transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized double-blind dose-response study. Fifty eight elderly patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for TURP surgery under epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated to a group receiving 15 mL of ropivacaine (group R) or a group receiving ropivacaine plus 5 microg of sufentanil (group RS). The concentration of ropivacaine was determined by a Dixon's up-and-down sequential allocation. The first participant received 0.3% of ropivacaine in both groups and subsequent concentrations were determined by the response of the previous patient in the same group. The EC50 of epidural ropivacaine was analyzed using the Dixon and Massey method. RESULTS: The EC50 of ropivacaine during TURP surgery was 0.186% (95% confidence interval, 0.173-0.200%) in group R, and 0.136% (95% confidence interval, 0.127-0.144%) in group RS (p<0.01). No differences in Bromage scale of motor block examination and the onset time of sensory block were observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of 5 microg of epidural sufentanil caused a 37% reduction in the EC50 of epidural ropivacaine in elderly patients who underwent TURP surgery. Thus, sufentanil addition during surgery of TURP can decrease the dose of ropivacaine anesthesia required.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amides/*administration & dosage ; Anesthesia, Epidural/*methods ; Anesthetics, Local/*administration & dosage ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Prospective Studies ; Sufentanil/*administration & dosage ; *Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome