Combination therapies of antihypertensive drugs are recommended in cases where hypertension is not controlled by monotherapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) between fixed-dose combination (FDC) of fimasartan/amlodipine 60/10 mg and the corresponding loose combination. Because of the high intra-subject variability for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of fimasartan, a randomized, open-label, 3×3 partial replicated crossover design was adopted. Subjects received a single dose of FDC of fimasartan/amlodipine 60/10 mg or the corresponding loose combination in each period. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 48 hours for fimasartan and 144 hours for amlodipine, respectively. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and its 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the FDC to the loose combination for C(max) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable time point (AUC(last)) were calculated. Sixty healthy subjects were randomized, and 57 subjects completed the study. The concentration-time profiles of fimasartan and amlodipine were similar between the FDC and loose combination. The GMRs (90% CIs) of the FDC to the loose combination for C(max) and AUC(last) were 1.0440 (0.9202–1.1844) and 1.0412 (0.9775–1.1090) for fimasartan, and 1.0430 (1.0156–1.0711) and 1.0339 (1.0055–1.0631) for amlodipine, respectively. The GMRs and its 90% CIs for C(max) and AUC(last) of fimasartan and amlodipine were included not only in the scaled bioequivalence criteria but also in the conventional bioequivalence criteria. In conclusion, FDC of fimasartan/amlodipine 60/10 mg showed comparable PK profiles with the corresponding loose combination, which suggests their bioequivalence.
Amlodipine ; Antihypertensive Agents ; Cross-Over Studies ; Healthy Volunteers ; Hypertension ; Pharmacokinetics ; Plasma ; Therapeutic Equivalency

No abstract available.
Amlodipine

No abstract available.
Amlodipine*

No abstract available.
Amlodipine*

OBJECTIVES: Investigate the influence of benazepril and amlodipine on the expression of secretin (PZ) and somatostatin (SS) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). METHODS: Forty-five SHRs (14 weeks old, male) were randomly assigned into 3 groups (=15):SHR group, Benazepril group (which was given benazepril 0.90 mg·kg·d) and Amlodipine group (SHRs were given amlodipine 0.45 mg· kg·d), taking WistarKyoto(WKY) as normal control (=15), meanwhile, rats in SHR group and WKY group were given the same volume of distilled water. After 8 weeks of intervention, the expression of protein and mRNA of PZ in duodenum and SS in sinuses ventriculi was detected by enzyme-linked immunoassay and RT-PCR. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of intervention, compared with the WKY group, the expression of protein and mRNA of PZ in duodenum and SS in sinuses ventriculi was increased significantly in SHR group (<0. 05). Compared with SHR group, the expression of PZ in duodenum and SS in sinuses ventriculi was decreased significantly in Benazepril group and Amlodipine group (<0.05). Compared with Benazepril group, in Amlodipine group the expression of PZ mRNA in duodenum and SS mRNA in sinuses ventriculi was decreased more significantly (<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The regulation disorder of PZ in duodenum and SS in sinuses ventriculi exists in SHR. The antihypertensive effect of benazepril and amlodipine may be realized by regulating the expression of PZ and SS, while the regulation of amlodipine is more obvious than benazepril.
Amlodipine ; pharmacology ; Animals ; Antihypertensive Agents ; pharmacology ; Benzazepines ; pharmacology ; Blood Pressure ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Male ; Random Allocation ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred SHR ; Rats, Inbred WKY ; Secretin ; metabolism ; Somatostatin ; metabolism

Antihypertensive effects of ethanol extracts of Aralia elata (Miq.) Seem. (AE) were investigated in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). SHR aged 14 weeks were treated for 8 weeks with AE (10 or 50 mg/kg/day) or amlodipine besylate (Am; 10 mg/kg/day) orally. Hypertension results in injury to several organs and can produce a significant increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) content as a result of lipid peroxidation and endothelial dysfunction. In this study, oral administration of AE and Am significantly reduced systolic blood pressure, organ weight index, and MDA content in tissues but increased significantly the plasma nitrite and nitrate concentrations. The endothelium-dependent relaxant activities of acetylcholine (10⁻¹⁰–10⁻³ M) in norepinephrine (NE)-precontracted aorta were increased in AE- and Am-treated rats. Particularly strong endothelium-dependent relaxant activities were observed in AE-treated (50 mg/kg) rats. The endothelium-independent relaxant activities of sodium nitroprusside (10⁻¹⁰–10⁻³ M) in NE-precontracted aorta were not changed. The results of this study suggest that AE has both antihypertensive and end-organ protective effects in SHR.
Acetylcholine ; Administration, Oral ; Amlodipine ; Animals ; Aorta ; Aralia* ; Blood Pressure ; Ethanol* ; Hypertension ; Lipid Peroxidation ; Malondialdehyde ; Nitroprusside ; Norepinephrine ; Organ Size ; Plasma ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred SHR*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of diabetic complications and antagonists of renin-angiotensin system and amlodipine have been reported previously to reduce oxidative stress. In this study, we compared the changes in oxidative stress markers after valsartan and amlodipine treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension and compared the changes in metabolic parameters. METHODS: Type 2 diabetic subjects with hypertension 30 to 80 years of age who were not taking antihypertensive drugs were randomized into either valsartan (n = 33) or amlodipine (n = 35) groups and treated for 24 weeks. We measured serum nitrotyrosine levels as an oxidative stress marker. Metabolic parameters including serum glucose, insulin, lipid profile, and urine albumin and creatinine were also measured. RESULTS: After 24 weeks of valsartan or amlodipine treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased, with no significant difference between the groups. Both groups showed a decrease in serum nitrotyrosine (7.74 ± 7.30 nmol/L vs. 3.95 ± 4.07 nmol/L in the valsartan group and 8.37 ± 8.75 nmol/L vs. 2.68 ± 2.23 nmol/L in the amlodipine group) with no significant difference between the groups. Other parameters including glucose, lipid profile, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance showed no significant differences before and after treatment in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Valsartan and amlodipine reduced the oxidative stress marker in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension.
Amlodipine* ; Antihypertensive Agents ; Blood Glucose ; Blood Pressure ; Creatinine ; Diabetes Complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Glucose ; Homeostasis ; Humans ; Hypertension* ; Insulin ; Insulin Resistance ; Oxidative Stress* ; Renin-Angiotensin System ; Valsartan*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of diabetic complications and antagonists of renin-angiotensin system and amlodipine have been reported previously to reduce oxidative stress. In this study, we compared the changes in oxidative stress markers after valsartan and amlodipine treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension and compared the changes in metabolic parameters. METHODS: Type 2 diabetic subjects with hypertension 30 to 80 years of age who were not taking antihypertensive drugs were randomized into either valsartan (n = 33) or amlodipine (n = 35) groups and treated for 24 weeks. We measured serum nitrotyrosine levels as an oxidative stress marker. Metabolic parameters including serum glucose, insulin, lipid profile, and urine albumin and creatinine were also measured. RESULTS: After 24 weeks of valsartan or amlodipine treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased, with no significant difference between the groups. Both groups showed a decrease in serum nitrotyrosine (7.74 ± 7.30 nmol/L vs. 3.95 ± 4.07 nmol/L in the valsartan group and 8.37 ± 8.75 nmol/L vs. 2.68 ± 2.23 nmol/L in the amlodipine group) with no significant difference between the groups. Other parameters including glucose, lipid profile, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance showed no significant differences before and after treatment in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Valsartan and amlodipine reduced the oxidative stress marker in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension.
Amlodipine* ; Antihypertensive Agents ; Blood Glucose ; Blood Pressure ; Creatinine ; Diabetes Complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Glucose ; Homeostasis ; Humans ; Hypertension* ; Insulin ; Insulin Resistance ; Oxidative Stress* ; Renin-Angiotensin System ; Valsartan*

This study describes the development of an analytical method to determine radotinib levels in human plasma using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for pharmacokinetic application. Plasma samples were sequentially processed by liquid-liquid extraction using methyl tert-butyl ether, evaporation, and reconstitution. Analytes were separated and analyzed using HPLC-MS/MS in selected reaction monitoring mode, monitoring the specific transitions of m/z 531 to 290 for radotinib and m/z 409 to 238 for amlodipine (internal standard). The HPLC-MS/MS analytical method was validated with respect to selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, recovery, and stability. Calibration curves were linear over a concentration range 5–3,000 ng/mL with correlation coefficients (r) > 0.998. The lower limit of quantification for radotinib in plasma was 5 ng/mL. The accuracy and precision of the analytical method were acceptable within 15% at all quality control levels. This method was suitable to determine radotinib levels in human plasma because of its simplicity, selectivity, precision, and accuracy.
Amlodipine ; Calibration ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Ether ; Humans* ; Liquid-Liquid Extraction ; Mass Spectrometry* ; Methods* ; Plasma* ; Quality Control ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

BACKGROUNDCombination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers has been successfully used in the antihypertensive therapy for many years. Fixed dose combinations of ramipril/amlodipine have a benefit effect for patients to achieve target blood pressure (BP). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of fixed dose combinations of ramipril and amlodipine (Egiramlon®) in hypertensive diabetic patients.

METHODSHypertensive diabetic patients who were enrolled into the RAMONA trial were included in this open, prospective, Phase IV observational clinical study. Patients had mild-to-moderate hypertension and failed to reach target BP levels through their previous therapy. During the four months of observation, patients took part in three visits (1st day = visit 1, 1st month = visit 2, and 4th month = visit 3) where they received a fixed dose combination of 5/5, 5/10, 10/5, or 10/10 mg ramipril/amlodipine, respectively, with the possibly required dose titrations, based on the decision of their attending physician. Target BP for diabetic patients was <140/85 mmHg. BP levels were measured in all visits, by taking two readings at 2-min interval. Laboratory tests including full blood count, renal function test, electrolytes, blood glucose, serum cholesterol, uric acid, triglycerides, liver function test, creatinine kinase, and midstream urinalysis were performed at visit 1 and visit 3.

RESULTSThe 6423 patients completed the study. Among these patients, 1276 (19.9%) patients suffered from type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mean age of these diabetic patients was 64.2 ± 10.0 years; 707 (55.4%) patients were males. Target BP was achieved by 891 (69.8%) of diabetic patients at visit 3 (primary endpoint). BP decreased from 157.5/91.3 ± 9.6/7.6 mmHg (visit 1) to 130.9/79.6 ± 7.4/5.8 mmHg (visit 3). As for the secondary endpoint of the study, total cholesterol decreased from 5.50 ± 1.13 mmol/L (visit 1) to 5.20 ± 0.95 mmol/L (P = 0.000), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased from 3.20 ± 0.93 mmol/L to 3.00 ± 0.77 mmol/L (P = 0.000), triglyceride decreased from 2.20 ± 1.14 mmol/L to 2.00 ± 1.97 mmol/L (P = 0.000), while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased from 1.30 ± 0.42 to 1.35 ± 0.30 mmol/L (P = 0.001) until the end of the 4th month (visit 3). Fasting blood glucose of the hypertensive diabetic patients decreased from 7.20 ± 1.88 mmol/L to 6.70 ± 1.38 mmol/L (P = 0.000), while HbA1c decreased from 7.90 ± 1.78% to 7.60 ± 1.83% (P = 0.000). Various fixed dose combinations of ramipril/amlodipine were well tolerated and no adverse event related to the use of the medicine has appeared.

CONCLUSIONSThe fixed dose combination of ramipril/amlodipine was effective in hypertensive diabetic patients who failed to reach target BP previously.

Aged ; Amlodipine ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Antihypertensive Agents ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure ; drug effects ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ramipril ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use