1.Challenges and innovations in diagnosing nonphysical child abuse in pediatric emergency departments
Chibuike Daniel ONYEJESI ; Jose Carlos DEL CASTILLO MIRANDA ; Sohaila Mohamed ABDELBAR ; Mayam Mohamed AZIZ ; Eslam ABADY ; Janna Ahmed OMRAN ; Alishah ZEHRA ; Mohammed ALSABRI
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Journal 2025;12(1):1-9
Child abuse is a widespread global health crisis with longterm implications for children’s physical, psychological, and emotional well-being. Pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) are often the first point of contact for children experiencing abuse, presenting unique diagnostic challenges due to the diverse manifestations of maltreatment. In contrast to physical abuse that often leaves visible markers, nonphysical abuse (e.g., emotional neglect or psychological harm) frequently go undetected, exacerbating underreporting and delayed interventions. This article examines the prevalence, diagnostic challenges, and multidisciplinary strategies for addressing child maltreatment in PEDs. Cultural and systemic barriers, coupled with insufficient training and resource constraints, hinder the recognition of subtle signs of nonphysical abuse. Advances in diagnostic imaging, behavioral assessment tools, and laboratory investigations are discussed as critical components of comprehensive evaluations. Multidisciplinary teams play a pivotal role in addressing the complexity of abuse cases, combining medical, psychological, and legal expertise to provide holistic care while minimizing additional trauma. The integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic workflows is explored as a transformative innovation, offering potential for early detection of abuse patterns and enhanced decision-making. However, the implementation of artificial intelligence requires careful consideration to ensure that it complements human expertise and aligns with ethical standards. There is a need for standardized protocols, targeted training programs, and supportive systems to empower healthcare professionals in recognizing and reporting all forms of child maltreatment. We propose more research to develop tools capable of detecting nonphysical abuse in PEDs. By combining technological advancements, multidisciplinary collaboration, and educational initiatives, PEDs can improve outcomes for vulnerable children and address the widespread issue of child maltreatment more effectively.
2.Impact of a New Preoperative Immune-Nutrition Protocol Using Zinc on Hospital Outcomes of Children with Hirschsprung’s Disease: A Novel Randomized Controlled Trial
Hoda Atef Abdelsattar IBRAHIM ; Sherif KADDAH ; Rawan Mohamed El-Hussein MOHAMED ; Sayed KHEDR
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2025;28(1):54-66
Purpose:
Research proved the beneficial effect of Zinc on human health and Gastrointestinal tract inflammatory diseases. We propose that zinc would be of value in children with Hirschsprung’s disease (HD) undergoing elective pull-through surgery. This study was carried out to determine the influence of preoperative zinc intake on postoperative outcomes, especially the hospital length of stay in patients diagnosed with HD as a primary outcome.Other outcomes include identification of the nutritional and inflammatory status including the nutritional and inflammatory markers in children with HD with possible impacts on hospital outcomes.
Methods:
This is a randomized interventional control study that was applied to 50 children diagnosed with HD who underwent elective pull-through surgery. We randomly allocated 25 diagnosed with HD who underwent elective pull-through surgery. We randomly allocated 25 patients to zinc treatment.
Results:
The results demonstrated that the interventional group had a lower incidence of complications (20%) when compared to the control group (64%), with a significant p-value of 0.002. In addition, less incidence of Hirschsprung’s associated enterocolitis (HAEC) (12% vs. 40%) and skin excoriation (8% vs. 32%) were documented in the interventional group compared to the controls respectively.
Conclusion
Pre-operative zinc supplementation may have a beneficial impact on HD children undergoing elective pull-through surgery as regards outcomes such as HAEC and skin excoriation.
3.Altered polyunsaturated fatty acids and oxylipins profile in Behçet’s disease
Mohamed Kacem BEN-FRADJ ; Ines NACEUR ; Emna TALBI ; Rahma WADA ; Omar FEKI ; Monia SMITI-KHANFIR ; Moncef FEKI
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2025;40(3):502-511
Background/Aims:
Behçet’s disease (BD) is an autoinflammatory disease of unknown etiopathogenesis. Oxylipins i.e., prostaglandins, leukotrienes, lipoxins, resolvins, and protectins are bioactive polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) derivatives involved in inflammatory response induction and resolution. The study aimed to determine the profile of selected PUFAs and oxylipins and to define a lipidomic signature for BD.
Methods:
A case-control study was conducted involving thirty-five patients with BD and thirty-five age and sex-matched healthy individuals as a control group. Selected plasma PUFAs and oxylipins were analyzed using a targeted LC-MS/MS method.
Results:
The lipidomic profile was different between the two groups. BD patients showed higher levels of oxylipins deriving from either the n-6-arachidonic acid (i.e., prostaglandin D2, E2, F2α, and 6-keto-F1α, thromboxane B2, leukotriene B4, E4 and F4, and 6-epi and 15-epi-lipoxin A4) or n-3 PUFAs (i.e., 18-hydroxyeicosapentaenoic acid, 7,17-dihydroxy docosapentaenoic acid, protectin X, and resolvin D5), but decreased levels of both n-3 and n-6 PUFAs. Multivariate analyses selected the combination of four mediators, i.e., docosapentaenoic acid, prostaglandin E2, thromboxane B2, and lipoxin A4 as an accurate lipidomic signature for BD.
Conclusions
The profile of PUFAs/oxylipins is altered in BD patients, characterized by increased pro-inflammatory and pro-resolving oxylipins. The findings suggest that oxylipin metabolism might be involved in BD pathophysiology and may represent a therapeutic target for the disease. Further research is required to examine the role of lipid mediators in BD.
4.Comparison of ultrasound-guided superior trunk block versus clavipectoral fascial plane block for clavicular surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
Mohamed Gaber MOHAMED ; Ahmed Mohammad FAHMY ; Marwa Mohamed MEDHAT
The Korean Journal of Pain 2025;38(2):198-206
Background:
This study compared the quality and duration of analgesia between the superior trunk (ST) and the clavipectoral fascial plane (CFP) blocks in conjunction with a selective supraclavicular nerve (SCN) block for clavicular surgeries.
Methods:
Fifty patients undergoing mid-third clavicular procedures were randomly assigned to the ST group (received an SCN block followed by blockage of the ST of the brachial plexus) and the CFP group (received an SCN block followed by the CFP block). The primary outcome was the time until the first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included total nalbuphine dosage and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores within the first 24 hours, the onset of sensory block, as well as deltoid and biceps muscle function using the modified Bromage score (MBS), diaphragmatic excursion, along with satisfaction levels.
Results:
The ST group exhibited a more prolonged duration until the first request for rescue analgesia compared to the CFP group (18.76 ± 0.89 hours vs. 15.34 ± 1.38 hours), with a mean difference of 3.42 hours (95% confidence interval: 2.76 to 4.08, P < 0.001). The ST group consumed less nalbuphine and reported lower NRS scores at 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours than the CFP group. Additionally, the ST group exhibited a lower MBS and diaphragmatic excursion than the CFP group. However, the differences in the onset of sensory block and satisfaction levels were not statistically significant.
Conclusions
The ST group demonstrated superior outcomes in pain control with less favorable outcomes concerning diaphragmatic excursion and upper limb motor function.
5.Regenerative Therapy in Erectile Dysfunction:A Survey on Current Global Practice Trends and GAF Expert Recommendations
Manaf Al HASHIMI ; Germar-M PINGGERA ; Taymour MOSTAFA ; Amarnath RAMBHATLA ; Taha HAMODA ; Rupin SHAH ; Eric CHUNG ; Ahmed HARRAZ ; Mohamed ARAFA ; Tuncay TOPRAK ; Omer RAHEEM ; Carlo GIULIONI ; Ponco BIROWO ; Luca BOERI ; Yassir JASSIM ; Priyank KOTHARI ; Ranjit VISHWAKARMA ; Bahadir SAHIN ; Widi ATMOKO ; Safar GAMIDOV ; Cesar ROJAS-CRUZ ; Darren KATZ ; Adriano FREGONESI ; Nazim GHERABI ; Armand ZINI ; Christopher Chee Kong HO ; Mohamed S. AL-MARHOON ; Marlon MARTINEZ ; Giorgio Ivan RUSSO ; Ayman RASHED ; Gian Maria BUSETTO ; Edmund KO ; Hyun Jun PARK ; Selahittin CAYAN ; Ramadan SALEH ; Osvaldo RAJMIL ; Dong Suk KIM ; Giovanni COLPI ; Ryan SMITH ; Maged RAGAB ; Ates KADIOGLU ; Quang NGUYEN ; Kadir BOCU ; Ahmed EL-SAKKA ; Charalampos THOMAS ; Hussain M ALNAJJAR ; Hiva ALIPOUR ; Ashok AGARWAL
The World Journal of Men's Health 2025;43(2):359-375
Purpose:
This study aimed to examine current global practices in regenerative therapy (RT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and to establish expert recommendations for its use, addressing the current lack of solid evidence and standardized guidelines.
