Surgery is the primary treatment for esophageal cancer, but the postoperative complication rate remains high. Therefore, it is important to prevent and manage postoperative complications to improve prognosis. Common perioperative complications of esophageal cancer include anastomotic leakage, gastrointestinal tracheal fistula, chylothorax, and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Respiratory and circulatory system complications, such as pulmonary infection, are also quite common. These surgery-related complications are independent risk factors for cardiopulmonary complications. Complications, such as long-term anastomotic stenosis, gastroesophageal reflux, and malnutrition are also common after esophageal cancer surgery. By effectively reducing postoperative complications, the morbidity and mortality of patients can be reduced, and their quality of life can be improved.
Humans ; Quality of Life ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control* ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Prognosis ; Esophagectomy/adverse effects* ; Digestive System Fistula/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies

Defunctioning stoma is an effective method to reduce symptomatic anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. It is of concern that about 1 in 5 defunctioning stomas will not be restored, that is, becoming permanent. And that is usually beyond expectation by physicians and patients, which deserves enough attention. The causes are complex, including anastomotic complications, tumor progression, perioperative death, poor anal function and patient willingness. Possible risk factors include symptomatic anastomotic leakage, age, tumor location, neoadjuvant therapy, anal function, TNM stage, ASA score, hospital factors, etc. Those factors may occur in various stages of patient referral such as before neoadjuvant therapy, prior to surgery, intra or post-operative period, and follow-up. Adequate physician-patient communication and shared decision-making, comprehensive tumor and patient function assessment, rational treatment strategy, careful manipulation during operation and good quality control, and meticulous perioperative management are important steps to reduce the permanent stoma. When shared decision-making, patients' needs should be fully considered while unnecessary expectations of anal preservation should be avoided. The risk of perpetuation of defunctioning stoma should be fully informed. Safe operation, especially anastomosis, is the key to avoid permanent stoma. And attention should be paid to the early detection and intervention of postoperative anastomotic stenosis.
Humans ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Surgical Stomas/adverse effects* ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Rectum/surgery* ; Risk Factors ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*

The incidence of anastomotic leakage, a common and serious postoperative complication of low rectal cancer, remains high. Clarifying the risk factors for anastomotic leakage in patients with low rectal cancer after surgery can help guide clinical treatment and help patients improve their prognosis. The current literature suggests that the risk factors affecting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after low rectal cancer include three aspects: (1) individual factors: male gender, high body mass index, malnutrition, smoking, alcoholism, and metabolic diseases; (2) tumor factors: the lower margin of tumor <5 cm from the anal verge, tumor diameter >2.5 cm, late tumor stage, high level of tumor markers and preoperative intestinal obstruction; (3) surgical factors: long operative time (>180 min), intraoperative bleeding (≥70 ml), more than 2 cartridges of stapling for anastomosis, contamination of the operative field, epidural analgesia and intraoperative hypothermia. Notably, the surgical approach (laparoscopic, open and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery) was not a factor influencing the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage in low rectal cancer. The findings on the effects of receiving neoadjuvant therapy, gut microbiota,intestinal bowel preparation, insufficient time for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, left colonic artery dissection, intraoperative blood transfusion, pelvic drainage, transanal drainage and combined organ resection, and postoperative diarrhea on postoperative anastomotic leakage in low rectal cancer are controversial. However, clinical workers can still take measures to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage according to the above risk factors by making a good assessment before surgery, actively avoiding them during and after surgery, and taking measures for each step, so as to bring maximum benefits to patients.
Humans ; Male ; Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control* ; Rectum/surgery* ; Rectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects* ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects*

Anastomotic leak is a common and serious complication after anterior rectal resection. Despite the continuous advancement of anastomotic instruments and surgical techniques, the incidence of anastomotic leak has not decreased significantly compared with the past. As more studies on the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak are published, postoperative risk factors of anastomotic leak, such as fever, time to first bowel movement, CT, C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), matrix metalloproteinase-9, and other cytokines and biomarkers (IL-6, TNF-α, lactate, pH, urinary neopterin/creatinine ratio), provide a reference for surgeons to assess the risk and increase the possibility of early diagnosis of anastomotic leak. Nevertheless, preventing the occurrence of anastomotic leak is still the ultimate goal. For the prevention of anastomotic leak, intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging technology provides a simple and safe objective method for surgeons to evaluate anastomotic perfusion. The diversion stoma may reduce the incidence of anastomotic leak. More and more evidence shows that drainage through the anal canal can reduce the incidence of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer, but whether different types of drainage catheters can clearly reduce the incidence of anastomotic leak still needs more evidence. In addition, there has not yet been a unified opinion on the retention time and location of the drainage catheter. At present, the research of anastomotic leak has not adopted a unified definition and the heterogeneity among related studies is still great. We still look forward to more high-quality multi-center large prospective and randomized controlled studies.
Anastomosis, Surgical ; Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control* ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Humans ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Rectum/surgery*

Objective: To investigate whether protective colostomy and protective ileostomy have different impact on anastomotic leak for rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and radical surgery. Methods: A retrospectively cohort study was conducted. Inclusion criteria: (1) Standard neoadjuvant therapy before operation; (2) Laparoscopic rectal cancer radical resection was performed; (3) During the operation, the protective enterostomy was performed including transverse colostomy and ileostomy; (4) The patients were followed up regularly; (5) Clinical data was complete. Exclusion criteria: (1) Colostomy and radical resection of rectal cancer were not performed at the same time; (2) Intestinal anastomosis is not included in the operation, such as abdominoperineal resection; (3) Rectal cancer had distant metastasis or multiple primary colorectal cancer. Finally 208 patients were included in this study. They suffered from rectal cancer and underwent protective stoma in radical surgery after nCRT at our hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. There were 148 males and 60 females with age of (60.5±11.1) years. They were divided into protective transverse colostomy group (n=148) and protective ileostomy group (n=60). The main follow up information included whether the patient has anastomotic leak and the type of leak according to ISREC Grading standard. Besides, stoma opening time, stoma flow, postoperative hospital stay, stoma related complications and postoperative intestinal flora were also collected. Results: A total of 28 cases(13.5%) suffered from anastomotic leak and 26 (92.9%) of them happened in the early stage after surgery (less than 30 days) . As for these early-stage leak, ISREC Grade A happened in 11 cases(42.3%), grade B in 15 cases(57.7%) and no grade C occurred. There was no significant difference in the incidence [12.8% (19/148) vs. 15.0% (9/60) , χ(2)=0.171, P=0.679] or type [Grade A: 5.4%(8/147) vs. 5.1%(3/59); Grade B: 6.8%(10/147) vs. 8.5%(5/59), Z=0.019, P=1.000] of anastomotic leak between the transverse colostomy group and ileostomy group (P>0.05), as well as operation time, postoperative hospital stay, drainage tube removal time or stoma reduction time (P>0.05). There were 10 cases (6.8%) and 24 cases (40.0%) suffering from intestinal flora imbalance in protective transverse colostomy and protective ileostomy group, respectively (χ(2)=34.503, P<0.001). Five cases (8.3%) suffered from renal function injury in the protective ileostomy group, while protective colostomy had no such concern (P=0.002). The incidence of peristomal dermatitis in the protective colostomy group was significantly lower than that in the protective ileostomy group [12.8% (9/148) vs. 33.3%(20/60), χ(2)=11.722, P=0.001]. Conclusions: It is equally feasible and effective for rectal cancer patients after nCRT to carry out protective transverse colostomy or ileostomy in radical surgery. However, we should pay more attention to protective ileostomy patients, as they are at high risk of intestinal flora imbalance, renal function injury and peristomal dermatitis.
Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control* ; Cohort Studies ; Colostomy ; Female ; Humans ; Ileostomy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies

Objective: To explore the efficacy and feasibility of transanal hand-sewn reinforcement of low stapled anastomosis in preventing anastomotic leak after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). Methods: A descriptive cohort study was conducted. Clinical data of 51 patients with rectal cancer who underwent taTME with transanal hand-sewn reinforcement of low stapled anastomosis at Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected. Inclusion criteria: (1) age >18 years old; (2) rectal cancer confirmed by preoperative pathology; (3) distance from tumor to anal verge ≤ 8 cm according to pelvic MR; (4) the lesion was evaluated to be resectable before operation; (5) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy; (6) taTME, end-to-end stapled anastomosis, and reinforcement in the anastomosis with absorbable thread intermittently were performed, and the distance between anastomosis and anal verge was ≤ 5 cm. Exclusion criteria: (1) previous history of colorectal cancer surgery; (2) emergency surgery due to intestinal obstruction, bleeding or perforation; (3) patients with local recurrence or distant metastasis; (4) the period of postoperative follow-up less than 3 months. The procedure of transanal hand-sewn reinforcement was as follows: firstly, no sign of bleeding was confirmed after checking the anastomosis. Then, the anastomosis was reinforced by suturing the muscle layer of rectum intermittently in a figure-of-eight manner using 3-0 single Vicryl. The entry site of the next suture was close next to the exit site of the last one. Any weak point of the anastomosis could also be reinforced according to the specimen from the circular stapler. The primary outcome were the incidence of anastomotic leak, methods of the secondary operation, anastomotic infection, anastomotic stricture, and conditions of Intraoperative and postoperative. Results: All the 51 enrolled patients completed surgery successfully without any conversion to open surgery. The median operative time was 169 (109-337) minutes, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 50 (10-600) ml. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 (5-16) days. The mssorectum was complete and distal resection margin was negative in all patients. Postive circumferential resection margin was observed in 1 patients (2.0%). Twelve (23.5%) patients underwent prophylactic ileostomy. One patient developed anastomosis stricture which was cured by digital dilatation of the anastomosis. ISREC grade C anastomotic leak was observed in 3 (5.9%) male patients, of whom 2 cases did not received prophylactic ileostomy during the operation, and were cured by a second operation with the ileostomy and anastomotic repair. The other one healed by transanal repair of the anastomosis and anti-infection therapy. One (2.0%) patient suffered from perianal infection and healed by sitz bath and anti-infection therapy. No death was reported within 30 days after operation. Conclusion: Transanal hand-sewn reinforcement in low rectal stapled anastomosis in preventing anastomotic leak after taTME is safe and feasible.
Adolescent ; Anal Canal/surgery* ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control* ; Cohort Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control* ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Rectum/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

