Child abuse is a widespread global health crisis with longterm implications for children’s physical, psychological, and emotional well-being. Pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) are often the first point of contact for children experiencing abuse, presenting unique diagnostic challenges due to the diverse manifestations of maltreatment. In contrast to physical abuse that often leaves visible markers, nonphysical abuse (e.g., emotional neglect or psychological harm) frequently go undetected, exacerbating underreporting and delayed interventions. This article examines the prevalence, diagnostic challenges, and multidisciplinary strategies for addressing child maltreatment in PEDs. Cultural and systemic barriers, coupled with insufficient training and resource constraints, hinder the recognition of subtle signs of nonphysical abuse. Advances in diagnostic imaging, behavioral assessment tools, and laboratory investigations are discussed as critical components of comprehensive evaluations. Multidisciplinary teams play a pivotal role in addressing the complexity of abuse cases, combining medical, psychological, and legal expertise to provide holistic care while minimizing additional trauma. The integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic workflows is explored as a transformative innovation, offering potential for early detection of abuse patterns and enhanced decision-making. However, the implementation of artificial intelligence requires careful consideration to ensure that it complements human expertise and aligns with ethical standards. There is a need for standardized protocols, targeted training programs, and supportive systems to empower healthcare professionals in recognizing and reporting all forms of child maltreatment. We propose more research to develop tools capable of detecting nonphysical abuse in PEDs. By combining technological advancements, multidisciplinary collaboration, and educational initiatives, PEDs can improve outcomes for vulnerable children and address the widespread issue of child maltreatment more effectively.

Child abuse is a widespread global health crisis with longterm implications for children’s physical, psychological, and emotional well-being. Pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) are often the first point of contact for children experiencing abuse, presenting unique diagnostic challenges due to the diverse manifestations of maltreatment. In contrast to physical abuse that often leaves visible markers, nonphysical abuse (e.g., emotional neglect or psychological harm) frequently go undetected, exacerbating underreporting and delayed interventions. This article examines the prevalence, diagnostic challenges, and multidisciplinary strategies for addressing child maltreatment in PEDs. Cultural and systemic barriers, coupled with insufficient training and resource constraints, hinder the recognition of subtle signs of nonphysical abuse. Advances in diagnostic imaging, behavioral assessment tools, and laboratory investigations are discussed as critical components of comprehensive evaluations. Multidisciplinary teams play a pivotal role in addressing the complexity of abuse cases, combining medical, psychological, and legal expertise to provide holistic care while minimizing additional trauma. The integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic workflows is explored as a transformative innovation, offering potential for early detection of abuse patterns and enhanced decision-making. However, the implementation of artificial intelligence requires careful consideration to ensure that it complements human expertise and aligns with ethical standards. There is a need for standardized protocols, targeted training programs, and supportive systems to empower healthcare professionals in recognizing and reporting all forms of child maltreatment. We propose more research to develop tools capable of detecting nonphysical abuse in PEDs. By combining technological advancements, multidisciplinary collaboration, and educational initiatives, PEDs can improve outcomes for vulnerable children and address the widespread issue of child maltreatment more effectively.

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic placed unprecedented strain on hospital resources and manpower. This study assesses the impact of Malaysia’s nationwide lockdown on the incidence, types, severity, and outcomes of emergency general surgery (EGS) cases at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed the data of patients who underwent EGS procedures for the period 2017 and 2021. Results: During the pandemic period, there was a 48.3% reduction in EGS cases (n=889) compared to the pre-pandemic period (n=1720). Significant reductions were observed in surgeries for appendicitis, soft tissue infection, colorectal, urology, peptic ulcer, and vascular disorders in the COVID period. Conversely, procedures for biliary disorders and hernia complications increased by 7.4% and 5.5%, respectively. Length of hospital stay increased by 57.8% for patients with small bowel disorders, while ICU/HDU admissions rose by 43.5% for colorectal cases (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in mortality rates between the two periods. Conclusions The overall reduction in EGS procedures during the COVID-19 period was consistent with global trends. Despite the challenges posed by the pandemic, the outcomes related to duration of stay, ICU/HDU utilisation, and mortality remained comparable to the pre-pandemic period. These findings highlight the adaptability of healthcare professionals in maintaining continuity and quality of emergency surgical care during a crisis.
Acute Care Surgery ; COVID-19 ; Pandemics

Background: This study compared the quality and duration of analgesia between the superior trunk (ST) and the clavipectoral fascial plane (CFP) blocks in conjunction with a selective supraclavicular nerve (SCN) block for clavicular surgeries. Methods: Fifty patients undergoing mid-third clavicular procedures were randomly assigned to the ST group (received an SCN block followed by blockage of the ST of the brachial plexus) and the CFP group (received an SCN block followed by the CFP block). The primary outcome was the time until the first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included total nalbuphine dosage and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores within the first 24 hours, the onset of sensory block, as well as deltoid and biceps muscle function using the modified Bromage score (MBS), diaphragmatic excursion, along with satisfaction levels. Results: The ST group exhibited a more prolonged duration until the first request for rescue analgesia compared to the CFP group (18.76 ± 0.89 hours vs. 15.34 ± 1.38 hours), with a mean difference of 3.42 hours (95% confidence interval: 2.76 to 4.08, P < 0.001). The ST group consumed less nalbuphine and reported lower NRS scores at 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours than the CFP group. Additionally, the ST group exhibited a lower MBS and diaphragmatic excursion than the CFP group. However, the differences in the onset of sensory block and satisfaction levels were not statistically significant. Conclusions The ST group demonstrated superior outcomes in pain control with less favorable outcomes concerning diaphragmatic excursion and upper limb motor function.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine current global practices in regenerative therapy (RT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and to establish expert recommendations for its use, addressing the current lack of solid evidence and standardized guidelines. Materials and Methods: A 39-question survey was developed by senior Global Andrology Forum (GAF) experts to comprehensively cover clinical aspects of RT. This was distributed globally via a secure online Google Form to ED specialists through the GAF website, international professional societies, and social media, the responses were analyzed and presented for frequencies as percentages. Consensus on expert recommendations for RT use was achieved using the Delphi method. Results: Out of 479 respondents from 62 countries, a third reported using RT for ED. The most popular treatment was low-intensity shock wave therapy (54.6%), followed by platelet-rich plasma (24.5%) and their combination (14.7%), with stem cell therapy being the least used (3.7%). The primary indication for RT was the refractory or adverse effects of PDE5 inhibitors, with the best effectiveness reported in middle-aged and mild-to-moderate ED patients. Respondents were confident about its overall safety, with a significant number expressing interest in RT’s future use, despite pending guidelines support. Conclusions This inaugural global survey reveals a growing use of RT in ED treatment, showcasing its diverse clinical applications and potential for future widespread adoption. However, the lack of comprehensive evidence and clear guidelines requires further research to standardize RT practices in ED treatment.

Background and Objectives: The timing of the reinstitution of warfarin after cesarean section (CS) delivery was not adequately addressed in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the risks of early versus late initiation of warfarin post-CS in patients with mechanical heart valves. Methods: This randomized, open-label cohort study included 114 pregnant women with mechanical heart valves planned to be delivered by CS at or after 28 weeks of gestation.Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Day-2-group, where warfarin was started on day 2, and Day-5-group, where warfarin was started on day 5 after CS. Maternal postoperative bleeding complications, mechanical valve thrombosis, need for blood transfusion or reoperation, and maternal mortality were identified. Results: Ten women (8.8%) had 11 bleeding complications, of whom 2 patients (20%) had intraperitoneal hemorrhage (none in Day-2-group and 2 in Day-5-group), 3 patients (30%) had subcutaneous hematoma (none in Day-2-group and 3 in Day-5-group), and 6 patients (60%) had sub-rectus hematoma (3 in Day-2-group and 3 in Day-5-group). No mechanical valve thrombosis, other thromboembolic events, or in-hospital maternal mortality were reported. Conclusion Despite the small number of events, the bleeding risk was lower in the group with early post-CS warfarin introduction than in the group with late warfarin introduction in patients with prosthetic heart valves.

Methods: This study included 36 patients with FHP with a mean age of 27±2.63 years. These patients were randomly assigned to the two following groups: experimental group A (n=19), which received CSEs and postural correctional exercises (PCEs), , and control group B (n=17), which received only the PCE program. Randomization was performed using the computer-generated block randomization method. Training was applied 3 times per week and lasted for 6 weeks. Data were collected before and after training using lateral view cervical X-ray and NDI. Results: Two-way mixed-design multivariate analysis of variance revealed significant improvements in mean cSVA and NDI values after training (p <0.05) in experimental group (A) compared with pre-training values, whereas no significant differences in these values were observed after training in the control group. In contrast, no significant difference in the mean Cobb angle values after training was observed between the groups. Conclusions Adding CSEs to PCEs is more effective than performing PCEs alone for managing FHP. The trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials. gov registry under the registration number NCT06160245.

Background: This study compared the quality and duration of analgesia between the superior trunk (ST) and the clavipectoral fascial plane (CFP) blocks in conjunction with a selective supraclavicular nerve (SCN) block for clavicular surgeries. Methods: Fifty patients undergoing mid-third clavicular procedures were randomly assigned to the ST group (received an SCN block followed by blockage of the ST of the brachial plexus) and the CFP group (received an SCN block followed by the CFP block). The primary outcome was the time until the first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included total nalbuphine dosage and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores within the first 24 hours, the onset of sensory block, as well as deltoid and biceps muscle function using the modified Bromage score (MBS), diaphragmatic excursion, along with satisfaction levels. Results: The ST group exhibited a more prolonged duration until the first request for rescue analgesia compared to the CFP group (18.76 ± 0.89 hours vs. 15.34 ± 1.38 hours), with a mean difference of 3.42 hours (95% confidence interval: 2.76 to 4.08, P < 0.001). The ST group consumed less nalbuphine and reported lower NRS scores at 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours than the CFP group. Additionally, the ST group exhibited a lower MBS and diaphragmatic excursion than the CFP group. However, the differences in the onset of sensory block and satisfaction levels were not statistically significant. Conclusions The ST group demonstrated superior outcomes in pain control with less favorable outcomes concerning diaphragmatic excursion and upper limb motor function.