BACKGROUND: The main challenge in new drug development is accurately predicting the human response in preclinical models. METHODS: In this study, we developed three different intestinal barrier models using advanced biofabrication techniques: (i) a manual model containing Caco-2 and HT-29 cells on a collagen bed, (ii) a manual model with a Caco-2/HT-29 layer on a HDFn-laden collagen layer, and (iii) a 3D bioprinted model incorporating both cellular layers. Each model was rigorously tested for its ability to simulate a functional intestinal membrane. RESULTS: All models successfully replicated the structural and functional aspects of the intestinal barrier. The 3D bioprinted intestinal model, however, demonstrated superior epithelial barrier integrity enhanced tight junction formation, microvilli development, and increased mucus production. When subjected to Ibuprofen, the 3D bioprinted model provided a more predictive response, underscoring its potential as a reliable in vitro tool for drug toxicity testing. CONCLUSION Our 3D bioprinted intestinal model presents a robust and predictive platform for drug toxicity assessments, significantly reducing the need for animal testing. This model not only aligns with ethical testing protocols but also offers enhanced accuracy in predicting human responses, thereby advancing the field of drug development.

BACKGROUND: The main challenge in new drug development is accurately predicting the human response in preclinical models. METHODS: In this study, we developed three different intestinal barrier models using advanced biofabrication techniques: (i) a manual model containing Caco-2 and HT-29 cells on a collagen bed, (ii) a manual model with a Caco-2/HT-29 layer on a HDFn-laden collagen layer, and (iii) a 3D bioprinted model incorporating both cellular layers. Each model was rigorously tested for its ability to simulate a functional intestinal membrane. RESULTS: All models successfully replicated the structural and functional aspects of the intestinal barrier. The 3D bioprinted intestinal model, however, demonstrated superior epithelial barrier integrity enhanced tight junction formation, microvilli development, and increased mucus production. When subjected to Ibuprofen, the 3D bioprinted model provided a more predictive response, underscoring its potential as a reliable in vitro tool for drug toxicity testing. CONCLUSION Our 3D bioprinted intestinal model presents a robust and predictive platform for drug toxicity assessments, significantly reducing the need for animal testing. This model not only aligns with ethical testing protocols but also offers enhanced accuracy in predicting human responses, thereby advancing the field of drug development.

BACKGROUND: The main challenge in new drug development is accurately predicting the human response in preclinical models. METHODS: In this study, we developed three different intestinal barrier models using advanced biofabrication techniques: (i) a manual model containing Caco-2 and HT-29 cells on a collagen bed, (ii) a manual model with a Caco-2/HT-29 layer on a HDFn-laden collagen layer, and (iii) a 3D bioprinted model incorporating both cellular layers. Each model was rigorously tested for its ability to simulate a functional intestinal membrane. RESULTS: All models successfully replicated the structural and functional aspects of the intestinal barrier. The 3D bioprinted intestinal model, however, demonstrated superior epithelial barrier integrity enhanced tight junction formation, microvilli development, and increased mucus production. When subjected to Ibuprofen, the 3D bioprinted model provided a more predictive response, underscoring its potential as a reliable in vitro tool for drug toxicity testing. CONCLUSION Our 3D bioprinted intestinal model presents a robust and predictive platform for drug toxicity assessments, significantly reducing the need for animal testing. This model not only aligns with ethical testing protocols but also offers enhanced accuracy in predicting human responses, thereby advancing the field of drug development.

BACKGROUND: The main challenge in new drug development is accurately predicting the human response in preclinical models. METHODS: In this study, we developed three different intestinal barrier models using advanced biofabrication techniques: (i) a manual model containing Caco-2 and HT-29 cells on a collagen bed, (ii) a manual model with a Caco-2/HT-29 layer on a HDFn-laden collagen layer, and (iii) a 3D bioprinted model incorporating both cellular layers. Each model was rigorously tested for its ability to simulate a functional intestinal membrane. RESULTS: All models successfully replicated the structural and functional aspects of the intestinal barrier. The 3D bioprinted intestinal model, however, demonstrated superior epithelial barrier integrity enhanced tight junction formation, microvilli development, and increased mucus production. When subjected to Ibuprofen, the 3D bioprinted model provided a more predictive response, underscoring its potential as a reliable in vitro tool for drug toxicity testing. CONCLUSION Our 3D bioprinted intestinal model presents a robust and predictive platform for drug toxicity assessments, significantly reducing the need for animal testing. This model not only aligns with ethical testing protocols but also offers enhanced accuracy in predicting human responses, thereby advancing the field of drug development.

BACKGROUND: The main challenge in new drug development is accurately predicting the human response in preclinical models. METHODS: In this study, we developed three different intestinal barrier models using advanced biofabrication techniques: (i) a manual model containing Caco-2 and HT-29 cells on a collagen bed, (ii) a manual model with a Caco-2/HT-29 layer on a HDFn-laden collagen layer, and (iii) a 3D bioprinted model incorporating both cellular layers. Each model was rigorously tested for its ability to simulate a functional intestinal membrane. RESULTS: All models successfully replicated the structural and functional aspects of the intestinal barrier. The 3D bioprinted intestinal model, however, demonstrated superior epithelial barrier integrity enhanced tight junction formation, microvilli development, and increased mucus production. When subjected to Ibuprofen, the 3D bioprinted model provided a more predictive response, underscoring its potential as a reliable in vitro tool for drug toxicity testing. CONCLUSION Our 3D bioprinted intestinal model presents a robust and predictive platform for drug toxicity assessments, significantly reducing the need for animal testing. This model not only aligns with ethical testing protocols but also offers enhanced accuracy in predicting human responses, thereby advancing the field of drug development.

Background: Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality among gynecologic cancers, primarily because it typically is diagnosed at a late stage and because of the development of chemoresistance in recurrent disease. Improving outcomes in women with platinumresistant ovarian cancer is a substantial unmet need. Activation of the glucocorticoidreceptor (GR) by cortisol has been shown to suppress the apoptotic pathways used by cytotoxic agents, limiting their efficacy. Selective GR modulation may be able to counteract cortisol’s antiapoptotic effects, enhancing chemotherapy’s efficacy. A previous phase 2 study has shown that adding intermittently dosed relacorilant, a selective GR modulator, to nab-paclitaxel improved outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with minimal added toxicity, in women with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The ROSELLA study aims to confirm and expand on these findings in a larger population. Methods ROSELLA is a phase 3, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, global multicenter study in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. Eligible participants have received 1 to 3 lines of prior systemic anticancer therapy, including ≥1 prior line of platinum therapy and prior treatment with bevacizumab, with documented progressive disease or intolerance to the most recent therapy. There is no biomarker-based requirement for participant selection. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive intermittently dosed relacorilant in combination with nabpaclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. The study’s primary efficacy endpoint is PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary efficacy endpoints include OS, investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate, best overall response, duration of response, clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks, and cancer antigen 125 response. The study is also evaluating safety and patient-reported outcomes.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05257408; European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database Identifier: 2022-000662-18

Background: Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality among gynecologic cancers, primarily because it typically is diagnosed at a late stage and because of the development of chemoresistance in recurrent disease. Improving outcomes in women with platinumresistant ovarian cancer is a substantial unmet need. Activation of the glucocorticoidreceptor (GR) by cortisol has been shown to suppress the apoptotic pathways used by cytotoxic agents, limiting their efficacy. Selective GR modulation may be able to counteract cortisol’s antiapoptotic effects, enhancing chemotherapy’s efficacy. A previous phase 2 study has shown that adding intermittently dosed relacorilant, a selective GR modulator, to nab-paclitaxel improved outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with minimal added toxicity, in women with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The ROSELLA study aims to confirm and expand on these findings in a larger population. Methods ROSELLA is a phase 3, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, global multicenter study in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. Eligible participants have received 1 to 3 lines of prior systemic anticancer therapy, including ≥1 prior line of platinum therapy and prior treatment with bevacizumab, with documented progressive disease or intolerance to the most recent therapy. There is no biomarker-based requirement for participant selection. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive intermittently dosed relacorilant in combination with nabpaclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. The study’s primary efficacy endpoint is PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary efficacy endpoints include OS, investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate, best overall response, duration of response, clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks, and cancer antigen 125 response. The study is also evaluating safety and patient-reported outcomes.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05257408; European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database Identifier: 2022-000662-18