Materials and Methods:
A 39-question survey was developed by senior Global Andrology Forum (GAF) experts to comprehensively cover clinical aspects of RT. This was distributed globally via a secure online Google Form to ED specialists through the GAF website, international professional societies, and social media, the responses were analyzed and presented for frequencies as percentages. Consensus on expert recommendations for RT use was achieved using the Delphi method.
Results:
Out of 479 respondents from 62 countries, a third reported using RT for ED. The most popular treatment was low-intensity shock wave therapy (54.6%), followed by platelet-rich plasma (24.5%) and their combination (14.7%), with stem cell therapy being the least used (3.7%). The primary indication for RT was the refractory or adverse effects of PDE5 inhibitors, with the best effectiveness reported in middle-aged and mild-to-moderate ED patients. Respondents were confident about its overall safety, with a significant number expressing interest in RT’s future use, despite pending guidelines support.
Conclusions
This inaugural global survey reveals a growing use of RT in ED treatment, showcasing its diverse clinical applications and potential for future widespread adoption. However, the lack of comprehensive evidence and clear guidelines requires further research to standardize RT practices in ED treatment.
6.Global Practice Patterns and Variations in the Medical and Surgical Management of NonObstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey, Guidelines and Expert Recommendations
Amarnath RAMBHATLA ; Rupin SHAH ; Imad ZIOUZIOU ; Priyank KOTHARI ; Gianmaria SALVIO ; Murat GUL ; Taha HAMODA ; Parviz KAVOUSSI ; Widi ATMOKO ; Tuncay TOPRAK ; Ponco BIROWO ; Edmund KO ; Mohamed ARAFA ; Ramy Abou GHAYDA ; Vilvapathy Senguttuvan KARTHIKEYAN ; Giorgio Ivan RUSSO ; Germar-Michael PINGGERA ; Eric CHUNG ; Ashok AGARWAL ;
The World Journal of Men's Health 2025;43(1):92-122
Purpose:
Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a common, but complex problem, with multiple therapeutic options and a lack of clear guidelines. Hence, there is considerable controversy and marked variation in the management of NOA. This survey evaluates contemporary global practices related to medical and surgical management for patients with NOA.
Materials and Methods:
A 56-question online survey covering various aspects of the evaluation and management of NOA was sent to specialists around the globe. This paper analyzes the results of the second half of the survey dealing with the management of NOA. Results have been compared to current guidelines, and expert recommendations have been provided using a Delphi process.
Results:
Participants from 49 countries submitted 336 valid responses. Hormonal therapy for 3 to 6 months was suggested before surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) by 29.6% and 23.6% of participants for normogonadotropic hypogonadism and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism respectively. The SSR rate was reported as 50.0% by 26.0% to 50.0% of participants. Interestingly, 46.0% reported successful SSR in <10% of men with Klinefelter syndrome and 41.3% routinely recommended preimplantation genetic testing. Varicocele repair prior to SSR is recommended by 57.7%. Half of the respondents (57.4%) reported using ultrasound to identify the most vascularized areas in the testis for SSR. One-third proceed directly to microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in every case of NOA while others use a staged approach. After a failed conventional TESE, 23.8% wait for 3 months, while 33.1% wait for 6 months before proceeding to mTESE. The cut-off of follicle-stimulating hormone for positive SSR was reported to be 12–19 IU/mL by 22.5% of participants and 20–40 IU/mL by 27.8%, while 31.8% reported no upper limit.
Conclusions
This is the largest survey to date on the real-world medical and surgical management of NOA by reproductive experts. It demonstrates a diverse practice pattern and highlights the need for evidence-based international consensus guidelines.