With the development of laparoscopic techniques and equipments, laparoscopic-assisted, even total laparoscopic radical surgery for gastric cancer can be performed successfully. However, the incidence of postoperative complications is higher in the laparoscopy group as compared to the open-surgery group, which is still the barrier for the total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Similar to open surgery, the major complications of digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy are anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic stricture and stenosis of input or output loop. Moreover, due to the lack of tactile feedback and a narrow field of vision, the laparoscopic operation may be associated with complications due to technical reasons. In clinic, we tried to reduce the incidence of these complications by improving surgical skills and strengthening the perioperative treatment of patients. According to our experience, the complications mainly occur in the early stage, and with the cumulative experience, the complications can be effectively reduced.
Anastomotic Leak ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Constriction, Pathologic ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Education, Medical, Continuing ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; Perioperative Care ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Postoperative Hemorrhage ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery

With the rapid advancement of minimally invasive new technology, laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery are now regarded as the main direction in surgical treatment for stomach cancers. Recent evidence has confirmed the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer and advanced gastric cancer. However, gastrointestinal surgeons should pay more attention to complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy because of rich blood supply, complex tissue layers and lymph node metastasis. Common complications related to laparoscopic surgery are associated with laparoscopic instruments and operating, intra-abdominal bleeding, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, pancreatic leakage, duodenal stump leakage, lymphatic leakage and so on. This article mainly focuses on the causes, prevention and treatment of the complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Anastomotic Leak ; Duodenal Diseases ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; methods ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; methods ; Stomach Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery

The anastomotic complications following radical gastrectomy mainly include anastomotic leakage, anastomotic hemorrhage, and anastomotic stricture. Theanastomotic complications are not rare and remain the most common complications resulting in the perioperativedeath of patients with gastric cancer. Standardized training could let surgeons fully realize that strict selection of operative indications, thorough preoperative assessment and preparation, and refined operation in surgery are the essential measures to prevent the anastomotic complications following radical gastrectomy. In addition, identifying these complications timely and taking effective measures promptly according to the clinical context are the keys to treating these complications, reducing the treatment cycle, and decreasing the mortality.
Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; Anastomotic Leak ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Constriction, Pathologic ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; diagnosis ; therapy ; Preoperative Care ; methods ; standards ; Risk Assessment ; methods ; standards ; Risk Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; complications ; mortality ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo explore the related factors of anastomotic leakfollowing anterior resection for the rectal cancer and the association of the preoperative nutritional risk screening 2002(NRS2002) score.

METHODSClinical data of 396 rectal cancer patients who underwent elective anterior resection from January 2010 to July 2015 at Affiliated Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University were collected. Patient's nutritional risk score on admission was calculated by NRS2002 scoring system according to original medical records. NRS2002 score less than 3 was defined as nutritious risk. Chi-squared test, or Fisher exact test and multivariate logistic regression wereused to analyze the association of the clinical pathological factors and NRS2002 risk factor with anastomotic leak.

RESULTSOf the 396 patients, NRS2002 score≥3, and anastomotic leak occurred in 157(39.6%) and 13(3.3%), respectively. In univariate analysis, different ages, NRS2002 score, preoperative intestinal obstruction, distance from anastomosis to anal vergeand tumor TNM stage were significantly associated with postoperative anastomotic leak(all P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative anastomotic leak among patients with NRS2002 score≥3 was significantly higher than those with NRS2002 score<3[6.4%(10/157) vs. 1.3%(3/239), χ(2)=7.806, P=0.005]. Multivariate analysis showed that NRS2002 score≥3(OR=3.988, 95% CI:1.004-15.837, P=0.049), existence of preoperative intestinal obstruction(OR=5.780, 95% CI:1.320 ~ 25.311, P=0.020),distance from anastomosis to anal verge≤5 cm(OR=0.236, 95% CI: 0.071 ~ 0.785, P=0.019) were the independent risk factors of anastomotic leak following anterior resection for the rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONRectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection with preoperative NRS2002 score≥3 should receive reasonable perioperative nutritional support to prevent anastomotic leak.

Anastomotic Leak ; epidemiology ; prevention & control ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nutritional Support ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors