Humans ; Melphalan/therapeutic use* ; Multiple Myeloma/therapy* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Transplantation Conditioning

Humans ; Multiple Myeloma ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ; Melphalan

Background: Intravitreal chemotherapy has been an effective addition in treating vitreous seeding in retinoblastoma. However, it was only in 2020 that it was used in the Philippines. There is no literature on its use in multiple Filipino retinoblastoma patients. Objectives: To describe the clinical course of the four patients who are the first to undergo intravitreal chemotherapy for vitreous seeding of retinoblastoma in the Philippine tertiary hospital. Methods: A case series of four eyes of four patients with retinoblastoma who underwent intravitreous injection of melphalan and topotecan for vitreous seeding at the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences of a Philippine tertiary hospital. Results: Two eyes, with International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification (IIRC) Group C with vitreous seeding, responded well to intravitreous melphalan and topotecan. One eye had recurrent vitreous seeding despite 10 intravitreal injections. One eye with IIRC Group E, did not respond to intravitreous chemotherapy and was eventually enucleated. This is the first case series on the local use of intravitreous chemotherapy in the country for vitreous seeding in retinoblastoma. The control of 50% achieved in this case series is lower than in other series due to longer treatment interval from poor follow-up and the presence of advanced disease. Conclusion The use of intravitreous melphalan and topotecan can be an effective adjuvant for systemic chemotherapy in controlling vitreous seeding in eyes with IIRC Group C. It is not effective in controlling IIRC Group E disease.
intravitreous ; melphalan ; topotecan ; retinoblastoma ; Philippines

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Bendamustine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use* ; Etoposide ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; Lymphoma/therapy* ; Melphalan ; Transplantation Conditioning ; Transplantation, Autologous

BACKGROUND: Bendamustine is an attractive option for the management of both de novo and relapsed lymphomas. It is being increasingly used in the conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and can be an alternative to the traditionally-used carmustine. In this study, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of bendamustine in the conditioning regimen for autologous SCT in refractory/relapsed lymphomas. METHODS: We designed a descriptive study to evaluate bendamustine in combination with etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BeEAM) in the conditioning regimen for autologous SCT. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (median age, 28 yr) with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) (N=8), non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) (N=5), or peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL NOS) (N=1) were included in the study. A median number of 5.95×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg were transfused. Median times to absolute neutrophil count and platelet engraftment were 17 days and 24 days, respectively. The 100-day transplantation mortality rate was 28% (4 patients). Eight patients (57.14%) had GII-III acute kidney injury, four patients (28.5%) had GIII-IV hyperbilirubinemia, and twelve patients (85%) had GII-III diarrhea. After 3 months, 37% (5 patients) and 21.4% (3 patients) demonstrated complete response and partial response, respectively. The median follow-up was 5.5 months (15 days–19 mo). At the final follow-up, 7 patients (50%) were alive and in CR. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that bendamustine is a potentially toxic agent in the conditioning regimen for autologous SCT, resulting in significant liver, kidney, and gastrointestinal toxicity. Further studies are required to assess its safety and efficacy at reduced doses.
Acute Kidney Injury ; Bendamustine Hydrochloride ; Blood Platelets ; Carmustine ; Cytarabine ; Diarrhea ; Etoposide ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hodgkin Disease ; Humans ; Hyperbilirubinemia ; Kidney ; Liver ; Lymphoma ; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin ; Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral ; Melphalan ; Mortality ; Neutrophils ; Stem Cell Transplantation ; Stem Cells

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The burden of acute kidney injury (AKI) has not been explored in Jordanian patients who receive hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, risk factors, and mortality of AKI among patients who underwent HSCT. METHODS: A retrospective pilot study included 70 adult patients who received peripheral HSCT was conducted. Weekly measurement of serum creatinine (SCr) was obtained for 3 months after chemotherapy and HSCT. Then, stages of Risk, Injury, and Failure of Kidney were determined based on the Kidney Disease for Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 41 months. Mortality was reported in 16 patients (23%). Out of 60 patients that had SCr values, 19 patients (31.6%) had AKI in 90 days after chemotherapy. Allogeneic HSCT, male donors, high-dose melphalan protocols and values of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were significantly higher among patients with AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Combining many nephrotoxic drugs and dosing adjustments should be considered in uniform protocols. Multidisciplinary care should be utilized to assess early kidney dysfunction that decreases adverse events and improves outcomes.
Acute Kidney Injury ; Adult ; Blood Urea Nitrogen ; Clothing ; Creatinine ; Drug Therapy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hematopoietic Stem Cells ; Humans ; Incidence ; Jordan ; Kidney ; Kidney Diseases ; Male ; Melphalan ; Mortality ; Pilot Projects ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Tissue Donors

