Intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) has been widely applied as an important blood conservation measure in surgical operations. However, there is currently a lack of clinical practice guidelines for the implementation of IOCS in patients with malignant tumors. This report aims to provide clinicians with recommendations on the use of IOCS in patients with malignant tumors based on the review and assessment of the existed evidence. Data were derived from databases such as PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Wanfang. The guideline development team formulated recommendations based on the quality of evidence, balance of benefits and harms, patient preferences, and health economic assessments. This study constructed seven major clinical questions. The main conclusions of this guideline are as follows: 1) Compared with no perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (NPABT), perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (PABT) leads to a more unfavorable prognosis in cancer patients (Recommended); 2) Compared with the transfusion of allogeneic blood or no transfusion, IOCS does not lead to a more unfavorable prognosis in cancer patients (Recommended); 3) The implementation of IOCS in cancer patients is economically feasible (Recommended); 4) Leukocyte depletion filters (LDF) should be used when implementing IOCS in cancer patients (Strongly Recommended); 5) Irradiation treatment of autologous blood to be reinfused can be used when implementing IOCS in cancer patients (Recommended); 6) A careful assessment of the condition of cancer patients (meeting indications and excluding contraindications) should be conducted before implementing IOCS (Strongly Recommended); 7) Informed consent from cancer patients should be obtained when implementing IOCS, with a thorough pre-assessment of the patient's condition and the likelihood of blood loss, adherence to standardized internally audited management procedures, meeting corresponding conditions, and obtaining corresponding qualifications (Recommended). In brief, current evidence indicates that IOCS can be implemented for some malignant tumor patients who need allogeneic blood transfusion after physician full evaluation, and LDF or irradiation should be used during the implementation process.

Objective:It analyzes the resource allocation efficiency and its changing trend of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022,discusses the problems existing in resource allocation,and provides reference suggestions for improving the efficiency of health resource allocation.Methods:The Banker-Chames-Cooper(BCC)model in Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)was used to statically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing in 2022.The Malmquist index model was used to dynamically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022.Results:In 2022,the overall comprehensive efficiency of medical institutions in Beijing was not high,with an average of 0.804.There were 6 types of medical institutions with effective production efficiency(35.30％),4 types of medical institutions with weak production efficiency(23.50％),and 7 types of medical institutions with ineffective production efficiency(41.20％).From 2016 to 2022,the total factor productivity change index of general hospitals,orthopedic hospitals,other specialized hospitals and nursing homes was greater than 1,and the average total factor productivity change index was 0.907.Conclusion:The allocation efficiency of health resources in various medical institutions in Beijing needs to be improved.It is suggested that the government should strengthen macro-control and allocate health resources in combination with the market;accelerate the promotion of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system,adjust the structure of medical resources,and improve the utilization rate of resources;make full use of psychiatric hospital health resources,avoid resource waste;improve technical ability and promote technological innovation.

Objective:It analyzes the resource allocation efficiency and its changing trend of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022,discusses the problems existing in resource allocation,and provides reference suggestions for improving the efficiency of health resource allocation.Methods:The Banker-Chames-Cooper(BCC)model in Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)was used to statically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing in 2022.The Malmquist index model was used to dynamically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022.Results:In 2022,the overall comprehensive efficiency of medical institutions in Beijing was not high,with an average of 0.804.There were 6 types of medical institutions with effective production efficiency(35.30％),4 types of medical institutions with weak production efficiency(23.50％),and 7 types of medical institutions with ineffective production efficiency(41.20％).From 2016 to 2022,the total factor productivity change index of general hospitals,orthopedic hospitals,other specialized hospitals and nursing homes was greater than 1,and the average total factor productivity change index was 0.907.Conclusion:The allocation efficiency of health resources in various medical institutions in Beijing needs to be improved.It is suggested that the government should strengthen macro-control and allocate health resources in combination with the market;accelerate the promotion of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system,adjust the structure of medical resources,and improve the utilization rate of resources;make full use of psychiatric hospital health resources,avoid resource waste;improve technical ability and promote technological innovation.

Objective:It analyzes the resource allocation efficiency and its changing trend of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022,discusses the problems existing in resource allocation,and provides reference suggestions for improving the efficiency of health resource allocation.Methods:The Banker-Chames-Cooper(BCC)model in Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)was used to statically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing in 2022.The Malmquist index model was used to dynamically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022.Results:In 2022,the overall comprehensive efficiency of medical institutions in Beijing was not high,with an average of 0.804.There were 6 types of medical institutions with effective production efficiency(35.30％),4 types of medical institutions with weak production efficiency(23.50％),and 7 types of medical institutions with ineffective production efficiency(41.20％).From 2016 to 2022,the total factor productivity change index of general hospitals,orthopedic hospitals,other specialized hospitals and nursing homes was greater than 1,and the average total factor productivity change index was 0.907.Conclusion:The allocation efficiency of health resources in various medical institutions in Beijing needs to be improved.It is suggested that the government should strengthen macro-control and allocate health resources in combination with the market;accelerate the promotion of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system,adjust the structure of medical resources,and improve the utilization rate of resources;make full use of psychiatric hospital health resources,avoid resource waste;improve technical ability and promote technological innovation.

Objective:It analyzes the resource allocation efficiency and its changing trend of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022,discusses the problems existing in resource allocation,and provides reference suggestions for improving the efficiency of health resource allocation.Methods:The Banker-Chames-Cooper(BCC)model in Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)was used to statically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing in 2022.The Malmquist index model was used to dynamically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022.Results:In 2022,the overall comprehensive efficiency of medical institutions in Beijing was not high,with an average of 0.804.There were 6 types of medical institutions with effective production efficiency(35.30％),4 types of medical institutions with weak production efficiency(23.50％),and 7 types of medical institutions with ineffective production efficiency(41.20％).From 2016 to 2022,the total factor productivity change index of general hospitals,orthopedic hospitals,other specialized hospitals and nursing homes was greater than 1,and the average total factor productivity change index was 0.907.Conclusion:The allocation efficiency of health resources in various medical institutions in Beijing needs to be improved.It is suggested that the government should strengthen macro-control and allocate health resources in combination with the market;accelerate the promotion of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system,adjust the structure of medical resources,and improve the utilization rate of resources;make full use of psychiatric hospital health resources,avoid resource waste;improve technical ability and promote technological innovation.

Objective:It analyzes the resource allocation efficiency and its changing trend of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022,discusses the problems existing in resource allocation,and provides reference suggestions for improving the efficiency of health resource allocation.Methods:The Banker-Chames-Cooper(BCC)model in Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)was used to statically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing in 2022.The Malmquist index model was used to dynamically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022.Results:In 2022,the overall comprehensive efficiency of medical institutions in Beijing was not high,with an average of 0.804.There were 6 types of medical institutions with effective production efficiency(35.30％),4 types of medical institutions with weak production efficiency(23.50％),and 7 types of medical institutions with ineffective production efficiency(41.20％).From 2016 to 2022,the total factor productivity change index of general hospitals,orthopedic hospitals,other specialized hospitals and nursing homes was greater than 1,and the average total factor productivity change index was 0.907.Conclusion:The allocation efficiency of health resources in various medical institutions in Beijing needs to be improved.It is suggested that the government should strengthen macro-control and allocate health resources in combination with the market;accelerate the promotion of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system,adjust the structure of medical resources,and improve the utilization rate of resources;make full use of psychiatric hospital health resources,avoid resource waste;improve technical ability and promote technological innovation.

Objective:It analyzes the resource allocation efficiency and its changing trend of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022,discusses the problems existing in resource allocation,and provides reference suggestions for improving the efficiency of health resource allocation.Methods:The Banker-Chames-Cooper(BCC)model in Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)was used to statically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing in 2022.The Malmquist index model was used to dynamically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022.Results:In 2022,the overall comprehensive efficiency of medical institutions in Beijing was not high,with an average of 0.804.There were 6 types of medical institutions with effective production efficiency(35.30％),4 types of medical institutions with weak production efficiency(23.50％),and 7 types of medical institutions with ineffective production efficiency(41.20％).From 2016 to 2022,the total factor productivity change index of general hospitals,orthopedic hospitals,other specialized hospitals and nursing homes was greater than 1,and the average total factor productivity change index was 0.907.Conclusion:The allocation efficiency of health resources in various medical institutions in Beijing needs to be improved.It is suggested that the government should strengthen macro-control and allocate health resources in combination with the market;accelerate the promotion of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system,adjust the structure of medical resources,and improve the utilization rate of resources;make full use of psychiatric hospital health resources,avoid resource waste;improve technical ability and promote technological innovation.

Objective:It analyzes the resource allocation efficiency and its changing trend of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022,discusses the problems existing in resource allocation,and provides reference suggestions for improving the efficiency of health resource allocation.Methods:The Banker-Chames-Cooper(BCC)model in Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)was used to statically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing in 2022.The Malmquist index model was used to dynamically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022.Results:In 2022,the overall comprehensive efficiency of medical institutions in Beijing was not high,with an average of 0.804.There were 6 types of medical institutions with effective production efficiency(35.30％),4 types of medical institutions with weak production efficiency(23.50％),and 7 types of medical institutions with ineffective production efficiency(41.20％).From 2016 to 2022,the total factor productivity change index of general hospitals,orthopedic hospitals,other specialized hospitals and nursing homes was greater than 1,and the average total factor productivity change index was 0.907.Conclusion:The allocation efficiency of health resources in various medical institutions in Beijing needs to be improved.It is suggested that the government should strengthen macro-control and allocate health resources in combination with the market;accelerate the promotion of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system,adjust the structure of medical resources,and improve the utilization rate of resources;make full use of psychiatric hospital health resources,avoid resource waste;improve technical ability and promote technological innovation.

Objective:It analyzes the resource allocation efficiency and its changing trend of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022,discusses the problems existing in resource allocation,and provides reference suggestions for improving the efficiency of health resource allocation.Methods:The Banker-Chames-Cooper(BCC)model in Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)was used to statically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing in 2022.The Malmquist index model was used to dynamically analyze the health resource allocation efficiency of 17 types of medical institutions in Beijing from 2016 to 2022.Results:In 2022,the overall comprehensive efficiency of medical institutions in Beijing was not high,with an average of 0.804.There were 6 types of medical institutions with effective production efficiency(35.30％),4 types of medical institutions with weak production efficiency(23.50％),and 7 types of medical institutions with ineffective production efficiency(41.20％).From 2016 to 2022,the total factor productivity change index of general hospitals,orthopedic hospitals,other specialized hospitals and nursing homes was greater than 1,and the average total factor productivity change index was 0.907.Conclusion:The allocation efficiency of health resources in various medical institutions in Beijing needs to be improved.It is suggested that the government should strengthen macro-control and allocate health resources in combination with the market;accelerate the promotion of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system,adjust the structure of medical resources,and improve the utilization rate of resources;make full use of psychiatric hospital health resources,avoid resource waste;improve technical ability and promote technological innovation.

Patients with severe trauma require an extremely timely treatment and transfusion plays an irreplaceable role in the emergency treatment of such patients. An increasing number of evidence-based medicinal evidences and clinical practices suggest that patients with severe traumatic bleeding benefit from early transfusion of low-titer group O whole blood or hemostatic resuscitation with red blood cells, plasma and platelet of a balanced ratio. However, the current domestic mode of blood supply cannot fully meet the requirements of timely and effective blood transfusion for emergency treatment of patients with severe trauma in clinical practice. In order to solve the key problems in blood supply and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma, Branch of Clinical Transfusion Medicine of Chinese Medical Association, Group for Trauma Emergency Care and Multiple Injuries of Trauma Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Young Scholar Group of Disaster Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association organized domestic experts of blood transfusion medicine and trauma treatment to jointly formulate Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients ( version 2024). Based on the evidence-based medical evidence and Delphi method of expert consultation and voting, 10 recommendations were put forward from two aspects of blood support mode and transfusion strategies, aiming to provide a reference for transfusion resuscitation in the emergency treatment of severe trauma and further improve the success rate of treatment of patients with severe trauma.