8.Recanalization Outcomes and Procedural Complications in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and COVID-19 Receiving Endovascular Treatment
João Pedro MARTO ; Davide STRAMBO ; George NTAIOS ; Thanh N NGUYEN ; Pawel WRONA ; Simon ESCALARD ; Simona MARCHESELLI ; Ossama Yassin MANSOUR ; Blanca FUENTES ; Malgorzata DOROBEK ; Marta NOWAKOWSKA-KOTAS ; Elena Oana TERECOASA ; Jonathan M. COUTINHO ; Mariana CARVALHO-DIAS ; Patricia CALLEJA ; João SARGENTO-FREITAS ; Ana PAIVA-NUNES ; Martin ŠRÁMEK ; Priyank KHANDELWAL ; Torcato MEIRA ; Mohamad ABDALKADER ; Pascal JABBOUR ; Martin KOVÁŘ ; Oscar AYO-MARTIN ; Patrik MICHEL ; Roman HERZIG ; Anna CZŁONKOWKSA ; Jelle DEMEESTERE ; Raul G. NOGUEIRA ; Alexander SALERNO ; Susanne WEGENER ; Philipp BAUMGARTNER ; Carlo W. CEREDA ; Giovanni BIANCO ; Morin BEYELER ; Marcel ARNOLD ; Emmanuel CARRERA ; Paolo MACHI ; Valerian ALTERSBERGER ; Leo BONATI ; Henrik GENSICKE ; Manuel BOLOGNESE ; Nils PETERS ; Stephan WETZEL ; Marta MAGRIÇO ; João NUNO RAMOS ; Rita MACHADO ; Carolina MAIA ; Egídio MACHADO ; Patrícia FERREIRA ; Teresa PINHO-E-MELO ; André PAULA ; Manuel Alberto CORREIA ; Pedro CASTRO ; Elsa AZEVEDO ; Luís ALBUQUERQUE ; José NUNO-ALVES ; Joana FERREIRA-PINTO ; Torcato MEIRA ; Liliana PEREIRA ; Miguel RODRIGUES ; André ARAÚJO ; Marta RODRIGUES ; Mariana ROCHA ; Ângelo PEREIRA-FONSECA ; Luís RIBEIRO ; Ricardo VARELA ; Sofia MALHEIRO ; Manuel CAPPELLARI ; Cecilia ZIVELONGHI ; Giulia SAJEVA ; Andrea ZINI ; Gentile MAURO ; Forlivesi STEFANO ; Ludovica MIGLIACCIO ; Maria SESSA ; Sara La GIOIA ; Alessandro PEZZINI ; Davide SANGALLI ; Marialuisa ZEDDE ; Rosario PASCARELLA ; Carlo FERRARESE ; Simone BERETTA ; Susanna DIAMANTI ; Ghil SCHWARZ ; Giovanni FRISULLO ; Pierre SENERS ; Candice SABBEN ; Michel PIOTIN ; Benjamin MAIER ; Guillaume CHARBONNIER ; Fabrice VUILLIER ; Loic LEGRIS ; Pauline CUISENIER ; Francesca R. VODRET ; Gaultier MARNAT ; Jean-Sebastien LIEGEY ; Igor SIBON ; Fabian FLOTTMANN ; Gabriel BROOCKS ; Nils-Ole GLOYER ; Ferdinand O. BOHMANN ; Jan Hendrik SCHAEFER ; Christian H. NOLTE ; Heinrich AUDEBERT ; Eberhard SIEBERT ; Marek SYKORA ; Wilfried LANG ; Julia FERRARI ; Lukas MAYER-SUESS ; Michael KNOFLACH ; Elke-Ruth GIZEWSKI ; Jeffrey STOLP ; Lotte J. STOLZE ; Paul J. NEDERKOORN ; Ido VAN-DEN-WIJNGAARD ; Joke DE MERIS ; Robin LEMMEN ; Sylvie DE RAEDT ; Fenne VANDERVORST ; Matthieu Pierre RUTGERS ; Antoine GUILMOT ; Anne DUSART ; Flavio BELLANTE ; Fernando OSTOS ; Guillermo GONZALEZ-ORTEGA ; Paloma MARTÍN-JIMÉNEZ ; Sebastian GARCÍA-MADRONA ; Antonio CRUZ-CULEBRAS ; Rocio VERA ; Maria-Consuelo MATUTE ; María ALONSO-DE-LECIÑANA ; Ricardo RIGUAL ; Exuperio DÍEZ-TEJEDOR ; Soledad PÉREZ-SÁNCHEZ ; Joan MONTANER ; Fernando DÍAZ-OTERO ; Natalia PEREZ-DE-LA-OSSA ; Belén FLORES-PINA ; Lucia MUÑOZ-NARBONA ; Angel CHAMORRO ; Alejandro RODRÍGUEZ-VÁZQUEZ ; Arturo RENÚ ; Francisco HERNANDEZ-FERNANDEZ ; Tomas SEGURA ; Herbert TEJADA-MEZA ; Daniel SAGARRA-MUR ; Marta SERRANO-PONZ ; Thant HLAING ; Isaiah SEE ; Robert SIMISTER ; David J. WERRING ; Espen Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN ; Annika NORDANSTIG ; Katarina JOOD ; Alexandros RENTZOS ; Libor ŠIMU˚NE ; Dagmar KRAJÍČKOVÁ ; Antonín KRAJINA ; Robert MIKULÍK ; Martina CVIKOVÁ ; Jan VINKLÁREK ; David ŠKOLOUDÍK ; Martin ROUBEC ; Eva HURTIKOVA ; Rostislav HRUBÝ ; Svatopluk OSTRY ; Ondrej SKODA ; Marek PERNICKA ; Lubomír KOČÍ ; Zuzana EICHLOVÁ ; Martin JÍRA ; Michal PANSKÝ ; Pavel MENCL ; Hana PALOUŠKOVÁ ; Aleš TOMEK ; Petr JANSKÝ ; Anna OLŠEROVÁ ; Roman HAVLÍČEK ; Petr MALÝ ; Lukáš TRAKAL ; Jan FIKSA ; Matěj SLOVÁK ; Michał KARLIŃSK ; Maciej NOWAK ; Halina SIENKIEWICZ-JAROSZ ; Anna BOCHYNSKA ; Tomasz HOMA ; Katarzyna SAWCZYNSKA ; Agnieszka SLOWIK ; Ewa WLODARCZYK ; Marcin WIĄCEK ; Izabella TOMASZEWSKA-LAMPART ; Bartosz SIECZKOWSKI ; Halina BARTOSIK-PSUJEK ; Marta BILIK ; Anna BANDZAREWICZ ; Justyna ZIELIŃSKA-TUREK ; Krystian OBARA ; Paweł URBANOWSKI ; Sławomir BUDREWICZ ; Maciej GUZIŃSKI ; Milena ŚWITOŃSKA ; Iwona RUTKOWSKA ; Paulina SOBIESZAK-SKURA ; Beata ŁABUZ-ROSZAK ; Aleksander DĘBIEC ; Jacek STASZEWSKI ; Adam STĘPIEŃ ; Jacek ZWIERNIK ; Grzegorz WASILEWSKI ; Cristina TIU ; Razvan-Alexandru RADU ; Anca NEGRILA ; Bogdan DOROBAT ; Cristina PANEA ; Vlad TIU ; Simona PETRESCU ; Atilla ÖZCAN-ÖZDEMIR ; Mostafa MAHMOUD ; Hussam EL-SAMAHY ; Hazem ABDELKHALEK ; Jasem AL-HASHEL ; Ismail IBRAHIM ISMAIL ; Athari SALMEEN ; Abdoreza GHOREISHI ; Sergiu SABETAY ; Hana GROSS ; Piers KLEIN ; Kareem EL NAAMANI ; Stavropoula TJOUMAKARIS ; Rawad ABBAS ; Ghada-A MOHAMED ; Alex CHEBL ; Jiangyong MIN ; Majesta HOVINGH ; Jenney-P TSAI ; Muhib-A KHAN ; Krishna NALLEBALLE ; Sanjeeva ONTEDDU ; Hesham-E MASOUD ; Mina MICHAEL ; Navreet KAUR ; Laith MAALI ; Michael ABRAHAM ; Ivo BACH ; Melody ONG ; Denis BABICI ; Ayaz-M. KHAWAJA ; Maryam HAKEMI ; Kumar RAJAMANI ; Vanessa CANO-NIGENDA ; Antonio ARAUZ ; Pablo AMAYA ; Natalia LLANOS ; Akemi ARANGO ; Miguel A. VENCES ; José-Domingo BARRIENTOS ; Rayllene CAETANO ; Rodrigo TARGA ; Sergio SCOLLO ; Patrick YALUNG ; Shashank NAGENDRA ; Abhijit GAIKWAD ; Kwon-Duk SEO ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(1):128-132
9.Endovascular Treatment for Acute Posterior Circulation Tandem Lesions: Insights From the BASILAR and PERSIST Registries
Wei LI ; Mohamed F. DOHEIM ; Zhongming QIU ; Tan WANG ; Zhibin CHEN ; Wenjie ZI ; Qingwu YANG ; Haitao GUAN ; Hongyu QIAO ; Wenhua LIU ; Wei HU ; Xinfeng LIU ; Jinbo HUANG ; Zhongkui HAN ; Zhonglun CHEN ; Zhenqiang ZHAO ; Wen SUN ; Raul G. NOGUEIRA
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(1):75-84
Background:
and Purpose Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute posterior circulation tandem lesion (PCTL). This study aimed to explore the role of extracranial vertebral artery (VA) stenting in patients with PCTL stroke undergoing EVT.
Methods:
Individual patient data were pooled from the BASILAR (EVT for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study) and PERSIST (Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke) registries. Patients with PCTLs who underwent EVT were included in the present cohort and divided into the stenting and nonstenting groups based on the placement of extracranial VA stents. The primary efficacy outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days and 1 year. Safety outcomes included 24-hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and all-cause mortality at 90 days and 1 year post-surgery.
Results:
A combined dataset of 1,320 patients with posterior circulation artery occlusion, including 263 (19.9%) with tandem lesions, of whom 217 (median age, 65 years; 82.9% male) met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. The stenting group had 84 (38.7%) patients, while the non-stenting group had 133 (61.3%). After adjustment for the potential confounders, extracranial VA stenting was associated with favorable shifts in mRS scores at both 90 days (adjusted common odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–4.28; P<0.01) and 1 year (adjusted OR [aOR], 2.04; 95% CI [1.05–3.97]; P=0.04), along with lower rate of mortality at both 90 days (aOR, 0.45; 95% CI [0.21–0.93]; P=0.01) and 1 year (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI [0.16–0.79]; P=0.01), with no significant difference in sICH incidence (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI [0.06–1.98]; P=0.24).
Conclusion
Extracranial VA stenting during EVT may improve functional outcomes and reduce mortality in patients with PCTL strokes.
10.Tenecteplase Beyond 4.5 Hours in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Mohammad ALADAWI ; Mohammad T. ABUAWWAD ; Mohammad J. J. TAHA ; Yasmeena Abdelall KOZAA ; Warda A. ALRUBASY ; Abdullah HAMAD ; Fatema Ahmad ALHNIDI ; Mohamed ELFIL ; Zaid NAJDAWI ; Xiaohan PENG ; Felicia HATAWAY ; Ekaterina BAKRADZE ; Michael J. LYERLY
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):184-194
Background:
and Purpose Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. While intravenous thrombolysis is recommended within 4.5 hours of last known well (LKW) time, many patients present beyond this window.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating tenecteplase (TNK) administration in AIS patients within 4.5 to 24 hours of LKW. The primary outcomes assessed functional independence and ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 90 days.
Results:
Three RCTs were included, comprising 1,054 patients (532 TNK and 522 standard medical therapy) with a mean age of 69 years, 59% males, and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10.5. TNK treatment was associated with mRS 0–2 at 90 days (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.70, P=0.023), indicating a 33% higher likelihood of achieving functional independence. However, the ordinal mRS shift showed no significant difference (standardized mean difference: 0.01, 95% CI: -0.37–0.39, P=0.09). Safety outcomes indicated no difference in the rates of sICH (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 0.86–5.00, P=0.1), and no difference in 90-day mortality (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.76–1.53, P=0.67).
Conclusion
This meta-analysis suggests TNK might be safe and effective for selected AIS patients in the 4.5- to 24-hour time window, offering improved functional outcomes without a significant increase in hemorrhagic complications.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail