1.Clinical efficacy of partial resection of puborectalis combined with mutilation of internal anal sphincter in the treatment of puborectalis syndrome with high anal pressure.
Hui YE ; Weicheng LIU ; Qun QIAN ; Zhisu LIU ; Congqing JIANG ; Keyan ZHENG ; Qianbo QIN ; Zhao DING ; Zhilin GONG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(3):304-308
OBJECTIVETo explore the efficacy of partial resection of puborectalis combined with mutilation of internal anal sphincter(IAS) in the treatment of puborectalis syndrome with high anal pressure.
METHODSTwenty-five cases of puborectalis syndrome with high anal resting pressure in the preoperative examination received the operation of partial resection of puborectalis combined with mutilation of IAS in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between January 2013 and May 2015. The position of puborectalis was confirmed by touching with the exposure under the transfixion device, and a transverse incision was made by electrotome between 3 and 5 o'clock direction of puborectalis, then partial puborectalis was lifted by vessel clamp at 5 o'clock direction, and about 0.5 cm of muscular tissue was resected. Between 8 to 10 o'clock direction of anal tube, about 1 cm length of transverse incision was made by electrotome, then partial IAS was lifted by vessel clamp and cut off. Preoperative and postoperative 3-month anorectal manometry and defecography were carried out. Wexner constipation score and Cleveland Clinic incontinence score were implemented before surgery and 3, 6, 12 months after operation. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR-ORB-16007695).
RESULTSOf the 25 cases, 18 were male and 7 were female, the average age was 55 years old and the average course of disease was 9 years. Compared with pre-operation, the postoperative 3-month anal resting pressure and maximal squeeze pressure were significantly decreased [(53.56±9.05) mmHg vs. (92.44±7.06) mmHg, (142.80±20.35) mmHg vs. (210.88±20.56) mmHg, respectively, both P=0.000]; anorectal angulation at resting state and forced defecation state increased significantly [(102.32±4.96)degree vs. (95.88±4.01)degree, (117.88±5.95)degree vs. (89.52±3.25)degree, respectively, both P=0.000]. Wexner constipation score of postoperative 3-month, 6-month, 12-month (8.28±3.91, 7.40±3.64 and 8.04±4.74) was significantly lower than the preoperative score (16.00±3.69, all P<0.05), while the score was not significantly different among 3 time points after operation (P>0.05). Cleveland Clinic incontinence score was 0 at postoperative 6 and 12 months, and revealed 20 cases were effective among all the surgical patients(80%).
CONCLUSIONPartial resection of puborectalis combined with mutilation of internal anal sphincter can effectively reduce anal pressure and improve symptoms of outlet obstruction, which is an effective method in the treatment of puborectalis syndrome with high anal pressure.
Anal Canal ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Constipation ; surgery ; Defecation ; Defecography ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Manometry ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Hypertonia ; surgery ; Pelvic Floor ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Pressure ; Treatment Outcome
2.Risk factor analysis of low anterior resection syndrome after anal sphincter preserving surgery for rectal carcinoma.
Fan LIU ; Peng GUO ; Zhanlong SHEN ; Zhidong GAO ; Shan WANG ; Yingjiang YE
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(3):289-294
OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after anal sphincter preserving surgery (SPS) for rectal cancer patients.
METHODSClinicopathological and follow-up data of rectal cancer patients who underwent SPS from January 2010 to June 2014 in Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients receiving permanent colostomy and local resection were excluded. Meanwhile, during October 2014 and March 2015, the enrolled patients were asked to fill out a specially designed questionnaire for LARS through face-to-face interview or telephone inquiry, according to the chronological order of operation. Based on the score of questionnaire, patients were divided into three groups: 0-20 points: non LARS; 21-29: minor LARS; 30-42: major LARS. The demographic and clinicopathologic features were compared among groups and the risk factors of major LARS were tested by logistic regression analysis.
RESULTSA total of 100 patients (61 males, 39 females) completed the bowel function survey, with an average age of 66.2(41-86) years, 33 patients <60 years versus 67 patients ≥60 years. No significant difference was observed in age distribution (P=0.204). Interval from operation to first follow-up was more than 1 year in 70 patients, and the median follow-up was 23 months. Thirty-seven patients were non LARS, 18 were minor LARS and 45 were major LARS. No significant differences in clinicopathological data (all P>0.05) were observed among three groups except radiotherapy history (P=0.025), tumor location(P=0.000) and distance from anastomotic site to anal verge(P=0.008). After comparison of non LARS group combined with minor LARS group versus major LARS, re-analysis of risk factors showed that radiotherapy history (RR=5.608, 95%CI:1.457 to 21.584, P=0.006), distance from tumor lower margin to anal verge (RR=0.125, 95%CI:0.042 to 0.372, P=0.000), distance from anastomotic site to anal verge (RR=0.255, 95%CI:0.098 to 0.665, P=0.004) and preventive ileostomy history(RR=3.643, 95%CI:1.058 to 12.548, P=0.032) were associated with major LARS. One potential risk factor detected in combined analysis was female (RR=2.138, 95%CI: 0.944 to 4.844, P=0.078). Multivariate analysis revealed that female (RR=2.654, 95%CI: 1.005 to 7.014, P=0.049), radiotherapy history (RR=10.422, 95%CI:2.394 to 45.368, P=0.002) and distance from tumor lower margin to anal verge ≤7 cm (RR=8.935, 95%CI:2.827 to 28.243, P=0.000) were independent risk factors of major LARS.
CONCLUSIONSLARS is a significant problem in most rectal cancer patients after SPS. The risk of major LARS increases on condition of radiotherapy, low tumor position and female. When dealing with these patients, preventive measures should be taken into consideration during SPS.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anal Canal ; pathology ; surgery ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; Colon ; surgery ; Defecation ; physiology ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Long Term Adverse Effects ; epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiotherapy ; adverse effects ; Rectal Neoplasms ; complications ; pathology ; surgery ; Rectum ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; methods ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Syndrome
3.Study of postoperative anorectal dynamics in ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection.
Si YU ; Jianzhong DENG ; Xiang PENG ; Qiaoling WU ; Yiban LIN ; Jiacheng ZHU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2016;19(8):928-932
OBJECTIVETo study postoperative anorectal dynamic change in ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection.
METHODSClinical and follow-up data of 26 ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection in our department from January 2007 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed (observation group). Thirty rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection by the same surgical team in the same period from the Medical Record Room were randomly extracted as control group. The observation indexes included preoperative and postoperative anal resting pressure(ARP), anal maximum squeeze pressure (AMSP), rectal maximum tolerable volume (RMTV), rectal anal inhibition reflex (RAIR) and Wexner anal function scores (0 means normal).
RESULTSThere were no significant differences in clinical baseline data between the two groups(all P>0.05), except the distance from lower edge of tumor to dentate line [(2.9±0.4) cm in observation group vs. (5.0±0.5) cm in control group, P=0.000]. There were no differences in preoperative anorectal manometry and Wexner anal function score between two groups (all P>0.05). The average follow-up time in observation group and control group was 14.5 months and 14.0 months respectively. Three months after operation, significant differences between observation group and control group (all P=0.000) were as follows: defecation frequency [(6.0±1.5) times/day vs. (2.5±1.0) times/day], Wexner anal function score(5.0±0.9 vs. 2.9±1.2), ARP [(32.0±6.7) mmHg vs. (45.0±8.2) mmHg], AMSP [(90.1±6.9) mmHg vs. (110.0±7.5) mmHg], RMTV [(61.0±7.2) ml vs. (91.1±7.5) ml] and positive rate of RAIR [11.5%(3/26) vs. 66.7%(20/30)]. One year after surgery, there were no significant differences in defecation frequency, Wexner anal function scores, ARP, AMSP and RMTV between the two groups (all P>0.05), however the difference in positive rate of RAIR was still significant[38.5%(10/26) vs. 93.3%(28/30), P=0.000].
CONCLUSIONLaparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultra- low rectal cancer can achieve satisfactory anorectal dynamic effect.
Aged ; Anal Canal ; physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Period ; Pressure ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Rectum ; physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies
4.Risk factors of anal function after transabdominal intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Shenghui HUANG ; Pan CHI ; Huiming LIN ; Xingrong LU ; Ying HUANG ; Zongbin XU ; Yanwu SUN ; Daoxiong YE ; Hui ZHENG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;17(10):1014-1017
OBJECTIVETo explore the risk factors of anal function after transabdominal intersphincteric resection(ISR) for low rectal cancer.
METHODSClinical and follow-up data of 96 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent transabdominal ISR in our department from January 2005 to December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The Wexner scoring scale was used to evaluate the anal function and the risk factors of anal function were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTSNinety-six patients completed Wexner scoring scale with mean follow-up of 32.7 months. Eighty-three cases(86.5%) presented good continence with a Wexner score less than 10. There was negative correlation between Wexner score and follow-up duration (Pearson coefficient, -0.078, P=0.003). Univariate analysis suggested the distance less than 5 cm from tumor to anal verge(P=0.043), height less than 2 cm from anastomosis to anal verge (P=0.001) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(P=0.001) were the risk factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that distance less than 2 cm from anastomosis to anal verge(P=0.020) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(P=0.001) were independent risk factors for fecal incontinence.