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (MCD) as a salvage regimen for heavily treated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients. We retrospectively analyzed a total of 27 patients who received the MCD regimen between April 2011 and November 2013. The MCD regimen consisted of oral melphalan 6.75 mg/m² on days 1–4, once-weekly dose of oral cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 and dexamethasone 20 mg/m² on days 1–4 and days 15–18. Each cycle was repeated every 28 days. The median age of the patients was 66 years and the MCD regimen was initiated at a median 37.7 months from diagnosis. Patients received a median of five regimens including autologous stem cell transplantation. The overall response rate was 25.9% (very good partial response 3.7%, partial response 22.2%) and 8 (29.6%) patients achieved a minor response. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2–8.5) ; overall survival 11.7 months (95% CI, 5.4–16.6). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 51.8% and 33.3%, respectively. Although the overall response rate is relatively low, the MCD regimen may have a role as a bridge to a novel regimen in heavily pretreated patients with MM.
Cyclophosphamide* ; Dexamethasone* ; Diagnosis ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Melphalan* ; Multiple Myeloma* ; Neutropenia ; Retrospective Studies ; Salvage Therapy* ; Stem Cell Transplantation ; Thrombocytopenia

Apoptosis ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Cell Proliferation ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Humans ; Melphalan ; Multiple Myeloma

Objective: To compare the efficacy, response and survival between high-dose melphalan (HDM) and cyclophosphamide+ etoposide+ busulfan (CVB) as the conditioning regimen in autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) . Methods: Retrospectively enrolled 123 consecutive NDMM patients who had received PAD induction with subsequent ASCT from Jan 2011 to Aug 2017. The CVB group and HDM group had 82 and 41 patients respectively. Results: ①No differences existed between these 2 groups in non-hematological side effects. ②Patients of CVB group had faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment time, with the median neutrophil engraftment time of 10 (9-35) day vs 11 (9-12) day for patients of HDM group (z=-3.433, P=0.001) , and with median platelet engraftment time of 11 (7-55) day vs 13 (10-35) day for patients of HDM group (z=-3.506, P<0.001) . CVB group entered neutropenia and severe thrombocytopenia more earlier than the HDM group, resulting similar neutropenia duration and severe thrombocytopenia duration between the CVB group and HDM group. However, patients of CVB group had significantly longer fever persistent time and antibiotic administration time. ③The response rate was significantly lower in patients of CVB group vs. patients of HDM group (9/46 vs 14/28, P=0.021) . Further, the minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate at 3(rd) month post-transplantation seemed to be lower in CVB group than that in HDM group (31.7%vs 48.8%, P=0.065) . ④Both the univariate and multivariate analysis showed that HDM and CVB groups had similar duration to progression (TTP) (P=0.619) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.295) . Conclusion: HDM conditioning regimen is superior to CVB regimen in hematological side effects, tumor burden reduction and administration convenience. However, these two regimen had similar TTP and OS in MM patients receiving ASCT.
Busulfan ; Cyclophosphamide ; Drug Combinations ; Etoposide ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; Melphalan ; Multiple Myeloma/therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Stem Cell Transplantation ; Transplantation Conditioning ; Transplantation, Autologous

BACKGROUND: High-dose melphalan (HDMEL) represents the standard conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM), but recent updates have suggested combination of melphalan with bulsulfan (BUMEL) is also associated with favorable outcomes. We performed the current study to address the lack of comparative studies between the two conditioning regimens in Asian populations. METHODS: Using the Korean National Health Insurance and Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service databases, 1,304 patients newly diagnosed with MM undergoing ASCT between January 2010 and December 2014 were identified. Patients were divided according to conditioning regimen (HDMEL vs. BUMEL), and after case matching, 428 patients undergoing HDMEL conditioning were compared to 107 patients undergoing BUMEL conditioning with respect to clinical course and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 52.5% for the HDMEL conditioning group versus 70.3% for the BUMEL conditioning group (P=0.043). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 82.0% versus 83.5% (P=0.525), respectively. Although not statistically significant, BUMEL conditioning was associated with more platelet transfusion, while HDMEL was associated with more granulocyte colony stimulating factor support. In multivariate analysis, BUMEL conditioning was not inferior to HDMEL conditioning in regard to both PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that BUMEL is an effective and well-tolerated alternative to HDMEL conditioning, with better PFS.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Busulfan* ; Colony-Stimulating Factors ; Disease-Free Survival ; Granulocytes ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Melphalan* ; Multiple Myeloma* ; Multivariate Analysis ; National Health Programs ; Platelet Transfusion ; Stem Cell Transplantation* ; Stem Cells*