CONCLUSIONSMost patients have good continence after transabdominal ISR. A distance of less than 2 cm from anastomosis to anal verge and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are independent risk factors for poor anal function after transabdominal ISR.
Anal Canal ; physiopathology ; Fecal Incontinence ; Humans ; Rectal Neoplasms ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors
5.Evaluation of anal function and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery.
Yihuan SONG ; Guangen YANG ; Jianming QIU ; Xiufeng ZHANG ; Qun DENG ; Dong WANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;17(8):809-812
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the impact of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) on postoperative anal function and quality of life in patients with benign rectal tumor and early rectal cancer.
METHODSClinical data of 50 patients with rectal adenoma and early rectal cancer undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery in our hospital from October 2008 to June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Anorectal manometry, endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS), the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI), and the physical and mental health status scores (SF-36) were used to evaluate preoperative and postoperative anorectal function and quality of life.
RESULTSAnorectal manometry indicated anal resting pressure (ARP), maximum squeeze pressure (MSP), rectal volume at sensory threshold(RVST), maximum tolerable volume(MTV) decreased significantly at the first month after surgery (P<0.05). MSP returned to preoperative level at the 3rd month (P>0.05). ARP and MTV returned to normal values at the 6th month (P>0.05). RVST returned to normal values at the 9th month (P>0.05). Recto-anal inhibitory reflex(RAIR) was absent in 1 (2%) patient preoperatively and in 30(60%), 18(36%), 7(14%), 2(4%) at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th months after surgery respectively. ERUS showed similar width and thickness of internal sphincter at 1st and 6th month after surgery compared with preoperative measures (P>0.05). Six months after surgery, the mean FISI score decreased(preoperative vs postoperative:8.5 vs 5.8, P<0.05), suggesting an improvement in fecal continence. However, the overall quality of life did not danger significantly after surgery(P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONSTEM has little impact on anorectal anatomic structure. Anal function may be compromised in the short-term, however the vast majority of patients recover completely after 6-9 months. TEM is a safe, effective and minimally invasive surgery.
Adult ; Aged ; Anal Canal ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Microsurgery ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Period ; Quality of Life ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies
6.Progression in bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving operation for rectal cancer.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;17(6):628-630
The progress in the idea and technology of rectal cancer improve the rate of sphincter-preservation, while bowel dysfunction is the major problem puzzling patients after sphincter-preserving operation. Recent researches reveal bowel dysfunction is closely associated with the postoperative change of anatomy, nerve damage and sphincter functional injury based on the mechanism of defecation function change through the analysis of anatomy, physiology and dynamics. This paper summarizes the mechanism and epidemiology of bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer operation, and elucidate the role of such mechanism in treatment and prevention of above bowel dysfunction.
Anal Canal
;
surgery
;
Humans
;
Intestinal Diseases
;
etiology
;
Intestine, Small
;
physiopathology
;
Organ Sparing Treatments
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Rectal Neoplasms
;
surgery
7.Comparison of anorectal pressure after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids versus Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation for grade III hemorrhoids.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013;16(12):1183-1186
OBJECTIVETo compare the long-term anorectal manometry of patients with grade III hemorrhoids treated by procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) or Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHAL).
METHODSA total of 114 patients with grade III hemorrhoids in our department in 2010 were prospectively enrolled, and divided into PPH group (63 cases) and DGHAL group (51 cases) according to patient preference. Patients received anorectal pressure examination 2, 6, 12, 18 months after operation, including rectal resting pressure, anal resting pressure, maximal anal contractive pressure and length of high-pressure band. Anorectal manometries between two procedure groups were compared.
RESULTSIn every time point of follow-up, as compared to PPH group, DGHAL group presented higher anal resting pressure[postoperative 2 months: (56.2±2.6) mmHg vs. (43.2±3.1) mmHg, postoperative 6 months: (55.2±2.1) mmHg vs. (45.1±2.5) mmHg, postoperative 12 months: (53.2±3.0) mmHg vs. (40.2±3.2) mmHg, postoperative 18 months: (55.3±2.6) mmHg vs. (43.2±2.5) mmHg, all P<0.01], and longer length of high-pressure band [postoperative 2 months: (3.45±0.14) cm vs. (2.95±0.22) cm, postoperative 6 months: (3.46±0.12) cm vs. (2.94±0.26) cm, postoperative 12 months: (3.45±0.12) cm vs. (3.01±0.21) cm, postoperative 18 months: (3.56±0.12) cm vs. (3.02±0.23) cm, all P<0.01]. While no significant differences of maximal anal contractive pressure and rectal resting pressure were found between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONBoth PPH and DGHAL are safe procedures and have similar efficacy in the treatment of grade III hemorrhoids, while DGHALpossesses better efficacy in the time of anal function recovery and the maintenance of anal function.
Anal Canal ; physiopathology ; Female ; Hemorrhoids ; surgery ; Humans ; Ligation ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pressure ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Prolapse ; surgery ; Rectum ; physiopathology
8.A Case of Intestinal Tuberculosis with Perianal Fistula Diagnosed after 30 Years.
Ji Hyun CHEON ; Won MOON ; Seun Ja PARK ; Moo In PARK ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youn Jung CHOI ; Jong Bin KIM ; Hye Jung KWON
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2013;62(6):370-374
Tuberculosis can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract. However, anorectal tuberculosis has rarely been reported. A 46-years-old male presented with abdominal pain and perianal discharge of 30 years' duration. The patient had received operations for anal fistula and inflammation three times. Although he had been taking mesalazine for the past three years after being diagnosed with Crohn's disease, his symptoms persisted. Colonoscopy performed at our hospital revealed cicatricial change of ileocecal valve and diffuse ulcer scar with mild luminal narrowing of the ascending, transverse, and descending colon without active lesions. Multiple large irregular active ulcers were observed in the distal sigmoid and proximal rectum. An anal fistula opening with much yellowish discharge and background ulcer scar was observed in the anal canal. However, cobble-stone appearance and pseudopolyposis were not present. Therefore, we clinically diagnosed him as having intestinal tuberculosis with anal fistula and prescribed antituberculosis medications. Follow-up colonoscopy performed 3 months later showed much improved multiple large irregular ulcers in the distal sigmoid colon and proximal rectum along with completely resolved anal fistula without evidence of pus discharge.
Anal Canal
;
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
;
Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use
;
Colon/pathology
;
Colonoscopy
;
Crohn Disease/diagnosis/drug therapy
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Fistula/*diagnosis/pathology
;
Humans
;
Ileocecal Valve/physiopathology
;
Male
;
Mesalamine/therapeutic use
;
Middle Aged
;
Protein C/analysis
;
Tuberculosis, Gastrointestinal/*diagnosis/drug therapy
9.Clinical significance of detection of internal anal sphincter in children with functional constipation.
Xiang-yu HOU ; Ling-yun WANG ; Wei-lin WANG ; Yong LI ; Yu-zuo BAI
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2011;14(10):753-755
OBJECTIVETo investigate the structural and functional changes of internal anal sphincter (IAS) in children with functional constipation (FC), and to evaluate the association between the thickness of IAS and the severity of clinical symptoms.
METHODSA total of 35 children with FC(constipation group,17 with incontinence) between June 2008 and December 2008 at the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were evaluated using anal manometry and endosonography. These patients were compared to 23 hospitalized children who were excluded for digestive and endocrinal diseases(control group). A validated symptom score(SS) was used to assess the severity of symptoms. The sum of SS ranged between 0 and 65.
RESULTSAnorectal manometry showed reflex relaxation of IAS in response to distension of rectal balloon in all patients. Rectal perceptional threshold in FC group was significantly higher than that in the controls[(42.4 ± 19.5) ml vs.(29.1 ± 15.6) ml, P<0.05]. The lowest volume for inducing reflex relaxation of IAS was significantly higher than that in the controls [(55.6 ± 31.6) ml vs.(30.5 ±13.8) ml, P<0.05]. The thickening of IAS was noted in all the patients[(3.8 ± 1.7) mm vs.(2.5 ± 1.0) mm, P<0.05]. However, there was no significant difference between FC and control in median resting anal sphincter pressure[(170.8 ± 62.3) mm Hg vs. (161.3 ± 51.1) mm Hg, P>0.05]. The median symptom score was 9.3 ± 4.3 in the FC group. The thickness of IAS correlated significantly with total symptom severity score(r=0.407, P<0.05). There was no correlation between thickness of IAS and age, sex, or duration of disease(P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONSStructural and functional changes of internal anal sphincter exist in children with functional constipation. The thickness of internal anal sphincter correlates significantly with symptom severity.
Anal Canal ; diagnostic imaging ; physiopathology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Constipation ; diagnostic imaging ; physiopathology ; Endosonography ; Female ; Humans ; Male
10.Anorectal motility in children with functional constipation.
Jie-Yu YOU ; Hong-Mei ZHAO ; Wen-Xian OU-YANG
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2010;12(11):915-917
Adolescent
;
Anal Canal
;
physiopathology
;
Child
;
Constipation
;
physiopathology
;
Female
;
Gastrointestinal Motility
;
physiology
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Rectum
;
physiopathology

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail